« first day (1754 days earlier)      last day (3478 days later) » 

07:10
@W5VO Yeah that looks better. I wasn't sure what you were aiming at, but then I noticed the hinges ... and the radio was looking weird all along, but hey tastes in design differ I figured ;o) The original cabinet looks like a car stereo :-/
 
2 hours later…
08:48
high quality question of the month electronics.stackexchange.com/questions/186021
09:03
Should have made a screenshot
No longer there
used the first piece of red heatshrink yesterday. it worked.
@Asmyldof does TVO ring a bell in ASML context?
@PlasmaHH yay! :-)
@jippie Not in about 30 seconds no
09:19
@Asmyldof there you go.
I think he's describing a relay.
@jippie thats not what it looked like when I posted the link, see the first revision oof the question
@PlasmaHH just the image.
I think anyone who knows me can figure out my feelings about the intellect behind the question: electronics.stackexchange.com/a/186033/53769
@Asmyldof you outsrouced tests?
@jippie No, Plasma gave me his address when I asked him, weeks ago, so now he already gets to play with his thank-you-present
09:28
thank-you-present? I didn't realise you were that thankful
... I literally asked the two of you if you wanted a kit
09:55
@Asmyldof threat & vulnerability assessment
@Asmyldof didn't realise you meant it. You are obviously not well known for being serious:-p
/me is out. Wish me luck for the interview
@jippie Enjoy, though I'm late
Don't know anyone in that department, but knowing some other depts, you'll have plenty work if they hire you
 
2 hours later…
11:57
it was some high level conceptual architecture infrastrucure thing at corporate IT, the job description was suboptimal :-/
ouch
I know that business pretty well, just not too comfortable with conceptuals and architecture.
@PlasmaHH I rather create things that actually work, than think up things that are supposed to work according to vendor claims.
12:54
@jippie I am at a point where I wish I could outline most of the way and have other people deal with the dirty details.
13:45
anyone has experiences with stuff that switches 300V and a few thousands of amps really fast (on and off)? what would be realistic speeds ?
 
1 hour later…
14:50
@PlasmaHH Would info on a 600V, 1000A buck converter be useful?
@W5VO unless it is done by parallelizing 1000 600V 1A buck converters, it could certainly be
@jippie I couldn't quite put my finger on what was wrong until I saw all the other pictures. The ad "Philco 39-31 Radio case&Zenith am/fm radio w/phono input" doesn't read very clearly
@PlasmaHH It was a 750hp motor inverter converted into a DC power supply - large tall cabinet. Used massive IGBT arrays. What do you want to know? Switching frequencies, rise/fall times?
(I'll have to go ask the guy)
@W5VO rise/fall time is the most interesting, but frequency is nice too, yeah
@PlasmaHH I'll let you know
cool, thanks
15:45
@W5VO Let me enjoy the brief moment that I feel smarter than someone else <:o)
 
2 hours later…
17:32
@jippie You can start hanging around MBO Metselen if that's a feeling you cherish
Finished a couple of boxes!
happy dance
 
2 hours later…
19:36
And built another one
20:35
I hate it when people paste an image screen shot from a pretty much text only display.
20:53
har har har
hm, the second meta question I answered this week, this is not going into a good direction
21:18
From a wikipedia article, kind of stood out to me as incorrect
> In many cases, the most expensive part of an integrated circuit is the pins, because they make the package larger, and each pin has to be connected to the integrated circuit's silicon.
@crasic sounds reasonable
21:34
Is there a term for PCB through hole single pins?
single pins? like half a cap?
nah, like a single pin header
with no header
found something "Pin Insert"
must be too late, not getting it...
I mean they are just called "pins"
but on an eng drawing, refering to "pins" is ambiguous
what do you use them for?
21:44
PCB to PCB connector
a single one? hm...
well two of them, but yep :)
second pcb is a bulkhead integrated into a hunk of metal
hm, blood everywhere on that case... someone is not going to be happy to clean that up...
what case?
@crasic If it has a plastic stand-off like any other header it's a header, regardless of pincount. You could call it a pogo but that would be a bad misnomer.
21:55
@Asmyldof just a pin, looks like a nail, no header
the pcb is the header
Otherwise, it can be treated as a pin. When you make a module that has 3 pins before its potted, they're called pins, plain and simple
it's
kinda like the business end of a bed'o-nails jig
I have microscope eyes again
Yes, they are pins, but on an assembly drawing "manual inspect pins for solder bridging and whiskers" is a little ambgious
I wish it wasn't covered under a strict NDA, because the 5 hours of HD video I just shot could very easily be cut into two full feature length wire-bonding-porn vids
21:57
wire bonding? like chip-scale?
Specially if there were an extra camera from the side shooting my hands/tools
Not 22nm process, but yes
Well, not the bonding itself
Batch of 200 items went... wrong and we kinda need them, so since I'm the only one with the patience and no-personal-life enough, I volunteered to put in extra time to fix and/or bridge some mistakes by hand, since there's no time for back and forth
10 of each type, for initial verifications, and then the rest will be shelved while we wait on the next batch
like leads to chip wire bonding?
sounds tiny
It is
Hence porn potential
how do you solder to silicon?
You don't
22:02
or is there a metal layer that is accesible?
The wire-bonding is done wrong, so the metalisation layer on the chips is fine
ah, gotcha
Need to keep original bonds everywhere, so it includes super-fine-grained induim-based solder paste that's extra sticky, tiny little hairs of gold and a teensy little heater
And many different pincers and pliers and whatnots
And a X-many stereo microscope
and someone stoopid enuff to do it
snip one bond, attach wire extension, pull over, attach other end quickly to prevent first joint from coming loose (took 2 extra tries first time)
then move original over to its neighbour after you snipped that, etc
22:06
wow, sounds painful
Normally you'd say "oy, idiots: do it again, but right this time!" but, we're alreayd behind :-)
would this pass conformance or is it r&d only?
Ah, by the time I have kids (if ever) the NDA will be gone and I can show them how awesome dad is ;-)
R&D
Need to go through a couple of cycles of D before we can conclude the R phase, so all needs to be quick as possible
neat cv line though
2nd stage and we expect to have marketable design after the next phase, but that needs to be in production before mid 2017, or the startup will fall in defunded
22:09
"Proficient at chip-scale rework"
:-D
Fair dues
Just wish I could show the video too ;-)
...
Should make a scar on my right index finger before I do the last batch, so I can prove it was me
Everytime I move out a tray-thingy-gel-pack-like-object you shortly see my finger in the vid :-)
(watched back a tiny bit at 4x)
awesome procedure video to have for the company though
Anyway, on to home. 0:11 here now. ZzZzZ time
That's one reason I opted to record
15:11 here, good day
The other is to be able to see if any aborations in measurements (optical chips) can be caused by a mistake I made
Very important that my mistakes don't influence the dev cycle, or we'll be hunting ghosts
22:13
I'm the only one here that does any video or photography of my rework, so what you did is awesome
:-)
nitynite. Sees yas later
hm, bed, yeah, or reverse engineer this lcd ...
22:28
@PlasmaHH unless its a particularly special or rare lcd, why?
22:42
@crasic I dont like throwing away stuff

« first day (1754 days earlier)      last day (3478 days later) »