The latest information we've had on the site design was about a month ago. Does anyone have any information as to what progress is being made as well as when we could expect to see the site design in action?
@bilbo_pingouin The president of PRC was visiting a few weeks ago.
Because our president wants to make nice with China (even though it's not actually his job to conduct foreign policy).
And the Chinese imported some "spontaneously formed crowds" that would wave chinese flags at him wherever he went, while the police went bullying everyone who didn't like it.
Like, harassing people who displayed Tibet flags, cordoning off the site of a lawfully anounced demonstration and such.
And apparently, arrested and beat a 19yo student for shouting "You should be ashamed of yourselves" at a policeman.
Which, you know, should be completely unthinkable according to our laws and constitution, and even the goverment coalition (loosely affiliated with the president) was outraged and ordered a bunch of investigations.
Meanwhile, the president invited some of the policemen to the castle and praised them for "preventing the excesses of mentally abnormal people".
@bilbo_pingouin We had a revolution over this exact shit 25 years ago. That's why we wrote all that crap into the f***ing constitution we came up with then!
Sorry. Like I said, I'm getting irrationaly angry over this.
@JonofAllTrades No need to ask permission, it's all good :) Just ask your question and edit it in. If people don't think it fits we'll say something and/or maybe edit it out again but I don't think that's ever happened so far :)
This CNN article claims Japan "owns" more US debt than China, though I did some digging around on the and found very little. You should also note that this article as a year old and much can happen in that time. This Wikipedia article contradicts the CNN article, though, and places Japan 2nd on the list.
Wikipedia is backed by this official document released by the United States Department of the Treasury on US debt. The US owes both Japan and China ~1.2 trillion USD, regardless of who is actually the master of our debt.
since I'm here, can someone explain why debt matters? 19 trillion sounds like a lot, but people don't seem to be too worried about it, and governments can just print money anyway so I get the feeling debt means something very different at the national level
plus, who enforces debt? If the US has the biggest military in the world, who's going to try to collect?
@DaaaahWhoosh When governments print money, they effectively take it from the people using it.
And debt matters because you need to pay for its maintenance, which means that less of what you tax people can be usefully spent.
The problem doesn't happen when somebody comes to collect, since that is largely infeasible even with smaller countries than the US; it happens when people don't want to lend anymore.
What the debt mostly looks like is a whole lote of small, termed loans, realised as bonds. You buy a bond that has, say, five years on it, and a certain interest, and government bonds tend to be really stable, until said government defaults.
@DaaaahWhoosh The interest is not huge, but it mounts.
So the trick is to find the government that borrows a lot on good interest in a stable currency, and stop buying the bonds just before it goes bankrupt.
Once there is a suspicion it might default, suddenly nobody wants to buy the bonds anymore, the government runs out of money because it can no longer borrow, and actually goes bankrupt.
That's why those ratings are so important; they represent the experts' opinion on how likely that particular government is to default.
Which also dictates how much interest the government has to offer to get people to buy the bonds.
And is also the reason why the politicians in countries with lots of debt (like most of the EU) don't like the fact that the rating agencies are independent and keep going on about how they should be "regulated" to "prevent excesses".
When Czechoslovakia had a "monetary reform" in 1953 (effectively a bankrupcy after the Communists have been "building a better tomorrow" with their centralised control of economy for five years by that point) our rating was dropped a couple of grades; we still haven't entirely recovered from that.
@DaaaahWhoosh Anyhow, it's really nice outside and I'm mostly done here at work. I'll go get a burrito and eat it on the bastions while the sun sets; if you have more questions, I'll answer them later.
Apparently, while trying to find the percentage of Earth's 2466 population killed at the time of the 1999 FN53 attack, which now has a speed of 150 km/s (after a period of acceleration) at an angle of 57˙, and 3.04 teratonnes of TNT on impact, I had to do some population numbers. The findings mentioned in the robots chat are these......
So....assuming today's current growth rate, the planet's population would be at 10.1 billion by 2040, far earlier than I initially expected, and a growth rate of 0.5% from there means a population of 13 billion by 2100, not counting colonisation efforts already in place since 2001 (when the International Lunar Outpost was born, and that was only 50 - 100 by ATL 2016). :/. That is part 1.
And then I reduced it to 0.01% growth rate, which takes into account an explosion in colonisation beyond the Solar System and by 2466 I have a nice, stable 14,116,157,556 humans living on Earth. :) And those are my findings.
Problem now is distribution of populations on each continent.
That number was a guesstimate based on current growth rate, followed by some guesstimates accounting foe fertility reduction, increasing development and those factors to some extent.
And that is just Earth from ATL 2016 to that point.
And then during the Second Extraplanetary War, by the time of the 1999 FN53 attack, this is Earth's population: 14,130,280,067 humans.
@FutureHistorian that really depends on where the center of civilization shifts over time. A couple hundred years ago, no one would have expected the distribution we have today
Worldbuilding has graduated! That's is awesome, and resulted in some changes, like voting for our moderators some time ago.
However,
The site will still receive a full design from one of our designers, which will be packaged with an increase in the amount of reputation needed to access each ...
@FutureHistorian You could probably pick any number within a billion of what you've found and very few people will disagree. As long as you're not talking about this world, a lot of things could happen to prove you right
Well, sure, but the point is you can come up with a lot of different numbers for population, no one really knows how it'll go. If you're making an alternate history, all you have to do is say it goes that way
So, after going through a some rough calculations, I figured my earlier question ran into a few problems regarding the final velocity of the asteroid. I pulled the mathematics a bit incorrect, so I dumbed it down to a speed of 40,264.06 m/s at final velocity. The Delta v, though is 26,264.06 m/s,...
@James So, the surfacing is still gradually coming off. I can now see the pitting, which is pretty deep in places; a lot deeper than I could remove without also removing the surface etching.