« first day (1896 days earlier)      last day (3282 days later) » 

Adi
Adi
13:01
@Matthew I have a bad news for you
-1 == true :(
user image
4
@AviD? is this you?
hehehe
I swear, thats some shit you or @RoryAlsop would pull xD
@Lighty One time, I recorded a crazy-as-hell message about ghosts in the forest... and played it under the bed so my cousin could hear it
He started freaking out and thought he was schizophrenic for a bit
hehehehehe :3
13:03
The recording mentioned his name, and stuff very few people knew about
and it demanded a sacrifice of pepsi in the center of the forest
ohohoho, that couldnt go wrong at all
He started freaking out big time
He does not sound smart
are you really related to @Simon?
Adi
Adi
Yep
13:06
@AviD He's pretty smart. We were kids at the time.
nsfw
Mmmmmmmmm
@MarkBuffalo is this grilled @Simon?
@SEJPM pls, this is grilled @Simon:
and by grilled, I mean deep fried. or shallow-fried?
Adi
Adi
and here's the other part of the issue
@Adi Well it's written in PHP
13:10
@MarkBuffalo that's deep fry
Adi
Adi
If I were to give this a category, I'd say it's also a deserialization issue
@Ohnana That doesn't look so deep to me
@MarkBuffalo they're submerged, it's a deep fry
they don't look submerged to me
well, as much as they can be. bread products float
13:11
@Adi It looks like you want a variable to be interpreted as two different types?
Well, I guess my question is why would numeric 1 ever equal the string "true"
?
@RoraΖ both get bool converted? both have bits set -> both are true?
@Adi I said it might be...
Why would "true" == 1 ?
@M'vy "true" == true === true == 1 ?
Btw. $JSON_OBJ->test is bool(true). Isn't that an array ?
13:19
looks like the hard part starts
need to document some code
Seems like 1 == "true" -> false is by design
@Adi Dayum.
1 == "php" -> false
1 == "1" is the only exception
@M'vy Look at the Loose comparisons with == table
@MarkBuffalo that's what I'm saying.
so it's perfectly legit to have 1 == "true" -> false
13:28
You might like this page: php.net/manual/en/types.comparisons.php
He just linked that, luls
Oh shut top Markus.
Shut bottom, Semon
ninja?
in fact it seems that == comparison of 0 and string falls back to int comparison. And "something" will always evaluate as 0 unless it's a proper number
@M'vy It might be the only smart thing PHP has done
13:31
Oh no, it's trickier. 1 == "1true" -> true :)
> After some investigation, it turns out aidan from the PHP manual mentioned that any strings that do not start with a number will be converted to 0 when casted as an integer.
Hence (bool) "true" is true, (bool) 1 is true, but (int) "true" is 0
and since neither 1 or "true" is a boolean, the comparison takes the common ground which is int in this case. Not bool.
This is why PHP is the second worst language in existence.
What's the first?
first being ?
Perl
English ? (LOL)
13:36
hahaha
rekt
that was too easy
Says the man typing in English
Canadian English?
@M'vy :(
13:37
Microdata Corporation was an Irvine, California-based computer company, developing hardware and operating systems to run its Reality environment. It later was taken over by its international distributor CMC Leasings, which in turn was taken over in 1983 by McDonnell Douglas Corporation, and is now part of Northgate Information Solutions. == History == The Reality name was given to Microdata's computer system and the operating system — the first version of what was later called the Pick operating system. At the time, Microdata owned rights to the Pick operating system in parallel with Dick Pick...
@Ohnana com'on, laugh at the joke too :)
@RoraΖ Yeah because you guys are too dumb to understand French.
So we gotta get to your level of dumbness.
Can we get a tl;dr roro?
@M'vy hmm I tried pointing to the English programming language (yes it is)
13:39
@Simon Dude I wouldn't be bragging about the French
@Simon company who sell services around PKI try to make out that amazon giving away free SSL certs is bad for security
written as a news article
They should be speaking one of a dozen other languages the number of times they've been defeated in history..
@RоryMcCune loooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooool
and not what it actually is which is a press release
13:40
@AviD vomiting
it's projectile
@RоryMcCune So what you're saying is that this Nick Hunter guy is a clown?
@RоryMcCune pls is there even a difference any more?
This looks surprisingly a lot like VB.NET
:(
@AviD well yeah there are some decent news articles out there
@Simon I definitely don't agree with his conclusions
@RоryMcCune He looks dishonest
13:41
as news goes, there are only like 3 or 4 that could even be called "tech journalists"
I saw his picture and clicked the back button
I agree with Markus, he looks like a huge nurd.
But yeah, the dishonest kind of nurd.
That's the "real estate agent looking to prey on you" look
Look at his forehead.
That's the forehead of a bad man.
lmfao
@Simon agreeing with me. The world is ending.
13:45
> Falsified keys and certificates would give the malicious actors an encrypted channel where they could hide their activities.
Real certificates allow that too
@M'vy yeah all his criticisms are equally applicable to paid for certs...
and with that one, you can just use self-signed certs!
> The other major risk is that if the Amazon CA is compromised, there is no quick way to revoke compromised keys and certificates.
Revoke the root CA. Done. Ooops
@M'vy "real" certificates?? I offense at that.
This guy has a Texas-sized forehead
these are just as real as theirs. Maybe more so.
13:47
His forehead is so big, it foreshadows something
@AviD yeah, yeah. You get the point.
> Be the first to comment.
hmmmmmmmmmm....
I'm sure it would be possible to link to the rule of usability
yeah automatic free SSL will improve the overall security of a lot of systems I reckon and outweigh other concerns...
@RоryMcCune But the terrorists! My forehead! Apply directly to the forehead.
14:30
oldest trick in the book -- sass the free stuff so they'll buy your not-free stuff
Boo for closing this question.
2
Q: Is there something like the OWASP top 10 for BizTalk applications?

oɔɯǝɹI'm familiar with the OWASP top 10, for web applications. Is there something simular for BizTalk applications?

Adi
Adi
@Xander I agree with the closure
@Xander why? it's a dumb question
Adi
Adi
I wouldn't say a dumb question, but it's not a very good one. If we allow these questions, we'll just get more "Is there something like OWASP Top 10 for X"?
@Ohnana No it isn't. Asking for alternatives to the OWASP Top 10 is a perfectly reasonable question for someone who is new to threat modeling.
Adi
Adi
14:36
@Xander No no no
Bad argument
He's not asking for an alternative to OWASP Top 10
He's asking us to list the top 10 security threats for BizTalk
@Adi So you're right that it certainly could be more generalized, but ignoring the "BizTalk" specificity, it's a perfectly good question.
Adi
Adi
@Xander "Is there something like OWASP Top 10?" is a completely different question
@Adi No he's not, and the fact that he accepted the answer pointing him at the CWE Top 25 demonstrates that
@Xander okay, "dumb" is too strong of a word. I see your point. but the "is there a list of vulns for <product>" pattern is close to a product recommendation
Adi
Adi
There's the SANS top 20
There's the ASVS (also from OWASP)
and there are many others
But he wants for BizTalk in particular
14:38
@Ohnana well questions about product security are definitely on-topic
Yes, and a good answer listing some of them and why you might use one vs another would be widely useful.
Adi
Adi
@Xander Because that's the only thing he can get
@Adi No he doesn't. Again, look at the accepted answer.
well, you've got a diamond. there's nothing stopping you from a reopen vote
Adi
Adi
25 secs ago, by Adi
@Xander Because that's the only thing he can get
14:39
He just used that as an illustration because that was his specific challenge at the time.
adi stop being a curmudgeon
Adi
Adi
@Ohnana Ha?
that is so not a product recommendation question
who closed that with that reason
Adi
Adi
@RоryMcCune Awful reason
@Xander i think the problem with this question is phrasing. we read it one way, and you read it another. and then the accepted answer points towards your interpretation
Adi
Adi
14:40
I agree
Also, @Xander
> a good answer listing some of them and why you might use one vs another would be widely useful.
100% agreement with you
but not to that question
@Adi If the only vulnerability classification tool you know of is the OWASP Top 10, and you're dealing with a non-Web app, it's perfectly reasonable to ask the general question in that specific form.
Adi
Adi
In canonical question, yes
@Adi, so if I edit the question to be more general, would you support re-opening?
Adi
Adi
@Xander 100%
@Xander FWIW I agree with you, could've been better worded as "what are the top security risks relating to Biztalk applications" but it's possible to derive what he's after
14:42
@Xander i'd reopen it
Adi
Adi
My only problem is that such questions open the door for "What is the OWASP Top 10 for X"
apart from anything else who dragged up a Q. from 3 years ago to close now...
Adi
Adi
@RоryMcCune Good motivation to improve it
@RоryMcCune Yeah, no doubt.
Adi
Adi
I agree with the closure
It sparked this discussion
14:43
@RоryMcCune oh lord i didn't even see that
Adi
Adi
Where we had a good result
Alright, I'll edit it tonight. If it gets re-opened, I'll answer it properly.
15:06
@Ohnana Not exactly free, but Comcast is desperately trying to get people to reconsider Google Fiber. lol
@MarkBuffalo i tried to get comcast to give me service, but they refused to wire my house
had to go with a tiny local isp
i regret nothing
...I actually had to wire my own apartment by myself
because of that reason
@RоryMcCune no decent reason, so I went with existing choice
I rage-smashed a hole in the wall where the cable is supposed to be... and wired it. then fixed the hole
@RoryAlsop sounds like we need more reasons :)
fortunately, the hole was pre-built with a box. I just had to rage-smash it to open it again.
@RoryAlsop my bad
but yeah, that is the same reason I did it
Adi
Adi
Okay, I feel stupid.
What does this mean?
> Specifically, PBKDF2WithHmacSHA1 only looks at the lower 8 bits of Java characters in passphrases on devices running Android 4.3 or below
What is "only looks at the lower 8 bits of Java characters"?
@ThomasPornin Save us from this question.
It looks as if it's excluding important details... but I don't know enough about crypto to make a guess without looking like a fool.
Adi
Adi
@MarkBuffalo The key issue here is not really crypto
hai guys
15:11
reads
Adi
Adi
@LucasKauffman Holy shit!
Where have you been?
and Hai!
@Adi singapore?
@Adi i think it's talking about unicode
Adi
Adi
@Ohnana Indeed it is
as in, it only looks at the segment of data you'd use in representing ascii
Adi
Adi
15:12
I just don't know what this "lower 8 bits of Java characters"
Adi
Adi
Ooooh
@Xander I would too
and everything else in the unicode representation gets truncated
Adi
Adi
@Ohnana So it ignores unicode chars?
15:12
@Adi different timezone :P?
seems to involve unicode translation?
@Adi it chops them to ASCII size and reads that
like some apostrophes in unicode may translate to others on a different set
kind of a ghetto ascii converter
so if you tried to use a unicode char before, it would chop and read it
@Ohnana not sure how you're getting that?
15:13
now, it reads the whole thing
> Beginning with Android 4.4, we have changed this implementation to use all available bits in Unicode characters
ah, ok
leading to different keys
I see what you mean
ofc, this may not hold for all unicode characters
yep, this makes sense now
good change
15:14
i'm not fluent in bit-representation for unicode sets
Adi
Adi
Yeah, that's how I reached that page
I had a file encrypted on an old phone
Can't decrypt on a newer phone
same app
same password
oh lord you're going to have to figure out what ascii characters it was reading
so I think what it did is essentially this:
RIP adi
myPassword1 = \u006d\u0079\u0050\u0061\u0073\u0073\u0077\u006f\u0072\u0064\u0031
so enter your former password like that, adi
and it may work :x
Adi
Adi
15:16
@Ohnana Luckily, I have a magic byte in the clear text
So I can generate two keyes
one with the old method and one with the new
win!
Adi
Adi
Whatever gives the correct magic, I accept it
because when you enter the backslash u codes, they should be parsed as a string in that way... provided you can even enter that many to begin with
@DavidFreitag How possible is it to tweak NFC to send RFID?
Adi
Adi
@Simon What are you trying to do?
NFC is an RFID
15:24
RFID can have a different freq IIRC
@Adi Send data to an RFID reader.
Adi
Adi
@M'vy HF RFID freq is NFC freq
e.g. open a door that uses RFID cards with Android.
Adi
Adi
@Simon If your phone supports HCE, then you can do that
Adi
Adi
15:27
@Simon and, of course, your reader operates at 13.56Mhz
salut
@Adi Ya I'm reading that right now, thanks.
salut
@kalina watcha'
Adi
Adi
@Simon To be honest, not gonna be easy
Like.. at all
15:30
@Adi Yeah, I'm not committing to anything right now.
today is a great day for public transit
Adi
Adi
@Simon This might be helpful with the terms to look for as well reddit.com/r/hacking/comments/148nby/…
no day is a good day for public transport
even days where another car gets exploited remotely
@Adi Yeah that sounds like quite a challenge.
/hugs transit pass
15:35
poor transit pass
although I'm guessing the amount of random groping you receive has started going down
believe it or not i have been groped exactly once. at a pride event. by a gay guy.
2
very weird.
wow
when I was working I frequently ended up using the London underground
So, this just hit me: WEP came about in '97, WPA in '03 (6 years after WEP), and WPA2 in '04 (just a year after WPA).

Here we are in 2016, around 12 years after WPA2 came about - double the time that passed between WEP and WPA. WPA2 is known to be broken in at least some ways for certain implementations - particularly in the most common mode, PSK. Where the hell's the WPA2 replacement?
people in philly are not very handsy at all
which was a proper nightmare
15:37
never seen people being touched inappropriately, and when someone jostles you, you get a grunted "yo sorry" in response
@kalina the tube is a nightmare in so many ways
@kalina Dare I ask what an improper nightmare would be?
@kalina that sucks
@Iszi a not nightmare thing dressing itself up as a nightmare
i'd probably carry around a blunt object to crack people's fingers with after a while
15:38
the tube is a proper nightmare because it's so packed you're unsure if you're being sexually assaulted or in the way
@kalina Did you just describe yourself?
fkin_rekt_irl
@kalina So, would that make @Simon's mom a proper or improper nightmare?
TOO LATE OSZI I ALREADY MADE THE JOKE
@Simon welcome to ignoreville
Ignoreville's cool, I wish it'd be both ways without any action on my side.
15:38
interestingly enough, people are more comfortable with touching me now. it's in a friendly way of course, but it's strange
nearly jumped out of my seat the first time it happened
@Iszi I'm not joining in your "your mom" silliness
@Ohnana I got stabbed on a bus
Just randomly minding my own business, and... stabbed.
@MarkBuffalo ^ strangest euphemism of the day
2
@MarkBuffalo you have seen some shit dude
was it in china?
Yeah, and it was coated with drugs
15:42
...
The stabbing object
new meaning for "drug spiking"
sometimes i wonder if you're an elaborate bullshitter
@Ohnana I wish
15:43
I've been wondering this since Markus day 2.
I have had a boyfriend take a brick to the back of the head for nothing more than asking a car parked across a junction to move
the world is plenty messed up
Yeah, it is
@Ohnana I'd like to elaborately go into it, but it's so far-fetched, and so outlandish, even I have trouble believing exactly what happened.
Since we're all making things up: I like dogs.
Public transit is pretty good in general in China, but sometimes you run into nutjobs... 99.9% of people are fine, though
@Simon SO you just said you don't like dogs?
15:46
@Arperum Exactly.
who would like dogs, they shed hair everywhere
They don't taste very good either. The meat is kind of tough
they don't understand "I'm trying to sleep"
Hmm...
-3
Q: PLEASE HELP ME TO LEARN AND TO BE A HACKER?

Muhammed Elsayedplease I want to learn information security and to be a professional hacker could you tell me how can i start ? please tell me the steps that i should follow to be a hacker thanks

15:48
Matthew, you better not say that you like dogs.
@kalina Then make sure they can't get into your bed when you are trying to sleep.
@MarkBuffalo I just saw that
@Matthew I want to provide an answer, "learn to program first"
or something
Did you see what he commented too?
@Arperum I do, by not having a dog
15:48
I want to tell him to shut the fuck up in the comments.
I think he's talking to himself
@schroeder ffs dude, why do you bother editing a question that literally has 0 chance of being good?
@MarkBuffalo Learn to use capital letters?
Just get rid of it already.
hold on flks - I'm on it
15:50
COME ON MAN
WE'RE ON A TIMER HERE
@schroeder nope, you edited the question without fixing 99% of the problems
@schroeder Wait. I want a gold badge for responding
@kalina keep your pants on
@MarkBuffalo I'm instantly downvoting if you post an answer.
@kalina That does work indeed.
15:51
@schroeder I find this offensive
@Simon You do that anyway, without even reading the answer
Can I be a hacker too? I want to hack Minecraft and Facebook! Please help me!
@kalina in what way?
@schroeder your implication that my pants would be off for any reason you could control
15:51
@MarkBuffalo I haven't downvoted any of your posts you donut.
@Simon What about Jackie Chan?
Not even.
@kalina what, you've never seen rage-no-pantsing?
Poor, misunderstood Jackie Chan
Oh wow... I suddenly like you more then, @Simon.
actually, i think the original phrase is "keep your shirt on"
15:52
-.-
cuz people are like "RAAAGH I'M ANGRY THIS IS NO TIME FOR SHIRTS."
@Matthew off topic > for assistance hacking a specific system
@schroeder I like your response
@Ohnana probably related to the incredible hulk
@kalina gee, I wonder who that could be
15:53
@kalina Hmm, true...
Schroeder is a good mod
@kalina don't use that phrase to much, else it might lose its impact
don't encourage him
@schroeder if I was offended I wouldn't usually inform you of it
thus, impact lost
@schroeder I gotta admit that's a 10/10 answer.
@kalina noted
15:56
as a matter of fact, the only really offending thing that happens in here is the amount of time I am misunderstood for somebody who is about to explode when I'm not, which invariably results in me elevating to that stage thus creating a self-fulfilling accusation
which one moderator has mastered
tl;dr
but he's back on ignore now
@kalina hey now, I didnt misunderstand anything
I never said anything about you getting ready to explode
@kalina ok so the default assumption should always be that you're just joshing?
okay wait, I did misunderstand a lot. but not that...
15:58
@Simon #EmbryoAttentionSpan
the whole thing was about the ongoing crapfest.
@RоryMcCune tell her I said that
@Simon 11/10 with rice?
@AviD People were pooping in here?
@RоryMcCune if I wanted to be super serious I have a career I could contribute to, I thought I'd made it well clear that this is escapism
I'm not sadistic enough to escape to someplace I don't enjoy being
@kalina It took me a while to get you, but now that I get you, I don't want to unget you.
2
15:59
@kalina that makes sense
@kalina well sometimes it's hard to tell when people are being super serious or just having fun online where body language is tricky
@MarkBuffalo verbally, yes.
@MarkBuffalo cute
3
@AviD ah, didn't know... usually seems tame in here.

« first day (1896 days earlier)      last day (3282 days later) »