@ThePhoton thanks for your advice. And thanks to @Asmyldof too! Your wisdom, freely provided, is worth a lot to me
I just realized that i have 0.05" pitch connectors, and this makes the ribbon half of that. 0.025" pitch. Anyway I have re-scoped all my signals and I see much more realistic square waves, no ringing is going on. In fact they do look a little rounded already.
My textbook states:
Due to reverse biasing the width of the depletion region increases and
current flowing through the diode is almost zero. In this case
electric field is almost zero at the middle of the depletion region.
However, I don't agree with this because even when reverse biase...
@Asmyldof the device itself can self-calibrate. its not super accurate or anything, and wouldn't be anything near a high quality scope in any case. it's a $300 "DSO Quad" pocket oscilloscope with mini-probes
the probes it comes with (plus the sampling circuit) turn out to have seriously low impedance and high capacitance - all the worst traits for low drive strength circuits
Hmm, should I follow all the design rules, or just the ones that are easy? ...is a question the guy I inherited this design from should have come up with a different answer to.
@JRE keep a few of the cut-offs in case you ever want to make conductive (black side) or dissipative (green side) trays for things
That's what I'm planning to do with my PnP project, make vibration trays with pieces of matting laying on a contact grid, so I can tip in un-taped components and have it place them anyway
@JRE I feel a bit guilty about sending newer/younger spare parts for the scope now. Afraid of what it might insinuate
@Asmyldof The table has a rail along the left side that was used to join it to the cabinet when it was still in the kitchen. I took it off, and soldered brass washers to the ground wire and to the connection for the grounding strap, then screwed the rail back down with the washers around the screws between the mat and the table. I think the connections that way are a little more solid than the crimp on snap connectors. I also put a banana jack in the rail for the ground strap.
@JRE As far as I could measure the snap connectors have <20Ohm connection to the black rubber if you fold the tips inward. Compared to the 20~50MOhm per square, that's fine :-)
But better is, as the word suggests, better
The strap (at least the 5 I tested) has the appropriate 1M resistor which doesn't spark up to 400VDC AFAICT (...Could Test)
@PlasmaHH That's the back door behind the brown curtain. The 3-Phase is there so I can run a cement mixer, or heavy saw, or welder on the patio behind the house.
@ThePhoton We could ask @Asmyldof and @Jippie to send is some pickled herring, then we take it to Sushi Tomi in Mountain View, see what they can do with that.
If it works out, they might come up with a cute name for it... EE roll... Netherlands roll... Atlantic roll...
I want six PWM pins to operate at 20Khz frequency, any idea how can I get that with Intel Edison? is there a way to possible increase the number of PWM pins at this frequency ?
Why is it always that more powerful devices like Intel Edison and many others, have less GPIOs and PWM pins than regular MCUs. It is very handy for prototyping :(
You could look for controllers that can take high level commands and do the PWMing. You might be able to find controllers that integrate the power FETs and other useful things.
In this question, $\tilde{x}$ indicates a Fourier transform defined as $$\tilde{x}(\omega) \equiv \int_{-\infty}^\infty x(t) \exp(-i \omega t) \, dt$$ and $\hat{x}(p)$ indicates a Laplace transform defined as $$\hat{x}(p) \equiv \int_0^\infty x(t) \exp(-pt) \, dt \, .$$
With this Fourier convent...