TNB Conlang (katlani)

DLosc

20:00

I don't think we decided on a sentence structure yet

pxeger

the word order isn't that fixed

Ginger Industries

hM

pxeger

because we're gonna use cases

Ginger Industries

where can I find the word list?

Redwolf Programs

With noun casing it doesn't matter much

@GingerIndustries It's going to be a bit less official than a single word list I think

That's a good, democratic way to decide on words

mathcat

20:00

what's this room for?

Redwolf Programs

Just request them, start using them, and if they catch on, they catch on

@mathcat We're making a TNB conlang

mathcat

means?

hyper-neutrino

with cases pretty much anything can just be tacked on and a verb is the only thing that's necessary

Ginger Industries

Formal word structure proposal: [tense] [adjectives]-[noun][case] [verb]

Redwolf Programs

@mathcat We're designing a written/spoken language for TNB

hyper-neutrino

20:01

i think. where do we want the verb in that case, at the end?

Ginger Industries

modification suggestions?

Redwolf Programs

I think we should allow any order for the nouns

mathcat

@RedwolfPrograms so a secret language only for TNB?

Ginger Industries

hm

pxeger

@RedwolfPrograms yeah, there should be no fixed order for the nouns I think

Redwolf Programs

20:02

@mathcat No, just a language designed by TNB, for TNB

Ginger Industries

[case]-[noun] [verb]?

mathcat

ah

sounds fun

Redwolf Programs

We should probably have trailing adjectives, if we're doing casing particles before

grandBagel

@GingerIndustries what about the adjective?

mathcat

nothing to do with coding?

pxeger

20:02

having a fixed place for the verb is a good idea, but I think it would make sense to have that place be the start of the sentence, not the end

Redwolf Programs

@RedwolfPrograms Although I like the reverse more

pxeger

@mathcat correct

Redwolf Programs

I like [adj] [noun] [casing]

Ginger Industries

[verb] [case]-[noun] [adjectives]?

mathcat

@pxeger 100 percent correct

Latin...

nope

pxeger

20:03

@pxeger because the verb basically carries the most important information in the sentence

DLosc

I like VSO

pxeger

German puts it "second" which is not terribly well-defined but helps with parsing

@DLosc the whole point of cases is that you can put the nouns anywhere you like

grandBagel

[case]-[verb] [adjectives] [noun]?

mathcat

@pxeger almost every time

hyper-neutrino

you kind of need the verbs to be on the left or right though

otherwise you have trouble with relative clauses

Ginger Industries

20:04

[verb] [tense][case]-[noun] [adjectives]???

DLosc

@pxeger Not the whole point of cases, but yes, word order can be flexible

Redwolf Programs

I'm in favor of verb first

Ginger Industries

until a decision is made we cannot use this language

DLosc

Maybe a default of VSO and then if you want to emphasize a word you can pull it to the front

grandBagel

I'm in favor of case-verb

Redwolf Programs

20:04

@GingerIndustries This seems overly simplistic and not really a helpful model of how to represent the grammar

pxeger

VSO or VOS should be both acceptable

Ginger Industries

I'm simplifying

hyper-neutrino

for example, how do you translate "the person who is eating the food sees the person who is drinking the water"

pxeger

I don't think we need a default

Redwolf Programs

^

Ginger Industries

20:05

what is S in that case?

hyper-neutrino

subject

Ginger Industries

ah

Wezl - a cautionary tale

I like verb first too

hyper-neutrino

verb-first or verb-last are both fine, and with cases, subject/object can be unfixed

or just not exist

Redwolf Programs

What should our subject, dir. obj., and ind. obj. particles be?

pxeger

20:05

@hyper-neutrino something like "see person[subj case marker] who eat food person[obj case marker] who[subj case marker] drink water"

mathcat

so more flexible?

hyper-neutrino

with verb-first my example would be like

pxeger

@RedwolfPrograms and where should they go

Ginger Industries

so I want V TC-S A

Redwolf Programs

I think they should come before the noun

hyper-neutrino

20:05

ok nvm pxeger got it already lol

mathcat

@GingerIndustries vote close?

Ginger Industries

this is just for words, not sentences

hyper-neutrino

hm, particle before the noun? interesting

DLosc

Bigger question: how many noun cases do we want, and which ones?

pxeger

@RedwolfPrograms I think their position should be described relative to the verb, not the noun

Redwolf Programs

20:06

And adjs after

@pxeger Wait, the casing's part of the verb?

pxeger

@DLosc subject, direct object, at least, and then max of a few more

Ginger Industries

verb tense&case-noun/subject adjectives

hyper-neutrino

also, adj before or after the noun, because i don't want to end up like french and have both xD

mathcat

@DLosc I'd say 3 or 4

Ginger Industries

or [verb] [tense][case]-[noun] [adjectives]

grandBagel

20:06

V C-N S-A

Redwolf Programs

@hyper-neutrino I say after

pxeger

@RedwolfPrograms wait I misunderstood what you were talking about, ignore me

hyper-neutrino

@DLosc depends on if we want to make things like direction/destination a part of the case or the verb

DLosc

Or prepositions

hyper-neutrino

for example, if your verb is "to go to" then "I go to the store" can case myself with subject and the store with object

pxeger

20:07

@GingerIndustries I think tense marker should be like an adverb, can more or less be anywhere

hyper-neutrino

if your verb is just "to go" then the self is a subject but the store would have to be a location

DLosc

Right

pxeger

in fact, tense markers arguably are adverbs

hyper-neutrino

flexible tense makes some sense

the only thing you need to worry about is again if it's too flexible you get ambiguity with relative clauses

Ginger Industries

what noun cases are there?

pxeger

20:08

@hyper-neutrino in French, direct object and indirect object are used almost like 2nd and optional 3rd "arguments" to verbs, with no real relation to actual preposition meaning

Redwolf Programs

@GingerIndustries Subject, direct object, and indirect object I think

Ginger Industries

@RedwolfPrograms examples?

pxeger

and maybe possessive?

Ginger Industries

i'm trying to learn linguistics at this point

hyper-neutrino

@pxeger oh, do you have an example? it's been a while since i've used french

DLosc

20:09

Oh, also: nominative-accusative, or ergative-absolutive?

Ginger Industries

good lord

pxeger

@GingerIndustries "I gave the ball to the girl": in English, "I" is subject, "the ball" is direct object, "the girl" is indirect object

Redwolf Programs

@GingerIndustries "You gave my dog to my dad": "You" is subject, "my dog" is direct object, "my dad" is indirect object

Ginger Industries

oh

mathcat

@GingerIndustries there's also this weird thing in Latin called ablative

it's this with sort of stuff

pxeger

20:10

@DLosc @GingerIndustries simple explainer

mathcat

and locativ

hyper-neutrino

@DLosc i do not understand any of those four words kek

DLosc

@mathcat The basic idea of an ablative case is pretty straightforward ("from where"), it's just that Latin overloads its ablative case with a ton of other meanings

pxeger

@hyper-neutrino in English, very roughly, nominative is subject, accusative is object

Ginger Industries

so under my system it would be [walk] [direct object][store] bc present tense is implied and there are no adjectives used

sound good?

Redwolf Programs

20:11

[go to] is an imperative

Ginger Industries

sorry

Redwolf Programs

That's a whole separate thing

hyper-neutrino

wait, so if the subject is removed it becomes imperative?

i'd rather have imperative be a tense-like adverb thing

Ginger Industries

fixed it

mathcat

that's ... lot

Redwolf Programs

20:12

@hyper-neutrino It is

hyper-neutrino

also this word order is basically japanese but reversed lol

Redwolf Programs

I was talking about [go to]

hyper-neutrino

oh?

Ginger Industries

ah yes, esenapaj

pxeger

@hyper-neutrino Or replace the subject with some kind of special pronoun-like particle indicating imperative, rather than removing it altogether?

Redwolf Programs

20:12

I read that as like "go to the store", where "go" is imperative

hyper-neutrino

@pxeger that could work too

@RedwolfPrograms oh. i read it as "to go to" = verb

Redwolf Programs

oh

Wait, so will we have words like the and a?

Ginger Industries

a decision must be made posthaste

hyper-neutrino

i don't think articles are really that needed

pxeger

@RedwolfPrograms I don't think we need them

Ginger Industries

20:14

._.

Redwolf Programs

Sounds good

Ginger Industries

alrighty

hyper-neutrino

@GingerIndustries also, wouldn't store need to be indirect object / destination case / whatever else there is here?

Redwolf Programs

Pronoun suggestion: nos (we/us), vos (y'all)

hyper-neutrino

oh suggestion

inclusive and exclusive we

Redwolf Programs

20:14

Ooh +1

Wezl - a cautionary tale

yes

Redwolf Programs

Should we have a we + you and we + y'all distinction?

mathcat

oh yes

grandBagel

@RedwolfPrograms yes

Redwolf Programs

Maybe a prefix to nos/vos then (if we go with those)

hyper-neutrino

20:15

oh that'd be interesting

Redwolf Programs

nonos and novos or something?

Ginger Industries

Official word format: [verb] [tense][case]-[noun] [adjectives]

hyper-neutrino

so like if i'm talking to a group of people, i can include the person i am directly talking to without the rest of their group?

Ginger Industries

NOT SENTENCES, JUST SINGLE WORDS

mathcat

@RedwolfPrograms that sound funny

Redwolf Programs

20:16

@hyper-neutrino Yep!

pxeger

@RedwolfPrograms "we but not you" is a more important distinction than "we + {you or 'y'all' [I hate that 'word']}"

hyper-neutrino

^ minus hating "y'all"

pxeger

@RedwolfPrograms can we avoid just pirating spanish too heavily?

Redwolf Programs

Sure

grandBagel

@GingerIndustries no dash?

Ginger Industries

20:16

@grandBagel forgot dash

Redwolf Programs

Those were mostly just placeholders

Since it's hard to talk about words that don't exist :p

Ginger Industries

there, we're done with that

it has been decided

:)

pxeger

@GingerIndustries I thought there won't be a dash in the actual word

Redwolf Programs

Well there also won't be both a noun and a verb in the actual word lol

Ginger Industries

@pxeger depends

I think the dash makes it more clear

mathcat

20:17

Have vovos talked about the tenses yet?

DLosc

Q: Why is Spanish a pirate's favorite language?
A: Because all the verbs end with -ar

4

Ginger Industries

I need a word list so I can try speaking this

Redwolf Programs

Q: Why is Spanish a otolaryngologist's favorite language?
A: Because all the verbs end with -ir

grandBagel

here (not complete)

Wezl - a cautionary tale

2 hours ago, by Redwolf Programs

So pas, ni, fu for the tenses (ni being optional)?

Redwolf Programs

20:18

Q: Why is Spanish an indecisive brit's favorite language?
A: Because all the verbs end with -er

Ginger Industries

@Wezl-acautionarytale yup

mathcat

er's my favourite word

Redwolf Programs

pasnifu should be an adjective for confused

or long lasting

DLosc

Yeah, I was thinking more like "unchanging, eternal"

hyper-neutrino

how do questions work

Redwolf Programs

20:20

I hate english's "do"

grandBagel

@hyper-neutrino What do you mean?

pxeger

Here's my idea of the grammar so far: first [verb] (always); then the remaining components can basically go anywhere. These components are: [tense], [adverb], [case][noun][adjective], [case][pronoun]

2

mathcat

@hyper-neutrino do we want a question mark?

Ginger Industries

i should be for pluralization

Redwolf Programs

Maybe questions are an adjective?

hyper-neutrino

20:20

about that

do we want pluralization conjugations

pxeger

@RedwolfPrograms huh?

Ginger Industries

so o is one cat, oi is 2 cats, oIIII is 10,000 cats

hyper-neutrino

or pluralization at all

grandBagel

on is any amount of cats

Ginger Industries

makes sense

pxeger

20:21

@hyper-neutrino yeah I think we agreed on i being a suffix for plurals, and it being repeatable

hyper-neutrino

repeatable?

Redwolf Programs

@pxeger "You are going to the store" -> "You questionly are going to the store" ("You're going to the store?" or "Are you going to the store?")

pxeger

@hyper-neutrino so if there are really a lot of cats, you can use iiii

Ginger Industries

@hyper-neutrino each i is one more thing, each I is exponentially more

pxeger

@hyper-neutrino for verbs? I don't think so

DLosc

20:21

@GingerIndustries goodreads.com/book/show/621739.Millions_of_Cats

hyper-neutrino

interesting

Ginger Industries

@pxeger no, IIII

Wezl - a cautionary tale

about capitalization, let's only use it for emphasis

pxeger

Let's stick to Latin convention for capital letters

Start of sentence, and proper nouns.

Ginger Industries

I''m working on the word list

hyper-neutrino

20:22

sure

DLosc

@pxeger So, all caps for everything? ;P

mathcat

@pxeger with maximum being how many i's?

pxeger

@DLosc I mean the convention of all modern languages which use the latin alphabet

Redwolf Programs

@mathcat Any number :p

DLosc

@pxeger * except German

grandBagel

20:23

@RedwolfPrograms what about I?

Redwolf Programs

I don't think i/I is actually a real feature of the language, right?

pxeger

@DLosc well the German system's not too much of a deviation from the norm actually though

DLosc

True

pxeger

@RedwolfPrograms the capitalisation isn't at least, I think

i for plurals is a feature I think

I kinda like being able to repeat it for increasing subjective number, but there should be some reasonable guidelines around it

Ginger Industries

Please preface all words with WR: so I can search them up

5

pxeger

20:24

like i is "a few", ii is generic "some" / "many", and iii is "too many"?

Ginger Industries

@pxeger i is one more, I is 10 times more

@pxeger 2 cats: oi

pxeger

@GingerIndustries no we're not using capitalisation to mark anything

hyper-neutrino

1. no capitalization for things like that
2. i don't like having that much precision

3

Ginger Industries

@pxeger I want an exponential increaser

pxeger

We're not using it for exact numbers

hyper-neutrino

20:25

this is a human language, not a computer language

Ginger Industries

okay

hyper-neutrino

if someone types oiiiiiiii and expects me to count the is i'm leaving them on read :P

pxeger

@GingerIndustries we want it to be vague

Ginger Industries

Okay, one sec

i: One more
ii: Two more
iii: Lots
iiii: Very very many
iiiii: Infinite

hyper-neutrino

@pxeger i like this

grandBagel

20:26

@hyper-neutrino same

hyper-neutrino

also how do we deal with uncountables

Ginger Industries

@hyper-neutrino use n

grandBagel

@hyper-neutrino on?

DLosc

@hyper-neutrino For a solid 10 seconds I thought you meant uncountable infinities, LOL

hyper-neutrino

lol

grandBagel

20:27

lol

Ginger Industries

WR: lol: Happines/laughter

Redwolf Programs

@pxeger Same

DLosc

So are we doing separate markers for case and for number, then?

Redwolf Programs

Prolly

Ginger Industries

@DLosc hmmm

pxeger

20:28

yeah, but actually it's a good point: what order do they go in?

Ginger Industries

numbers should just be a seperate word

don't overcomplicate

Redwolf Programs

We need to hash out numbers and ordinals soon so we have a name for TNB

pxeger

@GingerIndustries I think we meant not actual number, but pluralisation

DLosc

@GingerIndustries I meant number as in singular vs plural

Redwolf Programs

Ordinals should just be a particle with a number

Ginger Industries

20:29

speaking of names, what is this language called?

grandBagel

What is the name of this language?

pxeger

TNB conlang?

DLosc

Buncha ninjas in here today :P

Ginger Industries

@DLosc all nouns are singular unless suffixed with i

Redwolf Programs

We can give it a name like "TNB conlang" in "TNB conlang" once we have those words

pxeger

20:29

@pxeger is it noun[o/i/ii/iii][case] or noun[case][o/i/ii/iii]?

Ginger Industries

yes

just call it tnb language

Wezl - a cautionary tale

@grandBagel izl o lan

Redwolf Programs

I think cases should be particles at the front

DLosc

@pxeger Or [case]noun[o/i/ii/iii]?

Wezl - a cautionary tale

finger-biting cat language

Ginger Industries

20:30

we already have a word for chat, we just need one for language

Redwolf Programs

@Wezl-acautionarytale o'izl

grandBagel

WR: xor: language

Redwolf Programs

We don't have x

Maybe shor?

grandBagel

WR: shor: language

DLosc

@pxeger Of these, I think I prefer noun[o/i/ii/iii][case]

Wezl - a cautionary tale

20:31

WR: lano (n): word

DLosc

Wait, are we saying that all singular nouns end with o?

Ginger Industries

This language is therefore called kat shor

Redwolf Programs

WR: varir (v): To define (a word)

pxeger

@DLosc yeah I think this is the best one actually

Wezl - a cautionary tale

WR: lani (n): words / language

Redwolf Programs

20:32

Wait, o/i?

I thought it was no ending for singular

grandBagel

@DLosc +1

Redwolf Programs

Since o just means cat

pxeger

I thought o marked singular

Ginger Industries

@RedwolfPrograms so varir lano?

Redwolf Programs

Oh was it?

pxeger

20:33

@RedwolfPrograms but yeah that's fine, I thought o was a bit weird

Redwolf Programs

We could just do no ending for singular

pxeger

@RedwolfPrograms but then is it adjective or plural first? Or are we scrapping the idea of putting adjectives in the same word as the nouns?

@RedwolfPrograms +1

Wezl - a cautionary tale

@RedwolfPrograms yeah I guess that's best

DLosc

@RedwolfPrograms I like that

Ginger Industries

brb, no new words until I'm back

hyper-neutrino

20:33

wait so do all nouns end with consonants

DLosc

@pxeger Plural should be attached more closely than adjectives, IMO

@hyper-neutrino Not necessarily

hyper-neutrino

and do verbs have a consistent ending / format (also, i can't remember but no conjugations right?)

pxeger

So [noun][plural] [adjectives]

Redwolf Programs

Will we have a glottal stop in our language?

Wezl - a cautionary tale

WR: lan (n): word

pxeger

20:34

@RedwolfPrograms Probably not officially, but people will put them in anyway to aid in pronunciation

DLosc

@hyper-neutrino We have three tense markers but I don't think we decided anything else about verbs

pxeger

I think it doesn't need a letter of its own

Redwolf Programs

We should probably not have nouns at the end of words

Uh...I mean vowels lol

At the end of nouns

DLosc

I don't think it's a problem to end with o or a

pxeger

@RedwolfPrograms italians crying and shaking rn

DLosc

20:35

i and y might be problematic, yeah

u could be fine

Redwolf Programs

u should be fine too

Ginger Industries

back

pxeger

@DLosc we definitely can't have nouns ending with i, because then they become plural

Redwolf Programs

So, we probably need some case marker particles now

Wezl - a cautionary tale

I'd like it if we could have a consistent ending to denote noun/verb/adj/other but it's probably not going to happen

Redwolf Programs

20:36

What cases did we decide on?

DLosc

We didn't

Redwolf Programs

Honestly a consistent ending for every part of speech isn't a bad idea

Ginger Industries

I need a set of example sentences for the docs

pxeger

@RedwolfPrograms nominative, direct accusative, indirect accusative, at least, but I don't think we settled on whether there are any more

Ginger Industries

think about this one hard, because these are the examples

DLosc

20:36

But it sounds like a nominative/accusative system is the way to go to avoid hurting everyone's brains

Redwolf Programs

We can start with those I guess

DLosc

@RedwolfPrograms Disagree. Esperanto does that and it looks really unnatural.

Ginger Industries

eh???????

examples please

pxeger

@DLosc yeah I think it makes it a bit too rigid

Redwolf Programs

@GingerIndustries We don't have enough of the language figured out to have example sentences

Ginger Industries

20:37

brb

@RedwolfPrograms :/

Redwolf Programs

"Oops, finger-biting monkey!" will have to do for now :p

Anyone want to propose a noun casing particle?

DLosc

@GingerIndustries We're close, I think. We just need to decide on cases and verb syntax and then we can write a transitive sentence.

Redwolf Programs

I don't want to 'cause I'd probably pick something stupid lol

DLosc

ta = subject

Redwolf Programs

We could be lazy and do like...nom, dir, idir or something, but I don't really like that

How about, alongside DLosc's ta:

su = direct object

Different noun and consonant to avoid mishearing it

DLosc

20:40

Sounds good

Redwolf Programs

Maybe like, ri or pi for indirect?

DLosc

I was about to propose lia

grandBagel

idri?

Wezl - a cautionary tale

have we discussed articles?

Redwolf Programs

lia sounds good

DLosc

20:41

@Wezl-acautionarytale I believe we decided against them

Redwolf Programs

So ta/su/lia

DLosc

Do we want prepositions or postpositions?

Redwolf Programs

Prepositions sound better to me

grandBagel

@RedwolfPrograms same

Redwolf Programs

varir ta komy izl lani

"The finger-biting monkey defines words"

pxeger

20:43

Couldn't we have no subject marker?

Redwolf Programs

Oh, good point

pxeger

@RedwolfPrograms I'm not a fan of r at the end of words

Redwolf Programs

yeah, me neither tbh

DLosc

@pxeger I think it could be optional if the subject comes right after the verb, but weren't we planning to make the word order flexible?

pxeger

did we ever define phonotactics?

Redwolf Programs

20:43

no

pxeger

@DLosc but if only the subject lacks a marker, then you know it's the subject

Redwolf Programs

@DLosc I suppose if one of the nouns is missing the casing, you'd know it's the subject regardless of its position

DLosc

Hm. I suppose so.

How are we doing possessives?

Redwolf Programs

Maybe we can make ta like ni

pxeger

I was gonna suggest another case for possessives

Redwolf Programs

20:45

@RedwolfPrograms Use it when you need it, it's optional otherwise

For possessives, who's possessing what?

pxeger

@pxeger you apply it to the possessor; the possessee gets the case according to its role in the sentence as normal

Redwolf Programs

Makes sense I guess

Suggestions for the particle?

pxeger

so for "Alice's key[subj]" you write "key[subj] Alice[possessive]"

Redwolf Programs

What if you want to say "I took alice's key"?

DLosc

@pxeger That's not the only possibility, but it's a common one, yes

pxeger

20:46

@RedwolfPrograms my?

Redwolf Programs

Sounds good

pxeger

@RedwolfPrograms "I[subj] took Alice's key[obj]" -> "take [past] [subj]I [obj]key [possessive]Alice"

Redwolf Programs

Ohh, so it just comes after whatever the possessee is?

That makes sense, especially with the casing being at the front, because you can mentially parse it as "key my alice"

DLosc

It's like the genitive in Latin, or the preposition "of" in English.

pxeger

(oh yeah I forgot case goes at the front, my bad)

Redwolf Programs

20:49

This is sounding good!

I guess we need pronouns next, probably?

pxeger

@DLosc Genitive is exactly what it is, yeah

Wezl - a cautionary tale

I think the possessor should go in the same position as an adjective

Redwolf Programs

if komy izl isn't a commonly used insult in this language, I will be disappointed

@Wezl-acautionarytale They basically do

Wezl - a cautionary tale

wait are adjectives postfix?

Redwolf Programs

my [possessor] goes after the noun being possessed

@Wezl-acautionarytale Yes

pxeger

20:52

@RedwolfPrograms needs an imperative particle to be properly insulting

Wezl - a cautionary tale

ok good :)

pxeger

otherwise it could be a friendly warning at the zoo

Wezl - a cautionary tale

generally good advice to not stick your fingers through the bars

DLosc

I'm officially adopting the translation "bitey" for izl

Redwolf Programs

:)

So is vvizl izl the word for "bitey weasel"?

(I'd heard vvizl mentioned, don't remember if it was a word request)

DLosc

20:54

@RedwolfPrograms That's redundant ;P

pxeger

Can we change the fu future-tense particle to fy?

Redwolf Programs

@DLosc No, the word you're looking for is poetic :p

@pxeger Why?

DLosc

@RedwolfPrograms (I'd prefer to spell it with one v, FWIW)

Redwolf Programs

Same, I don't even think vvizl was meant as a WR lol

pxeger

@RedwolfPrograms because then it actually matches the start of the English pronunciation of the word "future"

Redwolf Programs

20:56

Our u was like the one in future, right?

Not like the one in luck?

pxeger

WR: vaiksal: bad

2

Redwolf Programs

Or did I get it backwards

pxeger

@RedwolfPrograms no, u is more like in boot; further back

Redwolf Programs

I guess we could do fy, yeah

Onions?

pxeger

If you have a Californian surfer duuude accent, boot is inaccurate

Redwolf Programs

20:58

Room's gone kinda quiet

pxeger

Are case markers attached to nouns, or is there a space in between?

Redwolf Programs

I've been imagining them with a space

pxeger

@RedwolfPrograms it's 9PM GMT - must be everyone's bedtime

speaking of which

Redwolf Programs

I think we'd been calling them particles, so it'd make sense for them to be separate

Bye pxeger o/

hyper-neutrino

we don't need words for bad, we can just take the word for good and then like add an "un-" prefix before it /s

oh yeah what do we do with copular verbs

Redwolf Programs

20:59

Flashbacks to esperanto

I'd proposed sir really early on, but before we decided on noun casing (so it was intended like so, sis, si, simus, etc.)

Transcript for