« first day (1440 days earlier)      last day (1740 days later) » 
00:00 - 19:0019:00 - 00:00

Mathieu Guindon
Mathieu Guindon
7:00 PM
it's under %appdata%\rubberduck
 
HackSlash
HackSlash
fresh install of Rubberduck v2.2.0.3242-pre ... No function suggest
I clear settings now
 
Mathieu Guindon
Mathieu Guindon
<~ puzzled
turn on trace-level logging, reparse; do the logs show the inspection running?
 
HackSlash
HackSlash
Without the config file it is stuck on Initializing...
Does it rebuild the config ?
 
Mathieu Guindon
Mathieu Guindon
it should, yes
did you quit & restart though?
RD would have loaded & cached the settings at startup
 
HackSlash
HackSlash
yeah, this is on the first ALT+F11 since I renamed the config
It's up but there is not a new config file
 
Mathieu Guindon
Mathieu Guindon
7:05 PM
that's because we don't make one if everything is default :)
still stuck?
 
HackSlash
HackSlash
k
2018-05-16 12:05:07.4601;TRACE-2.2.6710.18711;Rubberduck.Inspections.Abstract.InspectionBas‌​e;Intercepted invocation of 'ProcedureCanBeWrittenAsFunctionInspection.DoGetInspectionResults' returned 0 objects.;
 
Mathieu Guindon
Mathieu Guindon
ok so it did run
and wtf
 
HackSlash
HackSlash
yeah... this is just me? Other people see this still?
 
Mathieu Guindon
Mathieu Guindon
installs 3242
Rubberduck Code Inspections - 05/16/2018 15:08:54
9 issues found.
Hint: Member 'test' is implicitly public - (Book3) VBAProject.ThisWorkbook, line 3
Hint: Member 'DoSomething' is implicitly public - (Book3) VBAProject.ThisWorkbook, line 9
Suggestion: Procedure 'DoSomething' can be written as a function. - (Book3) VBAProject.ThisWorkbook, line 9
Suggestion: Le projet porte le nom assigné par défaut - (Book3) VBAProject., line 1
Suggestion: Parameter 'bar' can be passed by value - (Book3) VBAProject.ThisWorkbook, line 9
 
HackSlash
HackSlash
I just made another test with a string... It's not just objects. I'm not getting that suggestion on anything 
  <CodeInspection Name="ProcedureCanBeWrittenAsFunctionInspection" Severity="Suggestion" InspectionType="LanguageOpportunities" />
what else would ignore that?
 
Mathieu Guindon
Mathieu Guindon
7:11 PM
FWIW I'm getting these results with your MCVE:
Rubberduck Code Inspections - 05/16/2018 15:10:59
7 issues found.
Suggestion: Procedure 'DoSomething' can be written as a function. - (Book3) VBAProject.ThisWorkbook, line 11
Suggestion: Le projet porte le nom assigné par défaut - (Book3) VBAProject., line 1
Suggestion: Parameter 'bar' can be passed by value - (Book3) VBAProject.ThisWorkbook, line 11
Suggestion: Consider renaming la classe 'Sheet1' - (Book3) VBAProject.Sheet1, line 1
Suggestion: Consider renaming la classe 'Sheet2' - (Book3) VBAProject.Sheet2, line 1
wtf is going on...
 
HackSlash
HackSlash
ok, so it's just me.... but what did I do?
 
Mathieu Guindon
Mathieu Guindon
Version 2.2.6708.13023
OS: Microsoft Windows NT 6.1.7601 Service Pack 1, x64
Host Product: Microsoft Office 2010 x86
Host Version: 14.0.7208.5000
Host Executable: EXCEL.EXE
 
HackSlash
HackSlash
Version 2.2.6710.18711
OS: Microsoft Windows NT 6.1.7601 Service Pack 1, x64
Host Product: Microsoft Office 2013 x86
Host Version: 15.0.4997.1000
Host Executable: EXCEL.EXE
 
Mathieu Guindon
Mathieu Guindon
huh, the about box isn't showing the same version as the splash form / releases page
 
HackSlash
HackSlash
Rubberduck v2.2.0.3242-pre
 
Mathieu Guindon
Mathieu Guindon
7:15 PM
7 mins ago, by Mathieu Guindon
installs 3242
 
HackSlash
HackSlash
So why are our versions different?
 
Mathieu Guindon
Mathieu Guindon
excellent question
 
HackSlash
HackSlash
Maybe I have something fucky registered
I ran "Repair VBE Addin registration"
 
Mathieu Guindon
Mathieu Guindon
I hate when that happens. I've no idea what's going on.
 
HackSlash
HackSlash
Version 2.2.6710.18711
OS: Microsoft Windows NT 6.1.7601 Service Pack 1, x64
Host Product: Microsoft Office 2013 x86
Host Version: 15.0.4997.1000
Host Executable: EXCEL.EXE
same version...
 
Mathieu Guindon
Mathieu Guindon
7:18 PM
@HackSlash if RD is already loading, it wouldn't make a difference.
 
HackSlash
HackSlash
I want to unload and then reload from the fresh install
Ok, uninstall. No duck.
installs 3242
Quack Quack
 
Mathieu Guindon
Mathieu Guindon
notice splash says 3242
and about says something else
that's annoying
I'll take and insta-merge a PR that fixes this :)
 
HackSlash
HackSlash
Version 2.2.6710.18711
OS: Microsoft Windows NT 6.1.7601 Service Pack 1, x64
Host Product: Microsoft Office 2013 x86
Host Version: 15.0.4997.1000
Host Executable: EXCEL.EXE
My splash matches this version number
 
Mathieu Guindon
Mathieu Guindon
something is broken
@this any ideas?
 
HackSlash
HackSlash
and it's higher than your number? Is my build number valid for something else?
 
Mathieu Guindon
Mathieu Guindon
7:24 PM
I'll have to take a look at this at home
did you install 3242-pre on the same machine you got your clone on?
if so, there's a slight chance the VBE might actually be loading the debug build. is there a "serialize" button on the RD toolbar?
(that button only shows up in a debug build)
 
Duga
Duga
7:48 PM
[rubberduck-vba/Rubberduck] WaynePhillipsEA pushed commit 0cc3e19a to next: fix Run overload to handle ambigous named VBA projects
Merge pull request #4010 from WaynePhillipsEA/fix-ambiguousprojects-unittests2

Fixes handling of ambiguous VBA project names when invoking test methods
 
this
this
@HackSlash just to be 100% sure have you ever had a previous debug build installed? that was HKLM-registered. The current is HKCU-registered.
HKLM would trump HKCU
 
Duga
Duga
[rubberduck-vba/Rubberduck] mansellan pushed commit f634171c to next: VB6 Project ID now saves as a GUID to VBP file
Merge pull request #4007 from mansellan/3990

Saves ProjectID to custom property in the .vbp file (VB6)
 
this
this
@HackSlash a simple way to destroy all the traces of previous HKLM-installed debug previous would to be perform a unregistration with the regasm - the tlb file doesn't have to be the same one from the old build; it'll still work since regasm.exe works with HKLM exclusively for both registering/unregistering.
e.g. <path to regasm>\regasm.exe /u /tlb: <path to tlb file>\Rubberduck.tlb /codebase
Note that not having a ducky after uninstalling doesn't mean the registry keys are not there because the VBE registration is HKCU, while the COM registration is whenever the installer or the Visual Studio build puts it.
no, i should pay more attention. @HackSlash's version is higher than @MathieuGuindon's...
 
HackSlash
HackSlash
I think @this is right. It could be a debug version
 
this
this
So you do see Serialize button?
 
HackSlash
HackSlash
8:00 PM
I did
I thought that installing a new version would get rid of my debug version
 
this
this
it wouldn't
the debug delievered via the Visual Studio build process and the installed version are best thought of as 2 separate beasts
and they can co-exist but only one can operate.... just like Zaphod's heads.
 
HackSlash
HackSlash
Fantabulous. So other devs have run in to this before, I must assume
 
this
this
that's why I told to unregister the old debug before upgrading but I can't remember if that's applicable in your circumstances
the unregister is supposed to be only one-time thing
because of move from HKLM to HKCU
 
Vogel612
Vogel612
@HackSlash I think we run into something similar when trying to get an installed and a dev version side-by-side
 
this
this
if you were to subsequently download and install a version using per-machine, that would still trump the debug build because HKLM > HKCU
 
Duga
Duga
8:03 PM
[rubberduck-vba/Rubberduck] build for commit 77e178ad on next: AppVeyor build succeeded
 
this
this
installing it per-user would only temporarily trump the VS-built version but it'll get destroyed next time you build via VS.
well, not "destroyed" -- the registration would just be updated to point to the VS's build path instead of the install path.
so still like Zaphod's heads, I guess.
thinks he's stretching it with the references
 
Duga
Duga
[rubberduck-vba/Rubberduck] build for commit 77e178ad on next: 53.67% (target 0%)
 
IvenBach
IvenBach
@this Working through WHERE NOT EXISTS ( SELECT NULL FROM foo WHERE bar = 'baz'). Lead me to read stackoverflow.com/questions/173041/not-in-vs-not-exists.
I got lost about halfway in the first answer but from what I understood of stackoverflow.com/questions/4875745/usage-of-select-null the "subquery" in the (...) will allow EXISTS to indicate whether it found a valid value.
 
this
this
yes. treat it as a boolean function
btw, this uses SELECT * which only confuses the issue, IMO.
here's an example to make this more starkly clear.....
execute this query:
 
IvenBach
IvenBach
Hold up
 
this
this
8:10 PM
SELECT 1 / 0 WHERE 1 = 1;
what happens?
 
IvenBach
IvenBach
I'm trying to word what's in my mind.
WHERE NOT EXISTS (...) in laymans terms says "If it's not found add it."
 
this
this
add doesn't click - i would say include this current row being evaluated in the output.
the current row being the one from the FROM table prior to the WHERE, mind you.
 
IvenBach
IvenBach
You lost me.
 
this
this
ok, let's say you have FROM foo
 
IvenBach
IvenBach
INSERT INTO foo (bar) is putting whatever the results happen to be into the table foo at column bar as a new record. The results come from SELECT 'baz' AS bar WHERE NOT EXISTS ( SELECT NULL FROM foo WHERE bar = 'baz');
 
this
this
8:15 PM
and that foo table (or view or whatever don't care)
has 1000 rows
conceptually for each row in the foo table, we must evaluate the EXISTS(...)
if it returns true, include it
otherwise, don't
 
IvenBach
IvenBach
That's done by the WHERE NOT EXISTS
the True/False idea.
 
this
this
right - the point is that WHERE has to check that for each row that we have in the foo source qualifies, and EXISTS only provides a boolean result
depending on the subquery contained within the EXISTS()
so if the subquery has any rows, we know we need to include this particular row from the source foo into the final output
 
Duga
Duga
[rubberduck-vba/Rubberduck] build for commit 85d75346 on next: AppVeyor build succeeded
 
IvenBach
IvenBach
The source foo would be from foo which is contained in the subquery SELECT NULL FROM foo WHERE bar = 'baz'?
 
this
this
we aren't paying any attention to the contents of the subquery; we are only interested in seeing whether there's any contents or not.
no, one level up, from the FROM
 
IvenBach
IvenBach
8:19 PM
INSERT INTO foo (bar) is the foo you're referring to?
 
this
this
e.g. SELECT .... FROM foo WHERE NOT EXISTS ( SELECT NULL FROM bar WHERE baz = 'hi');
set aside the INSERT part for now
 
IvenBach
IvenBach
ok.
 
Duga
Duga
[rubberduck-vba/Rubberduck] build for commit 85d75346 on next: 53.68% (target 0%)
 
this
this
focus on the SELECT part. INSERT literally doesn't care what SELECT stuff does; it only eats what output the SELECT provides
 
IvenBach
IvenBach
alright
 
this
this
8:21 PM
SELECT statement can be filtered using WHERE, right? EXISTS and IN both use subqueries but in a different way.
go back to my earlier example --- try this in SSMS
SELECT 1 / 0 WHERE 1 = 1;
what happens when you run this query?
 
IvenBach
IvenBach
kneejerk reaction says it barfs since 1/0 I'm assuming is an error.
 
this
this
now try this.... SELECT 1 WHERE EXISTS (SELECT 1/0 WHERE 1 = 1);
 
IvenBach
IvenBach
Divide by zero error encountered.
A single 1 in returned.
 
Mathieu Guindon
Mathieu Guindon
 
this
this
now try: SELECT 1 WHERE EXISTS ( SELECT 1 /0 WHERE 1 = 0);
@MathieuGuindon Yeah been there, my shirt's frayed out already. :(
 
IvenBach
IvenBach
8:24 PM
Nothing is returned.
Give me a sec to try and #Wordify what I'm understanding.
 
this
this
now try this.... SELECT 1 WHERE 1 IN ( SELECT 1/0 WHERE 1=1);
 
IvenBach
IvenBach
Subquery WHERE, inside EXISTS(...) is expecting something that resolves to TRUE/FALSE. The SELECT then is evaluated for 1=1 since that is True. It get's the SELECT 1/0, which is an error and is something, which has EXISTS evaluate to True. Ultimately it SELECTs 1 to return as the singular result.
 
this
this
no, the SELECT part inside the EXISTS(...) is totally ignored
that's why we don't get division by zero error when the statement is in an EXISTS subquery
 
IvenBach
IvenBach
But why is it there if it's ignored?
Is it because syntax mandates that something be there?
 
this
this
because it's required by the committee.
yeah
which is why I always write it as SELECT NULL FROM....
to emphasize that it has zero importance
 
IvenBach
IvenBach
8:30 PM
:click: OK. That makes more sense.
 
this
this
SELECT * and SELECT 1 are technically equivalent but gives the wrong sense esp. when comparing to IN which will barf if you gave it 1/0 in the SELECT
 
IvenBach
IvenBach
I know that IN is something with SQL now. I'll look at researching it later.
 
HackSlash
HackSlash
@this So the RegAsm commands have not cleared up the issue for me. My registry is littered with RubberDuck entries and I really wish uninstall would clean everything that install put in... I have artifacts from every version I have ever installed...
This is a greater problem with Windows, as all applications seem to do this
 
this
this
the installer i made a month or so ago should clean after itself
wasn't the case w/ the versions prior to that
and definitely not for debug from vs builds
 
IvenBach
IvenBach
@this I think the Lego's all started snapping together.
 
this
this
8:33 PM
the script that gets run on vs build from the Deployment project will clean up the previous build version
but it can only know of the immediate, not all past versions....
 
HackSlash
HackSlash
if there was less junk it would be easier to find the needle in this haystack so thank you for your efforts
 
this
this
i know that's a big reason why i wrote the deployment to help manage all this crap in registry
 
FreeMan
FreeMan
Monking, all!
 
this
this
but if you did install versions prior to the one w/ new installer, and since regasm didn't help, it might be best to delete all keys
 
FreeMan
FreeMan
Been in Excel Hell, and have an interesting situation...
 
this
this
8:37 PM
Peter put up a solution that may be of help
 
HackSlash
HackSlash
eh?
 
FreeMan
FreeMan
according to MS, Excel has a DATEDIF() function
 
this
this
 
FreeMan
FreeMan
Yet, when I type =DATE into a cell, it doesn't show up in IntelliSense:
 
this
this
that would make it easier for you to find all the keys
 
FreeMan
FreeMan
8:38 PM
 
this
this
@FreeMan a matter of Excel version, perhaps?
 
FreeMan
FreeMan
and when I boldly forge ahead and type it in anyway, I get #NAME
I'm on Office 2016 which the linked page references
 
this
this
O365?
 
FreeMan
FreeMan
nope, desktop
that article says it's all versions from O365 back through O2007
including O2016
 
this
this
huh yeah it does.
I have to assume that MSFT knows about you and put in DisableIfUserIsFreeMan switch then.
 
FreeMan
FreeMan
8:40 PM
I can only imagine...
I was just going to ask if someone had an O2016 version handy to see if I got the crippled copy.
oops, sorry, the error is #NUM!, not #NAME...
 
IvenBach
IvenBach
xl2013 doesn't have it listed.
 
FreeMan
FreeMan
grr... OK, I've got a date fubar'd somewhere. :(
=DATEDIF("1/1/2016","1/1/2017","M") gives me 12
Odd though, that it doesn't appear as an option.
Thanks for the rubber ducking. Back to the salt mines...
 
mansellan
mansellan
@Duga, incoming...
 
Duga
Duga
> Closes #3994.

Found that VBEProjectExtensions is unreferenced (possibly by removal of SC), dropped.
 
IvenBach
IvenBach
TYVM @this for again helping me connect the wires.
Just tested it and was able to get expected results.
:+1:
 
FreeMan
FreeMan
8:53 PM
AH! DateDif() only works if the earlier month is the first month. I had 'em backwards.
sigh...
 
Duga
Duga
[rubberduck-vba/Rubberduck] build for commit c75ae906 on unknown branch: AppVeyor build succeeded
> # [Codecov](https://codecov.io/gh/rubberduck-vba/Rubberduck/pull/4015?src=pr&el=h1) Report
> Merging [#4015](https://codecov.io/gh/rubberduck-vba/Rubberduck/pull/4015?src=pr&el=desc) into [next](https://codecov.io/gh/rubberduck-vba/Rubberduck/commit/85d75346282060886013aad30c4a93b5b304b8f5?src=pr&el=desc) will **increase** coverage by `0.13%`.
> The diff coverage is `0%`.


```diff
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## next #4015 +/- ##
===========================
[rubberduck-vba/Rubberduck] build for commit c75ae906 on unknown branch: 53.81% (target 0%)
 
Duga
Duga
9:17 PM
[rubberduck-vba/Rubberduck] build for commit 1f3c3641 on unknown branch: AppVeyor build succeeded
 
HackSlash
HackSlash
At long last, I manually cleaned my registry. Now I have the correct build number showing.
Version 2.2.6708.13023
OS: Microsoft Windows NT 6.1.7601 Service Pack 1, x64
Host Product: Microsoft Office 2013 x86
Host Version: 15.0.4997.1000
Host Executable: EXCEL.EXE
 
IvenBach
IvenBach
:+1:
 
Duga
Duga
> # [Codecov](https://codecov.io/gh/rubberduck-vba/Rubberduck/pull/4015?src=pr&el=h1) Report
> Merging [#4015](https://codecov.io/gh/rubberduck-vba/Rubberduck/pull/4015?src=pr&el=desc) into [next](https://codecov.io/gh/rubberduck-vba/Rubberduck/commit/85d75346282060886013aad30c4a93b5b304b8f5?src=pr&el=desc) will **increase** coverage by `0.12%`.
> The diff coverage is `0%`.


```diff
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## next #4015 +/- ##
===========================
[rubberduck-vba/Rubberduck] build for commit 1f3c3641 on unknown branch: 53.81% (target 0%)
 
HackSlash
HackSlash
I load the test case and I still don't see "Procedure 'x' can be written as a function"
 
IvenBach
IvenBach
Have you parsed?
 
HackSlash
HackSlash
9:26 PM
The circle arrows?
yeah
 
IvenBach
IvenBach
It says Ready?
 
HackSlash
HackSlash
yup
 
IvenBach
IvenBach
You don't have any @Ignore annotations perhaps?
 
HackSlash
HackSlash
I don't think I ever have. I'm using a test workbook
just the test code pasted in from the example
 
IvenBach
IvenBach
Which example?
 
HackSlash
HackSlash
9:28 PM
#2719 
Sub test()
Dim foo As Object
Set foo = New Collection
DoSomething foo
End Sub

Sub DoSomething(ByRef bar As Object)
  bar.baz = "x"
End Sub
2018-05-16 14:30:07.6861;TRACE-2.2.6708.13023;Rubberduck.Inspections.Abstract.InspectionBas‌​e;Intercepted invocation of 'ProcedureCanBeWrittenAsFunctionInspection.DoGetInspectionResults' returned 0 objects.;
 
IvenBach
IvenBach
Neither do I.
 
HackSlash
HackSlash
Aha! Is not just me?
I can't get any ProcedureCanBeWrittenAsFunction to pop on my code
I've tried a few example of what "should"
 
Duga
Duga
> I double checked this and I'm not getting any issue either.

Tried with code below that I know used to give results.
```
Public Sub test()
Dim bar As String
bar = "old value"
RewriteAsFunction bar

Debug.Print bar
End Sub

Public Sub RewriteAsFunction(ByRef value As String)
value = "new value"
End Sub
```

`Procedure can be written as a function` is set to `Suggestion` and there is no annotation to ignore this inspection.
 
IvenBach
IvenBach
@Duga Possible regression bug?
 
Duga
Duga
 
mansellan
mansellan
9:42 PM
Works for me (in a standard module)
 
Duga
Duga
> I double checked this and I'm not getting any issue either.
 
Mathieu Guindon
Mathieu Guindon
@IvenBach then why does it work for @mansellan and me?
 
IvenBach
IvenBach
Not sure.
I'm not getting a result either when I know I should.
 
mansellan
mansellan
tried in Sheet1 too, works there
 
IvenBach
IvenBach
I believe you.
 
mansellan
mansellan
9:48 PM
@HackSlash are the other inspections showing?
@IvenBach lol posted it for my q ^^
 
IvenBach
IvenBach
Fresh pull from Next along with Clean, Rebuild.
I'm at a loss...
 
Mathieu Guindon
Mathieu Guindon
so, false negatives now.. great!
TTGH
 
Duga
Duga
10:12 PM
> MCVE:

1. Open Excel VBE
2. Using PE, rename VBAProject to 'Test'
3. In CE, *without selecting any node*, Click Add Module from the toolbar
4. Module will be created in folder 'VBAProject', not 'Test'

![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/25420409/40146667-53e5d054-595e-11e8-8183-23ba1bbb037c.png)

Absent a selected node, the default folder should be based on the name of the active project. Spotted because it's more apparent in VB6, which has a different (and varying) de
 
Mathieu Guindon
Mathieu Guindon
Excited to announce that we’ve broken our previous record of 1 download.
Tweeted by Cockfuckpod on May 15, 2018 at 5:51 PM
 
Duga
Duga
 
this
this
I have no inspections here using Iven's MCVE
 
Duga
Duga
 
this
this
I wonder if it's possible that the inspection results is non-deterministic? That would explain why some gets results while others don't. It shouldn't be, however.
wth why is there even a like button on outlook web?!?
Newsflash for Microsoft: Ya ain't Facebook. Don't be like them, mmmk?
 
Duga
Duga
10:22 PM
 
mansellan
mansellan
@this #TrynaBeDownWithTheKids
 
this
this
#Reject
 
mansellan
mansellan
@Duga first issue I've raised in ages that isn't #vb6-specific :-)
 
Mathieu Guindon
Mathieu Guindon
10:58 PM
@this "send a smile/frown" is for user feedback. Or is it something else?
 
this
this
Nope
 
HackSlash
HackSlash
Since I don't know how inspections work can someone tell me if this code is redundant?

var ignored = new HashSet<Declaration>( State.DeclarationFinder.FindAllInterfaceMembers()
.Concat(State.DeclarationFinder.FindAllInterfaceImplementingMembers())
.Concat(builtinHandlers)
.Concat(userDeclarations.Where(item => item.IsWithEvents)));

return Listener.Contexts.Where(context => context.Context.Parent is VBAParser.SubStmtContext)
.Select(context => contextLookup[(VBAParser.SubStmtContext)context.Context.Parent])
What I see is that the conditions in "var ignored" are repeated below in the "Listener.Contexts.Where"
...
 
this
this
11:16 PM
hmm but I see this line !ignored.Contains(decl)
 
this
this
11:48 PM
@WaynePhillipsEA just to help clear what I think is confusion on my part - normally an source interface must implement dispatch (though it may be dual) -- is there any reasons why a source interface should not be a dual interface and implement dispatch only?
 
IvenBach
IvenBach
#TIL 1-1-30 is the day excel switches from 1929 to 2030 when YYYY isn't specified.
Another reason to use YYYY always.
 
this
this
@IvenBach never ever use ambiguous date formats. ISO dates only and forever.
 
IvenBach
IvenBach
I know. I wanted to see when it would occur. #CuriosityNotKillingThisDuck
 
this
this
you'd be surprised at how many people fat finger their way into 3rd or 11th centrury....
 
IvenBach
IvenBach
The year 210? I'm sure that's what they meant.
 
this
this
11:52 PM
yeah
"we have this order placed on March 17th, 218. Now sir, would you be so kind to explain to me why it took you 1800 years to fulfill this unfilled order?"
 
mansellan
mansellan
@this Meh, that's about average for some carriers...
 
this
this
lol
 
IvenBach
IvenBach
Better late than never?
"You're accepted to <PrestigiousUniversity>." :grumble: 25 years too late.
Home Time. Get to digestify what I learned today.
 
00:00 - 19:0019:00 - 00:00

« first day (1440 days earlier)      last day (1740 days later) »