@Ohnana sec is part of dev. Just as dev need to focus on UX, and performance, and maintainability, and a thousand other concerns, security is one of them.
a big one, surely, or even a meta-set of concerns. But it is dev's responsibility.
sec people are there to support and guide and help fill in gaps.
I'm not going to give him money without owning at least half of his company, and I'm not owning a company that is going to get hacked in the week it goes up
@AviD it is. but with security, it's the details and the little things. Devs have enough work and bullshit, and I think they'd benefit from having a work buddy who understands these things
@Simon While I of course do enjoy this lowbrow humor, and tend to partake in it myself (okay hell I'll admit I practically invented that one), we are refraining from such humor during the moratorium.
@Flyk but he should be.
it should appear in the business plan regardless.
even if it gets summed out in the end, in case any circumstances change.
Two years later the software is so late you decide to pull the source and finish it yourself. Only to find that what they have created is not "software" but a textual representation of satan himself.
my super legally enforceable unless you run away into <list of countries>, in which case you're purely in hit man territory and the nda wouldn't even matter anyway
Well, yes and no. The most important feature for modern space-bound CPUs (aside from 100% reliability) is radiation hardening. Radiation hardening is considered at every step of the design process from the materials used to the configuration of the transistors in each internal circuit. These chip...