« first day (1462 days earlier)      last day (3716 days later) » 

11:00
@M Zeinstra i dont know
@MZeinstra it's an anonymous account
..
Pls, be more precise
I'm not sure how I can further clarify this
@kalina What is anonymous?
@MZeinstra it can't be further clarified, it's quite clear in and of itself...
11:01
@Stefan name withheld
somebody who is anonymous is unknown
Are you sure?
@Arperum: so its like trying to stack up flaming chainsaws while being juggled?
Was there a flag party here?
yes
party 24/7 here
Ahh it means: Anoniem
11:02
@Adnan no
thanks!
@kalina Why do we have new faces here, then?
Whats wrong with us??
I mean, we got you here in an unfortunate flag party
No idea
11:03
@Adnan one of them wanted Stack Overflow, tripped over, and landed in InfoSec
the other one possibly came with him, since they were speaking dutch to each other
thats not dutch
@Stefan nothing in principle, however the questions you are asking are more SO than Sec
Yiddish, whatever.
@kalina I see
Heh - sorry:
in The Practice Room, 7 mins ago, by hinafu
I've got a question, what would be a proper fingering for this piece? http://i.imgur.com/uXK085S.png
donuts?
11:06
@JourneymanGeek Yup, but I think you forgot the part where people are trying to steal the chainsaws, other people are trying to just see you fuck up and throw rocks at you, and then you have that one guy who just wants to test your reaction speed. Also: the chainsaws multiply at random times.
@Stefan let me guess, you're associates of @Lighty ?
@RоryMcCune or @Simon
Who is @Lighty???
@Arperum And you're balancing on an inflatable ball in a shark tank
@Adnan too early for team canada
11:07
@RоryMcCune 'Blame Canada'
@Stefan a dutch person who frequents this room, given you appeared to be speaking Dutch it seemed like a logical conclusion..
@RoryAlsop Lazer sharks.
nope im sorry i dont know your friend :(
@Stefan and then you mentioned donuts - hence Simon, although I'm guessing you just read topic #1
11:08
Stefan.. You don't know anything..
@Stefan friend... that's one way of describing it...
@RоryMcCune I decided to not post what I typed up, because it was too mean.
@MZeinstra You dont know anything!
Someone got any idea how to get the "selfie" hat?
@RoryAlsop my new theory is @Lighty sockpuppets :) this seems most probable
@Noordung nice one
That headstock is identical to my Charvel Predator
11:10
@RоryMcCune Spelling is too good. Although the weird is accounted for.
@Arperum true.. he could just be trying to throw us off the scent there tho'
@RоryMcCune But they are also posting exactly the same random questions in the Bridge. That is even less like @Lighty
@Stefan GAH. NO gifs like that please. Gifs are bad.
Okay - @Stefan and @MZeinstra - be aware that while your behaviour isn't offensive, it is very odd, and doesn't fit here. I include in this the duplicate posting of questions across multiple chat rooms, and pushing questions that are entirely unrelated to this site. Suspensions and time-outs could happen...
what's going on
there are animated gifs in here
when did the embargo on animated gifs get lifted?
additionally, does this mean I can now post ponies?
@kalina dunno - but gif removed now
11:17
idk when i uploaded it i didnt have a chance to cancel it and it didnt give any warning/error.
@RoryAlsop innuendos galore :)
ponies...erm... what size?
@Stefan Why did you even upload it in the first place?
@RoryAlsop where can i find the chat rules then? I never used this before
@arperum cause its funny
so, @Stefan - why did you take @kalina's answer to your question here and post it over on the Bridge to exactly the same question?
11:18
@arperum Stefan is true
what is it you are trying to achieve
Nothing its kinda chanceless
But can you post the rules here? or isnt that possible
No, we don't write rules down
@Stefan click on info and then faq
they're formed over time and committed to memory
we can't tell you the rules
11:20
@MZeinstra He's not a boolean. SO he's not "true"
you have to work them out for yourself
the 'be nice' section is useful, but as @kalina says, the key to joining any chat on the Internet is 'learn the local behaviour'
Iam a boolean and iam true!
@Stefan also rule[0] is "don't annoy the mods"
don't just jump in, post nonsense, etc
11:22
It also helps to at the very least say hello. Or just look for a while before actually joining in.
@Arperum yes he is
May I ask who '@Lighty' is?
@Gerwin A regular user of this chat.
@Gerwin you just did
:-)
haha :P
11:22
@RоryMcCune annoying the mods is literally the thing I exist to do on chat
alright thanks ^^ I kept seeing people talk about him so I was curious ^^
if( @Stefan ){
return "STEFAN IS A BOOLEAN";
@kalina I know
@kalina s/the mods/some of the mods
Another question: Is it possible to create your own chat room?!
11:23
@Stefan seriously read the faq before doing that
if( @Stefan ){
return "STEFAN IS A BOOLEAN";
} else{
return "STEFAN IS STILL A BOOLEAN";
}
@RoryAlsop strangely, I treat you all the same, but half of you have this preconception that I'm the offspring of $devil and $annoyingThing
first off -why do you want to? SE is not a chat network. Chat exists to support our site communities
@kalina I leave preconception to Jesus
I see what you did there
@kalina :-)
11:25
How do I create my own chat?
@MZeinstra The joke is old, dead and buried by now.
@MZeinstra first of all, you start by choosing your programming language
@kalina best answer :-)
@MZeinstra then you decide how it's going to work, whether it will be peer to peer to client/server
@MZeinstra then you implement your new chat from the ground up, in $language
@MZeinstra read my note just up there ^
11:26
once you have created your own chat, you can make your own rules
@kalina do not by the hand
@MZeinstra This doesn't even make sense, not even as a literal translation from Dutch.
@MZeinstra in that case try discourse.org download install sorted
I'm upset...
And now I'm happy :D
@kalina neah you're lovely :)
11:28
@kalina I was going to post a link for him to follow, but your answer is the better option.
@MZeinstra English $€&#!@%$#?!~, do you speak it?
I'm fine
How are you?
@Noordung you're so kind, your reputation with kalina has increased by +100
@kalina hehehe that's the "association bonus"? :D
@kalina - infinity +100 is still -infinity.
11:29
"You've reached Exalted reputation with 'Kalina' Congratulations!" ^^
@Noordung no, but it's enough of a reputation gain to put you above half of the people in here
@Gerwin impossible
impossible!?
there's nobody above honoured
aww :(
@Noordung time to go SSJ2... get that reputation up! ^^
@kalina And I don't expect said honoured people to be in here to be fair.
11:30
@Arperum indeed
not even me? ;(
I don't think I have an internet friend that's above friendly
but... but....
@kalina well apart from @Adnan (if it goes low enough it loops back to the top right?)
@RоryMcCune no I had to implement something specific for @adnan
11:32
@Gerwin There is no reason anyone here would have you above "random person who randomly joined our chat after some other random person pushed a question of him down our throat".
just returns a static value of -1
ick I hate drinking tea
it feels so pompous
@AviD what's wrong with tea?
its not coffee
lol pompous
11:33
I'm drinking a tonne of tea for my throat
xD, well my apologies for that @Arperum I asked those guys to look at my question, when he suddenly said he asked it here, so I joined to see how it went
it helps the hell out of it, but bleh
hot chocolate is good for sore throats
I always get those two mixed up
we ran out of the good flavors. now I'm stuck with PLAIN tea, because I dont like all the fruity flowery teas.
Well... that escalated quickly...
11:34
@kalina haha! was about to respond to that. something that would make @Simon very uncomfortable.
@Gerwin Oh, so he was actually trying to get us to answer it here, and then post our answer as his on SE? that's serious negative points.
@Gerwin welcome to the DMZ.
I don't know what he tried to do, I guess he tried to help me
@AviD is @Simon ever comfortable in the DMZ?
@Arperum yeah. almost as bad as asking security guys about frikkin CSS.
11:34
how much entropy do you lot think people typically get in their passwords?
@Tinned_Tuna 20-30 bits, at best
excluding intelligent security folk
Can i get a welcome too? :O
@AviD thank you ^^
@AviD That too. CSS is very secure didn't you know?
and paranoid people
and your mom
11:35
guys
@Stefan sure. you're welcome.
It's time for me to ask a silly question
Thanks! :-)
something I should probably know but don't
@AviD hm. I've been doing a bit of calculation assuming 20b of entropy. you need to do some pretty harsh things to usability to push the chance of an attacker winning at an online brute force vs. a single password...
11:36
but probably do
just not with the words you're going to use
@Arperum there are actual security issues with CSS, but thats not the point
Can you explain what you mean by "entropy" in relation to passwords?
@AviD I know.
@kalina no silly questions. Only silly people asking ridiculous questions.
@Tinned_Tuna NO.
@AviD Your hat is ridiculous.
11:37
@AviD ?
@Tinned_Tuna WRONG.
@Tinned_Tuna INCORRECT.
@AviD Care to expand?
@Tinned_Tuna xkcd 936.
@AviD I said nothing on asking users to generate passwords
11:38
and of course
568
Q: XKCD #936: Short complex password, or long dictionary passphrase?

Billy ONealHow accurate is this XKCD comic from August 10, 2011? I've always been an advocate of long rather than complex passwords, but most security people (at least the ones that I've talked to) are against me on that one. However, XKCD's analysis seems spot on to me. Am I missing something or is th...

@Tinned_Tuna uhh? so we may have misunderstood?
@AviD he asked you to expand you donut!
getting users to generate high-entropy passwords is like getting blood from a stone. Further, we're largely not in control of the institutions' policy
@Tinned_Tuna against a single account I'd agree that online bruteforce should be impractical and with no prior knowledge. If the attacker has a large number of usernames he could try 1-2 v. common passwords across the base which would have a better chance of success
@Noordung I DID (by reference)
@Tinned_Tuna yeah, that last part is always a big lose.
@AviD I N C O R R E C T <- this is expansion
11:39
I have those fights every other week.
@Avid, @RоryMcCune I'm looking specifically at "vertical" attacks -- defending against horizontal attacks is my next ticket on the list :-p
@Noordung heh
@Tinned_Tuna are vertical attacks those attacks you do while standing?
@Tinned_Tuna so what did you mean?
@RоryMcCune - thanks for the suggestion yesterday, Veil worked very well for encoding an exe payload!
i wasn't able to encode the swf attack
11:39
@Tinned_Tuna also leads to either passwords written down and/or sequence passwords.. every.. single...time
@paj28 coolio :)
@AviD so, we've got a set of users, and assuming the attacker picks one out for some reason and starts guessing for that one user
@RоryMcCune or birthdays, or telephone number....
@Tinned_Tuna okay?
@AviD the password policy is set by different institutions (our customers) and the user's passwords meet those varied policies
Who got loads of hats allready?
Guys, a quick question about PHP: How secure against SQLInjections, is the filtering of Special Characters in PHP
11:40
@paj28 yeah that one I've not seen much for, I guess it's possible but might require manual stuff... one idea would be commercial SWF packers...
@Tinned_Tuna ah, so you want to protect against BF attacks, without any consideration for the password itself?
@Gerwin mediocre
so, given that situation, and a bound of how likely that attacker is to succeed at that particular attack in one day, we need to estimate the entropy in the average user's password
I know but i want to know about people in here
11:41
@AviD Alright, thank you ^^
I'm tempted to just grab rockYou, etc. and run Shannon's estimator of entropy over the whole thing, but it's quite old now, and probably not representative
@Tinned_Tuna again, that depends on the policies. also, then what?
@Stefan that's the exact thing I just linked you
11:42
implement lockouts that are long enough to stretch the entropy to cover a whole day?
I know i didnt ask for a link either
Basically, given a (supported) estimate of the entropy of the passwords in the system, and a desired bound of P(attacker wins), we can devise an appropriate policy which tackles that particular attack.
yes you did
I didn't
@Tinned_Tuna you said you have no control over the policies.
what do you control, just the lockouts?
11:44
@AviD indeed
ahh I see. Sucky indeed.
and far from a decent situation to be solving.
@Tinned_Tuna I'd just take a pragmatic approach, set lockout at 10. after that many attempts the user has forgotten their password and that's low enough that unless they have a really dumb password or the attacker has knowledge of likely values, they won't get in :)
@Stefan You did, and why on earth would you post the same link in reply to you getting the link?
however... I would suggest perhaps starting with "regular", short timeouts. iteratively increasing in length, until you can be assured that this is an attack (to some degree of certainty), and then trip into active defense mode.
@RоryMcCune Lockout for how long? Until admin intervenes? Until email reset?
11:45
dear moderators
i.e. human intervention, etc
I believe we're being trolled
you should ban @Stefan @Simon @Tinned_Tuna and @RоryMcCune
@kalina That or someone is genuinely beyond help.
will resolve all trolling
@Tinned_Tuna well as they've forgotten it, it'll be admin intervention anyway :) One add-on is that this does leave a DoS risk, so you'd need some detection/anti-automation to address that.
11:46
@RоryMcCune yeah. though 10 will still give you passwords for a great deal of users, depending on the scenario and policies.
If i ask how many hats you guys got Im not asking for a link.
...not a single person bit
if I had my way no websites would have any brute force protection at all
I'm such a failure
it's just on users to pick a strong password
11:47
@AviD sure but if people are in the top 10 your likely stuffed anyway
@RоryMcCune oh, agreeably.
@AviD so you'd just take a punt at what a decent policy would look like and call it a day?
The best password is qwerty
@RоryMcCune if you say CAPTCHA I'll kill you.
@paj28 what about attackers with e-mail address lists locking your entire userbase out of their accounts?
11:47
oops, I meant "kick".
1 min ago, by kalina
I believe we're being trolled
@AviD CAPTCHA
@AviD have you seen googles new not really CAPTCHA CAPTCHA?
with no brute force lockouts, they won't lock anyone out
@AviD I am trying to come up with some sort of basis for the policy, do most people just take a punt and put something that looks sensible in place?
11:48
@RоryMcCune which is why I suggested having a multi-step lockout, eventually escalating into a human.
@paj28 hmm DoS risk (assuming you're using b/scrypt)?
@Tinned_Tuna no, actually most people put something that does NOT look at all sensible in place.
@AviD lol
oh, and also just use a single fast hash with no salt
@RоryMcCune seen it, not looked at it. curious how it works.
11:49
all this is fine - if people use strong passwords
@paj28 still the most common
why should web sites jump through hoops for stupid users?
@paj28 which has never in the history of the universe actually happened :)
@paj28 this is a silly question
@paj28 what kills me are the sites that prevent you from using a strong password. far too common.
11:49
@AviD my current guess is given 20b of password entropy, a vertical attack, and 25 guesses, lockout for 30mins, gives the attacker ~1.1x10^-3 chance of getting in
i use strong passwords
and a password manager
@paj28 'cause bad publicity from users getting Pwned hurts the websites
Websites should jump through hoops for their users for the same reason any company should jump through hoops for their users: The companies want the users, not the other way around
roryalsop on June 19, 2014

paj28 posed a question that really fits better here as a blog post:

Security Stack Exchange gets a lot of questions about password strength, password best practices, attacks on passwords, and there’s quite a lot for both users and sites to do, to stay in line with “best practice”.

Web sites need a password strength policy, account lockout policy, and secure password storage with a slow, salted hash. Some of these requirements have usability impacts, denial of service risks, and other drawbacks. And it’s generally not possible for users to tell whether a site actually does all this (hence plaintextoffenders.com). …

@paj28 sure me too, but our behaviour will not be copied across any decent sized userbase
11:50
@Tinned_Tuna I dont like probablity for this calculation. I prefer Time-To-Break.
What is the worse password you can use?
@RоryMcCune apparently, not too much.
@RоryMcCune Sony seems to disagree.
@kalina - that is a very good point, and true, but I HATE THE WORLD
@Stefan god, love, sex, password
@AviD how do you manage that? Do you consider it to be broken in when the cumulative probability over the time of the attack >0.5 ?
11:51
@AviD well breach fatigue is a thing sure
@paj28 hey hey hey you're meant to be chilled out these days :op
@Tinned_Tuna not at all, I avoid probability.
@kalina nope the worse password is your username or 1234567890
now look what's happened
this information security conversation has attracted a bear
:-)
@Tinned_Tuna but after 25 guesses they've absolutely definitively forgotten, why not perma-lockout until they go through the reset procedure?
11:52
@Stefan that's ten characters long, god and sex are three
the basic calcluation is: total amount of possible passwords (assuming equal probability each) / 2 (for the average case, which works due to equal probability) / rate of password guessing.
and popular
that is a bear
@RоryMcCune because of lockout
@Tinned_Tuna consider your lockout mechanism a rate throttling control. nothing more, nothing less.
(unless its a permanent lockout).
@AviD oh for DoS risk... I'd prefer other anti-Dos stuff like looking for failed login patterns and block the attacker
11:53
@RоryMcCune tru dat
so, in the example above, ((2^19)/1200) days ~= 437days?
6
A: What is the difference between login throttling and temporary account lockout?

AviD"Throttling" and "temporary lockout" are exactly the same thing. It is likely, however, that your dev team misunderstood the concepts, and assumed you meant "throttling" like most of the other answers here did (with the exception of @R15, though that is less an answer and more of important con...

1200 guesses per day, etc...
anyways, time for lunch for the moment.
@Tinned_Tuna with those base assumptions, yes.
lunch?!
11:54
@AviD thanks for the chat, I'll be back in a little while
are you gonna eat tinned tuna?
@Stefan I'm a vegetarian
explain
your name xD
@Tinned_Tuna but that assumption means that on average you are allowing one passsword every 72 seconds.
explain your name
11:55
explain your face
@Tinned_Tuna is that right?
explain the barrage of random questions.
smileyball with a t-shirt
explained my face
explain "eggsplain"
@AviD I can't, there's no way I can describe how awesome my face is to a bunch of geeks on the internet - it's just an impossible conversation to have
MY GOD I KILLED CHAT
quick, somebody call a waaaaaaaaaaahmbulance
you killed a cat??
11:58
@kalina I think people are mostly trying to evade a random and rather rude "explain" demand from a certain smiley
@kalina ya know loads of people don't get that line, I've used it and got blank responses before..
@RоryMcCune :p
@Arperum explain
Whooohooo!! Black Mirror Christmas Special is out!

« first day (1462 days earlier)      last day (3716 days later) »