@lady.donut Yeah I made it with a large helping of cayenne, cumin, oregano, onion powder, and chili powder. It's also got homemade salsa with chilies in it from my buddy's garden. Oh and just a dash of ghost chili salt.
@Simon We all know that has nothing to do with Android, though.
> The thing is, there are lots of very intelligent, well informed people here, very credible people who can provide a great deal of insight on information security related topics and when it comes down to it, that is the only thing that counts.
blabla, old post that has been mentioned often, and rebuffed almost as often.
"I DONT KNOW HOW THE INTERNET WORKS BUT I HATE IT ANYWAY"
"ALSO THIS SITE IS BROKEN BECAUSE I MISUSE IT"
user122738
7:22 AM
Yes, he talked about 3 reasons: poor community whereas we have great members that i want to thank even when they ask a question or comment. He complained about non rich and long answers: but lot of questions do not need long answers and any person can lead by example by giving a detailed long answer when needed (as i did once).
user122738
And most of the people who agreed with him (believe me, i read all the commentators last night) they complained about downvoting or rude comments they received or unfair suspensions which lead them to stop contributing ... rather childish reasons.
"People focus on the wrong rewards and behave pettily to each other. I know, because I am proof!"
"And the more experienced users are all cranky because of people like me! How rude!"
this quote "StackOverflow was once fun. It is no longer. " is really the only valid reasoning there.
you dont enjoy it anymore, for whatever your own personal reasons? Fine, of course you are welcome to leave. But dont pretend that your own personal reasons are anything but.
which leads to an attitude of locking down the scope and the quality level, shunning the crap. Which in turn leads to the above ranting about authoritativeness and pettiness.
user122738
@CodesInChaos it is good to have a space where both professionals and beginners can talk. I see it as a positive thing even if experts may be bored sometimes they can meet useful posts from their colleagues (just on this website there are unanswered questions of professionals)
@Begueradj I completely agree. the problem is that beginners (as a group) tend to ask the same question, over and over and over again, with very little (if any) variability. They also (apparetly, but it could just be the law of numbers) prefer to ask it again as if it is an original and difficult problem, instead of scrolling down 6 lines and finding a comprehensive answer to their exact precise question.
Maybe you were expecting a more friendly and ready to help community here because you thought it would be similar to StackOverflow. Think again... Most 'answers' or 'constructive feedback' are aimed at arguing against what you are trying to do or the way in which you have written your question ra...
complained about the community, bitched about cliquishness
JavaScript Shell
This will make the language completely unusable.
clear(this);
Isn't it nice how JavaScript has such a nice function to destroy itself?
This is pretty simple, the clear function completely empty an object. this refers to the global object clearing out everything including ...
@AviD well they would say that and then bury "but if it doesn't it's not our fault, you don't own this software and we have no liability if it blows up and kills your dog" in the license agreement
No, it is not "encrypted with the private key". This is a flawed analogy that does not work for algorithms other than RSA, and, when looked at closely, does not work for RSA either. It is an old way of explaining signatures that, in practice, spreads more confusion than enlightenment. — Tom Leek3 mins ago
JavaScript Shell
This will make the language completely unusable.
clear(this);
Isn't it nice how JavaScript has such a nice function to destroy itself?
This is pretty simple, the clear function completely empty an object. this refers to the global object clearing out everything including ...
What triggers this behavior?
The newline character.
