« first day (920 days earlier)      last day (2715 days later) » 
00:00 - 19:0019:00 - 00:00

12:07 AM
@Alconja Uhm thanks. I will try adding another key clue to see if that's enough to force a single solution.
 
Heh, someone downvoted my valentine code answer.
Doesn't look like I'll succeed in doing a Geobits :-P
 
@Randal'Thor well last seen 1m ago and in The Ninteenth Byte
 
@JonathanAllan By "doing a Geobits" I meant repeating his success, not finding him! :-)
Last spoke 2 hours ago - I'll try to catch him when he's active.
 
oh, I read "I'm tempted to go and find Geobits to show him" :/
 
Hey, are you a PPCGer too?
 
12:21 AM
Yeah
 
Seems to be quite a few of our top users who're also active over there.
 
12:33 AM
Out of curiosity, does anyone else find it a little, ... I dunno, martinetish ... to VTC questions whose intent is manifestly clear even if they don't explicitly state it? I've seen a few instances recently where a question was voted to close, or in fact actually closed, when it seems quite apparent what the questioner is looking for. A recent example is MBB's puzzle; the intent, decrypt the cipher, doesn't even bear mentioning. It was closed as "unclear what you're asking" -- but ... is it?
 
12:50 AM
I occasionally post questions over at PPCG. Not much of a coder myself - thinking of learning a weird esolang or finding some other ridiculous construction method just to get obscurity points, though.
 
1:17 AM
@Rubio I think in that instance people were using "unclear" as a surrogate for the, as yet, non-existent "low quality" close reason. As for not explicitly stating things, that sounds like a bad idea... ;)
 
"I don't get it" + "You didn't state the objective" ≠ a low quality or unclear puzzle. I don't think MBB's presentation of that puzzle is particularly good (and practically speaking needed the hints to solve, but mechanically didn't), but it was in fact a pretty good puzzle, the intent was clear, and other than reducing this uncomfortably close to "I can't define a 'bad puzzle' for you but I know it when I see it", I'm not sure what exactly it is that made that one VTC-worthy.
 
Alconja, you did have the goal in one of the sub-images (sort of):
 
It is a bit weird for a puzzle to be put on hold as "unclear what you're asking" after it has been solved.
 
That's happened twice in the last week.
At least. I suspect I've seen at least 3, but I can't find the 3rd one now
 
What was the other one?
 
1:29 AM
2
Q: State of the Union

paoloA topical puzzle for you all. Can you tell me, briefly, which of the following US states is the odd one out, and why? California Colorado Connecticut Delaware Hawaii Illinois Oregon Rhode Island

OP confirmed in a comment that my answer was correct, though never actually accepted it (and apparently went AWOL immediately thereafter)
 
@Rubio Your answer by itself makes clear that the question is too broad.
 
But it doesn't, actually. See my comment under the actual question.
 
This is why "odd one out" questions tend to be bad: one can often make a case for any particular one being the odd one out.
 
My "answers" were deliberate jokes, until I actually hit on the right one. The others didn't fit, weren't topical, and clearly were not intended solutions.
 
I'm with Rubio on this one, FWIW.
 
1:32 AM
But any of them could have been considered a valid solution.
I stand by my VTC on that one.
 
Any pattern-finding question will have multiple possible answers. Should we forbid 'em all?
 
The puzzle from the onset hinted at topicality and at abbreviation relevance. (And wordplay.) None of the answers given fit that, so would not qualify to make it "too broad". In my opinion.
 
@GarethMcCaughan They don't all have multiple possible equally sensible answers.
 
I agree that that one was a marginal case -- I don't think voting to close is entirely unreasonable -- but I think leaving it open would have been better.
 
I really do think that one was well hinted, the answer sought was definite, and the other answers precluded by the question itself.
 
1:35 AM
This one also didn't have multiple possible equally good answers. (I'm not sure "sensible" is the right word.)
 
If someone posts a and someone else answers it with a stupid polynomial interpolation which obviously wasn't intended, then I wouldn't say it's too broad just because of that.
 
A vote to close seems to me to be a judgement on behalf of the overall community that a puzzle is objectively bad. And I don't think either of the two referenced qualify. That's my opinion, and I think I can argue well for it.
 
I think this puzzle was (just about) like a number-sequence that has other unintended answers via polynomial interpolation. The question indicated explicitly that a topical answer was sought (none of Rubio's other answers had that property) and it hinted that abbreviations were relevant (only one of Rubio's other answers had that property).
Again, I don't want to claim it was a great puzzle or deny that it was at best teetering on the edge of being too broad.
 
But if someone asks "what's the odd one out - Britain, Kazakhstan, Argentina, or Lesotho?", then an equally good case could be made for any of them, so that's too broad, at least without further clues towards what sort of odd one out is being sought, which would probably make it trivial.
 
Right. But this question was not like that because there was an answer that, once stated, was fairly clearly better than the others.
 
1:39 AM
I'm only bringing it up because it seems, as I said, to have happened more than I'd expect in recent days, and maybe a modicum of caution should be called for before knee-jerk reaching for the Close button just because something looks like it might not be a good puzzle. Voting to close, in particular after a puzzle has actually been solved and therefore is, objectively, solvable from its own clues, seems like bad form.
 
@Rubio Not so much "objectively bad" as objectively off-topic or unanswerable. I believe I've written about this on meta ...
 
And yes, I'd agree that if it was the question you just asked, that it boils down to "Guess the criteria I'm thinking of"
but neither of these puzzles were that.
 
16
A: Is the distinction too subtle between downvoting and voting to close?

rand al'thorA CLOSE VOTE IS NOT A SUPER-DOWNVOTE. Sorry for shouting. But this is a really important point which far too many people apparently fail to grasp. Downvotes are used at the discretion of the individual voter, and mean "this is a bad question". They can reflect the voter's opinion of the qualit...

 
The proper solution was hinted at in the puzzle. (And in MBB's, further hinted in hints, though arguably that may flag it as a bad puzzle)
 
Again: when a puzzle has been attacked by someone other than its setter, who has given it nontrivial amounts of thought and arrived at the setter's intended solution with confidence that it is the intended solution -- isn't that strong evidence against its being "objectively unanswerable"?
 
1:40 AM
^^^ That was what I was thinking of, but this one is actually better:
 
No.
 
5
A: Proper rules for closing

Avigrailtoo broad the question has already 3+ answers that all look plausible/acceptable I can easily think of one or more answers for this riddle Op has been contacted: -- OP states the intended answer is similar or even worse -- OP can't show that some of the clues haven't been used properly OP...

 
@Rubio What was the "No." in response to?
 
I could then argue that the Dargloc puzzle is VTC worthy.
er. Sorry. I completely misread Gareth. :)
 
I wondered (hence my question)
Incidentally, I would have some sympathy with closing the Dargloc puzzle :-).
 
1:42 AM
@GarethMcCaughan That's where we disagree, then. I think some of the other solutions in Rubio's answer looked more likely than the intended one. "Letters which appear in 'Hillary Clinton'" just seemed fairly random to me.
 
My answer now that I read it is "Yes", though I would qualify it somewhat; it's possible to get the answer to a bad question and that doesn't make it not a bad question. But VTC because "unclear" in that case is, I think, unquestionably inappropriate.
As it was plainly clear enough to someone to follow the clues to a solution.
 
I think it would have been a better puzzle if the setter had contrived to have both (major) candidates participate symmetrically in the condition.
And yes, absolutely a puzzle can be a terrible puzzle despite being solvable, but -- as Rand has rightly been pointing out -- being a terrible puzzle is not the same as deserving to be closed as "unclear".
 
I think you meant me, but yes.
 
I actually meant Rand. (See, e.g., that first meta question linked above.)
 
I gotta run for a bit, but I just wanted to raise a little flag of caution. I'll read the metas when I get back.
 
1:45 AM
@GarethMcCaughan Lack of symmetry between the two major candidates has been a much bigger problem than just here ;-)
 
@Randal'Thor Yes, but let's not get into that here...
(I would hazard a guess that there's a great deal of agreement among the denizens of PSE about which candidate was better, but I bet there isn't total unanimity, and political arguments can get very toxic very fast.)
 
Heh, yeah, I didn't mean to start a political debate. There's an election room for that anyway.
 
2:33 AM
hmm, any ideas on the final step of the patternbot? I'm stumped.
cant see any indication of anything other than "look stuff up on oeis". But there is no such sequence.
Maybe it could be a triangle read by sequences or something?
 
3:03 AM
I obviously didn't read your answer carefully enough -- I thought you'd completely solved it.
oh -- is it actually all the sequences themselves that you haven't got? I think I saw you said something like "OEIS sequences in order" and just assumed you'd checked :-).
oh, no, I understand now
so you have the right sequences but don't know where each one needs to start from
my apologies for being slow on the uptake
 
yeah I don't know for sure, but I am almost certain that everything is correct except for where the sequences I've given start.
so eleven and ten items of those two sequences respectively, but possibly starting at a different n
 
3:27 AM
yeah A000002 is a best guess - updated. Others seem to be accurate - but I don't shink all are known to infinity anyway.
From 13 on we see ...,4,4,4,2,2,3,3,2,4,... which does not appear in OEIS
if you can spot a mistake in there?...
...4,4,4,2,2,3,3,2,... does appear though.
 
So, like - I read Rand's meta post. I read the Proper Rules for Closing. I would disagree with "already has 3+ answers that all look plausible/acceptable" to the extent that it could accept answers clearly not the intent of the asker; a "stupid polynomial interpolation" may be provably "correct" without being Correct™, and similarly there are often going to be answers that are defensible, but nevertheless are incomplete or unsatisfying in how well they fit the question.
Other than that, I agree with pretty much everything in the Rules for Closing accepted answer. And would argue that the recent VTCs I commented on, don't fit.
 
*shink = think ^
 
@JonathanAllan I think I've got the last bit of the patternbot
but hang on a moment while I check details
 
hmm last should be A21 but is actually A22...
^ oh hmm no it is A21 sorry
 
aargh, it doesn't quiiiite work (yet)
I'm getting my arse kicked by the Law of Small Numbers
see, if instead of starting position in the sequence as listed in OEIS we use starting position relative to "correct" sequence indices -- i.e., add the (first) offset value from the OEIS entry -- then we get 2,?,2,?,3,2,?,2,3,3,4,?,4,4,5,2,3,3,4,3,4
aargh formatting
sorry, I had underscores there at first and that did entirely the wrong thing
anyway, OEIS has a bunch of matches for 2,3,3,4,?,4,4,5,2,3,3,4,3,4
which I think are all morally the same thing, namely number of bits in n
 
3:52 AM
"morally"
 
but the earlier terms don't quite match
 
those numbers are the ones I posted plus "left-offset"?
 
sorry, I said "number of bits" and I meant "number of 1-bits"
@JonathanAllan yes
 
yeah I read bits set and understood "ones"
 
@Deusovi by "morally" I mean that e.g. one of them is "numerator of fraction of 1-bits" which is very frequently equal to the number of one bits
and one of them is "max number of 1-digits in any base" which is usually the number of 1s in base 2
and some others differ in more fundamental ways but equal the #1bits sequence "often" for good reasons
anyway, lots and lots of them look like 2,2,3,?,3,3,?,2,3,3,4,?,4,4,5,2,3,3,4,3,4
where the italicized ones are ones that seem to differ from the starting-point sequence we've got here
and maybe this is all coincidence, but it seems like a really big coincidence.
 
4:05 AM
it definitely seems like the right kind of result for the puzzle, not sure whey the extra offset in the most likely candidate "hamming weight"
(that is A000120)
 
anyway, it's 4am local time and I'd better go to bed. Good luck!
 
I'm also in the UK - Good night!!
 
Good night guys :)
 
Well I'm still up (ish)
 
4:51 AM
The latest question needs to be taken out back and shot.
 
Lock: 3,[n*1],6,7. Unlock: 3,[n*1],6,9,4 or 2,[n*5],9,4
It looks like the OP is asking if their answer is right.
 
Yeah actually I just was typing up an edit to address the open-endedness of the state diagram. There's a mention of 5-digit sequences, which presumably is an external constraint as it's not a constraint of the state diagram.
 
5:07 AM
Ah yeah I pretty much ignored all the writing
Pretty sure you've answered everything except their question: "Your answers are wrong, neither of them are five digits long" :p
 
I couldn't tell what they were actually asking, so figured I'd provide the most general answer possible. :)
 
Think you got it
 
This is, amusingly, a case where the question is completely unclear but it doesn't even matter because the answer is straightforward and easy to provide regardless of what their specific question was. Unless they actually meant those tags, in which case who knows what they're after.
 
Someone who can't string a coherent sentence together is likely to get the wrong tags.
 
poor guy's getting savaged on rep for that Q though. :)
 
5:14 AM
having 0 effect
or almost
 
5:27 AM
@Deusovi Aaah thanks, that's a great relief :-)
 
I don't suppose there's any way to SUGGEST an edit to the OP of a question (or, I guess, answer) without actually making it, once you're past the rep threshold for unreviewed edits?
 
@Rubio I think so. However, you can always ping the OP and manually suggest an edit in the comment.
 
or edit and comment "is that what you meant" or equivalent.
 
I suppose. Though I sort of did that already, I guess. :)
Just in an answer rather than in a comment, or in the original question
 
user230888
@Ankoganit No upcoming prof. Phenomenon puzzle ?
 
6:00 AM
@tpk Nah, not anytime soon, sorry. Nice and new math puzzles are hard to come by.
 
 
8 hours later…
2:11 PM
@Mithrandir nice puzzle!
 
@BeastlyGerbil Thanks!
 
I'm exploring Sarumon now, got to the greeny, purple yellowy bit
Found the ROT13 text at the bottom
 
What's the latest CCCC?
 
Posted an answer
 
I'm creating a new one, but need to solve the last one before I can post it.
This one still unsolved?
22 hours ago, by Rand al'Thor
19 hours ago, by Gareth McCaughan
CCCC: A state I've reached: turned on (6)
 
Sid
2:25 PM
Unfortunately, I don't see the image, it says "not available"...
 
@Randal'Thor have you clicked on Mithrandirs puzzle yet? If you click on the picture, it isyour account on the computer
 
Sid
Well, another image shows Rand's puzzle about Mithrandir.... which leads to nothing that I see... while another has someone from The Hobbit...
 
@BeastlyGerbil Yeah, I know.
Sep 7 at 21:34, by Mithrandir
user image
 
Oh you found the GIF on the keyboard too then
 
Sid
That image reminds me of Windows 98... Not sure, why...
 
2:28 PM
My rep is about 10k out of date though :-P
 
@Mithrandir I can't decode the pigpen cipher in the BFG to anything
 
Sid
@BeastlyGerbil Yeah, it gives weird letters...
 
Most of the books lead to images, but a few lead to text so I am focusing on those
I like the red circles one :P
 
Too broad?
 
Okay @Mithrandir I've been through every single book and some contain secret links and letters, but most just contain an image from a movie or a book cover or just an image, and thats really confusing me. Are those pics important?
 
Sid
2:44 PM
@BeastlyGerbil Rebus?
There is no tag, though...
 
Yeah I found a pretzel rebus and a couple that look like rebuses, but most arent
For instance, one of them just shows a picture of a donkey
And one just shows a fire
 
11
A: The many memes of scifi.stackexchange

Wad CheberMeme: rand al'thor's (or anyone else's) donkey of shame Originator: Wad Cheber Cultural height: September 2015 to present. Background: rand made the mistake of admitting that he has never seen any of the Star Wars movies. Therefore, he was forced to ride a donkey backwards into the des...

Mithrandir does know his SFF memes, though maybe he wouldn't put them in a puzzle over here.
 
Aaah this one is really bugging me. I've found Q3 and H2 but can't find another letter to complete an imgur address
 
On the other hand, he's already included a reference to the "Mithrandir = Rand al'Thor" thing in that puzzle.
 
@Randal'Thor thats the donkey one
 
I don't think so
 
Hmm, maybe not. The fact that the solution is in the story does narrow it down, I suppose.
Although the question doesn't actually say that.
So it probably is too broad as stated.
 
@Randal'Thor can you help with the pretzel rebus?
 
@BeastlyGerbil That one was solved ages ago.
 
Its part of Mithrandirs new one
 
Sid
2:58 PM
@BeastlyGerbil I don't quite remember, but It had something to do with LOTR..
 
4
Q: The second pretzel rebus

MithrandirThis is the sequel to this. What does the below quote, written with pretzels, say? (The tags are a hint... :P) Overall image: Mug shots: Sorry, this first one is kinda blurry. But it's still recognizable :) Next one's a bit blurry, sorry. But it doesn't really matter :P) G...

"In a hole in the ground there lived a hobbit."
 
Probably indicates the book called 'Hobbit'
 
user230888
Mithrandir is a sockpuppet of BG. :P
 
Which by the law of transitivity of sockpuppetry implies rand is a sockpuppet of BG :P
 
@tpk you haven't been here long enough to know Rand althor and Mithrandir are the same person ;)
(Not really its an inside joke)
 
3:05 PM
lol just realised sockpuppetry is an equivalence relation
 
Sid
@Ankoganit Pretty obvious, isn't it? That should be an example of equivalence relations in books.. :P
 
@Sid Yeah, that's obusovi
 
user230888
Yeah, very trivial.
 
@Ankoganit Obusovi is Deusovi's brother?
6
 
@Randal'Thor lol
I'll keep that typo
 
3:08 PM
@Beastly @Gareth @Jonathan More delete votes on this? It's a request for people to write creative stories, not a puzzle.
 
Sid
Wait, duplicate questions are also equivalence relations?
Maybe not, Not exactly symmetric...
 
user230888
Nope, one way based on time.
 
Wow, @Gareth's C4 is unsolved for 19 hours
My C4s don't even last 19 seconds
 
@Ankoganit I'm not sure about symmetry ...
With genuine bad sockpuppets, there's likely to be one 'master' account and a sockpuppet which is mainly used to upvote that one. Not sure if you'd say the master was a sockpuppet of the sockpuppet.
 
3:19 PM
Um that depends on whether you agree to call the original user to be a sock of the fake users
Actually yes, that doesn't work too well
 
I'd say Gamow, for instance, has too much rep to be a mere sockpuppet.
Having socks isn't the same as being one.
 
Yes I mean we can be sure @Randal'Thor isn't a sockuppet
 
damn now what do I write if they ask for an example of equiv relations in an exam :( :P
 
He might have some (naught, naughty) but h isn't one himself
 
@BeastlyGerbil Having sockpuppets isn't naughty in itself, unless you use them to upvote yourself etc.
I do have a sockpuppet, but there's nothing nefarious going on with it.
 
3:22 PM
who? mithrandir? :P
 
user230888
For example, MBB ... [?]
 
86
A: How should sockpuppets be handled on Stack Exchange?

Shog9How can I be sure I'm looking at a sockpuppet? You can't ever be 100% sure. What you think is a sockpuppet could in fact be my good friend Nog Shine, who loves everything I write, copies my writing style, and uses my computer to vote and post stuff when I step away for coffee. But in practice, ...

 
Many high rep answerers have a sock for asking, I heard
 
@GarethMcCaughan?
 
@Ankoganit I dunno, maybe on SO.
In these parts asking is at least as prestigious as answering.
 
3:25 PM
Yeah, that was SO I think
Not here
 
Dependigng on the puzzle, it is generally as hard to make one as it is to solve it
 
user230888
@BeastlyGerbil Sorry no offence, but except for finding Beastly's wife and a cipher, all his puzzles, although being (well) efforted, are trivial.
 
8
Q: Do the top answerers have secondary accounts to post questions?

Jader DiasI wonder why some of the top answerers (> 1000 answers) on SO have so few questions (< 100 questions). Has anyone ever caught them using multiple accounts?

 
@tpk, my top ones aren't and yes unfortunately I agree with you for the rest. I'm only 13 and still need to work out how to make consistent good puzzles
 
@BeastlyGerbil If your question meant "do I have a sockpuppet for asking questions": nope, no sockpuppets at all, sorry.
 
3:28 PM
I am going to try and concentrate more on what I'm good at, imgur mazes
@GarethMcCaughan aaaaah :P
 
user230888
Why care about the age ? You may be 13 and posting good puzzles, or be 30 and posting trivial ones.
 
: if @Deusovi ever makes a sockpuppet, he should call it Obusovi.
8
 
@tpk my point is I still haven't figured out before posting whether a puzzle is good and isn't trivial
To use a cliche - I'm still learning
 
@Sconibulus If you happen to be around, is there any chance you could double-check a couple of things in your chess cipher? Specifically, whether S5 is really correct for both word 4 letter 5 and word 6 letter 4; and whether word 5 is missing a letter. Thanks!
@tpk People do commonly learn a thing or two between ages 13 and 30. For instance, that complaining in public that someone else's puzzles are "trivial" is rude.
5
 
Nah I agree
 
user230888
3:32 PM
Nov 15 at 12:01, by tpk
Oh. I am a stupid.
 
But I also would like to point out that a lot of puzzles on the first page of the votes section are trivial, including this from Rand Althor
 
@BeastlyGerbil You're welcome to agree, and you may well not be bothered by it, but that doesn't stop it being rude. (Something is rude, I suggest, if a substantial fraction of people it's said to would be upset by it. Of course if someone knows you really well then they may say things to you that would usually be rude but they know you won't mind -- but I bet tpk doesn't know you that well.
 
Trivial =/= bad or boring
 
If you're asking, you probably already figured it out, but yeah, there was one letter left out of the plaintext that would not change a word meaning because it was unencipherable with the chosen key
 
@BeastlyGerbil You thought Andrew Void was trivial? :-(
 
3:34 PM
let me check to make sure I didn't screw up a different letter
 
Depends on the definition of trivial
 
@tpk Being rude about yourself doesn't excuse you from being polite about other people. (This is a thing I learned between age 13 and age 30.)
 
@Randal'Thor I'm thinking trivial means involves a piece of trivia (In your case the book A Void) if it doens't mean that, I apologise
 
@Sconibulus I've figured out the answer, or at least I think I have, but I am still trying to make sense of how the "S" letters work. I thought I had a kinda-sorta pattern that would semi-explain them but then I found something else that broke it :-).
 
@BeastlyGerbil Most of them
 
3:35 PM
@BeastlyGerbil I think by "trivial" @tpk means too easy / content-free / no serious thinking required.
 
@BeastlyGerbil I thought "trivial" normally means easy, simple, uninteresting.
 
I don't remember what the BFG one is....
 
And if trivial does mean bad or boring then I will take offence at @tpk's comment
 
(the etymology of "trivial" is quite interesting, btw)
 
@GarethMcCaughan via is road, right
?
 
3:36 PM
@GarethMcCaughan Indeed. Comes from the trivia and quadrivia in ancient Greek times IIRC?
 
@Randal'Thor okay then, sorry
I just meant it contained a piece of trivia
 
When the education curriculum was split up into seven parts (though I can't remember what they all were).
 
@Randal'Thor Mediaeval rather than ancient Greek, but yes.
 
Once I heard obvious etymologically means "right there on the road"
 
FWIW Andrew Void is a great puzzle
 
3:37 PM
oh, sorry, earlier than mediaeval, actually
goes back to late Roman
but not Greek
 
@BeastlyGerbil No problem :-) Once I realised you were using "trivial" in a different sense, nothing to be offended about.
 
@Randal'Thor @BeastlyGerbil I am pretty sure @tpk is not using it in that sense, though.
 
@tpk wait till tommorow when I post a puzzle for the metapuzzle and then try and call that one trivial. It's anything but
 
6
Q: What does this message on your doorstep say?

MithrandirYou wake up one morning and head outside to get your mail. However, on your doorstep, you find an encoded message... What does this message say?

 
user230888
In my def, trivial = very very easy.
 
3:38 PM
@tpk = @ArbitraryKangaroo, right?
Or am I getting mixed up with someone else?
 
I use trivial in the sense 'three vials': "Nurse, give that patient a tri-vial dose"
2
:P
 
@Ankoganit no, not "right there on the road". Back in Olden Times (tm) there was a sort of 7-part academic curriculum; the three parts that were studied first were the "trivium" (three roads) and the four that came after were the quadrivium (four roads). So the easy stuff was "trivial" because it belonged to the earlier part of the curriculum.
trivium = grammar, logic, rhetoric
 
@GarethMcCaughan Oh, nice! I was talking about "obvious" though
 
oh, yes, obvious = right there in the road getting in your way
 
@GarethMcCaughan Curses, it looks like you're right and I'm a terrible person, word 4 was supposed to have S7, not S5.
 
Sid
3:40 PM
@tpk See, Every puzzle appears trivial once it is solved. For example, the puzzle that Mithrandir referenced in his latest puzzle.. (The one asked by Rand) had a very simple concept and that's where the beauty lies, in the simplicity of the puzzle.
 
ok, thanks. oh, and that means a bit of extra information about the S-letters, which may help deconfuse me a bit.
 
Some puzzles are good because they are complicated (Alconja's) but some are good as they are simple
 
user230888
@BeastlyGerbil I would be sleeping/at school then.
 
@BeastlyGerbil Some of the best puzzles seem very complex and difficult but are actually easy once you get the right idea.
 
user230888
Trivial puzzles aren't puzzles, as trivial problems are nothing but rote dumb exercise.
 
Sid
3:43 PM
@tpk sample? WHat do you call as trivial problems?
 
This is why I like (good) riddles: they can be really confusing and seemingly impossible to make all the clues fit one single thing, but when you find it, everything slides into place so beautifully.
 
@Sconibulus I have only very weak evidence that there is anything wrong here, but could you confirm that both s2 (word 1 letter 5) and s19 (word 4 letter 1) are correct? My highly deficient and defective understanding of the S-letters makes me think they should be letters 16 apart but in fact they seem to be letters 10 apart.
 
For instance, this awesome riddle, which remained unsolved for months until the great McMagister was brought out of retirement.
 
@Sconibulus (feel free not to indulge me in these queries, of course)
 
I'm going back through and making everything else is right, just to verify. I thought I'd done this before, but I guess I missed something
 
3:45 PM
Such a massive amount of clues, and nothing seemed to fit them all.
Until you come up with the right solution, and everything makes perfect sense.
(@Beastly @Gareth one more delete vote needed on this)
 
Already VTD
 
Sid
How does that puzzle have so less votes? And the answer too... That is my new benchmark for writing riddles..
 
@Sid Which - paco's riddle?
 
Sid
Yep
 
It should be noted that even though this answer was posted almost 3 months after I posted the puzzle, McMagister had been inactive and hadn't seen the puzzle until I contacted him on another forum on August 12. It took him only one hour to solve this puzzle! — pacoverflow May 11 at 22:44
 
3:51 PM
He's not active anymore?
 
Last seen about a month ago.
 
That reminds me, f'' has completely vanished.
 
I see @Deusovi hammered the "prophesied battle" question :-)
 
@GarethMcCaughan Everything except the S5->S7 in word 4 looks right, I double-checked the S squares, and treble-checked those two in particular, and it's right
word 5 letter 1 is s2 though? Did you maybe lose track of a word somewhere?
 
@GarethMcCaughan Mind giving a hint on the C4 ? :-D
 
3:59 PM
@Beastly @Gareth One more delete vote needed on this too ...
 
Again already VTD
 
I suspected as much :-)
Enjoying your new 10k powers, eh?
 
@Beastly is enjoying his new toys privileges :P
 
Yeah I just went into tools and looked at delete votes. VTD if I agreed
 
I'd probably have 10k on SFF if I didn't keep disappearing :P
 
4:02 PM
@BeastlyGerbil That's not the whole explanation though, since I've found a couple (via the 10k tools) where you were the only VTD so far.
Until I added my VTD, of course.
 
@Sconibulus Thanks. I'm not sure what you mean about word 5 letter 1 being s2 (I agree it is); the ones I was asking about were 1:5 (which is also s2) and 4:1 (which is s19); if my understanding of the S-letters is right then those ought to correspond to f4 and f6 respectively, and if my guess at the plaintext is right then those are C and M respectively, and I'd been hoping there was a kinda-repeating 2-row pattern about the S-letters with period 16.
 
@Randal'Thor yeah those were in the 'extreme donvotes' section
 
oh, wait, 16 = -10 so maybe it's OK
no, that's the wrong way around
the above may entirely fail to make sense because the 2-row pattern may simply be a flatly wrong guess on my part
 
well you do clearly have the plaintext correct, do you want/need any further hints for the S-encoding?
 
not yet, I think
 
4:09 PM
Oh, T isn't an ordinary move, by the way. Notice that all instances of T are the same move
 
fair enough
maybe then R indicates all sorts of funny business: T for check, perhaps, O for castling, X for capture
though my explanation seems like it works too :-)
If there were an "r16" we could discover whether it means something else when there's a promotion
 
well... that particular move would end up encoding an X,T, and the promotion result
 
Sid
Anyone above 2k, I see an edit of a 2-year old question...
 
@Sid ?
 
user230888
4:21 PM
@Sid After seeing, in the puzzles where its instantly obvious how to proceed. Can't add links from mobile, being lazy.
 
@Sid Seems legit. (I checked the revision history of the Wikipedia article, and it doesn't look as if anyone is messing around with the "maximum" and "minimum" wrongly there.)
 
Oh, wait, I'm super dumb, there IS an encoding for S, I just managed to miss it repeatedly, it would have been S13
 
@Beastly Wow, there's a whole pack of questions now which you and I have VTD'ed and just need one more.
@Alconja @Jonathan or other 10k-ers, questions in need of deletion: one, two, three, four (also maybe votes to close on this and this?)
 
Sid
4:40 PM
I see, there hasn't been the site self-evaluation in a while..
 
I like that almost invisible text thing. Just saying...
Apparently, I also like dropping random hints in chat...
 
@Sid Isn't that a beta thing?
 
Sid
Is it? I am not sure.... I just saw it at the community bot's profile...
 
There was a 7th review queue here for site self-evaluation a couple of times.
11
Q: Let's get critical: Nov 2014 Site Self-Evaluation

CommunityWe all love Puzzling Stack Exchange, but there is a whole world of people out there who need answers to their questions and don't even know that this site exists. When they arrive from Google, what will their first impression be? Let's try to look at this site through the eyes of someone who's ne...

10
Q: Let's get critical: May 2015 Site Self-Evaluation

CommunityWe all love Puzzling Stack Exchange, but there is a whole world of people out there who need answers to their questions and don't even know that this site exists. When they arrive from Google, what will their first impression be? Let's try to look at this site through the eyes of someone who's ne...

 
Sigh. Again, I don't understand why there's any reason at all on closing the Which Star was Closest question. If answers other than the intended one only fit if you wildly speculate, and/or ignore information provided in the puzzle, I don't think it makes sense to look at them as "proof" that the question was too broad.
When a puzzle excludes answers other than the intended one, but does so in a way that isn't apparent until you see the actual answer and see how the others are excluded, I think that's actually clever puzzle crafting and a good thing; penalizing that by VTC as "too broad" seems, to me anyway, to be discouraging questions that don't beat you over the head with their path to their intended solution.
 
4:45 PM
@Rubio You may be right. I haven't actually VTCed (yet), but I thought it was worth discussing.
 
The Apple Star question?
I thought that was pretty good
 
I thought it was excellent. Subtly hinted to a specific answer.
 
Which one?
 
I've never heard that thing inside an apple referred to as a star, nor do I think it looks particularly like a star, so in my subjective opinion it's not a good question, more like "plastic bag"/"guess what I'm thinking" territory.
But I do accept that mentioning "half an apple" in the same line as "which star is closest to us" may make that answer more natural than others and therefore the question not too broad.
@Deusovi This one. Btw, there's some comments you might want to remove there, including one with an unnecessary spoiler.
 
Oh yes that would be mine
Deleted
 
4:53 PM
"I didn't narrow it down to the intended answer from the provided clueing" ≠ "Too broad" :-)
 
 
1 hour later…
5:59 PM
@Ankoganit OK, a hint on the CCCC: I already mentioned that there's a word that essentially serves as filler: the word in question is "reached". (It's not strictly filler, but it might as well be in terms of effect on the clue.)
 
That's the one I'd guessed.
Could "on" suggest an anagram somehow?
Giving the answer as a state whose name is an anagram of "turned"?
 
(would you like me to comment on those speculations?)
 
6:17 PM
dentur
deturn
Druten
dunter
durent
Red nut
Rudnet
Truden
Trunde
truned
tunder
Tundre
tunred
turend
turned
undetr
 
I sort of assumed 'turned on' meant 'NO' for something like Norway, but didn't find anything else that might make that fit
 
Hmm, yes, "turned" would be a better anagram indicator than "on".
But the answer is 6 letters long.
@GarethMcCaughan I wouldn't mind some more help, but others might - I'm far from the hottest crossword solver around here.
Maybe the fact that it's lasted so long unsolved is more to do with the weekend than it being particularly hard ...
 
Certainly possible. (I don't think it's very hard, but of course it's always hard to assess one's own.)
I will say that I would never use "on" as an anagram indicator but might use "turned" to indicate either reversal or anagrammatization. Or, of course, neither: it could be used for its actual meaning or as a source of letters for treatment as indicated by other words. None of the foregoing is intended as a hint for this particular clue.
 
@GarethMcCaughan You spell "anagrammatization" with a Z? I'm afraid you'll have to turn in your Brit card now.
3
 
6:32 PM
@GarethMcCaughan Oh.
Hang on, I thought you were a Cambridge man!
:-P
> A state I've [reached]: turned on (6)
Maybe "A I've on" anagrammed (turned) to form a state?
 
ACTIVE A, CT (Connecticut), I've ->Turned on
 
Nice!
@Gareth ^^ ping
 
reached could maybe mean 'the path traversed to get here' as a sum thing
 
6:50 PM
(sorry, was making gravy)
@Sconibulus Correct!
 
Yay! I got one!
Umm... now to make one
 
@Randal'Thor yup, Cambridge, but I agree with the OUP's reasons for its stance on -ize.
And I claim it's a perfectly cromulent British English spelling given that Oxford does it.
(disappearing again for dinner)
 
@GarethMcCaughan I haven't been able to take the Oxford English Dictionary seriously since they decided "literally" could mean "not literally".
 
how about... CCCC: A western study area featuring waterfowl, increasing rapidly (7)
(Apologies in advance to Deusovi for probably breaking some sort of rule)
 
Whew. I made my puzzle hard for me to find what I need, and I know where they are. o_o
So you missed some letters, but don't count on being able to do fill in and have them magically appear. It's too close for that :) — Mithrandir 1 min ago
I'd say he missed... 5 invisible text thingies?
@LukasRotter that's a hint :P
 
00:00 - 19:0019:00 - 00:00

« first day (920 days earlier)      last day (2715 days later) »