@AviD I hadn't though of it that way but I do admit there is some validity to your claim. I think the question is important since it helps answerers use real data to talk about potential outcomes. What is the difference between a community wiki and a regualr question? maybe I better ask on meta...
Im wondering when, if ever, we should use the community wiki feature which we often see on SO.
Is it even implemented in our site?
Also have a look at discussion-questions . Discussion questions and other questions which arent easy to make a common conclusion on are often tagged as Community W...
either I just became a victim of an upgraded malware-USB-in-the-parking-lot attack (just had one delivered to my home from "amazon"), or I have a secret admirer.
but really, this thing is awsome!
oh, nevermind. Just found the note... it was a gift, from someone I actually know.
But, it sure made me suspicious as hell when the delivery guy handed me a package from amazon I didnt order...
@thisjosh in my view, cw is useful for those types of questions which have a lot of value, but are not really objective questions, in that there can be one complete correct answer.
such as list-of-x questions, if the list has value (so it cant be closed).
its not a condemnation of the question, quite the opposite - even though normally it should have been closed (because its not "proper" SE format), it's deemed important enough to keep. CW gives us a mechanism for that.
did you see @nealmcb's suggestion for QOTW #2 - on hardening, leaving the rainbow tables till a later week. Makes sense to shuffle topics around a bit I think. meta.security.stackexchange.com/questions/388/…
@RoryAlsop makes sense, IF you dont want to do a *-theme. But he makes sense about waiting with the themes till later.
on the other hand, I also think we need to keep the q-surveys to a low nmber, too. they're great, but if it just grabs other q's it doesnt add much content.
probably does put things in perspective, though...
i guess QotW is good for that then :)
but, thats not a Q otW, its a Topic otW.
still I hate fortify and all, but I think having some of the qotw like that could be fantastic.
especially if its anything like @nealmcb's first one, on all the password questions - that was great. And I hate fortify.
well this is the thing - I reckon the normal posts will be the in depth ones people want to do off their own back, whereas QOTW, while not filler, are regular popular topics, with info from the q and a's, some extra bit, but not in depth. -- easy to do one a week
I like some of the ways fortify hooks in to the full dev environment. Definite value add if you can let the developers run it on every build - so they can impove their code before it ever gets to an IT Sec fortify scan
that is a complete win if you get devs wanting to use it
project I worked on this spring worked that way - the devs really liked it. Needed a lot of behind the scenes tweaking so that for devs it 'just worked' but the level of acceptance was awesome at that point
and as it needed to hook into TeamFoundation, Ant and Maven - that was interesting, but fortify worked in that environment
I would definitely use it, as a starting point, if I didnt have anything else.
ah, those are smart fellows.
my problem is less with the integration (though I have cursed their UI often), its with the engine. And there's not much you can tweak there, except to shut stuff off.
It's ongoing... part of a larger, longterm engagement. and, it's not just the one... Fortify is scary popular. and my feelings for it go way back, long before this one...
@RoryAlsop may I direct you to something that was brought up in the AU meta regarding "LMGTFY" answers to questions? I think it sufficiently answers the validity of "LMGTFY" or "Google it" answers.
(just a thought, but its relevant because i expect them to show up here ;) )
hey @ScottPack, a question. What would you do in the circumstance of someone posting an answer that had a link to "lmgtfy" or some similar site, or just even saying "google it"?
The good thing here is that people generally try and help - the downside of that is that sometimes we don't push back hard enough on really crap questions which should really be found as google result number 1
As an aside, I would also be willing to state that if that type of answer is actually warranted, then you're looking at a rather poor question that is likely not very well suited to the site.
I just ran across a link to LMGTFY on Ask Ubuntu. In the past, I've found it offensive when users have posted LMGTFY links for me.
When, if ever, is it acceptable to link to LMGTFY on Ask Ubuntu?
I feel like some basic level of research should be evident from the questions. Not necessarily mastery of the material, but some indication that the individual is actually willing to learn on their own and contribute.
I also like Mario's answer, comparing it to the equally despised RTFM.
I will totally quote straight out of man pages and documentation when appropriate, however I try to at least give some explanation of the quotes that comes from hard earned experience :)
I think the general consensus is that if the question is really weak we hope folks vote to close, but if it is marginal, providing content along with links is a positive action we can take. I still feel that if we can also educate the users in not being lazy but learning how to find information, then that is a net gain as well.
@RoryAlsop that's at least the consensus over at AU... if a user does not have sufficient privileges to vote to close, they should flag it for moderator attention for the same reason they'd vote to close it, and a mod will analyze the validity of that
Screenshot
About
This userscript, based on SOApi.js, injects itself in all SE sites' chat pages and polls the API for reputation changes every 60 seconds.
When your reputation changes, this is announced at the top of the page.
SO Live! Chat Edition uses the same notification system cha...
No more re-typing the same comments over and over!
This script adds a little 'auto' link next to all comments boxes. When you click the link, you see a popup with 6 configurable auto-comments, which you can easily click to insert.
Features
1. Read your comment before you post it!
Note th...
Screenshot
Before:
After:
About
Instead of showing comments in chronological order, this user script displays them in a threaded view, making it easier to follow conversations in long comment threads.
It uses heuristics similar to the @-reply recognition (but it is a little bit more ...
UPDATE:
Version 0.9.9.3
Screenshot
App Homepage
Printable view
About
http://www.stackprinter.com
StackPrinter is a website that pulls the main details of a given question, all its answers, comments and votes formatting them in a simple essential printable view.
I've created ...
although I have greasemonkey, I haven't any idea how to install something into it - I think I have one of Gina Trapani's scripts, but that was from a 'click this to install some google goodness'
but first - must run through the monsoon rains to my train...which will probably be cancelled due to rain, 'cos we never get rain in Scotland so can't plan for this sort of weather
This is one of those conversations that's fun to watch, but not be involved in. Like watching the ultra-conservative and the ultra-liberal "discuss" Regeanomics.
@ScottPack has anyone asked a question regarding the advantages between Key-Based authentication and Password-based authentication for SSH? If so, can I have a link to it>?
What are the advantages and drawbacks of the certificate based authentication over username and password authentication?
I know some, but I would appreciate a structured and detailed answer.
UPDATE
I am interested as well in knowing what attacks are they prone to, e.g. as so far mentioned brute...
I just got a call from someone with a heavy accent from India (I assume he was talking some kind of English dialect, but although I speak English, I did not understand about a third of his words)
@AviD I'm not taking offence. Setting aside the selection critera of which question qualify for the Community Wiki marker; I am thinking about the difference between a Community Wiki question and a normal question in terms of its behavior on the site. I don't think they rank differently in searches. They don't prevent any kind of answers or comments. Is it just whether users can earn reputation from answers?
Imagine something like TrueCrypt where user A can decrypt his files, or any 3 of the 10 directors in his organization can decrypt user A's files. As I understand it this is similar to the way the DNSSEC Root Keys are secured. Obligatory wiki entries. Does anyone know of any commercial or open sou...
@thisjosh The basic sharing uses Shamir's scheme, which was published more than 30 years ago, and is fine; the question already contains an appropriate link.
More advanced protocols aim at providing a shared decryption such that running it does not imply "showing your shares"
Secret sharing refers to method for distributing a secret amongst a group of participants, each of whom is allocated a share of the secret. The secret can be reconstructed only when a sufficient number of shares are combined together; individual shares are of no use on their own.
More formally, in a secret sharing scheme there is one dealer and n players. The dealer gives a secret to the players, but only when specific conditions are fulfilled. The dealer accomplishes this by giving each player a share in such a way that any group of t (for threshold) or more players can together reco...
Shamir's scheme already allows sharing between an arbitrary number of parts with an arbitrary quorum (well, the quorum must not exceed the number of parts).
Shamir's scheme is about choosing a random polynomial in a finite field
if you want quorum q then you chose a polynomial of degree q-1
such that P(0) is the secret to share
then the parts are P(1), P(2), P(3),... and so on
there is no relation between the quorum and the number of parts, except that if you make less parts than the required quorum then you will not get far.
@Iszi yeah, that was a discussion here, but as I finished that, i had a client of mine ask about setting up SSH on a linux box, and they want either all password-authentication or all key-authentication, no hybrid mix. (regarding the post that you highlighted me on)
When you select it, it copies the whole comment thread to a chat room and leaves a note at the bottom of the thread inviting participants to join you there.
This is for a Windows XP SP3 machine, trying to access file shares on a Windows Server 2008 R2 system.
The client had access to the server previously, and other clients on the same network are not having problems. Other network functions for the troubled client do not seem to be affected.
When...
BTW, if any of you guys have input for that issue please do chime in. I'll be on-site with it in about a half hour.
Did some troubleshooting remotely earlier, which is how I've gotten the intel posted thus far. But I don't want to do any more on what could be a problem lower in the stack, without physically being there.
(My bet's still that the root cause is at Layer 8, but that's beside the point now.)
This is for a Windows XP SP3 machine, trying to access file shares on a Windows Server 2008 R2 system.
The client had access to the server previously, and other clients on the same network are not having problems. Other network functions for the troubled client do not seem to be affected.
When...
@TheEvilPhoenix Oh - I thought that onebox was just an illustration of the comment discussion issue. And the reference to being "on site" made me think @iszi had posted a chat message here that he intended to post to some coworkers