« first day (3792 days earlier)      last day (1088 days later) » 

12:58 AM
@forest that said, I suspect there's not much that I run, outside my lxd containers that won't happily run on debian
Actually, I have one container for an application that's only got debian packages :D
 
1:26 AM
Couldn't you just install the .deb manually with dpkg on Ubuntu?
 
@forest several layers of dependencies deep to build
and I'd need to maintain/keep them up to date
 
ah
 
And I wasn't sure if I was going to keep it
 
2:21 AM
quick sanity check...
superuser.com/questions/1646463/… <--- if its a public key as per the answer, no harm leaving it around right?
 
Leaving the public key around? Yeah public keys are harmless.
 
right. I think OP's worried about the DV and closevote but there's no great reason to replace it with gibberish if its not anything useful
Thanks for the assist
 
Well it should probably be put in <pre> instead of <code>.
 
that's probably a trivial fix
I was more worried about whether we needed to retract
 
Nah not if it's a public key or public cert.
 
2:31 AM
yup
But I figured it was better to get a second opinion before punting it back to OP
 
There are a number of people who did post their private keys on SE though, but in most cases it was intentional (i.e. "example" private keys that they made only for this purpose).
 
Oh that's fine
If it was a real private key - the 'smart' thing would be to temporary delete, resolve the issue (and a smart OP would generate a new one!) then undelete
or any PII really
 
There was someone who posted a private PGP key accidentally and allegedly I modified it to be acceptable by keyserves and uploaded it for the lulz. :^)
 
(since redaction needs 2 mods and is slightly tricky)
lol
Or a standard fake key, used akin to RFC 5737 IPs or RFC 6761 Domains
(no I don't memorise these. I know they exist :D )
 
The fun thing is when people accidentally post a Tor hidden service private key.
Although I've never seen anyone do it on Stack Exchange.
But it allows you to totally take over the domain.
 
2:40 AM
And that's a situation when you'd want to flag and make it super clear this is very bad.
I mean that or point the domain at the rickroll
@forest pre tags on that key make it one loooooooong line
so that's a no, we're not doing that :D
 
@JourneymanGeek Not before using the key, of course!
brb
 
> I mean that or point the domain at the rickroll
:D
 
 
5 hours later…
Anonymous
7:36 AM
Hey :)
 
hey
 
Anonymous
I am super tired but I have so much to do.
 
Sleep, and dream about what you have to do. :P
 
Anonymous
Going to drown myself in caffeine. Saw an article this morning, not that I am surprised by this but Amazon had a sales income of 44 billion in Europe in 2020 and they paid precisely 0% corporation tax on it.
 
Anonymous
And then you have these clowns that tell me: "you should pay 40% tax its good for everyone!"
 
Anonymous
7:41 AM
It's not good for me...
 
yup
I refuse to willingly pay taxes until the megacorporations pay their share.
 
Anonymous
You know what's so hilarious?
 
That's why I preferentially accept money through cryptocurrencies.
 
Anonymous
An Amazon spokesperson said this: "We’ve invested well over €78bn in Europe since 2010, and much of that investment is in infrastructure that creates many thousands of new jobs, generates significant local tax revenue, and supports small European firms."
 
The whole Amazon claim that they "support small businesses" is complete, utter bullshit.
 
Anonymous
7:43 AM
That translates to: "we've invested 78 billion, so we don't think we need to pay more" except they fail to mention that they only invested that 78 billion so they could make hundreds of billions more.
 
Anonymous
Acting as if they did it for the good of Europe, lmfao.
 
mhm
Amazon is... a truly repulsive company.
Even Google is, in many ways, better.
 
Anonymous
Yes, I agree.
 
Anonymous
I very much disagree with the idea of a world government, but the idea of a world corporation tax.. I can get behind that.
 
World government is one of those things that only works if governments work.
 
Anonymous
7:44 AM
It's a utopian ideal though, it will never happen, even if it did it wouldn't work how we'd like it to work.
 
Not until we live in a post-scarcity society akin to that of Star Trek.
 
Anonymous
Heh.
 
Anonymous
Isn't your current president a world tax promoter?
 
Anonymous
Ours isn't... He gives contracts to his friends and then they fuck them up.
 
Anonymous
Like how we spent 200 million on an excel spreadsheet...
 
Anonymous
7:49 AM
Yes, really...
 
He's not my president.
He's just some asshole saying he's in charge.
 
Anonymous
Yes, my apologies :D
 
Anonymous
Oh, forest.
 
Anonymous
I meant to ask you: what do you think of Mullvad? (Not for opsec just in general)
 
VPNs in general are not ideal if you want anonymity.
Mullvad doesn't seem to be really scammy, though. Good if you want to torrent.
 
Anonymous
7:54 AM
@forest Yeah, I'm aware.
 
But it's not trash like PIA or HMA.
 
Anonymous
I hear a lot of things about Mullvad, they seem actually like a decent company.
 
I think they've grown in the past 5-10 years.
It used to be that they had like... 2 different servers.
I used it once to shitpost on 4chan back when none of their IPs were banned.
But then I got them all banned and had to buy a VPS.
 
Anonymous
Hahahahah :D
 
Anonymous
Hmm, someone just sent me this: getsession.org
 
7:58 AM
Some E2E messager?
 
Anonymous
Seems like Signal but without needing a mobile number... Interesting.
 
Anonymous
Yeah, it's a fork of Signal.
 
Eh, I wouldn't trust it. I'd be careful.
 
Anonymous
Oh I'm not going to use it.
 
Use OTR or whatever if you want numberless E2E.
 
Anonymous
7:58 AM
I'm just interested.
 
There was something like that before that was bad. Cryptocat or something.
 
Anonymous
I do wonder why Signal themselves will not allow sign up without a phone number.
 
Anonymous
I think the whole phone number association thing is absolutely retarded.
 
Anonymous
"we can't read your data! but we can give your phone number to LE"
 
No idea. Maybe they want to ensure that people don't mistake them as an anonymous service?
 
Anonymous
8:00 AM
That seems plausible, yeah.
 
Anonymous
I wouldn't use Signal for that, though.
 
Anonymous
I just use it in the same way a "normal" person uses WhatsApp. There's better ways to communicate for other purposes than Signal.
 
I don't own a phone anyway so I've never needed to use it.
I dislike the idea of having a portable GPS tracker that I pay for.
 
Anonymous
I'd love to get rid of mine...
 
Anonymous
Hah, yes. Me as well.
 
Anonymous
8:02 AM
I don't like it at all.
 
Throw it away. Buy a dumb phone.
 
Anonymous
Well, I just bought that Pixel to run Graphene.
 
Anonymous
It's not perfect but, it's an okay solution for now.
 
GrapheneOS is probably more secure than most desktop OSes, ironically.
 
Anonymous
Yeah, from what I can see it really doesn't have many competitors either...
 
Anonymous
8:05 AM
There's Lineage but that looked like it had way less security features.
 
Lineage is kinda trash.
@J-- Because it's being developed for the sake of security, not profit.
I know the guy who made it. He's a good guy.
 
Anonymous
Yeah, it didn't seem that great at all. (Lineage)
 
Anonymous
@forest That's exactly what I want :D
 
The most important part of the OS though I believe is the hardened malloc.
(Well, and the hardened bionic in general, but that's not as applicable outside of Android)
 
Anonymous
Oh yeah, I meant to read that link, I'll read that today.
 
Anonymous
8:08 AM
The hardened malloc section.
 
Since you're doing vuln research, I think you'll like it.
Best part is you can compile it for any *nix and put it in /etc/ld.so.preload!
 
Anonymous
Yeah I'll like it for sure :D
 
Anonymous
I have two more ROP challenges to complete.
 
Anonymous
And I can absolutely see why people use ROP compilers :d
 
:P
 
Anonymous
8:24 AM
I should really start my day.
 
Anonymous
But I really don't want to start my day.
 
And I need to end my day.
In a few days I'm going to have to get up really early for work and I don't like that. :(
 
Anonymous
Heh.
 
Anonymous
Yeah, it must be super late for you...
 
Anonymous
It's nearly 10am here.
 
8:39 AM
:D
> Cellebrite makes software to automate physically extracting and indexing data from mobile devices. They exist within the grey – where enterprise branding joins together with the larcenous to be called “digital intelligence.” Their customer list has included authoritarian regimes in Belarus, Russia, Venezuela, and China; death squads in Bangladesh; military juntas in Myanmar; and those seeking to abuse and oppress in Turkey, UAE, and elsewhere. [...]

Given the number of opportunities present, we found that it’s possible to execute arbitrary code on a Cellebrite machine simply by includin
 
Anonymous
Ugh, Cellebrite.
 
Anonymous
One of the most morally bankrupt companies on planet Earth.
 
Oh there are worse ones out there.
Cellebrite is fairly low-level, used by the dumbest of the dumb (cops and the like).
 
Anonymous
Oh, this is from a while ago, a few weeks, I think.
 
Anonymous
I saw this before. Cellebrite poked the bear.
 
Anonymous
8:44 AM
They got what they deserved, frankly.
 
Yeah it's not new, but it's hilarious.
 
Anonymous
Yeah, it is :D
 
But I love "Files will only be returned for accounts that have been active installs for some time already, and only probabilistically in low percentages based on phone number sharding." :D
 
Anonymous
The police use Cellebrite here quite a lot, they really like it.
 
They've gotta be shitting their pants.
Well it just shows people... don't use a fucking cell phone.
I mean yeah, you can do JTAG attacks against desktops, but still...
 
Anonymous
8:45 AM
:)
 
Anonymous
I'll never hold a different view for anyone who works at a company like this.
 
Anonymous
Hahahahahahahhahaah.
 
Anonymous
+1
 
:P
 
Anonymous
I will genuinely never hold an ounce of sympathy for anyone who works at place like this.
 
Anonymous
8:46 AM
If you're an accountant you're just as complicit as an engineer.
 
But in all seriousness, there are worse companies. Cellebrite is a baby.
 
Anonymous
Oh for sure!
 
Raytheon and their ilk are much more dangerous.
 
Anonymous
:)
 
Anonymous
Oh yeah, Raytheon... I'm aware of them.
 
8:48 AM
The thing is, most people who work for those companies are easy pray for getting pwnt and having something not-so-legal placed on their computer. Now, most of them are bright guys, but not flawless. Not saying I've done this, but... vae victis
 
Anonymous
They are absolutely vile.
 
Anonymous
@forest Heh :D
 
Anonymous
I just don't understand how someone can go to work knowing they are contributing to the murder of journalists and innocent people just for $50,000 a year.
 
Anonymous
I mean, what is wrong with you?
 
Eh, they make more than that.
Or at least, people who sell to them.
 
Anonymous
8:49 AM
I mean, the tech people do, yes.
 
Anonymous
But imagine you're just a clerk.
 
ah
 
Anonymous
You're making $50,000 a year to be complicit in murder.
 
mhm
 
Anonymous
I mean, the tech people, I understand it a bit more.
 
Anonymous
8:49 AM
They make a damn lot for sure.
 
I'd rather sell 0days and security services to pedophiles than these fuckers.
 
Anonymous
But it's still fucking morally bankrupt.
 
Anonymous
It makes me sick, honestly.
 
Thing is, if you have the knowledge required to work at a place like that, you can get work nearly anywhere.
 
Anonymous
Yes, exactly.
 
Anonymous
8:50 AM
This what makes my piss boil so much.
 
Anonymous
They could work anywhere, go work at Google, ffs. Even that is more ethical than this shit.
 
Anonymous
But for some unknown fucking reason they choose to work at a place that sparks genocides. Imprisons innocent people. Risks the lives of millions to catch the few.
 
Anonymous
I don't get it. I'll never get it.
 
On the upside, it's certainly possible to defend from an adversary with those kinds of resources.
But it requires very solid opsec and a very strong understanding of privilege boundaries.
 
Anonymous
Do you know what frustrates me the most?
 
Anonymous
8:53 AM
It's the security people that work at those companies.
 
Anonymous
Let's forget the developers a moment, they are often not that bright when it comes to security. But actual security engineers that work there, they should know better.
 
You'll get to know a lot of them if you start working in exploit dev. :/
 
Anonymous
There has been a war on privacy for the last 15 years, for you to work in security and not defend that right is absolutely fucking vile.
 
Anonymous
It's like these people who work in infosec that promote crypto backdoors. If you do that, I genuinely hope you lose everything in your life of value.
 
Anonymous
@forest Heh, yes, unfortunately so.
 
Anonymous
8:55 AM
The thing is, I will absolutely make sure I choose to work at a place that I believe is as moral as it can be.
 
You don't even need to do that. Just don't go with the least moral.
Keep the hacker spirit.
 
Anonymous
As much as I hate tech companies, I would have no problems working there because even though they do unethical shit, at least I know my exploits aren't being used for starting wars.
 
Well... Look at Facebook :/
 
Anonymous
But, you know, it just takes research.
 
Selling exploits to the feds.
 
Anonymous
8:57 AM
Oh, I'd never work at Facebook though.
 
Anonymous
I am already very aware of how morally bankrupt they are.
 
Anonymous
Ew.
 
Anonymous
Look at the title of this article.
 
Yeah it's dumb, but it ends on a good note (critical of FB).
 
Anonymous
That's gross. The way they have written it makes it hard to disagree... I don't like that.
 
Anonymous
8:59 AM
Disgusting.
 
Anonymous
Facebook has long been off my list for a place I'd work, anyways.
 
Anonymous
Never liked it, never will.
 
Thing is, trying to hack pedophiles is a very dangerous game. Most of them are dumb, but every once in a while you have one that can take that 0day you handed to them.
An exploit that can hack a pervert's Firefox can just as easily hack a child's.
So people should be careful giving pedophiles the very tools they need to create a botnet of kids.
> debug1: rekey after 420696969 blocks
hehehe
 
Anonymous
Yeah, the thing is, the cause here is good, I am not going to suggest it wasn't. The problem is that the cause does not outweigh the risk involved in creating a 0day like this.
 
Anonymous
First things first being, they will use it again.
 
9:02 AM
Well, in this particular case they selected a 1day.
One which Tails was going to fix in an upcoming update (or rather, a component of Tails).
 
Anonymous
Even still...
 
Right. It's still dangerous.
 
Anonymous
Yeah, it is.
 
Anonymous
I am not going to defend pedophilia (obviously) but I am absolutely going to defend arming LE when they routinely break boundaries and get away with it.
 
Anonymous
It's a sad fact that the child in this situation is of less value than what LE are going to use that exploit for in the future.
 
9:03 AM
mhm
 
Anonymous
Privacy and security and freedom come above everything.
 
Privacy and security and freedom protect people in the long-term.
 
Anonymous
Yeah.
 
That's why I'm so happy that there exist tools like Tor and LUKS.
 
Anonymous
As much as I would love to value the life of that child here, the consequence of that is the situation which ensued, which is that LE got armed with a nasty exploit.
 
Anonymous
9:05 AM
In a perfect world, the child would be safe and they wouldn't need to make an exploit that they can use later.
 
Anonymous
But the world isn't perfect.
 
Maybe if people actually taught children PROPER FUCKING DATA HYGIENE.
 
@J-- tbh - most computer forensics folks are uh...
halfway technical
so a lot of the things we get taught are pretty much 'tool use' and 'legally hard to discard' evidence collection
 
Very true.
 
If you think about these, all these are basically DD with a write blocker, chain of custody and hashes
Nothing that interesting
 
9:09 AM
@JourneymanGeek Well, Cellebrite actually uses exploits against mobile devices.
The write blocker comes after.
It's a plug-n-play mobile exploitation toolkit with forensics acquisition technology.
 
Anonymous
^
 
@forest the end user isn't going to write or understand most of it
 
@JourneymanGeek Right. Hence it being plug-n-play.
 
@forest and phones are 'messy' compared to PCs for that since you can't really do offline data acquisition
(and till recentish, the first thing you did was pull the plug)
 
Well the idea is to use this toolkit to bypass screen locks.
Yeah nowadays, you never pull the plug.
(Sounds like you have some forensics experience :P)
 
9:11 AM
@forest experience, no
Its what I have a degree in
 
heh
 
so I can fairly competently talk out of my ass about it
 
That's funny, since I do anti-forensics.
Maybe that's why we often clash. :P
 
Anonymous
:D
 
9:15 AM
Its either the whole "fundamental personality disgreement" or I'm in "authority" and you're anti authority I suspect :D
 
haha probably
 
Anonymous
Yeah.
 
Anonymous
Well, I don't think all of us are anti authority.
 
Anonymous
Most of us, for sure.
 
Anonymous
As I said before, I'm so anti authority I don't even agree with the idea of a sleep schedule :D
 
9:18 AM
:D
 
@J-- patched nanosleep() out of all his kernels.
 
Anonymous
I feel really strange today.
 
Anonymous
@forest hahahaha :D
 
Anonymous
Now I just need to patch emotions() out of my kernels.
 
Anonymous
Or whatever the computer equivalent of emotions is.
 
Anonymous
9:20 AM
I'm on my way to becoming a total infosec robot.
 
Maybe personality()
That's a real syscall too.
 
Anonymous
Hahahahaha :D Yes, that works.
 
Anonymous
To be fair, I don't have much of a personality anyways. My personality is I hate authority and hate people, it's pretty one dimensional.
 
Anonymous
Hate being the common theme...
 
Anonymous
Its more the fact that I am extremely negative.
 
Anonymous
9:22 AM
I am negative about almost everything.
 
Anonymous
And, I like it. I often am not disappointed.
 
Anonymous
Jesus, I am downloading this ISO and its downloading at 140kb/s
 
Anonymous
im gonna cry.
 
@J-- eh, I've downloaded one at 10 kbps. Well actually didn't manage to download it. Had to wait a day for the internet to get better and then download again
 
Anonymous
oof.
 
Anonymous
9:30 AM
would anyone be interested in seeding a torrent for me
 
Anonymous
so i can download it sometime within this decade...
 
@J-- how big?
 
Anonymous
5gb.
 
@J-- I can
link?
assuming its legal
 
Anonymous
Thank you.
 
Anonymous
 
Anonymous
ill buy a license, yes, yes.
 
Anonymous
:D
 
Anonymous
archive.org is really slow.
 
Anonymous
i guess they dont want peoiple to download over the site
 
Anonymous
makes sense.
 
9:33 AM
lol
I have a bunch of disks in case
funny story that...
I recently bought a chinese nuc-clone with a ryzen
Their stock installs are dodgy (it had a wierdly long KMS licence) so I decided to do a reinstall off an 'official' windows 10 media
(for some benchmarks)
it validated.
like "legit" digital entitlement
@J-- torrent hasn't started ._.
 
Anonymous
Really?
 
Anonymous
Damn.
 
Anonymous
That's annoying...
 
there's one peer
 
Anonymous
Ah yes, I see that.
 
Anonymous
9:35 AM
drat...
 
Anonymous
i guess ill find it elsewhere
 
Giving each other your IPs huh?
 
@J-- uhh
gimme a sec
I knew this site that was a front end to the offiical windows site and let you download the ISOs
it was slightly dodgy but...
caveat emptor, it looks dodgy as hell so double check the hash if you don't trust it
 
Anonymous
This seems fine.
 
Anonymous
Really dodgy looking but whatever
 
9:41 AM
Punchline is...
6
Q: Is downloading Windows ISOs from TechBench downloaders safe?

LateralTerminalHow safe are TechBench downloaders? Is it safe to download an iso from TechBench downloading service for example: https://tb.rg-adguard.net/public.php I have no idea how it works but it supposedly downloads the ISO directly from Microsoft servers. Chrome says the download for Windows 7 Ultimate i...

that's where I found out about it :D
 
Anonymous
Oh nice, thanks :D
 
Anonymous
This is much faster.
 
I've never gotten MS's insistance on the MCT and only having the latest versions available, and hiding older versions
 
Anonymous
Yeah, it's weird...
 
On specific configs you're stuck on older versions
and there's situations where the ISO is useful
 
Anonymous
9:46 AM
Yeah, 100%. Lots of situations...
 
I do my fresh installs off a IODD disk enclosure that'll load ISOs and VHDs directly
 
Anonymous
I currently have 7 deskmats waiting to be manufactured and arrive.
 
Anonymous
Good God...
 
Anonymous
I have a problem.
 
so I need ISOs
or a bigger desk
 
Anonymous
9:47 AM
@JourneymanGeek oh thats a great idea.
 
Anonymous
i should do something like that...
 
I have a 2541 - I recommend that or the mini
I bought the enclosure and dropped my own drive in but YMMV
but I also do a lot of reinstalls and support stuff so....
 
Anonymous
I'd really like to build a server for VMs and stuff. Once I move, I'll probably buy one and spin up eSXI so I can do that.
 
Anonymous
It would be really useful to stop hosting VMs on my desktop.
 
9:50 AM
MAKE SURE the NICs are intel
 
Anonymous
I don't like it.
 
not realtek
 
Anonymous
It's messy.
 
no idea about broadcom
 
Anonymous
Any specific reason? Not supported with eSXI?
 
9:50 AM
yup
You can kinda beat it into working but not worth the pain
 
Anonymous
Right, thanks.
 
Anonymous
I'll remember that.
 
Anonymous
To be honest, I saw some decent servers for like £300-400.
 
Anonymous
I wouldn't need anything too crazy. Just a lot of cores.
 
also real servers are noisy
 
Anonymous
9:51 AM
I might just build it in a PC case? :think:
 
Anonymous
like a big case, obviously.
 
tbh, I'm debating just setting up a quartet or so of NUCs or an X99 board (old-ex server boxen)
 
Anonymous
i think uhhh bequiet do a decent one.
 
Anonymous
To be honest, I probably don't even need eSXI.
 
Anonymous
Bit overkill.
 
10:30 AM
lol
KVM is nice
proxmox is an 'easy' distro based off that and craft computing has a ton of good videos on it
 
Anonymous
10:45 AM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U9MvkI7zfv8
> criticizing rich people for aligning themselves with capitalism
> wearing nike.
good one.
 
Anonymous
Don't get me wrong, I like this show. I am also by no means a capitalist, far from it.
 
Anonymous
But you cannot sit there and criticize one for supporting capitalism and simultaneously wear Nike.
 
Anonymous
If you cannot see the hypocrisy in that, you're an idiot.
 
Anonymous
"I dislike this person agreeing with capitalism, but I support it by buying Starbucks, wearing Nike".
 
Anonymous
It's moronic.
 

« first day (3792 days earlier)      last day (1088 days later) »