16:15
@RajorshiKoyal To expand on what I just wrote in a comment on your question:
1. PSE is specifically for puzzles and questions about puzzles, and your question definitely doesn't fit that; so it's not on topic here, I'm afraid.
2. There is no One True Way to classify all different kinds of reasoning. There are a bunch of different ways of thinking, and a bunch of different things to think about, but they all have fuzzy edges and if you insist on dividing up the very general area of reasoning into different types, there are lots of ways to do it.
3. Dividing things up into kinda-arbitrary categories is a thing educators often like to do, because it gives them a framework for their books, courses, etc. But the choice of how to divide things up is mostly something they do, rather than reflecting a reality that Really Truly is divided up into those bits.
4. You can certainly identify some particular kinds of reasoning that might be worth paying attention to. (Say, formal logic, or reasoning by analogy, or scientific investigation.) But these things don't exist in isolation, and most of the time good thinking will involve different reasoning styles working together.
5. So if someone's going to write a book or something on (say) scientific reasoning, it will likely involve other things too. So you won't be able to find a bunch of books, or lecture courses, or whatever you have in mind, that cover every kind of reasoning without overlap.
6. The specific terms "verbal reasoning" and "nonverbal reasoning" you mentioned are ones I've usually seen in the context of tests of reasoning ability. If what you want is to get good at doing those tests, then probably the best advice is to find a bunch of tests, and repeat the cycle { try hard to solve one, look at the answers, think hard about things you couldn't do or got wrong }.
7. If that's the case, I hope you won't confuse reasoning with doing tests of reasoning ability. There's some correlation between being good at one and being good at the other, which is why the tests exist in the first place, but training for the tests probably won't make any difference at all to how good you actually are at thinking. (In an ideal world, no one would train for the tests at all, but of course you can't stop people trying to get ahead.)