« first day (574 days earlier)      last day (4407 days later) » 

10:00 PM
@Cerberus do you have baking beans?
 
Ah OK.
 
Or rice?
 
@Mien Nope.
@Mien Yes.
 
@Cerberus If you have a nice modern recipe, it'll give you the target temperature at the center. If not, when you shake it a little, it should still jiggle a little in the center
 
You can use that :)
 
10:01 PM
@derobert Ah OK, good tip. And is that for a custard topping or a regular lemon-cake topping? eyes dazzled
 
Or he can use a starch-containing recipe. It will stabilize the custard up to cooking temperatures.
I guess it is easier for a newbie.
 
Oh right, the lemon squares had that.
 
I was really surprised that most recipes I've seen now did not contain starch.
 
@Mien the taste is a bit better without starch
Actually, it depends on your definition of better.
 
Of course it does.
 
10:02 PM
@rumtscho The thing is, last time I think I just threw everything in without paying too much attention, just by intuition and loosely following a recipe, and it was great.
 
It is more... dainty. :P
 
There there.
 
And the time before was probably the same.
 
@rumtscho Unlike your bloody man-hands?
 
:D
 
10:03 PM
@Cerberus It depends on 1) your definition of great and 2) your ingredients and 3) some luck.
 
So I don't think this is a hard kind of cake.
 
There is no luck in baking.
@Cerberus the time you talked about it could've made you a pie already
or tart, whatever.
 
@Sobachatina My prof already punishes me enough if I don't label a figure (or an axis in a diagram). Do you have to do it too?
 
There are three different procedures that are used for custard pies (technically, tarts). (1) cook custard entirely on stove top, pour into tart crust, done; (2) cook custard partially stove top, pour into tart crust, bake some more, done; (3) do not precook custard at all, pour into tart crust, bake
 
@rumtscho Well, what could go wrong if you're paying a bit of attention?
@Mien Haha true.
 
10:03 PM
@Mien Unless your oven is old and injects a large random variable. :)
 
@derobert OK that makes sense.
 
@rumtscho Sorry. I forgot you were sensitive about that. :)
 
@Cerberus If you are using a pure custard recipe and overheat it, you can end up with a mass of miniscule egg grains suspended in whey
You can still eat it, if you want to
My mother has never in her life made pastry cream which didn't reach this stage
 
@rumtscho It's probably a delicacy somewhere.
 
She believes that this is what pastry cream should look and taste like.
 
10:05 PM
@Cerberus the Cooks Illustrated lemon tart recipe I posted is (2)
The most likely reason they picked (2) instead of (3) is the note at top about cooking immediately; the acid in the lemon also denatures proteins, but apparently not in a texturally appealing way
 
My mom never tried to make pastry cream.
She did make pudding from those sachets. :p
 
... so, probably, it takes too long to get up to temperature in the oven and would turn out grainy
 
In the microwave;
 
@rumtscho Hmm I see.
 
@Cerberus I'll note that Cooks Illustrated recipes are generally very well tested. I doubt it'll fail as long as you follow it
Now, if you want something easier, lemon bars are easier :-P
 
10:10 PM
@derobert Hmm I'm a bit scared of the preheating of the filling, and I don't have a thermometer.
@derobert Yeah, easy = good!
But looks great, you other pie/cake/...
 
@Mien My mother is afraid of microwaves
 
Mine too.
 
She thinks they make food unhealthy through their radiation, or something like that.
 
Haha why?
 
Yep.
 
10:11 PM
So we don't have a microwave.
 
I baked bacon in the microwave today.
 
@Cerberus I think that this was a real concern back when microwave ovens were new
 
Easiest way to prepare bacon.
 
By now, it has been proven that it is not the case. But the news haven't reached my mother.
 
@rumtscho Oh, I see. I mean, I have heard it before.
 
10:12 PM
@Cerberus Lack of thermometer will make that harder, you'll have to go by the consistency, which of course is easier to miss...
 
And if they do, she won't believe them.
 
I'm just saying:
1 hour ago, by Cerberus
I want to make a lemon pie/cake.
That was one hour ago.
:D
 
@derobert Hmm yeah I think it's more prudent if I follow a simpler recipe like I have in the past.
@Mien Haha you win.
 
@Cerberus Nothing wrong with that
But throw in some starch, to be safe
 
@Cerberus well, let me screencap the CI lemon bars. Can't get much simpler...
 
10:13 PM
A tbsp should be enough for one tart
 
@rumtscho Hmm OK will do.
@derobert I have your linked recipe open.
 
@Cerberus oh, do you actually have a CI account? Or do you mean the other screen cap?
 
@derobert No, I mean that other link about squares.
But if the CI recipe is even better/easier, please!
 
I don't think I posted a lemon squares recipe before. But whatever, one sec, almost got the screencap ready
 
10:18 PM
 
Thanks!
 
@derobert how much does a CI subscription cost?
 
@rumtscho web membership is $34.95/yr
@rumtscho magazine is $24.95 in the US, no idea how much it is internationally.
 
@derobert This is additional to "web membership"?
What do you get for web membership only?
 
Web membership gets you access to the recipes, taste tests, equipment tests, etc. online
The magazine gets you the printed magazine in your mailbox. The two are completely separate, AFAIK
 
10:22 PM
@derobert The same ones which appear as articles in the magazine?
 
yes, same ones which appear in the magazine
 
Is there content in the magazine which isn't available online?
 
Not sure.
Never had the magazine subscription
 
So, do you guys still have the energy to help me choose a recipe as well?
 
There is a free trial, after which you can normally get a discounted first year
 
10:24 PM
Or too tired? I can ask it tomorrow as well.
 
@rumtscho if you go to cooksillustrated.com there should be a free trial thing somewhere
 
Okay I've read it.
I'll have to convert the measurements...
 
@derobert Oh, I have had some looks at what is in the online database
The things you posted now, a test or two somebody else posted
Sadly, I can't use the equipment tests
But the rest seems quite useful.
But I won't make an abo now anyway
Can't afford to spend the money right now.
 
abo?
 
abonnement
subscription, sorry.
I decided that it is time to say goodbye to Maemo
 
10:27 PM
lol
you sent me to the dictionary there :-P
 
Because my battery doesn't hold through the day now, and there is no sense in getting a new battery for a phone which can't even sync my calender
So, ETA of the HTC One X is the 11.4.
Beautiful thing, but my budget for luxuries is spent for quite some time.
 
You've bought a new phone?
 
@Cerberus ordered it
 
Ah OK.
 
It gets here next wednesday
 
10:29 PM
Android?
 
The newest one
 
Icecream Sandwich?
 
The HTC One X (codename HTC Edge and HTC Endeavor) is a quad-core smartphone designed by HTC. It runs Android 4.0 mobile operating system with an HTC Sense graphical user interface. The HTC One X was announced on the 26th February, 2012, at the Mobile World Congress. Currently HTC's flagship device, the One X comes with a Nvidia Tegra 3 quad-core while a dual-core Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 One S is also available in the One series line-up. Hardware Processor, memory, and storage The international version has a 1.5 GHz 4-Plus-1 quad-core Nvidia Tegra 3 with a fifth Battery Saver Core. I...
 
Heh. I've stil got my good ol' Droid X.
 
Yes, it has ice cream sandwich, a 1200x720 screen and so on
 
10:30 PM
Very nice.
 
@derobert I hadn't planned to replace my old one so soon
 
I would like to have that.
How much does it cost?
 
600 Eur
 
OK.
 
I need to replace mine... Just haven't gotten around to it
 
10:31 PM
But it just came out.
 
That is a bit more expensive than the Galaxy Nexus.
 
You can expect it to drop a lot in the next few months.
 
Which should be around 450ish?
Right.
 
The GN used to cost the same when it was brand new.
There is a smaller One.
 
I can't believe anyone would buy an Iphone, which has much worse specs for a higher price.
Ah OK.
 
10:32 PM
@rumtscho Yeah, that'll do the budget in for a bit
 
It doesn't have worse specs.
It is just the ecosystem.
 
Sure it does.
 
I used to have a Palm T|X
 
@rumtscho GSII was also about that price.
 
I think it has a slower, dual-core CPU.
 
10:32 PM
I am tired of not being able to touch my own data
 
But that's almost a year ago now.
 
I am on Windows Mobile, if you want to have a laugh.
 
I don't think the quadcores are quicker - nobody writes multithreaded phone apps right now
 
@rumtscho Well OK. But it is a better spec.
 
Actually, most mid range android phones today are still single core
 
10:33 PM
Sure.
 
@Cerberus yes, but it is half a year newer
Half a year is lots of time in the current smartphone market
 
This is mine:
 
Also, I mostly buy for display
 
@rumtscho Isn't there always an Android phone newer than the latest Iphone, except perhaps in the month in came out?
 
 
10:34 PM
Can't stand a display on which you can't fit stuff
 
Hahaha.
 
And my old one was 800x480, I wanted something better now that I upgrade
 
@Mien Oooh! I used to have that phone. Except, it said "Nokia" on the side.
 
There are only 5-6 phones available now better than 800x480
 
@rumtscho I believe the largest Android phones are always considerably larger than the latest Iphone. Display size + res, I mean.
 
10:35 PM
@derobert I still have one
 
@derobert Yes it's a Nokia :)
1800 I think.
 
I use the smartphone for Internet mostly
 
I bought it as an emergency.
But it does not break.
 
Because the other one has a plan for cheaper talking.
 
My phone.
 
10:36 PM
@Cerberus Oh, one of the older Windows phones?
 
The volume buttons are buttons because the wheel was not invented yet.
@rumtscho Yes, Windows Mobile 6.0.
 
I didn't laugh, because they say that the current mobile Windows is quite good
 
It is from 2007.
 
@Cerberus I would love to stay with one phone for so long
 
@rumtscho I thought you had a Nokia?
 
10:37 PM
But the models they keep making just aren't good enough for my high requirements :P
@Mien yes, the N900
Great software, crap hardware.
 
@rumtscho Well, WM is not, at least, it was good until the first true touch-based OSs came out: then everybody saw how much WM sucked. I am using 3rd-party software for nearly everything, including the dialler. With that, it is quite OK.
 
Anyway, I'm off.
I'm tired like... something very tired.
Nn.
 
Annoying. You can buy an unlocked Galaxy Nexus for around $450–500. But Verizon wants $650.
 
@rumtscho Actually it was my brother's old phone, three models ago.
 
And nobody cared to write apps for this great software, because nobody uses this phone and no other with the same OS exist.
 
10:38 PM
And of course, the unlocked one won't be CDMA
 
@rumtscho Ah so you're high maintenance.
@Mien Night!
 
@derobert yes, I heard about that. It is terrible.
 
Slaap als een os!
Of als een roos!
 
@Mien Goodnight.
 
aan?
 
10:39 PM
I wouldn't go back to buying locked phones.
 
Maar dank je
@Sobachatina Thanks. N.
 
Too many vowels!
Too maany vooweels!
 
Hehe.
 
@rumtscho Even with a 2yr contract, they want $300. Bloody ridiculous.
 
@Sobachatina this is funny
 
10:40 PM
@Sobachatina The ee in een is actually pronounced as a schwa.
 
Because, to me, the "w" is a vowel
 
W/u and j/y/i are often considered semi-vowels.
 
@derobert yes, these contract phones are actually an expensive credit
 
Yep. But its basically the way the entire cellphone market works in the US :-(
 
In Bulgarian, U is considered a normal vowel
And we transcribe W in English words the same way as an U
So to me, there isn't really a difference in pronouncing "vowel" or "vouel"
Both have three vowels in a row :)
 
10:42 PM
I understand.
 
Verizon is still selling it for its introductory price. Hasn't had a price drop yet.
 
@derobert I thought all your markets worked on credit, not only the phones
 
Can't you buy it elsewhere for less?
 
@Cerberus they don't sell unlocked phones in the US
 
Just in some internet shop?
 
10:43 PM
And they can't buy the European version because the US cell networks use a different protocol
 
@rumtscho Right, then unlock them? Or buy them abroad?
Ohh...
That sucks.
 
@rumtscho Well, we buy a lot of things via credit cards, but those work quite a bit different. E.g., if you pay off your credit card bill every month, you don't actually pay any interest
 
Actually, there One X isn't even sold that way in the US
The quadcore processor doesn't work with the chip for their network
 
Ohh...
Well, telephone companies here suck big ass too.
 
@Cerberus Well, Verizon is CDMA, not GSM.
 
10:44 PM
And so they have the same phone, with another name, and with another processor, which can work in their network.
 
How much do you think 1 MB of data is on my friend's subscription (she doesn't have a data bundle)?
 
@derobert I thought you had no GSM providers at all
 
@rumtscho no, we have GSM providers
 
@Cerberus probably a lot
 
@derobert OK, that is inconvenient...
 
10:45 PM
Especially on old subsctiptions
 
@rumtscho Sprint, AT&T, and T-Mobile are all GSM
 
@rumtscho € 2.
 
@derobert OK - I didn't know that. But they use different bands, right?
 
So a simple YT video would cost € 100 or so.
 
@Cerberus yes, here it is the same thing.
At least for old plans.
 
10:46 PM
@rumtscho some of them, yeah. But a lot of phones work with all of the bands
 
@rumtscho And that sucks, right?
 
The terms of plans change every 3-4 months or so
 
I have 2 GB a month for € 15.
I don't want a bundle, I just want to pay for what I use, and a reasonable price!
 
And the newest ones include a few MB free even for talk-oriented plans
 
Hmm.
 
10:46 PM
I looked at new plans for mine, but won't change
 
I have a plan from 2006.
 
My old plan is 8.50 a month for 200 MB
The new ones are different
 
Because it allows me to call outside my bundle for € 0,08 / minute.
 
There is one for 15 Eur, capped at 1 GB, and I would have taken it
But it is also half the speed only, 3.6 mb
Mine is 7.2 Mb
 
So do you often go over 200 MB? And do you notice such a speed difference?
 
10:48 PM
And for the normal speed, you have to take the 5 GB included - plan
 
I don't.
It depends greatly on your phone.
 
And this costs 25 Eur, which is a big difference.
@Cerberus I don't go over 200
 
In any case, it sucks!
 
But this is because my old phone can't do many things I want to do
 
I mean, try using Google maps just 200 km from here, in Belgium.
 
10:49 PM
OK, roaming is a completely different story
It is expensive everywhere, no matter what the distance
 
That's just part of the story.
 
Well, at least roaming here isn't such a problem, as the US is so large.
 
They make about 500 % profit on that, I believe.
@derobert Exactly.
 
As for my usage, I never watch videos on my phone - but I might want to start now, with better software support and a bigger display.
And this would take me over 200 MB very soon.
Or streaming web radio.
 
I watch videos sometimes, always whenever I want, and I never go over 200 MB.
 
10:51 PM
But good videos are large
OK, some traipsing kittens on youtube can be small
 
Heh.
 
But if you go to the more beautiful stuff on Vimeo, they don't stream it below HD - or if they do, the scaling is too slow I think
 
Web radio can also use up a lot of bandwidth if you listen to it a lot.
 
It is easily 50 MB for a 2-3 min video.
 
Right.
 
10:53 PM
But the most offending thing was the one month when I went over the 200 MB
Our old Internet contract had run out, without the girl in whose name it was telling us
 
I have a T-mobile prepaid phone that I pay about $100 a year for. Just about right.
 
We just woke with no internet and when we called tech support, heard that there is no contract any more
 
You know, I don't want to pay € 15 for a cap of 2 GB: I just want to pay € 15 / 2000 = € 0,75 per MB.
 
We decided to get another provider with better terms, and stayed over a month without Internet until the switch was made.
 
@rumtscho Oh no, they just end your contract??
 
10:55 PM
And in this time, I hit my barrier.
@Cerberus It was a four-year contract, and the four years were up
 
But why would they do that?
It automatically goes on until you formally end it here.
 
Odd. I've never heard of an Internet contract that ends when the time is up, instead of just continuing month-to-month
 
Very foolish of them.
@derobert Same here.
 
And after I hit the limit, they made my mobile connection much slower - I think 64 kb
 
Yikes yes.
 
10:56 PM
And I didn't notice much change!
 
Heh.
 
Turns out that my phone hardware was so slow rendering pages
 
Hmm really?
 
But I'm not sure how you survive a month w/o Internet access. At least not after, say, 1998.
 
Oh, yes.
 
10:57 PM
That this was the bottleneck, not the connection speed.
@derobert I had Internet at work
 
In browsing, there won't be that much of a difference.
I have that too.
 
And also some at the phone, for browsing
I don#t know how the neighbours survived, I think they don't have smart phones
I also bought a prepaid data plan for my computer
 
And I seriously doubt whether you would notice 7.2 Mb/s v. 3.6 Mb/s on a modern phone.
 
@rumtscho Well, other than living at work, I'm not sure how you did that...
 
I could pay 2 Eur per day to use Internet
 
10:58 PM
Yay!
 
@derobert yes, I stayed in the office after my work was done.
But the problem with the prepaid thing was that it needed a special software to activate each day
And the software was Win and Mac
So I had to bring the laptop home if I wanted to have Internet
 
WTF, they couldn't just have a web site?
 
I found out how to tether the desktop to the laptop
But still, it was cumbersome. Because I normally leave the laptop in the office.
 

« first day (574 days earlier)      last day (4407 days later) »