@pauska Me too... but seeing as how we don't have the time to do any testing, or a test environment that has any resemblance to production, well SCCM groups aren't gonna prevent that anyway.
@pauska Push from WSUS, auto-download and install.
@pauska When you want to manage it from a single pane
so you can upload .ipa and .apks and stuff right from config manager
and it shows you all devices associated with users in one look. So you can see all associated devices, PC, phone, tablet, for a user right in the config manager console
You use intune for MDM and SCCM for everything else
@pauska only for remote wipe/pin enforcement
the normal activesync stuff
Intune lets you sideload apps and stuff
In a "unified" deployment, Intune adds MDM for iOS, Android, Windows 8 phone, and Win RT capabilities to SCCM
So when you set it up, you log into the tenant Intune account to basically register the thing, then you install the Intune connector in SCCM and never touch Intune again. You handle MDM through SCCM and it transparently leverages Intune behind the scenes
So when you combine the two with the SCCM 2012 SP1 integration, you get the client PC management that SCCM offers, the MDM management that Intune offers which is absent otherwise, all managed from your on-premise SCCM console
Our Intune tenant is all fucked up though so I've had a hard time setting it up in our demo environment :(
We're considering blowing away everything including our Azure AD and starting over fresh haha
It's more keeping your shit in order from the beginning than anything. At least that's how it was explained to me
@pauska The US supreme court is hearing arguments for striking down the gay marriage ban in California. There's a small chance that they could make a ruling that would apply to all 50 states (but that's unlikely) so people are all changing their Facebook pics to a red equals sign for marriage equality
Most likely the supreme court won't overturn California and will say that as of right now, it's up to the states
And Alito and Scalia kept saying that the supreme court has usually let this stuff slide until history/public opinion decides it definitively, and they specifically cited racial inequality and how long it took to get a ruling out of that supreme court
@MDMarra Interesting. Guess we'll see. If recent history is any indication though, we ought to prepare for the worst possible ruling, whatever that would be in this instance.
So, it's not like a majority of justices were on the same page about why they were unhappy, or at least cautious, about this case. But for one reason or another, justices from both sides were uneasy
@HopelessN00b the best ruling would be for them to completely ban all state recognition of marriage. Leave it all up to the people to do whatever the heck they want.
@Zoredache Yup. Government shouldn't be in the business of certifying personal relationships anyway, especially not in a discriminatory fashion (as with marriage). Odds of that ruling coming down are less than 0, though.
@MDMarra So government involvement in it should only extend as far as a matter of contract law. And in matters of contract law, consenting adults are free to make contracts with other consent adults, regardless of sexual affiliation or gender.
I had a friend that voted republican and we talked about it and she was like "If I think obama could leagalize gay marriage in 4 years, I'd vote for him. But I don't think he can do that and I agree with Romney on other issues"
@pauska Not like any one else is different on that score, though. Whole reason European appointees didn't back GW II was that Sadam was giving them oil kickbacks.
