« first day (2843 days earlier)      last day (2335 days later) » 

04:39
@JourneymanGeek can you help me with uninstalling wsl?
In elevated command prompt it gives me the Error: 0x80070002
Or I should ask this on SU?
Because on internet, there are lot of articles regarding this error but they are associated with windows update NOT with wsl
I tried to uninstall using lxrun /uninstall /full
@daya I've not really played with WSL
05:04
Okay I will ask it on SU then
@JourneymanGeek Wtf, On SU, "You have reached your question limit"
\o/
I think that's network wide
Should I try in chat rooms of SU?
 
1 hour later…
07:15
@Arminius My submissions on other challenges worked
whoa
ah
I just joined the room, Benoit says "it worked". I kinda felt like I have been summoned..
I'm not sure if window.location is ignored by the bot, so I always load a new Image
@TomK. Haha
I will try to summon you on the CTF Slack
now?
Right now.
:O
gah.. what's our workspace address?
got it
don't have my password here... :s
lul.. not even sure what email I used..
It won't work then.
As far as I can tell :P
hm, weird
I thought so as well
Try with "googlemail"?
but Slack says I don't have permission for this room
07:25
Strange
I will send you an email to that address
Done :)
just changed my password
There's so little time. I'd like to do some kind of CTF some day though
there's a lot of time at night @M'vy !
You can join us whenever you want @M'vy!
just got your mail benoit
yay!
wow... Cisco really fucked up again
07:35
@BenoitEsnard I tried some other XSS challenges. There the bot worked fine too. Maybe it's a bug
Let's go to Slack to trade payloads then?
I'm not sure what the fuck is wrong with this challenge
The solutions we have are working in our browsers, we aren't exploiting any DOM XSS (I haven't found any, to be honnest), so I don't know what the fuck is happening :(
I will have another try this week-end, then I'll ping some people on their IRC channel
@Arminius Oh, and why are you awake that early?
You still haven't slept, right? :P
Insomnia
:/
I'm in bed right now. Didn't manage to fall asleep for a few hours so I grabbed my phone, heh
Do you know why you can't sleep?
@BenoitEsnard what's the time investment required?
@BenoitEsnard Not sure, it's been like that for years. Something wrong with brain chemistry I guess. But really not too uncommon in this channel...
30h days would be a good start
07:48
@M'vy there is none
I'll see if I can get into my Slack account from mobile
@Arminius Maybe you should do things that make you tired
like.. read a lot of @forest's answers for instance
Maybe if he audo-records them for me that could work
Well, I could be interested. Should I ask an invite somewhere?
@M'vy None. You can play the full 24 hours if you have time & knowledge, or you can also ignore this week-end and wait for another challenge
07:50
I see
@M'vy We need an email address to invite, due to the way Slack works
You can use a throwaway if you want
Ah right
It won't be useful in any way, it will just have a temporary link to the account creation
Let me check which one I use in slack
I'm yves.stadler on the standard gmail extension
The invitation has been sent!
You can remove your message from the chat if you want to.
We won't ever need it anymore. :)
08:02
ah too late
 
1 hour later…
Anonymous
09:12
@TomK. Oh, dear...
yep
Anonymous
Cisco are fantastic lol.
10:33
@MweyaRuider Hey, at least it's better than stealing the passwords for profit!
Anonymous
11:07
Is anyone here?
Anonymous
I need some help..
sup @Joshua.J
Anonymous
I'm having issues converting this certificate.
Anonymous
It's driving me insane.
Anonymous
Why won't my Linux shell accept this command "-certfile"
11:15
don't want to be picky here, but that's probably a flag
what's the command?
Anonymous
Sorry I meant flag.
Anonymous
:p
are you trying to do this?
Anonymous
I'm trying to convert a PKCS7 into a PKCS12
Anonymous
But for some reason it doesn't like it.
Anonymous
11:19
> openssl pkcs12 -export -in certificate.cer -inkey privateKey.key -out certificate.pfx
@forest True true :)
Anonymous
But for some reason, I get "unable to load private key"
Anonymous
Even though it's a .key in the same dir.
Anonymous
It would appear it doesn't like -inkey
Anonymous
I don't know why...
11:22
not sure, never converted certificates
Anonymous
Hmm, it's really strange.
and they use
> openssl pkcs12 -export -in PingFederate.pem -inkey PingFederate_private.key -out PingFederate.p12 -certfile RootCA.pem -certfile Intermediate.pem
dunno if you need the intermediate, but the RootCA might be of interest
Anonymous
Yeah, I just get "unable to load private key"
Anonymous
This is annoying...
Anonymous
I hate certificate shit.
Anonymous
11:28
So much.
12:16
@Joshua.J It's not able to accept -certfile when you pass it a cert?
openssl pkcs12 -export -in something.cer -inkey something.key -out something.pfx -certfile someca.cer
@Joshua.J I assume you created certificate.cer with openssl pkcs7 -print_certs -in certificate.p7b -out certificate.cer?
Does anyone have experience with pingfederate? in the sense, is it "good" security-wise?
12:37
Seems like a very complex system.
GUI administration, setup wizards...
12:55
Quick question on site policy: If I answered a question but found out almost immediately after that it has an exact duplicate, should I delete my answer, or just keep the answer and mark the question as a duplicate as well?
Why would you find a duplicate after answering the question?
Because I posted an answer but forgot what a term stood for (I just remembered the acronym) so I searched it, and an exact duplicate was one of the first few results.
I mean this has to done before answering and then mark question as duplicate
So imo you should keep the answer and mark as duplicate
Yeah that's what I did. Thanks.
No Problem!
Anonymous
13:01
God.
Anonymous
I'm really not used to working with certificates.
Anonymous
Wait a nightmare, seriously.
@forest keeping your answer might also help future readers to find answer to that question more easily
Anonymous
I'm getting flustered because I've fucked this up twice now, lol.
Anonymous
And now I'm going back to the customer like a dickhead with a new CSR, Christ.
13:03
heh
I hope you weren't dealing with his private keys...
Anonymous
No.
Anonymous
I'm just confusing myself.
Anonymous
And applying certificates to the ASA is pretty confusing on its own.
ASA hardware is stupid anyway.
Anything with IOS software is dumb.
@forest I also posted a question which had a duplicate a few months ago, because I haven't used the exact same terms as in original question. I marked it as duplicated, and found out that SE has deleted my question 30 days later since it wasn't useful anymore
Anonymous
13:27
Yeah, I know.
Anonymous
I'm going to have to generate a new CSR now.
@forest: IME there is an awful lot of misinformation and false claims made about, and in the name of "Security". Simply changing the context of a tool can completely undermine its purpose. Since the OP explicitly states a requirement for a "plug and play" solution, I infer that he/she has not considered the applicability nor impact of this to his/her implementation. Your dismissal of concerns raised by authoritative players in the Security domain as "uninformed" is not a very helpful approach. — symcbean 10 mins ago
lol apparently the TrueCrypt devs are now "authoritative players in security" :D
13:46
Hm.. are questions about SQLi really ontopic here?
0
Q: Why Group by & HAVING clauses doesnt work?

Test22I was testing my application for SQL-injection attacks , here is the source code <?php //including the Mysql connect parameters. include("../sql-connections/sql-connect.php"); error_reporting(0); // take the variables if(isset($_GET['id'])) { $id=$_GET['id']; //logging the connection parameters...

SQLi is related to hacking, isn't it?
yeah, but isn't this pretty much "how do I write a sql query?"
Why would they not be on-topic?
@TomK. Not really. SQLi won't necessarily let you use an arbitrary query.
@TomK. Yeah
This question is off-topic to me
Ha!
you two can fight it out, I'll have a smoke
13:49
The query he tried won't work even without any filter
(I haven't read that exact question, just talking about SQLi in general).
You can't escape @forest. We need to fight now.
Are we doing it?! Now?! Right here?!
Anonymous
I hate messing things up at work.
Anonymous
I just made myself look so incompetent.
Anonymous
I generated three CSRs to get this to work.
Anonymous
13:55
Oh fucking dear.
Anonymous
I'm sad...
it's called learning on the job @Joshua.J
the important thing is, that you now know more than you did before
There's nothing wrong with gaining knowledge through failing.
SMTP MTA Strict Transport Security (MTA-STS) is a mechanism enabling
mail service providers (SPs) to declare their ability to receive
Transport Layer Security (TLS) secure SMTP connections and to specify
whether sending SMTP servers should refuse to deliver to MX hosts
that do not offer TLS with a trusted server certificate.
the new https everywhere for mail
Anonymous
14:12
@BenoitEsnard I know.
Anonymous
But the customer doesn't see it like that.
Anonymous
The customer just sees it as the fact I took two hours to put a certificate on their ASA.
Anonymous
So I do agree Tom, it is learning on the job but the fact is, it took me a long time sort this out/
Anonymous
And now they're mad.
14:35
"SMTP MTA-STS attempts to protect against an active attacker trying to intercept or tamper with mail between hosts that support STARTTLS."
That's an improvement, but what if I don't trust all the hosts it goes through?
I wish some of the actual end to end encrypted email attempts took off more, but key distribution is difficult :(
Anonymous
14:48
0
Q: How do I instruct our network engineer to secure connection from BYOD to our organization?

FilopnWe read the NIST paper about securing BOYD, but it's just a long document according to our network engineer. He refuses to use it as a guide while asking to have a checklist. According to him, the checklist will help to go over the security requirements and decide which of the points from the che...

Anonymous
This will only cause discussion IMO
Anonymous
That was the fastest deletion I've seen in my life.
Anonymous
"AES-256 is currently no more secure than AES-128."
Anonymous
Surely that is not actually true.
I haven't seen the question
But about that claim, I think I've already read somewhere that AES-128 was better for AES-256 for reasons I can't explain
Anonymous
14:58
0
Q: Does using AES-256 encryption really grant any further security?

Eärendil BagginsAES-256, as far as I know, generates an 256 bit key to encrypt a message, and the 256-bit key is generated by a known algorithm starting from the password the user chooses. Since the encryption is symmetrical, though, any user inputting the same password will be able to generate an equal 256-bit ...

Anonymous
"AES-256 is currently no more secure than AES-128."
But don't trust my memory and search real cryptographers' opinions :)
Anonymous
Well, that's a different thing Benoit.
Anonymous
This user isn't saying AES-128 is better, he's saying it provides the same security as 256.
Anonymous
Which I am not sure I believe...
15:01
141
A: Why most people use 256 bit encryption instead of 128 bit?

Thomas PorninWhy do people buy red sport cars ? They do not go faster than sport cars of any other colour... AES comes with three standard key sizes (128, 192 and 256 bits). Many people see this and think that if there are three distinct sizes instead of just one, then there must be some difference, and sinc...

See also:
20
A: Does AES-192 provide better encryption than AES-256?

Thomas PorninRelated-key attacks are interesting mathematical properties of algorithms, but have no practical impact on security of encryption systems, as long as they are used for what they were designed, i.e. encryption (and not, for instance, as building blocks for hash functions). Bigger is not necessari...

15:26
Hey guys, new here, can I ask a general cookie question or is that considered "software support" ?
What is your question? :o
It's hard to tell from "general cookie question" if it will be on-topic or not.
Fair enough. I guess generally when expiring cookies, what stops someone who has acquired a previously valid cookie from adding it to their browser and maintaining authorization to a site?
It's a valid question. :)
To rephrase, a hacker gets an authorized cookie, that cookie is subsequently expired, does that expiration affect the cookie as it was when the hacker obtained it?
Not sure if there's a duplicate though
15:29
I wasn't sure how to ask it so I probably did a bad job googling
The site keeps track of a session cookie's validity span and will discard/invalidate it after that
@dckuehn I googled some keywords and haven't found anything
Our site in this case is .net, so the framework itself will keep track that the cookie is no longer valid?
The answer posted by @Arminius is valid, but you should still post it in my opinion, as other people will see it
Ok cool, I'll do that. Thanks
15:32
Yes! Most cookies encode the creation / expiration time in the value, so they can check whether it has expired or not.
Well I guess that gets back to the original question. If the original cookie had an expiration of 1 hour but the user logs out after 10 minutes, the "original cookie" still has an exiration of 1 hour, so the hacker with the "first cookie" can still add it to their browser and use it for 50 minutes?
But that goes back to @Arminius point that the site would keep track and know that the cookie has expired?
There's different ways to handle that, and indeed keeping a list of revoked cookies is a solution
Update 張啟元 (Chang Chi-yuan) has cancelled his plans to hack Mark Zuckerberg The power of #bugbounty it's real.
sigh
I did post a question here: security.stackexchange.com/questions/194679/… , let me know if I can be more clear
Anonymous
16:07
Well, this weekend is basically the final push.
Anonymous
Tomorrow I need to sit a practice-test and decide whether I am going to push the NA-Sec back or not.
Anonymous
I was close to passing the first time but I am really not that confident, especially on the configuration of authenticated routes, they were a nightmare to lab in Packet Tracer the first time.
Anonymous
So I am not looking forward to it at all.
What's NA-Sec for again?
Anonymous
Cisco Certified Network Associate in Security.
16:10
Ah
Anonymous
So firewalls, IPS, IDS and routers acting as a firewall basically.
Anonymous
But all Cisco stuff, lol.
Anonymous
Then I will be a two-time CCNA welps - and I got my company to agree that I am doing OSCP next and not another Cisco exam so that's nice.
Anonymous
I can finally take an exam I actually want to do.
I wonder how easily you can just offer certifications for stuff
Or if there are legal hurdles
16:40
How much cryptography should I know to become a pentester?
Depends on what you're pentesting
More specifically, I don't want to deal with complex mathematics(which most cryptographers do)
I would want to pentest a web app and a network
You don't necessarily need an in-depth knowledge of crypto for that. However, there may always be parts where it's really helpful. Or where you should at least know about common pitfalls
Exactly
You'll eventually find custom session cookie implementations etc.
16:46
Is this for me?
You might find that as part of a webapp pentest
@Arminius I want to know which topics should I learn from a pentester's point of view? As you know we don't really need to master it.
Hmm I find that hard to summarize
I didn't find a content summary for that course
16:56
You need to sign in
I am sorry but check this please..
Maybe someone else here has some better tips. What I'm thinking is, you should e.g. know about padding oracles, but you don't need to dissect a Feistel cipher. It should be okay to know for what use cases SHA1 is broken without understanding why it is. I think you can get far in areas of pentesting without explicitly focusing on crypto and pick up knowledge along the way
Yes, got it!
Thank you @Arminius
I had a look at the Udacity course but didn't find a course summary after logging in
Looks pretty high level to me though
Yeah, they don't provide course summary
But in lessons you can view chapters to see the contents
Actually, after skimming over the content, I like it. Seems like a practical, reasonably basic overview
I would expect a pentester to know that stuff
17:12
Anyway, I will just try to understand the concepts from security point of view without necessarily falling into it's mathematics
AFAICS it doesn't even go much into attacks, mostly how different cryptographic schemes work, etc.
Indeed
Anonymous
I think Arminius is right.
Anonymous
You don't need to really know a lot of Crypto.
Anonymous
Just the basics on common algorithms, hashing, salting, etc, etc should be fine.
Anonymous
17:22
If you're learning how to pen-test web-apps it would be useful to learn how TLS/SSL sessions work.
Anonymous
And how the server communicates with the client over TLS/SSL
Anonymous
And of course the crypto side of those so what crypto functions they actually use.
Anonymous
And their implementation I guess.
17:44
Yeah, thanks @Joshua.J
 
3 hours later…
Anonymous
20:32
I love getting FGITW'd
What question?
Anonymous
Doesn't matter :p
Anonymous
Was just a free rep question.
Anonymous
But eh, oh well.
22:41
Wow, that FB bug looks great.

« first day (2843 days earlier)      last day (2335 days later) »