« first day (1277 days earlier)      last day (3990 days later) » 

00:01
@MatthewIfe That was nice
I wonder if that really was his personal diary
kce
kce
What my nerd-izzles.
Anonymous
00:17
@MarkHenderson I've got a motherfucking complaint
Anonymous
> your account has been automatically suspended for posting inappropriate content and cannot chat for 30 minutes.
@PatoSáinz You posted about babies getting cut in half
It got flagged
I'm not surprised
what room was that in? :P
Anonymous
I just mentioned the fact such thing existed, I didn't know you could offend people by mentioning something
00:18
(obviously not here)
Anonymous
@FalconMomot here
Anonymous
@FalconMomot yes indeed
@FalconMomot Here
@PatoSáinz Well now you do :)
and here I had all this faith in sysadmins and stuff
Anonymous
00:19
@MarkHenderson But seriously wtf
fwiw when someone in here flags a comment in here it probably has crossed their line
I only take flags seriously when they're from and in this room
Anonymous
It wasn't like I described the whole shit, just told it
@PatoSáinz Don't take it personally
Anonymous
@MarkHenderson lol I never take anything OTI personally
Anonymous
But it's just... surprising
Anonymous
00:20
Apparently I'm more cold hearted than what I thought
@PatoSáinz shrug
It doesn't happen often
And usually it's @wesley
Anonymous
Death is part of life. Some of them die horribly like the two cases mentioned before and those things happen. I dare to say, weekly, in India. It's not like I oneboxed the video, what else, a flag for saying "people die from starvation in Africa"?
Anonymous
But meh ok
@PatoSáinz Sounds like you're taking it pretty personally to me
Anonymous
@MarkHenderson You seem right, maybe
00:23
I don't control what people do or don't find offensive
@PatoSáinz (he does, we're all bots)
Anonymous
@MarkHenderson neither do I, but now I know what to expect
So I missed my flight. @joel where are you!?!
Anonymous
@MatthewIfe proof?
All I know is that if someone in here flags it (and I know who flagged it; it wasn't a non-room member on a driveby) then it's probably over whatever line there is
00:24
@MarkHenderson For starters, that statement here in the US is sufficient proof that you're a part of the oppressor class and should be hounded out of any gainful employment and ostracized.
@ewwhite in the middle of a deployment
How did I end up here in life. Why me. Why is LEMP / Wordpress paying my bills. What have I done
@JoelESalas That's a much nicer way of saying Fsck Off. =)
Oh, can I come help? I know how to use the command line!
@PatoSáinz well, clearly someone found it offensive and it was his fault. Duh.
00:25
@ewwhite You're more than welcome to visit!
@Magellan I will change my name to Osama Ack Bin So Houdini
Anonymous
@MarkHenderson oh ok
@MarkHenderson that'll get you sent to Gitmo
Anonymous
@MarkHenderson at least it's more legit than a random suspension because a joke about consultants and sluts...
I'm at the sausage place right now. But how is the deployment going? @joel?
Anonymous
00:26
@Magellan can't tell if irony or not
@ewwhite orly
@PatoSáinz It's sarcasm if it not true. Irony when it's true.
I'm going to the Down and Out with a friend in a bit ... yelp.com/biz/the-down-and-out-los-angeles
Anonymous
@Magellan then is it true or false
@PatoSáinz depends
Anonymous
00:27
@Magellan oh god you are confusing me
@PatoSáinz you're welcome
@joel cool. I'm staying downtown again. Dive bar?
@ewwhite very divey
don't bring a backpack
@ewwhite They won't let you in
I didn't know you were in town! or I wouldn't have agreed to meet my friend
00:29
Can I wear my Google glass?
@ewwhite rofl yes
I didn't plan to be here. Total customer fail
@ewwhite Was that the people disconnecting the printer?
You should just throw in the towel and move to LA.
@Magellan anyone who uses the phrase "check your privilege" should be slapped for attempting to derail.
2
10am- "Oh, the phone vendor is here,Ed. He needs a few things..."
00:31
@ewwhite ya sure, you betcha. $250/hour.
@PatoSáinz This isn't #reddit on freenode, this is a chat for (alleged) professionals
Anonymous
I'd pay to see a movie of a BOFH starred by Nicholas Cage
A few things == a windows server vlan definitions, TFTP setup, routing changes, ACLs, cabling...
Anonymous
@JoelESalas that's why
You know how long it takes to update a windows 2008r2 server from a fresh install?
Anonymous
00:33
@ewwhite 2 hours?
@JoelESalas though I'm firmly of the opinion that some of the non-general audience business chat in here should be done in a hipchat room or something.
@magellan you are right
free for < 5 users too
i use it for non-emergency notifications
@pato yes. 2 hours. Hours that I didn't plan for.
I like hip chat. Last job had it. Wish I could use it as a general chat client
Anonymous
@ewwhite can't they be unattended?
00:38
Good question...
I don't know..
Hi. Did I miss something?
Anonymous
@MichaelHampton maybe
@ewwhite same here. game company rocked hipchat and google hangouts. didn't feel at all like we were geographically dispersed.
@ewwhite Are you remotely interested in a seamy dive?
00:53
I'm enjoying my sausage fest!
2
FEAST
First meal of the day
Then back to hotel to put all the brokenness I saw this weekend into Trello
dolla dolla billz
Customer gave me a check for the hardware today..
So I'm feeling all special... But then I realized I can't cash $45k at a currency exchange
So no Spearmint Rhino for me tonight..
01:08
@Basil TN Visa is a free trade work Visa... get one for up to 3 years, renewable basically indefinitely, open to citizens of Canada and Mexico (NAFTA free trade zone) with certain technical specialties to work in the US.
01:18
ARGH
remember how I am transferring to the US from Canada?
and how the exchange rate has tanked in the past year by like 10%?
they want to change my pay over at 90 cents on the dollar, instead of the near-parity I negotiated it at
@FalconMomot you get paid what... 16 beaver skins and 1 moose a week?
how does that exchange?
@MattBear One moose a week! Mr. Millionaire over here
@FalconMomot "Uh, no."
Oh wait, better one... "That means I only work 90% as many hours for you, right?"
pretty much
I couldn't be less enthusiastic
have a meeting to chat about it tomorrow morning
before my flight
last-minute, rushed, as usual
The $94000-a-year offer I have from google (contrast $85500 from the current place) looks a lot better in that circumstance
Yet another reminder that I got into the wrong career. Oh well.
01:39
@FalconMomot that's it? cheap bastards.
@Magellan Hey, I'd kill like... 8 people to pull down that salary at a good workplace, doing what I do. Unfortunately, it's looking like that's what it's going to take. Find one of those rare openings, interview, and kill all the other candidates to clinch the position.
@HopelessN00b uh, unless there's some serious perks, that's cheap for here. imho
@Magellan Guess that's pretty area dependent. It's pretty big-ballin' for where I am, and unless you're willing to suffer through working for a bank, you probably won't see that salary as an SA or SE.
windows work here is much cheaper unless you're a Dev. Do some serious linuxing and work hard on moving up to companies with more enterprise-grade deployments, you could easily be pulling 6 figures in a few years.
@Magellan Screw you all. I've been working hard for 7 years now and I've only just hit 80k package (salary+perks)
And that's good for this area
01:47
@HopelessN00b Crush-kill-destroy-MAIM!
very low tech unemployment here.
@Magellan Seems like it would get in the way of being lazy and coasting through life on my... well, however I'm doing it. Killing 8 people is clearly the easier, and therefore, better option.
finding good people is VERY difficult
@MarkHenderson Dude... you need to move. That's... that's... I mean. Ouch. Now I feel all guilty and shit.
Bob
Bob
01:49
@MarkHenderson Would you mind sharing which area?
@Bob Sydney
North west
Bob
Bob
:\
I don't work for a big company though, and I refuse to, which limits my oppertunities
Bob
Bob
Ah, that might do it.
@MarkHenderson what's your top skill?
Bob
Bob
01:52
How far NW? Say, relative to Hornsby - further N? Further W?
so... I finally am understanding the need for a decent bike haha
@Bob Well I work in Norwest business park
So more blacktown than hornsby
@ewwhite Good question. Perhaps one that I struggle with
Bob
Bob
Ah, so further off to the west.
I'm very good at delivering the projects that people actually need versus the one that they think that they want
Neutral Bay? That's a thing, TIL.
01:53
@jscott Yep. Where junior lawyers live.
Bob
Bob
I honestly have no idea how pay there compares to other areas.
@Bob Depends on the company more than anything else
And I do work for a cheapskate
@MarkHenderson I suppose it's as appropriate an arbitrary combination of words as any then.
is there a chat room for cryptography
@Ethan How about you go to crypto.se and click the "chat" link
That'll tell you pretty quickly
01:55
@Ethan Yeah, but it's encrypted.
2
@HopelessN00b lol
I've not verified their certs, but @HopelessN00b is correct, and there is a crypto chat.
Bob
Bob
@MarkHenderson :(
@Bob Yeah but I like working here
01:58
when talking about an "n bit RSA key" does that refer to the number of bits in the in the encryption modulus
e.g the product of the two primes being used would be n bits?
And that counts for a lot
Bob
Bob
True, a good environment makes a world of difference.
@MarkHenderson Yeah, something you forgot to mention while making me feel sorry for you. I'd happily trade my job in for one that doesn't suck. And, unless I'm even more unemployable than I think I am, I will, fairly soon.
@Ethan That's talking about key size.
@HopelessN00b My apologies
@HopelessN00b How big of a relationship is there between the two, given the key size could you give bounds on the size of the modulus being used?
In a typical scenario, I mean I imagine you could intentionally make it bigger
or somthing
02:04
@Ethan That... would be a question you don't want me to answer, as I'm not confident I'd get it right. Not much of a math geek, since a string of horrible math teachers in the latter half of high school and the early part of college.
@Ethan Neeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeerd
(sorry, I've always wanted to do that)
> n is used as the modulus for both the public and private keys. Its length, usually expressed in bits, is the key length.
RSA is a cryptosystem, which is known as one of the first practicable public-key cryptosystems and is widely used for secure data transmission. In such a cryptosystem, the encryption key is public and differs from the decryption key which is kept secret. In RSA, this asymmetry is based on the practical difficulty of factoring the product of two large prime numbers, the factoring problem. RSA stands for Ron Rivest, Adi Shamir and Leonard Adleman, who first publicly described the algorithm in 1977. Clifford Cocks, an English mathematician, had developed an equivalent system in 1973, but it...
@HopelessN00b Alright, but you know how people typically add a salt of some kind to hash the plain text even before encrypting it, does that salt act as the substitution cipher. Or is that done even before the hashing? broadly speaking with most protocols
sorry kinda vague
@Ethan the salt is used as a 'mixing' source. Because none-salted values are usually already known.
@Ethan what context?
I don't know of any cases where you salt + hash + encrypt
02:11
@Andrew I do
@Ethan Salt is used as an additinoal input. As in, combined with the original value (in some way), and then the combined value is hashed.
@Ethan it also ensures hashes differ between two plaintexts when the original plaintexts are similar.
@MarkHenderson examples?
HMAC?
@HopelessN00b yes but wouldn't the hashing, be the actual encryption scheme
and the salt would just be done before to pad it?
02:13
Section titled Impossible-to-crack Hashes: Keyed Hashes and Password Hashing Hardware
@MarkHenderson if you're not using bcrypt you're doing it wrong
We've been AESing our hashes for a long time
Bob
Bob
@Andrew Wait, what's salt got to do with encryption?
@Ethan, hashing is importantly meant to be a lossy operation.
@Bob exactly!
02:13
There is a big difference. Encryption is reversible. Hashing is not.
(or at least not meant to be ;))
One should never be able to deduce the original input from a hash.
Bob
Bob
@MatthewIfe It isn't - as long as you're losing data, you can't reverse it.
@standaloneSA Thanks for the lunchtime read. Also: VINDICATION! I have been AESing hashes for YEARS and have been told it was a waste.
Bob
Bob
You can sometimes find a (possibly different) input that hashes to the same result. But that's not reversing it.
And as long as you're losing data you'll have multiple possible input for the same result.
@Bob I didnt say hashes were reversible.
Bob
Bob
@MatthewIfe You said it's not meant to be, implying that there's cases where they are... which would be so terribly broken :P
02:16
@Ethan Yeah, you seem to be misunderstanding the difference between hashing and encryption. Encryption is reversible. (You can decrypt to get the original values.) Hashing is purely one-way. Not reversible. And typically, salts are only used with hashing algorithms, not encryption.
Actually I am implying that to our current knowledge they are not meant to be.
Bob
Bob
Hm. Any hashes with variable-length output?
@HopelessN00b im talking about asymmetric encryption
sorry if i didn't make it more clear
@Ethan re p=np no it wouldn't, thats a totally different mathematical problem to do with proving whether or not any known hard problem has a unknown easy solution.
02:17
@Bob What hash algorithm are you talking about when you say you've found collisions?
Bob
Bob
@RyanRies I'm saying that as long as the output space is smaller than the input, collisions must exist. Finding them is an entirely different exercise.
The existence of one-way functions is not proven. If true, it would imply P\neNP
@Bob Yes you're right -- my mistake for not following the whole conversation
@Ethan Still the same answer. Encryption is reversible, hashes aren't. And salts aren't generally used with encryption, symmetrical or asymmetrical.
02:19
@Ethan p=np is the mathematical question as to finding proof as to whether any known currently hard problem will always have a easier (non-polynomial) solution.
@Ethan well I dont think it would purely mathematically. It would prove it for a certain case of mathematical problems, it merely deducts a problem set.
Bob
Bob
@MarkHenderson That's an interesting one. Defense-in-depth and all, but the salt still doesn't have a direct affect on the encryption (and vice versa)
Perhaps (im not a maths guru) that would be enough.
@Bob No. Not at all
@MarkHenderson ok, so you encrypt(hash(salt+data)) but what separates the key from the hashes?
@Ethan I have a feeling that hashing (being a lossy process in terms of information systems) is not considered a polynomial problem.
02:22
@Andrew The same way you always do
@Ethan I'm happy to be totally wrong there ;)
Bob
Bob
@Andrew More like encrypt(hash(salt+data), key)
Keep it on disk, unreadable by all but a single user
@Bob notation :P
@MatthewIfe I don't know much about it lol
02:23
It's not foolproof, but it certainly makes things more difficult for a remote attack
Bob
Bob
@Andrew Well, generally with encryption the key has to be known independently of the cleartext.
yea you have to give them the key for the hash
> This could increase security if an attacker would only have access to the database and not to the place where the key is actually stored. The problem is that often in data compromises an attacker will at least have access to the hard disk and in some cases even the memory. If the attacker can obtain the key, then the pepper does not add any security to the hashing algorithm.
Bob
Bob
You're never adding security to the hashing algorithm by encrypting the output. You're adding some security to the entire scheme, but not the hashing algorithm itself.
Yes, I love nitpicking.
We do it because we provide the customer with their own database, should they request it. This way, if they manage to lose their database, whoever finds it can't even begin to brute force the passwords
02:26
> This is not as easy as it sounds. The key has to be kept secret from an attacker even in the event of a breach. If an attacker gains full access to the system, they'll be able to steal the key no matter where it is stored. The key must be stored in an external system, such as a physically separate server dedicated to password validation, or a special hardware device attached to the server such as the YubiHSM.
@MarkHenderson Sounds like that could be inconvenient, if they're the one who find their lost database, though. :o
@Andrew We encrypt them in case the database is stolen from wherever it is off-premesis
@HopelessN00b Well, even so the lost database would still be useless unless they want to brute force all the hashes
@MarkHenderson unless said database contained names, addresses, telephone numbers, credit card details..
Mind you, if they have a copy of the database they don't need a password. They can look at anything they want anyway
@MatthewIfe No credit card details
But it will stop them from taking the stolen database and getting onto the live database in order to change things
We have some large clients where if you had the right access, could benefit from it greatly.
Hope you dont store session cookies in that database in plain-text then :)
02:33
Oh, gawd.
@MatthewIfe Session cookies rotate. You have a database from 2 weeks ago? Good for you. Those cookies are all useless.
Well, we've looked over the xml you are sending and everything looks fine. The only thing we can see is that when we copy the xml from the e-mail and paste it into Word it underlines the e-mail address as a hyperlink. It looks like that's the problem, you need to send us the xml with no hyperlinks.
@HopelessN00b Is that from thedailywtf?
It must be
@MarkHenderson Yup.
I received an email like that today, from one of our suppliers. Our dumbass business parners sure do get around.
@HopelessN00b yup, I remember reading that one
@MarkHenderson snow! 101 F.
Bob
Bob
02:38
@Andrew ...why would you use Fahrenheit? D:
@Bob because the majority of thedailywtf readers are USian...
Bob
Bob
Ah. TDWTF submission.
I almost thought there was a Canberra in the US for a min. (wait, is there?)
@Bob Must be. I mean there's a London and a Rome and a Paris.
Anonymous
Bob
Bob
02:42
@HopelessN00b Trying to find one right now..
@Bob unlikely given the etymology
Bob
Bob
@Andrew Wouldn't be the first time one place was named after another :P
@Bob have you read the meaning of the word yet?
Bob
Bob
@Andrew Yea. I meant, say, a town or city in another country named after Canberra, Australia.
@Bob Strangely there is a Melbourne, Florida.
Bob
Bob
02:44
And Sydney:
amongst others....
Bob
Bob
> *Populated Places*
Sydney, NSW, Australia
Sydney, FL, U.S.
Sydney, ND, U.S.
Sydney, NS, Canada
Sydney, South Africa
Sydney Vanuatu

Hampden Sydney, VA, U.S.
Poilcourt-Sydney, France
Sydney on Vaal, South Africa
> Antarctica

Mount Melbourne

Canada

Melbourne, Nova Scotia
Melbourne, Quebec

England

Melbourne, Derbyshire
Melbourne, East Riding of Yorkshire
Melbourn, Cambridgeshire

United States

Melbourne, Arkansas
Melbourne, California
Melburn Hill, California
Melbourne, Florida
Melbourne, Iowa
Melbourne, Kentucky
Melbern, Ohio
Bob
Bob
Hm, looks like Canberra might be Au only!
let's not get started on Perth
@Bob Lidcombe
Because it's a contraction of two peoples names
Ooh this is good too: delimiter.com.au/2014/03/10/…
@MarkHenderson speaking of hardware for passwords etc.: arstechnica.com/security/2014/03/…
HMAC hardware token
@Andrew This is my favourite part
> it may be that the Abbott government will appear as nothing more than a thin, greasy layer in the core sample of future political scientists drilling back into the early years of the 21st century.”
He is greasy

« first day (1277 days earlier)      last day (3990 days later) »