right, hence my comment.

Oh, gawd, I just now pictured that user as a victim: 'nono, you're ussing that wrong! you should put your user name there!'

'it clearly says so as a parameter name!'

@TildalWave, okay, now I'm speechless

OK I'm flagging that as not an answer because it isn't. His English is obviously crap and doesn't even get the question. I think (not entirely sure) he's interpreting the question as "how do I prevent this from happening"

> i think that Bob, do not like to perform any sql injection, if i have understand what he want to do

I got it.

nono... I think he does not know what sql injection is

and I think he wonders why OP exects a insert to happen in a get request.

that's the risk you run if there's mention of PHP anywhere in the question :)

(because, I suppose, 'you insert into SQL using myphpAdmin')

(all problems in this 'quote' intended.)

@TildalWave, so over here this does count as NAA?

because there has some heat been going on on meta.SO about NAA only being for non-anwsers and VLQ might be used for this kind of answer.

@SmokeDispenser author fails to address any concerns in the question, so yeah ... reason why is meaningless, he's not answering what the question asks

right, I have the same opinion on that; I just came to learn on SO that that is not the definition of NAA, but rather 'is this an attempt to answer a question'

But i can easily forget that again:)

SO is funny that way, but I don't really care much about it to be honest, it's only trouble when SO members mostly just active on SO come to other SE sites where we'd have some standards of quality

not always, but often enough

low quality flag says to me "please help improve this", i.e. there's some value in keeping it but it might need polishing

if that answer is flagged as such, I honestly wouldn't know where to start improving it

right:)

I am quite glad to have moved over here :)

btw, I just answered a php question. I feed dirty and somowhat ashamed;)

brb

LOL I just watched that WAT video destroyallsoftware.com/talks/wat

@SmokeDispenser correct, have a +1 so the shame stays with you 4eva!! muahahahaha

fuck, I have 29 points of PHP shame which is more than double that of @Simon's

hahah

I actually got +1 from that

so I got my downvote back;)

and yeah, that wat-video is a classic

I love to place links to it wherever I see fit :)

hmm, @TildalWave, would this be 'product recomendation'? It will sureld attrackt link only answers;)

@SmokeDispenser Dunno, wouldn't mentioning MITRE's CVE List Master Copy cve.mitre.org/cve/cve.html and a short description how to filter by types and get additional info on vulnerabilities be an answer? e.g. cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvekey.cgi?keyword=web+application?

haha

look at the comment I just sent

LOL ninja'd

oh god, my typing in horrible today

and since I'm using a non-standard layout, this must look really weird. mixing up y and d for example:)

@TildalWave, did put an answer on that. Might even be a good question; yet the nvd does not publish the actual researcher that submitted the CVE in the first place, does it?

How cool is that? I just have been made aware that two of the three questions about plaintext offenders i answered on are in the HNQ :)