@kalina Please do not blindly remove tags. If you're editing a post to remove a bad tag, take the time to add appropriate tags. If in doubt, leave it alone.
@RoryAlsop Until five minutes ago I had no problem with kalina except for finding her conversation boring. I do however take issue with her recent messages here. This is not being nice.
I think we need to create some new tags for documents and documentation. Sometimes it's something-policy but there are other meanings that do warrant a tag and I can't find an applicable one.
@kalina - Okay, but when balance is temporarily out of whack, if someone who usually has no interaction with you comes in to point out something, best bet is to assume it's because they are interested in that something, rather than just to have a go at you.
@Simon having a laugh is used to expresss that someone isn't serious "You're having a laugh, £500 for a car", having a go could have several meanings depending on context "Come and have a go if you think you're hard enough" is an invitiation to have a fight, "I'm going to have a go at cooking a curry" just indicates attempting something
@kalina - Gilles has already suggested he would rather just avoid conversation with you normally. And you knew that the edits would be very visible - yes I agree that the vast majority look fine - so you'd have to assume a few people might find ones that weren't quite right
that's the difference between being on the sliding scale starting at "really like" and ending at "really dislike" and being off the far left off the scale
@kalina well - here, separate mod-ness, from someone who will have been nudged by a wall full of edits. He has always been one of the stricter folks on correct edits - we have a couple of people who put a lot of effort in here (including you)
And remember - you did say you didn't want to continue on with that line of chat
@kalina I read that as ban incorporated. Probably biased by that classic Metallica album - Damage Inc
"oh phantom flagger, if you have concerns about the content of this room, might I suggest you speak to the site mods who would be happy to talk it through with you"
> Mossack Fonseca worked with 33 individuals or companies who have been placed under sanctions by the US Treasury, including companies based in Iran, Zimbabwe and North Korea.
> One had links to North Korea's nuclear weapons programme.
Hmm. Pretty sure that was a CIA operation to allow it on the down-low, so they could keep tabs on the progress.
