« first day (1098 days earlier)      last day (4080 days later) » 

00:00
Wow.
I knew he was a bad man.
THAT'S RIGHT. I WENT THERE.
I don't blame ya.
So far I don't see HatDash having an effect on new visits. The question on the 5th or 6th has, but that is tailing off now.
lots of page views though
8 hours ago, by Scott Pack
Yes. We want to keep some closed questions around as examples of what isn't acceptable.
@AviD Yeah, I know. I took that into account.
00:01
Oh - and Q&A upvotes are through the roof. That's cool.
Clearly your views of acceptable behavior are much looser than mine. I suppose that's to be expected.
@ScottPack Because his ass is very... ?
IM'A STOP HERE.
There, it makes more sense now.
@Simon prob'ly best
I'm sure there's a Foamy video that's relevant but those are barely even home safe, let alone work.
@ScottPack I dread to think what that might be - but I'm at home so here goes google
00:03
@ScottPack nooo, we agree on it not being acceptable, I just have lower expectations from fellow users, thus need more examples around.
@RoryAlsop You would kill the dude if your daughter would have a boyfriend like me, right?
@Simon yes, because he would be 10 years too old for her :-)
Well, that makes sense.
she is only 11
weirdo
00:04
@RoryAlsop Here's a good one. I like his rants. youtube.com/…
@RoryAlsop dead men don't grow any older.
I'm 13, don't forget that.
@ScottPack erm...now that I see that, you have told me about foamy before...
weird - it's all flooding back now
@RoryAlsop Which is funny because I only started watching any of them a few days ago.
@vortaq7 is all up into that.
who da fuk is that
00:08
@ScottPack maybe it was him
my memory...you know
The dude can have ANY nickname on SE and he has a random number in it anyway.
10/10
They say that memory is the 3rd thing to go.
@ScottPack ....
I'm waiting for @Simon to ask the question :-)
Antici
Shit, which question should I be asking?
Oh wait, I got it
00:10
pation
@ScottPack What are the other 2?
I'm having trouble remembering.
Is it time to get that second gold badge?
I think it is.
@Simon how far off it are you?
00:12
2x upvotes
Wait, me upvoting questions!
Haha, I'll take the free upvotes anyway.
That's a rough one because you have to upboat a certain number of questions but it also has to be a certain percentage of all your boats
Yeah.
That should do.
Update you donut!
600/600 but no badge
qq
00:31
@Simon I would wait and see - some take a wee while to update
Yeah, I'm just being impatient.
00:53
Hoora, I got it!
I hope there's a hat that goes with it.
Oh yes there is, woohoo!
 
1 hour later…
02:04
OM NOM NOM REAL FOOD
morning
afternoon
Guess I'm gonna have to wipe my machine and upgrade.
02:32
Feel free to add some stuff here:
0
A: How should I handle chat flags?

Mr. Peanut Monopoly McManishWhat does it mean? This means that a message on the chat server was flagged as spam/offensive, and you are asked to review it. If you mark it as valid, the number of flags on the message is incremented (and decremented if you mark it as invalid). If it reaches 6, then the message is deleted a...

Upvoted
I feel like mentioning in a comment that one time, a mod came here and said that he would validate all the flags from this room from now on without checking the context or anything.
@Simon me?
Hell no you never did that.
It was some random dude I had never seen before.
@Simon I think I should :P
PFFFFFT
02:57
user image
3
aaaawwww
@ManishEarth Won't a ban be easier?
I take my "aaaawwww" back.
@Simon It's alright. I never wanted it anyway.
@ScottPack You are a Fedora user right? Have you encountered any issues upgrading between major versions using the provided tools? Or should I just wipe and reinstall?
@TerryChia YOU BETTER VALIDATE MY EDITS
afk
04:01
@TerryChia you're collecting chat stars for ze cat hat?
Anyone know why Sec.SE is in read-only mode?
Huh?
Correction: Probably the whole SE network. MSO, too.
Maintenance?
@TildalWave already have that one.
04:07
How the fuck did this Zach dude review a suggested edit?
He has 1 rep!!
05:16
Each Christmas, those cookies stir up some controversies on some have-nothing-else-to-report-on newspapers in Finland and internationally.
Fun stuff.
@AviD I know you were looking into the whole "Windows tablet for RDP" use case. Have you ever considered a Chromebook for that purpose?
05:50
@Adnan uh. why?
@TerryChia me can vouch for chrome RDP support. My primary RDP client these days.
06:20
@tylerl Cool. Possibly thinking of picking up one.
Which model are you using?
06:32
@tylerl Why they cause a stir? Or why do Finns eat swastikas for Christmas?
06:59
@Adnan Didn't you just answer your own question?
haha @RoryA your hat suits you well :)
The Mask: dr. Mayhem redux
@Adnan If you want, I could get rid of a few of those "controversial cookies" for you, just send them over :)
they look like mince pies that burst open, but I suspect that that's more leaf pastry dough than pie dough?
07:27
Morning
Mornin'
08:04
@TerryChia interesting, I might look into that if I get around to it. I assume they are incredibly cheaper...?
@AviD I won't say incredibly... but there are a few models going for < $300.
@TildalWave no, they look like children's pinwheels made into food.
@TerryChia thats almost the same price as SurfaceRT. even the older version, still more worth it.
@ManishEarth which hat?
@AviD That's not including the price of a keyboard cover right?
dammit, I hate that lately all these international sites like automatically redirecting me from their homepage to the localized page. If I wanted that, I would have added co.il instead of .com!! :@
@TerryChia but yeah. 64GB Surface 1 now going for 330$, touch cover for 50$.
@AviD I see. Chromebooks have the advantage of being able to boot into Ubuntu though.. Interesting trade-off.
08:14
@TerryChia I guess it depends on the specific chromebook, but it seems to me that aside from the RDP, the surface would be a stronger tablet.
@Simon because, my dear @Simon, it was an edit on his own post.
Since this was your edit, I really would have expected you to show a little awareness.
I never cease to cause myself disappointment.
@AviD Already have the hat on ITSec
@ManishEarth for meta?
08:29
Didn't have it at the time, no
But the post wasn't for hats
@ManishEarth sure, sure.
@AviD I don't really gun for the site specific ones :P
nooooo
But I find Sec.SE to be a good place to get the ones I don't have :P
@manish!
how do you get eureka
08:42
@kalina fight club
...
see my recent meta comments
that's a little unfair after I spilled my secrets!
@kalina I spilled it, it's pretty obvious if you check out my recent comments
Or wait a sec
now look
that doesn't help at all
08:45
@kalina latest meta comment?
yeah
it is a bunch of words about getting a hat for knowing hot to get a hat
that's all
think about that sentence
@AviD I was being polite :P
the words "figured out" in a comment?
@ManishEarth Mr. Peanut Monopoly McManish?
08:49
@TildalWave I actually changed my username to that a day before hats came out.
I saw the list of hat names (haxxx!) and liked the Peanut one
@ManishEarth I like "McManish" sounds like some brilliant box of select candy filled with whisky
2
obviously, I'm not a chocolate man ... but I'd suffer the vessel if there's good whisky in them
@kalina nah.
@kalina You have to figure out how to get the hat in the presence of a dev/CM
So....basically it is a manually awarded hat. Mention that and you're probably good.
08:53
well that's stupid
in mso chat if you want
@ManishEarth So which meta comment then? I wanna see if I figure it out
latest
which site?
I feel like you're setting me up to get banned
08:56
@TinyTim Yay! So figuring out how you get the hat gets you the hat? Isn't that a bit circular? :P — Mr. Peanut Monopoly McManish 12 mins ago
this?
So... an exclamation followed by a question?
might help if I knew which hat we're talking about ... wait, let me check
Eureka? Must be some jubilation then... I'd say it's "Yay!"
OK there's something I don't get... which hat? The Yeager?
Look at the answer again
09:02
@ManishEarth Ah I get it
don't tell me they wrote a script to catch all the possible such comments or that they have folks checking all of them that mention a few select keywords
I need to wake up
I NEED ENERGY
somebody is very successfully trolling me
they wait until I rep cap, with no downvotes, and then at 6pm-8pm they downvote me
preventing me from getting the updo hat
...
if you'd really have rep-capped otherwise
@TildalWave I have that on multiple sites
I'm talking about the updo hat
I actually very specifically said those words
09:16
@kalina nevermind, its a stoopid lookin hat!
who wants to wear a triangle??
IT'S ANOTHER HAT
@kalina just try to be agreeable for a day :P
I NEED IT
@TildalWave technically correct superceeds all
this kind of behaviour has to be classifyable as abusive voting
set fire to all downvoters!
Let's all wear the updo hat to tease @kalina.
@AviD You were talking about things posted specifically to attract hats?
09:18
@TerryChia you'd like that, wouldnt you.
I actually filed a bug report and submitted a patch to firefox for that :P
@kalina perhaps, depends ... maybe you don't have a stalker at all, maybe you just like to think that you have one :P joking
@ManishEarth theres a hat for that?
for getting a bounty
@TildalWave sadly, I very rarely attact multiple downvotes on the same question and I frequently get multiple downvotes on multiple questions that are otherwise positively voted in the space ofa minute
that sounds like stalker to me
as a matter of fact, every piece of content I've submitted to SE has a positive or zero score
no negatively voted content at all
09:19
@kalina ask the mod of the site to look into it then
LOL gaming mods doing actual stuff
I mean a mod
it's only a hat, I just think it's a bit immature
hmm, would it be wrong to pentest the winterbash site, to find additional hats?
oo, maybe there is a hat for that!
@kalina as in, someone likes you immature?
09:21
if it was a case of liking me, they'd be upvotes
@TildalWave pulling pigtails by the swing at recess, I wonder who that could be....
@AviD A black one? ;)
@kalina or teasing
@TerryChia haha, great!
I prefer a different kind of teasing
09:22
@AviD yup, that kind of thing
I like this hat :-)
but if we're playing the 'teasing @Kalina' game I might change
:-)
I'm not bothered about other people having the hat
I'm not switching hats, but I also want to tease @kalina.
Kind of like poking a bear.
oooooerrrrr
hahaha
09:36
Care to accept my answer? Pretty please? I want the "steal acceptance" hat :P — Mr. Peanut Monopoly McManish 2 mins ago
Not that is hat whoring, @AviD
@ManishEarth yes, it is!
hatslut.
flagged as "more of a whore than I am"
2
this is cool.
user image
2
@AviD what's up with the last one?
the tumbler
@ManishEarth its already at the right height, so if you go too far you lock it.
09:40
But you can't go too far
like the guy who puts half a dozen locks on his door, and leaves half unlocked.
The key won't go further
@ManishEarth I can always go too far. I usually do.
Look at the hilt of the key...or whatever you call that
@ManishEarth the right key. but if you try picking it....
09:41
@AviD It will already be picked
oh right
Still, not hard to notice.
Especially since it's the last tumbler
Which is the one you start with while picking
@ManishEarth umm.... usually locks are not open like that.... you dont get to see the tumblers.
@AviD No, I mean that if it was any other tumbler a lockpick would be left wondering as to where the break is because for those there are times where you don't feel a break but one exists
For the last one it is ridiculoisly easy to find the break. So if you don't, it must be at the bottom
anyway, thats just that key's pattern... obviously a different key will be different.
That's the point of random. You never know what you're gonna get.
unlike a box of chocolates - of course you're getting frikkin chocolates, you always know what you're gonna get! Goddammit!
Wait, so how do you get Chuck Yeager again? I just got it.
@TerryChia nobody knows
It has to be for some sort of answering behavior
09:49
Good morning
or afternoon
or evening
@ManishEarth + timing + votes
I NEED A HERRO!
I'M HOLDING OUT FOR HERRO TILL THE END OF THE NIGHT!
@AviD You type that, the music I have on goes "Did you ever know that you're my hero?"
09:55
FTFY
hehe
quick Yeager experiment: go upvote this, real quick.
0
A: Why CSRF Token has to Cryptographically Strong Random number, in Double Submit Cookies method?

AviDShort answer: To prevent brute forcing the CSRF token. Let's take a trivial example: let's say your token is a single digit, accepting values from 0 to 9. Now sure, an attacker cannot read this value from the cookie or header, but she does not have to - she can just send 10 CSRF requests, one...

spite!!!!
@AviD Done. ;)
Oops, you said upvote. :P
it also happens to be correct...
yoiu probably broke the yeager algorithm now.... :-(
@AviD Here, have an upvote. :P
10:07
thats probably my shortest answer in years.
Go write an answer to that memory safe code question.
I rarely bother answering, but when I do, I usually have a lot to say.
@TerryChia case in point - that would be a longer answer.
need time. dont have time. but if we never take the time, how will we ever have time?
thats a puzzle.
hmm. no yeager yet. Might it also have to do with other answers? /cc @ManishEarth
dunno
It may have to do with outscoring the accepted answer
Both of my Yaeger answers did that
But Tim said that that wasn't the criteria
@ManishEarth my Yaeger was for a fast answer
heh, I like your eureka. bastard.
10:13
@kalina one of mine wasn't
you should lower it, so it is squeezed between the uprights.
@ManishEarth well it can't be for a first answer, because otherwise everybody would have it
one of mine wasn't a first
one sec lemme check
interesting
maybe it's the speed of the upvotes for that post then?
10:16
Yeager achieved.
@AviD how?
fast answer?
@ManishEarth I thought that was a factor, but you claimed its not. Also, at least 2 upvotes within X minutes of posting (X is at least 10 minutes or so). Unless there is a delay with the hatgranting....
That makes sense
there is always a delay with the hat granting

« first day (1098 days earlier)      last day (4080 days later) »