Cube Connect is a Flow-like mobile puzzle game on the surface of a cube.
Rules of Flow (which is simply Numberlink with colors instead of numbers; copied from Nikoli rules with small modification):
Connect pairs of the same colored dots with a continuous line.
Lines go through the center of the ...
My thinking all revolves around it ending just in 'D' (the 'crack of dawn' implying its first letter). This would fit the general ending of words that are synonyms of 'tormented' also...
Something like HARASSED, where you have HARE (speed) 'inhaling' A+SS, all followed by D(-awn). If SS=line (e.g. via shipping, somehow) then this might work
(I've also been working with RATE and PACE and similar short word for 'speed' that end in an 'E' to give us the useful 'ED' ending...)
although I realise in my haste, that's the wrong part to fodderise based on your thinking
My thinking, as I don't think I'll get any further on my own, it was COCKCROW and line -> ROW (although, first issue not inhaled) leaving one of the C for speed( of light) and the rest... no idea
Maybe 'speed inhaling' is a slightly cryptic description of gasping?
I was making ripple effect but failed on uniqueness. That lead me thinking of putting inequality sign to fix the puzzle. Then, I'm wondering, what if I make a new one with intentional inequality sign? So, here we are!
Rules (from Nikoli):
The areas divided by bold lines are called "Rooms". Fill ...
Have to say, I'm not really seeing it... If someone wants to ask about Rubik's cube terminology, for example, they are probably most likely to get an answer by tagging it with [rubiks-cube] rather than [terminology]. Ditto for cryptic crosswords, or grid deduction puzzles. I can't think of a situation where you would ever use it on its own, without already having another tagged puzzle type for reference.
@Stiv I'm thinking of it from the perspective of looking for questions that are requesting terminology, no specific puzzle type, just terminology requests.
However, I will say I don't see a lot of benefit; but since I thought of it, I wanted to get the opinion of others. :)
That's all this is, of course - my opinion (I can't speak for others) - and I agree with what Chris says above: it does feel a bit of a 'meta tag' rather than a topic in its own right. [puzzle-identification] I get, because in those instances you don't have a lot to go on; but [terminology] as described above really sits inside another more pertinent tag that you could use, depending on the type of puzzle you're inquiring about.
(And if you don't know the type of puzzle itself, we're back to [puzzle-identification] instead!)
How is thisnot opinion-based? It's literally asking for an opinion on best scramble method. Answers end up being recommendations for methods/software the answerer personally likes.
As the answers show, people are interpreting it to mean "share your favorite scramble method!" and everyone provides why they like their method and why it's random "enough"
I'm of the opinion that the question is only on topic if it asked for an authoritative scrambling method from the ANSI standard on Rubik's Cube Scrambling or other competent body. And even then, it's a LMGTFY question
Historical locks are sometimes applied to questions.
What is a historical lock?
What is the purpose of a historical lock?
How are questions affected by historical locking?
When is it appropriate to lock a question for historical reasons? When is it not appropriate?
How do I request a historica...
The missing term in this sequence has been replaced by the placeholder "—".
What is the missing term, and why?
10000
121
100
—
24
22
20
17
16
15
14
13
12
11
10
@samm82 PAR = average sort of means modest, in the "a modest apartment" sense. "a" = one = I. "little sentimental" = its first letter, S. So you get PARIS, a Greek character. I suspect this is not the intended solution.