« first day (1887 days earlier)      last day (3291 days later) » 

16:00
Oh look. A table
yeah it's not all "NO ROOLZ!!!"
but it's close!
It is a PKCS#11 DLL that wraps around CryptoAPI.
Theoretically it would allow your Firefox to use the certificate that is in your Windows store.
@ThomasPornin Thank you. I managed to get Chrome working after some effort
And it's working now
@Ohnana Yeah it seems anarchism is one step closer to communism
anarcho-capitalism
16:02
@ThomasPornin funny. I get cert error in Firefox on that page :)
it's a bit like looking into the sun :|
@Ohnana lol
@Ohnana But how do you explain to your kid why looking to the sun is bad?
@Simon STOP IT
:D
16:03
@TildalWave The link is http, not https. Some trigger-happy SSL-everywhere, maybe ?
@Ohnana That sounds like fun right now
https everywhere you noob!
:D
@ThomasPornin oh, yes you're right
See, that's why I refuse to use HTTPS everywhere.
I rep capped today for saying: don't be a dumb-ass
27
A: What are the dangers of advertising my MySQL-powered amateur site?

schroederOh my. YES! All those things are of a concern. You only expose your server publicly if you are prepared to have that server taken over by a malicious party. All one needs to do is to find a misconfiguration or a security hole and they can own your personal computer that you use to do things lik...

16:04
It ends up creating bugs to your browser experience so fuck that.
@schroeder lulz
@schroeder It's still good advice, though.
@MarkBuffalo "don't be a dumb-ass"?
@Simon the bugs are created by shitty fucking sysadmins
@schroeder Why are you oneboxing it here then? You should do that tomorrow :P
always good advice
16:06
@schroeder Yup, but it's specific
@Ohnana And we can't get rid of them so we do have to deal with them.
People are going to google this, and find your post
and it's going to help them not be a dumbass
Markus, shut top.
@schroeder repcapped @ 265 before I woke up. come at me
@schroeder sometimes highest voted answers are really obvious. my highest voted answer of all time is me saying "yes pentesting might break stuff"
137
A: Is it acceptable that a skilled professional pentester deletes or modifies sensitive data in production unintentionally during a pentest?

Rоry McCuneThere's no way that a pentester can 100% assure that data will not be modified or deleted, in the same way as they can't assure that system availability won't be affected (I've knocked systems over with a port scan or a single ' character). as you say a web crawler can delete data from a system ...

16:07
@RоryMcCune Have another upvote
lol
also, this is why you need white box vs. black box testing
yeah white-box testing in a dedicated environment FTW
soo much nicer/easier/more effective
where your scope is a specific app/system
unfortunately, that can often take a long time to set up if the company doesn't have a dedicated testing environment
@MarkBuffalo but surely in a modern DevOps environment, spinning up duplicate test env's is a standard part of the existing CI/CD process?
@RоryMcCune Fortunately, we have testing environments
but... you'll be surprised by how many companies do NOT
@MarkBuffalo nah I've been a tester for years, I wouldn't be surprised 'cause I get asked to test in prod. all the time :)
16:11
@MarkBuffalo developestuction
if you are asked to set it up, then you have to ensure the web apps actually work in the testing environment. this involves changing/chasing down configuration files/etc
@MarkBuffalo I repcapped more than 500 times. Keep quiet.
4
FKIN REKT
@ThomasPornin I'M CATCHING UP TO YOU
Just give me about 5-6 more years
@RоryMcCune even if that will break prod? :(
@MarkBuffalo yes
16:13
@MarkBuffalo yeah, I've broken a few prod. env's in my time :)
they usually have us skip testing
"don't touch that it's prod"
well now i want to crush it more
@kalina What about "My whole planet destroyed because you thought someone wanted your autograph!"
@Ohnana just lucky for them that most bad guys will totally respect that if they break in, otherwise bad things would happen!
@MarkBuffalo by that time, the difference of how many times you two repcapped will only increase :P
@RоryMcCune ya dood
16:14
@RоryMcCune what kind of protection clause would you put in for a whitebox test?
@TildalWave yeah, I'm just messing around. I don't generally care about rep. I just wanted to get to 10k, so now I'm being lazy
@AviD well white-box / test env the worst you'll do is trash the test env. If they need it for other stuff, they should still back it up (or just snapshot the VMs) before the tester starts
@RоryMcCune hopefully they had an appropriate backup?
otherwise they should just blow it away at the end of testing
@MarkBuffalo yeah I'll do that one day ... not in a hurry tho, managed nearly 50k on space in the meantime
16:16
Only nurdz like space.
@MarkBuffalo usually it's just "reboot things" to fix. but I did once get a case where a customer came back 9 months after testing, saying data we created as part of the test broke their upgrade... I pointed at the bit in the report that said "please delete all data created under these users at the completion of testing"
@RоryMcCune I've seen clauses along the lines of "no gauranatee what we say here is complete or even correct blabla"
but I dont like that
in fact I really hate it
@AviD oh in terms of pen test scope
absolutely
i've also seen "your environment changes through time, this is a snapshot"
@RоryMcCune not even pentest, things like code review / design / arch. / etc
16:17
@AviD nah it's entirely justified (IMO). Take a system that has had 2 man years of work to develop and a test is going to walk in cold and in under 2 man weeks be better at that system than the devs
if someone gives me as much time as the devs had to write it, I'll take out the caveats
also, "it is impossible to find every vulnerability, this is our best effort in identifying"
@RоryMcCune no, but I think you should stand behind what you write.
@Simon it's in a sense very similar to infosec
@RоryMcCune agreed
@AviD remembering that debugging is harder than writing code, there's no way you can guarantee that you've found all the security bugs
16:18
@Ohnana yes, that always makes sense in the scope.
@RоryMcCune 100% agreed
I'm debugging right now.
@AviD do devs stand by their code and guarantee no bugs?
and it's much much harder than writing code, of which I'm quite quick at
@RоryMcCune yeah no, not talking about "all", but the things you DO write
@RоryMcCune not no bugs, but that it does what it claims to do
well, or they should
@AviD sure I would always stand by my findings as written, and provide evidence, but I ain't guaranteeing there are one's I didn't miss
16:19
@RоryMcCune hahahaha
see e.g. Jeremiah Grossman's current rant on guarantees in the security product space.
You're a gross man.
@RоryMcCune not about missing things, about what we DID write
@AviD what does a security test claim to do?
@AviD sure what do you say you'll do on a security test
do you say "I'll cover the OWASP top 10, 100% guarantee"
@RоryMcCune no no, not what I'm talking about
say you put in the report "SQL injection"
but oh btw there is no injection, and not even a database.
16:21
@AviD then you suck as a tester
so what the hell did you just report...
@RоryMcCune pfft
exactly
@AviD seriously I do see it, but I try to describe what I saw, and why it leads me to a conclusion. If I'm not sure, I say "I'm not sure, but x is indicative of y"
stand behind the quality of your work, not the completeness
@AviD oh absolutely but you need to caveat where needed (e.g. what was the scope, did you get the right accounts, did the app. work properly, did they provide you a dir listing of the web root so you have some confidence that you hit all the URLs available)
@AviD Eventually not having completeness leaves you standing outside without a job.
16:22
@RоryMcCune too often I see clueless reports, with wrong findings, analysis, explanations, etc - but then they say "oh we dont guarantee anything we write is correct"
so yeah, you suck if you do that
@RoraΖ disagree. Depends on scoping.
@AviD ah well that's B.S. if they can't stand behind their actual findings, that's lame
@AviD "pls don't sue me :c"
@RоryMcCune yeah thats what I'm talking about though.
@AviD so if your original question was , do I do that kind of thing, the answer is no I don't . That said I'm just a tester, I don't write the contracts :)
also, while we agree completeness is not achievable, if you say you're testing for XSS, and there is a trivial XSS right on the main page and you didnt find it - your ass is negligent.
(again not talking about extreme edge cases, hidden pages, complexified logic...)
@RоryMcCune heh not sure what my question was
16:25
@AviD yeah sure if there's something that should've been found in the scope of testing (XSS on the front-page) but say for example the account provided didn't have rights to see a given page, you may never even know that
sure
or (as is very often the case) the devs are dropping new code all the time (during and immediately after the test)
it becomes almost impossible to determine whether an issue was present at the time of testing
or a really complex XSS - e.g. if param1 has a specific value (which you never see), then it causes param2 to be processed differently...
@AviD oh on that Burps new 2nd order scans are v. cool for finding things like that or XXE
@RоryMcCune Well that's why you test off of tagged RCs, and not some trunk people are committing to.
16:27
@RoraΖ heh that implies good development discipline from the target. I seriously have had people do deploys to the test environment during a pen test or immediately afterwards
sigh I hate people
@RоryMcCune I've had people write code right on the prod server
@RoraΖ me too :) which is why the idea for me of a dedicated test env. that can be frozen for pen testing makes soo much sense
I've started writing up as a security finding (under secure maintenance and code protection) when dev teams dont have a proper VCS and process around that.
@AviD nice. I remember one time I was doing a server build review and saw an admin log into the box and start surfing gaming websites, that was amusing
16:28
@RoryAlsop that's kinda ok but it's not amazing
@RоryMcCune Yeah you should be able to build up a testbed from an RC, and be sure that it's not going to change.
@RoraΖ yep. it's why I'd love to work with more DevOps kind of companies where that kind of thing is de-rigeur, instead of "oooh you want a test env. well that'll take 2 months to approve and build"
@kalina "Trillian: You idiot! You signed the order to destroy Earth! "
@RоryMcCune yeah same
@kalina "Trillian: Probability factor of one to one. We have normality. I repeat, we have normality. Anything you still can't cope with is therefore your own problem. "
not just that, but they tend to have a more mature development process too
16:31
@kalina yeah - she wasn't written that well. Mostly used as a foil for Arthur or Zaphod
proper VCS, defined backlog, test cases, etc
or Ford, come to think of it
@AviD and you can file your findings directly into the bug tracker instead of writing a word report!
and actually knoew where things are, and how they work
0
Q: Russian guys break through our firewall

Dennisin my company, some russians broke through our firewall and got to our pfSense. The pfSense has a failover Design, so two WAN Connections are available. It is reachable over the internet via two diffrent addresses. Actually our firewall blocks all incoming ports, except: Address1: PORT ST...

^poor russians, get blamed for all sorts
also v. sexist question, it could've been Russian Girls!
16:34
@RоryMcCune heh was about to say
if anyone wants to flag, I can't see any option but to close it as too broad with a comment "who knows - could be anything" :-)
flegs away!
If you open a connection to a machine, and the service receiving the connection is in any way exploited, your firewall isn't going to do jack shit
16:52
"Yoga on snow"
-.-
@RоryMcCune Sneaky fucking Russians
@MarkBuffalo norton ips
no, not technically a firewall
You're a firewall.
your mom is the great firewall of china
16:59
@kalina ids/ips?
I said ips
intrusion prevention system?
yep
ah, so ids/ips
results in such emails as:
A high-risk intrusion was detected on <servername> within group Default Group on 2/12/2016 4:14:46 PM. Attack Signature: OpenSSL Heartbleed CVE-2014-0160 3
17:00
That's only for known vulns
You're a known vulnerability.
fkin rekt
and it's signature based, which is kind of a retarded way to handle network intrusion detection
You're a retarded way to handle network intrusion.
@Simon I love you. Never stop being you
4
The story is evolving and soon it'll be uncontrollable.
17:04
@Simon You're evolving and will soon be uncontrollable.
NO
@MarkBuffalo you are one of Simon's socks?
@RoryAlsop You're one of Simon's socks
Rekt pls
fkn sukt
17:08
#pls_yolo_rekt
Wait, wrong one... oh no.
Oh no...
17:20
It's okay. Nothing to see here. Back to fogeying...
17:36
Security at the expense of usability
this is a good mod abuse story
@Ohnana What is?
I imagine that @Simon's socks are quite smelly
the pin wall
pls
17:44
10/10
that's not mod abuse, it's room owner abuse
pls @Ohnana moar skillz
plz kalina it's @RoryAlsop who put the last star pin up
SO
no wat
u sed plz
nuh uh
pls its pls
if you like the star wall why don't you take a screenshot, it'll last longer
17:47
that's a good idea
-.-
das gud idea
@Ohnana yeah no it wasn't
I claim full responsibility for the current pinwall story
@RоryMcCune really? didn't see you in the room list
an epic tale of donut and buffalo "affection"
with ponies
@Ohnana it doesn't seem to trigger activity if you just pin stuff
17:49
@RоryMcCune interesting
ders no affection
@Simon that's not what the pinwall story says
That... star wall... THE DAMN HELL
da pinwall is a lie
@Simon pls somon, pinwall is love, pinwall is life
@MarkBuffalo hey those are all things people actually said in the room
no dodgy edits involved
17:51
yeah, just way out of context
#nocontextDMZ
You should move the donkey one above the ponies
@MarkBuffalo "If one would give me six lines written by the hand of the most honest man, I would find something in them to have him hanged." - Cardinal Richelieu
@MarkBuffalo I can't actually set the order, there's a fine art in getting them to line up
@RоryMcCune A wonderful quote. I remember this one fondly. I do this all the time, actually. Like earlier when we were discussing the male vs. female programmers with @kalina
@RоryMcCune That's why politicians avoid honesty like the plague.
17:54
@CodesInChaos heh
@RоryMcCune Like all good quotes, that one is probably fake...
You're probably fake.
@Simon You mean that... I... am not a bear ?
Probably.
@ThomasPornin well it is disputed, apparently originally attributed to Richelieu in 1896
still a good quote
@Simon HERESY!
18:32
NSFW
I'm intrigued as to whether this will work - only needs a few more posts to be voted up to 10 and it will may progress to private beta
91
Etiquette

Proposed Q&A site for individuals who are interested in matters of etiquette within their proper contexts, including but not limited to: religious, cultural, dining, and the reasons therefore. The scope is not limited to Western etiquette.

Currently in definition.

o lawd
@Simon it's hard to be humble
"Is it acceptable to cut a line if you know someone in it?"
pls no but everyone does it anyway
@Simon not in Britain they don't! Or else they get a stern glance!
and a muttering under the breath
dayum
18:41
possibly a strongly worded letter to the Guardian
Or in Glasgow, they may just get stabbed :-)
@RoryAlsop Arguably, "Western etiquette" really means "buy our opium or we'll bombard you to death". From a certain non-Western point of view.
@ThomasPornin sadly that is all too true in that context
I need to buy some DDR3 server memory, any brand recommendations?
Every time I use the "Publish" feature on .NET, I expect the world to explode.
So far, it worked flawlessly every single time though.
@ThomasPornin that's what's nice about having ancestry who were all extreme pacifists - no latent shame
18:43
o w8 the app doesn't load
OOPSIES
@schroeder I am sufficiently individualist to disregard any notion of inherited sins.
ololwrongcredentials
o it works
BLACK MAGIC I TELL YA
(Except for the British, of course)
@ThomasPornin heh. I'm sufficiently messed-up heritage- and origin-wise that it would be pointless :-)
@RoryAlsop I smell an origin story!
18:47
If I were a Brit, I'd always laugh at the Scots.
@schroeder He is 50% Scottish, 50% Viking, and 100% whisky.
2
Most of the time, I'd be like "u wot m8".
In the beginning Rory created the Universe.
This has made a lot of people very angry and been widely regarded as a bad move.
@kalina I dunno - it's got lots of pretty bits. I especially like the fjords
da wot
18:48
da simons
o
I'm currently listening to some frustrated teenager music.
Gotta stay young.
#emo
#emosimon
I should have been emo.
I feel like that's a phase that I've missed out.
at least you didn't miss out on being a hipster
o pls
18:55
@RoryAlsop That makes the both of us :P
i wish you could thumbs down pandora ads
Can someone tell Markus to shut top for me?
alright, I'll shut up
see you later, @Simon
I want you to shut top, not to shut up wtf?
he says "shut top" because when you're Canadians...
18:57
@Ohnana I wish I could pandora. Getting our music onto it is a struggle
@RoryAlsop why?
contracts?
o kalinuh ffs pls
@Ohnana geographical region
waaaat
@Ohnana I Scotland
18:59
i understand the listening side, but the artist side?

« first day (1887 days earlier)      last day (3291 days later) »