« first day (4148 days earlier)      last day (1030 days later) » 

03:05
@belkarx Novi Fosili, Die Mayrhofner, The Corries, Tomatito and Paco de Lucia, Jewish Starlight Orchestra, 100 Tamburaša, Cancionero de Upsala, occasionally sea songs, Acapella, and movie soundtracks.
 
2 hours later…
04:41
@FireQuacker Favorite movie soundtrack?
 
7 hours later…
11:59
Is commenting "RTFM" considered offensive?
 
2 hours later…
13:55
@belkarx Not sure I have a favorite. I listen to Avengers: Endgame, Star Trek (2009), and random other movie soundtracks. Some Ennio Morricone. Favorite individual tracks are Mandalorian theme, Chariots of Fire title theme, and Magnificent Seven title theme.
you can say RTFM means read the friendly manual if anyone accuses you from being offensive
4
@ThoriumBR I like this idea.
and if anyone is offended by being told to read the manual, you can say "the manual explains better than I could, and copy/paste from it would prevent you from learning extra things there"
14:10
I do not think I would risk to be banned just from telling someone to read the documentation, even if the OP is offended by it.
I am not that sure...
the risk is low, but not zero
For one comment, the risk is low unless it's egregiously offensive. Usually it takes a pattern of offensive comments before suspension.
 
2 hours later…
16:02
Not sure if anyone remembers me, it's been a few years since I was active. But I'm back and trying to be active here again :)
16:54
Welcome back!
I don't think I was active in the DMZ at this time. But welcome back anyway!
17:49
Yeah I was probably active back in 2014-2016
18:42
@RoraΖ Evenin' - long time no see!
18:59
welcome back
 
1 hour later…
20:09
Welcome back. Although I don't think I was here when you were active. :P
20:59
@A.Hersean Not offensive, but under certain new silly rules, it's "unwelcoming". I think it depends on context. A comment with nothing about "RTFM" is as offensive as saying "Google it", but I don't think that particular initialism is problematic in and of itself.
21:13
RTFM was actually discussed on Meta Stack Overflow back in 2009, long before most of the welcoming crazes
netns and IPv6 are beating me down so hard I am about to give up...
the problem: I want to create a namespace for some software so they can use a different ipv6 address than my computer, so I can test some things (and I can tcpdump and not have to filter out my local addresses). so I went the netsh way.
I created a namespace, a virtual interface, added the host interface as the gateway, I can ping the host from the ns and ping the ns from the host, but nothing on the local network can ping the ns and vice versa
21:31
I don't think IPv6 is handled differently from IPv4 in network namespaces, is it?
it should be the same
well, I will try again tomorrow...
Can Cloudflare be used for traffic correlation vs Tor?
@user Cloudflare is in a position to perform attacks from the role of the destination website.
But that's true for all major CDNs or any highly-centralized network.
@user Can you elaborate more on the question?
21:48
(i dont know much about those things) I was wondering if NSA for example has full access to Cloudflare and other CDNs, would it only need to control entry nodes to deanon users? I mean, it wouldn't need to control any exit nodes, right?
@user An attacker can do a lot more if they have control of the exit node itself. If they only have control of upstream, they can't take advantage of cryptographic malleability within the Tor network (the so-called crypto tagging attack).
But yes, they can perform other tagging attacks, such as injecting delays to encode information about what site was visited and hoping that the target uses a guard owned by them or a friendly entity that will then listen for said delays.
Because Tor's guards (the entry nodes) are kept unchanging for around 3 months, it makes it a lot more difficult for them to perform a Sybil attack. I described a bit about what an attacker can do if they control the exit vs the destination website here:
1
A: Attacks on decentralised networks by running a fleet of nodes with modified software

forestIt would be possible in theory using remote attestation for network access controls. This could reduce the TCB (Trusted Computing Base) to only the CPU. Unfortunately, this would require all Tor relays to be run on hardware that supports such remote attestation such as those with SGX, which would...

22:03
Any idea what type of data GIFCT share besides image hashes? If they share mouse location perhaps a big adversary doesn't even need to control many CDNs.
GIFCT is a group of big tech companies. Twitter, Facebook, etc.
Share in what sense?
Are you referring to PhotoDNA-type hashes?
They share data among each other (facebook, youtbe, twitter, etc) for sock puppet detection among other things if i recall correctly. I remember in a video they mentioned sharing image hashes but don't think they went into details. Neither did they mention other types of data.
The image hash sharing is for detecting child pornography (it's not actually a cryptographic hash, but a representation of an image that is hash-like and flexible enough to withstand mild image editing). I'm not aware of them sharing information for sock puppet detection, beyond whatever third party sources they may use.
@user I don't think they share all that much, tbh. They don't want to help their competition.
Officially, that is. A nation-state threat actor may have compromised them a la PRISM.
 
1 hour later…

« first day (4148 days earlier)      last day (1030 days later) »