« first day (214 days earlier)      last day (4964 days later) » 
00:00 - 20:0020:00 - 00:00

00:13
"you look smart, can I have some urine?"
heh, @RebeccaChernoff will probably come yell at me for that....
It took me 3 episodes to realize that was Rosenbaum.
hehe.... not really lex luthor, huh....
A bit different, yeah
 
3 hours later…
03:14
@AviD I hadn't though of it that way but I do admit there is some validity to your claim. I think the question is important since it helps answerers use real data to talk about potential outcomes. What is the difference between a community wiki and a regualr question? maybe I better ask on meta...
2
Q: How and when should we use the Community Wiki feature?

KarraxIm wondering when, if ever, we should use the community wiki feature which we often see on SO. Is it even implemented in our site? Also have a look at discussion-questions . Discussion questions and other questions which arent easy to make a common conclusion on are often tagged as Community W...

already there, but not clear to me...
 
5 hours later…
07:59
Hi there!
 
1 hour later…
09:09
either I just became a victim of an upgraded malware-USB-in-the-parking-lot attack (just had one delivered to my home from "amazon"), or I have a secret admirer.
but really, this thing is awsome!
oh, nevermind. Just found the note... it was a gift, from someone I actually know.
But, it sure made me suspicious as hell when the delivery guy handed me a package from amazon I didnt order...
does that make me paranoid?
09:35
@thisjosh in my view, cw is useful for those types of questions which have a lot of value, but are not really objective questions, in that there can be one complete correct answer.
such as list-of-x questions, if the list has value (so it cant be closed).
its not a condemnation of the question, quite the opposite - even though normally it should have been closed (because its not "proper" SE format), it's deemed important enough to keep. CW gives us a mechanism for that.
09:47
@AviD So you're better than those DoD employees :D
(IIRC the good institution :P)
@Mvy :)
I think it was several different incidents, not just the DoD.
Mind you, I will be plugging this bad boy in soon enough ;)
some kind of hiking-style usb - durable, waterproof, etc...
not that I ever go outside, but its coooool
10:07
:P
I heard of a mouse hacking too :p
With a chipset included in the mouse :P
@Mvy It was very nicely done - although the image of the inside of the mouse was a horrible physical kludge
Well... who dismantle its mouse before plug it in?
exactly
eww... brings a whole different meaning to dissecting mouse in biology class....
10:25
^^
Today kids, we're going to study : the mouse :O
- Grab a screwdriver
- Wait, what?
10:36
hehe
hm... we're -> where ?? What I have been drinking? Oh I know, nothing. That could be the problem in fact.
10:54
nevermind, it was understood by all. Probably had equal amounts to drink, so its symmetric...
@AviD symmetric anti-drinking ... there's something wrong here
oops, missed the part about the "nothing"...
anyway, shouldnt that be "symmetric null-drinking"?
did you see @nealmcb's suggestion for QOTW #2 - on hardening, leaving the rainbow tables till a later week. Makes sense to shuffle topics around a bit I think. meta.security.stackexchange.com/questions/388/…
hmm, as long as we're applying crypto terms to drinking - i think we should switch over to "bcrypt drinking": many many rounds.
@AviD public/private drinking
:-)
10:57
hehe
(nobody knows how much you drink in private, but everyone sees your public drinking)
lol
@RoryAlsop makes sense, IF you dont want to do a *-theme. But he makes sense about waiting with the themes till later.
on the other hand, I also think we need to keep the q-surveys to a low nmber, too. they're great, but if it just grabs other q's it doesnt add much content.
probably does put things in perspective, though...
i guess QotW is good for that then :)
but, thats not a Q otW, its a Topic otW.
still I hate fortify and all, but I think having some of the qotw like that could be fantastic.
especially if its anything like @nealmcb's first one, on all the password questions - that was great. And I hate fortify.
well this is the thing - I reckon the normal posts will be the in depth ones people want to do off their own back, whereas QOTW, while not filler, are regular popular topics, with info from the q and a's, some extra bit, but not in depth. -- easy to do one a week
normal ones take a bit longer, are deeper etc
a fortify one would be fun
@RoryAlsop I agree.
do you hate fortify much more than the other tools - Veracode?
or just hate them all?
11:02
hehe
i just have to use fortify more, client requirement...
I havent used veracode much, but while I dont like the other products too much, I have a special level of despising for Fortify.
I like some of the ways fortify hooks in to the full dev environment. Definite value add if you can let the developers run it on every build - so they can impove their code before it ever gets to an IT Sec fortify scan
that is a complete win if you get devs wanting to use it
maybe because of the difference between their marketing image and reality...
despite its drawbacks
@RoryAlsop thats a very big IF.
and, most other tools have some level of hooks too.
e.g. IBM Rational Appscan Source Edition (?) nee Ounce has much better hooking into the dev environment.
project I worked on this spring worked that way - the devs really liked it. Needed a lot of behind the scenes tweaking so that for devs it 'just worked' but the level of acceptance was awesome at that point
and as it needed to hook into TeamFoundation, Ant and Maven - that was interesting, but fortify worked in that environment
11:05
really? thats fantastic.
that you got the devs to buy in.
yup - wish we could use it as a case study:-)
almost got them looking at it in terms of scores
how few findings they could have in the weekly build
I've had much more luck with checkmarx, even with ounce there was more interest. And I had a very big client where the devs loved klockworx...
@RoryAlsop should!
had more interaction with devs than sec team, tbh
really positive environment
the exception that proves the rule....? ;)
@AviD can't. NDA
11:07
thats very cool. Opposite experiences suck
aww shucks.
tbh, as long as one doesnt have high expectations for the output or efficiency, its not bad for what it does.
it wasn't fortify themselves I was working with, but Justin and teh Gotham Digital folks - they really know their fortify integration!
that makes the difference too
I would definitely use it, as a starting point, if I didnt have anything else.
ah, those are smart fellows.
my problem is less with the integration (though I have cursed their UI often), its with the engine. And there's not much you can tweak there, except to shut stuff off.
@AviD yeah - the rules/exceptions bit is half the battle. That's why they hire folks like us:-)
11:13
@RoryAlsop how much have you actually mucked around with those?
I've tried it out, but except for rare cases havent found it worth the effort.
it doesnt even compare to checkmarx... them, I'm a fan of.
even if they do still have startup-issues.
It was a hugely critical bit. For xMLOC applications we needed to tweak the false positives side of things. Pretty high effort, I agree.
Haven't played with Checkmarx yet
@RoryAlsop high effort, yes - but did you get enough back out of it? without hitting the false negatives rate?
definitely!
hmm. might be I should look into that again.
wont stop me from hating on it, but I might complain less :)
11:35
:-)
So how much longer is this engagement, @Avi?
@ScottPack the fortify one?
why, tired of my whinging? ;)
It's ongoing... part of a larger, longterm engagement.
and, it's not just the one... Fortify is scary popular. and my feelings for it go way back, long before this one...
 
1 hour later…
13:06
Mornin'
morning is evil
especially on Mondays
Mornin' @Iszi
Mornin' @Thee
is it bad that I really like mornings - I'm that annoying person who gets up early and makes toast, thus forcing everyone to be awake:-)
yes, its bad @RoryAlsop
:P
@RoryAlsop may I direct you to something that was brought up in the AU meta regarding "LMGTFY" answers to questions? I think it sufficiently answers the validity of "LMGTFY" or "Google it" answers.
(just a thought, but its relevant because i expect them to show up here ;) )
13:23
Morning Gents
hey @ScottPack, a question. What would you do in the circumstance of someone posting an answer that had a link to "lmgtfy" or some similar site, or just even saying "google it"?
@TheEvilPhoenix General rule of thumb? I go back to my, rather undiplomatically phrased, "Being A Good Human Step 0: Don't be a dick."
@TheEvilPhoenix - did you have a link?
Sometimes flippancy works and is fine, in the general case I don't much care for it.
Particularly in professional environments.
@RoryAlsop yeah, do you want it? Its on the AskUbuntu meta, but it pertains to answers which are only "Google It" or "LMGTFY" links
13:30
The good thing here is that people generally try and help - the downside of that is that sometimes we don't push back hard enough on really crap questions which should really be found as google result number 1
i'd hate to have all of you base stuff off of other SE sites but the question of LMGTFY in answers was brought up a few months ago :P
As an aside, I would also be willing to state that if that type of answer is actually warranted, then you're looking at a rather poor question that is likely not very well suited to the site.
mhm
this is the meta post on AskUbuntu's site about LMGTFY answers:
11
Q: When is it acceptable to link to LMGTFY?

ændrükI just ran across a link to LMGTFY on Ask Ubuntu. In the past, I've found it offensive when users have posted LMGTFY links for me. When, if ever, is it acceptable to link to LMGTFY on Ask Ubuntu?

I feel like some basic level of research should be evident from the questions. Not necessarily mastery of the material, but some indication that the individual is actually willing to learn on their own and contribute.
but i think its relevant to everywhere
@ScottPack i agree
but i also think immediately directing a user to google or lmgtfy as an answer is not useful
and thus that "answer" is worthy of being burned with fire.
13:31
@Jeff's answer was - "Never, as far as I am concerned. If it is a problem we can blacklist it."
fairly definite
:-)
I also like Mario's answer, comparing it to the equally despised RTFM.
I will totally quote straight out of man pages and documentation when appropriate, however I try to at least give some explanation of the quotes that comes from hard earned experience :)
indeed.
but quoting out of manpages is actually USEFUL
because sometimes, the best source of info IS the manpage :P
i shall return... coffee run
Sorry... been out of the loop... this about the Dropbox question?
Same here.
@Iszi Not strictly that one, but there is the feeling that lately there have been a lot of easily googlable questions.
13:37
I think the general consensus is that if the question is really weak we hope folks vote to close, but if it is marginal, providing content along with links is a positive action we can take. I still feel that if we can also educate the users in not being lazy but learning how to find information, then that is a net gain as well.
having said that
votes do count
if a user doesnt have the rep to vote to close
they should flag it for mod attention
@TheEvilPhoenix good point
@RoryAlsop that's at least the consensus over at AU... if a user does not have sufficient privileges to vote to close, they should flag it for moderator attention for the same reason they'd vote to close it, and a mod will analyze the validity of that
13:43
yep
@RoryAlsop Can't rely on votes to close these days. Not enough people with the privilege.
@Iszi hence why I mentioned the "Flag for Mod AttentioN" thing
@Iszi you'll have that back soon enough
It's 3k now isn't it?
and you're on 2,580 - pretty close
 
1 hour later…
15:14
I think I'll manage to edit my way up to 2k if I keep at it. :)
@ScottPack only 121 to go - easy
Edits are worth 2 each, so 61.
Shit, I could do that just by getting rid of all those 'Thanks!'
Scratch that, 111.
heh
101 maybe :-)
I like the SO Live! plugin. Nice pretty pop-up when rep comes in.
15:18
12
Q: SO Live! Chat Edition. — live updates to your reputation score, while chatting.

badp Screenshot About This userscript, based on SOApi.js, injects itself in all SE sites' chat pages and polls the API for reputation changes every 60 seconds. When your reputation changes, this is announced at the top of the page. SO Live! Chat Edition uses the same notification system cha...

wow, i haven't been on security stack exchange since the remodeling... very interesting
@Ormis I like it. Very pretty.
i like it, a bit of a governmental feel, but still good
@ScottPack that's funny. But I fuess I won't use it.
@ScottPack SO live?
15:26
This is probably my favorite, in concept, but that I haven't used yet.
46
Q: Pro-forma comments

Benjol No more re-typing the same comments over and over! This script adds a little 'auto' link next to all comments boxes. When you click the link, you see a popup with 6 configurable auto-comments, which you can easily click to insert. Features 1. Read your comment before you post it! Note th...

@RoryAlsop See the stackapps one-box two lines down :)
I hardly have a handle on useful APIs - any hints on other useful ones?
@ScottPack got it now
30
Q: Threaded comments

balpha Screenshot Before: After: About Instead of showing comments in chronological order, this user script displays them in a threaded view, making it easier to follow conversations in long comment threads. It uses heuristics similar to the @-reply recognition (but it is a little bit more ...

of course there must be somewhere which explains how to use these?
55
Q: StackPrinter: The Stack Exchange Printer Suite

systempuntoout UPDATE: Version 0.9.9.3 Screenshot App Homepage Printable view About http://www.stackprinter.com StackPrinter is a website that pulls the main details of a given question, all its answers, comments and votes formatting them in a simple essential printable view. I've created ...

guessing that will be on meta - will have a look later
15:28
They're all user scripts. If you use Chrome then they install directly as extension. If you use FF, then they install into GreaseMonkey
How they get used depends on the specific script.
although I have greasemonkey, I haven't any idea how to install something into it - I think I have one of Gina Trapani's scripts, but that was from a 'click this to install some google goodness'
For instance, stackprinter plops a print icon underneath the Facebook/Twitter icons on a question.
I should really research that side of things
but first - must run through the monsoon rains to my train...which will probably be cancelled due to rain, 'cos we never get rain in Scotland so can't plan for this sort of weather
catch you later
I you have Greasemonkey, and click on a properly formed userscript, it will attempt to auto-install.
Good luck!
15:48
@RoryAlsop Rain cancels trains ?
That must be quite epic rain
Or quite unepic trains
16:01
According to weather.com they receive an average of 2.2 inches of rain for the month of July.
Having trouble telling how much they've received so far this month, but that's not very much.
I think I remember hearing that Sandwich (~200 miles away I think?) received 1" on Saturday.
 
1 hour later…
17:25
afternoon, everyone
hows things
@AviD I'd like to hear your opinions on Fortify
This is one of those conversations that's fun to watch, but not be involved in. Like watching the ultra-conservative and the ultra-liberal "discuss" Regeanomics.
lol
@ScottPack has anyone asked a question regarding the advantages between Key-Based authentication and Password-based authentication for SSH? If so, can I have a link to it>?
@TheEvilPhoenix I think there was something along those lines recently.
@Iszi link and highlight me
i have to head back to work :/
17:35
24
Q: Certificate based authentication vs Username and Password authentication

StefanyWhat are the advantages and drawbacks of the certificate based authentication over username and password authentication? I know some, but I would appreciate a structured and detailed answer. UPDATE I am interested as well in knowing what attacks are they prone to, e.g. as so far mentioned brute...

There's an older one.
Oh wait... that was actually a discussion here, wasn't it? Never made it into a question, right?
I just got a call from someone with a heavy accent from India (I assume he was talking some kind of English dialect, but although I speak English, I did not understand about a third of his words)
@AviD I'm not taking offence. Setting aside the selection critera of which question qualify for the Community Wiki marker; I am thinking about the difference between a Community Wiki question and a normal question in terms of its behavior on the site. I don't think they rank differently in searches. They don't prevent any kind of answers or comments. Is it just whether users can earn reputation from answers?
He was talking about how the servers of his company were receiving data from my "Windows computer" and he wanted me to run things for him.
Just "for checking about viruses"
looks like a kind of mail-based worm, only using an Indian coprocessor instead of mails.
Did you ask him for his direct line?
Or did you mess with him a bit first?
I just told him that I was not using Windows, and he was quite speechless for a few seconds
(and that's true ! I am running Linux, here)
17:42
My windows says Ubuntu is that the virus?
Listening to his garbled English was already painful as it is
I like to 'put them on hold' and see how long untill the hang up
I work from my home, so I get many calls like that (in French from West Africa, in English from India)
Hey Thomas have you see this question?
0
Q: Are there any "real world" implementations of secret-sharing encryption schemes?

scuzzy-deltaImagine something like TrueCrypt where user A can decrypt his files, or any 3 of the 10 directors in his organization can decrypt user A's files. As I understand it this is similar to the way the DNSSEC Root Keys are secured. Obligatory wiki entries. Does anyone know of any commercial or open sou...

@thisjosh Yes. But I do not know of any such product.
I have seen secret sharing in some products, but not for file encryption
17:45
What about theory?
@thisjosh The basic sharing uses Shamir's scheme, which was published more than 30 years ago, and is fine; the question already contains an appropriate link.
More advanced protocols aim at providing a shared decryption such that running it does not imply "showing your shares"
Yes I saw, are there other methods then points on intersecting curves?
And are there theoritical limits on minimum number of divisions, ratio of min parts needed to total partitions?
Secret sharing refers to method for distributing a secret amongst a group of participants, each of whom is allocated a share of the secret. The secret can be reconstructed only when a sufficient number of shares are combined together; individual shares are of no use on their own. More formally, in a secret sharing scheme there is one dealer and n players. The dealer gives a secret to the players, but only when specific conditions are fulfilled. The dealer accomplishes this by giving each player a share in such a way that any group of t (for threshold) or more players can together reco...
Shamir's scheme already allows sharing between an arbitrary number of parts with an arbitrary quorum (well, the quorum must not exceed the number of parts).
Is quorum vlaue function of the total number of parts?
@thisjosh no
Shamir's scheme is about choosing a random polynomial in a finite field
if you want quorum q then you chose a polynomial of degree q-1
such that P(0) is the secret to share
then the parts are P(1), P(2), P(3),... and so on
there is no relation between the quorum and the number of parts, except that if you make less parts than the required quorum then you will not get far.
17:55
Oh ok, is there a maximum to the number of parts you can issue?
If your finite field has size r, then you can issue up to r-1 parts
This is an opensource tool which matches the question
the author has selected a prime value slightly bigger than 128 bits
so he can issue more than 2^128 parts
which should be ample enough
The choice of the field is arbitrary, provided that it is a field
Thanks! I'll take a look.
i.e., if you compute modulo an integer, this must be a prime
makes sense
18:12
@Iszi yeah, that was a discussion here, but as I finished that, i had a client of mine ask about setting up SSH on a linux box, and they want either all password-authentication or all key-authentication, no hybrid mix. (regarding the post that you highlighted me on)
 
1 hour later…
19:20
Has anyone else run across the "automatically move this discussion to chat" feature?
its a feature?
i always assumed it was someone just saying "Move it to chat!"
@Iszi Where does one find this feature?
@ScottPack Happens when you're part of a long comment-chat.
Undocumented feature?
@ScottPack Perhaps. It pops up as a little notice under your comment, saying something like "would you like to automatically move this to chat?".
19:31
Ah, ok. I avoid comment discussions like the plague. Haven't run into that one.
When you select it, it copies the whole comment thread to a chat room and leaves a note at the bottom of the thread inviting participants to join you there.
2
Q: "Network path was not found" when trying to access a file share.

IsziThis is for a Windows XP SP3 machine, trying to access file shares on a Windows Server 2008 R2 system. The client had access to the server previously, and other clients on the same network are not having problems. Other network functions for the troubled client do not seem to be affected. When...

 Discussion between Iszi and Kyle

Imported from a comment discussion on superuser.com/questions/...
Interesting.
That last comment screenshot "let us continue this discussion..." was auto-generated.
19:34
So it automagically creates a new chat room and, presumably, invites all parties?
@ScottPack Exactly
AND it copies the existing comments from the thread into the chat room.
Presumably order is preserved?
you hope :P
And the comments are left on the original site, good.
BTW, if any of you guys have input for that issue please do chime in. I'll be on-site with it in about a half hour.
Did some troubleshooting remotely earlier, which is how I've gotten the intel posted thus far. But I don't want to do any more on what could be a problem lower in the stack, without physically being there.
(My bet's still that the root cause is at Layer 8, but that's beside the point now.)
19:50
@Iszi Huh?
@nealmcb i think its this:
2
Q: "Network path was not found" when trying to access a file share.

IsziThis is for a Windows XP SP3 machine, trying to access file shares on a Windows Server 2008 R2 system. The client had access to the server previously, and other clients on the same network are not having problems. Other network functions for the troubled client do not seem to be affected. When...

@TheEvilPhoenix Oh - I thought that onebox was just an illustration of the comment discussion issue. And the reference to being "on site" made me think @iszi had posted a chat message here that he intended to post to some coworkers
not sure :P
i'm making assumuptions
but i think that's all there is... because of the nature of saying "Input for that issue"
it makes me think it was relating to the aforementioned post
@TheEvilPhoenix has the right of it.
I'm going to be at the location where that issue is being experienced soon.
oops wrong window
00:00 - 20:0020:00 - 00:00

« first day (214 days earlier)      last day (4964 days later) »