The only people that have the power to change profile pictures are moderators. The only reason a moderator would change your profile picture is because they found it inappropriate.
@Griffin what @Gilles said - it may not offend him or me, despite what we may think of it, but we do need to listen to the wider audience. When it was just in the DMZ it got a couple of complaints. Having it on all your accounts has gained attention from that wider audience, and the decision has been made to tell you not to use it any more. Personally - I'd use a different avatar.
I was watching Ironman 2 on TV. I was thinking: "Oh man, if I'd watch this movie with @ScottPack, he'd be able to tell me what is accurate and what was added by the pesky producers".
I know about biometrics and different technologies within biometrics.
I am working on one case study in which I have to show some latest technology in biometrics such as "TEMPLATE FREE BIOMETRICS".
My questions are as follows:
1. Is palm vein biometric an example of template free biometric? Yes...
Yup. All the flags. Blindly validating all flags is the only way to get people to not use flags. It's like the nuclear option only the shooters haven't figured out the warheads are live yet.
I would like to know all existing solutions to connect to a remote machine (for subsequently infect).
I would try for example to find the password by brute force or other ...
It is to be used in C + +
Thank you in advance.
@tylerl I think at least @kalina admitted to it. I don't recall @Terry pointing anyone in any particular direction. For all we know @Terry is actually a tree.
> Florida Highway Patrol troopers say a two-vehicle crash Tuesday was caused by a 37-year-old woman driver who was shaving her bikini area while her ex-husband took the wheel from the passenger seat.
@kalina Please don't edit posts just to remove “thanks”. Fix everything that needs fixing, such as grammar, tags, etc. Also, don't artificially make titles into grammatical questions, most titles are better worded as titles than as questions.
I've just went through @kalina 's edits (yes, Sunday morning, the dog is being walked). She had 25 edits approved. Only 5 of them deserve being approved.
@DavidFreitag It's not, you're 100% correct. The problem is that when we have a bunch of noobs making similar edits, can we really tell them with a straight face that their edits are bad right after we accepted @kalina's?
@DavidFreitag So, when a guy like Sajid (a good dude who's making edits and writing answers here) makes a minor edit and it gets rejected, how can I explain to him that we accepted @kalina's thank-you-removal edit?
it's less true here than on SO, and I guess here we aren't used to floods of minor edits
@kalina If you're bored, there must be hundreds of thousands of posts on Stack Overflow that need edits, and Stack Overflow doesn't have a front page to flood
@DavidFreitag Forgive my harsh reply, but isn't that what you detest about your "culture"? On several occasions you protested such practices by your government. Now you're engaging in those practices.
@Gilles The only way for this situation to be resolved is if we actually reject some of her bad edits. 5 in a row and she won't be able to make edits for some time. Or something like that
@Adnan re. security.stackexchange.com/questions/44843/… : if http://example.com redirects to https://example.com and if the rest of the session does remain as HTTPS to example.com (which 99% of users won't bother to check, but for the sake of my question assume they do), what can go bad?
Is this is still vulnerable to MIM attack?
yes it is, because you'd probabl y go with session-cookies that might be sniffed through a browser-plugin like firesheep or man-in-the-middle'd easily.
What are the precautions?
best-practice nowadays is to have your whole application run via...
90% of the "answer" doesn't answer the question. Yeah, it's a good advice, but it's not an answer.
The 10% that pretends to answer the question (first paragraph) is actually inaccurate and even completely wrong.
@Thomas If/when you have some time, could you please check my math in the 3rd paragraph of this http://security.stackexchange.com/questions/44821/does-including-the-username-in-a-password-make-it-less-secure/44825#44825
The more I read it, the more I think I've made a big mistake.