@BretCopeland I hope he does. I left some support on your comment. I don't know if Stephane flies or not, or is big into aviation. It may be hard for him to see the difference between a constellation and aviation charts... But I think you concept gets it right, so I hope he follows it.
Now if I could just get him to use my "The up/down vote arrows should be B2s" idea....
@BretCopeland Well, he's doing pretty damned well all things considered. If it was me, it'd probably end up looking more like that original design from a while back...
He mentioned something about not doing custom arrows anymore because they aren't...scalable?
Part of the reason we don't customize vote arrows anymore is that we already have enough of a problem reminding people to vote, making them look different, or possibly not like arrows, doesn't help.
Assume a passenger aircraft were left undercover for a very long period, perhaps thousands of years, in a damp, arboreal environment. How much of it would survive? Which parts would remain intact, and which parts would decay? What would it take to get it airborne again?
How long could it reasona...
@Federico That is one of the major limitations of Stack Exchange. The idea of the "correct answer" check mark goes all the way back to Stack Overflow. And it supposedly meant "I tried this and it worked for my particular problem".
We don't ask questions like that here though, and sometimes in order to understand the answer to a question you have to have a certain level of knowledge.... It's a bit of a draw back. I kind of wish the answer check mark could be removed sometimes. Just let the community decide without the need for a check mark when it comes to answers that are not easily tested against the question...
For whatever it's worth, I actually voted to delete the answer since I feel that it being marked as "correct" actually harms the site...
@falstro You can't delete it? Ah rats... But yeah, that's essentially what I mean. Sorry, my terminology get's confused some time "accepted answer" is what I meant... -_-;;
It also might be possible for an author to delete an accepted answer if it has a negative score. I sort of forget what buttons are available under what circumstances because I see all the buttons all the time.
@falstro I would agree there should be a better alternative, I've made suggestions to that effect on Meta before (and gotten horribly downvoted for even bringing it up.)
I don't like this solution either, but it's the only way to let people visiting the site know that the answer is wrong.
@BretCopeland To be fair, he did clarify it in one of his comments.
If his comments can be added to his post by a mod....
Though I guess they could be added by anyone, come to think of it.
In his comments it fairly clearly sounds like he's talking about airways, not circle routes.
In fact this may be a duplicate of a question I asked some time ago...
These days, on larger/newer aircraft at least, it seems like GPS navigation is pretty much ubiquitous. So it doesn't seem like VORs and Non-directional Beacons (NDBs) would really get a lot of usage and, as I recall, the reason we have airways is because they were the connection points between V...
There, marked it as a possible dupe. Really wish the author would clarify. Honestly agree with @Falstro that voting down an accepted answer just because it's not completely correct is stupid, still not sure what alternatives we have in SE.
The problem is generally that the asker has the right to "accept" an answer, SE treats this as to say the answer is "correct" (by adding a check mark, by promoting it to the top of the list).
this has some sense on SO, if there's a particular problem to solve and the answer might have actually done that. But SO also suffers from the same behavior issue, better answer below? Downvote the shit out of the accepted answer "because". The only person being notified of the downvote is the guy who wrote it and he can't do anything about it.
@falstro Absolutely, I was telling @Federico up above that it would be nice if that check box didn't exist for Stack Excahnges like ours. There's no way to verify the answer, like on SO, so it's kind of pointless and can give incorrect answers an air of authority.
@falstro Yeah, which is the part that really sucks. But at least people reading the answer later know that it's wrong. It's an idiotic solution, but it's the only one that exists.
I made a comprehensive suggestion once on how to fix the problem. Nobody on Meta even read it, they just cried "burn the which" and down voted me to hell.
Intro- Yes, this has been discussed before, but I have a different solution and some updated reasoning. Please, for the love, read the post before down voting it... (but then you can down vote it all you want, I know it's not a popular idea :)
tl;dr:
I personally think users should be able to ...
Yeah, I guess the best solution would be to do away with the accepted answer concept altogether. I briefly pondered if you could have "dispute accept flag" kind of like close votes, but hey, that's what the stupid vote buttons are for. :P Either that or don't move the accepted answer to the top of the list
I dunno, "dispute accuracy" is the downvote button. It doesn't apply to this case, it's valid in one shape or form, just probably not the answer that best describes the situation
Accepted answers are pinned to the top of the list of answers, even when the accepted answer is outvoted by other answers (unless it was a self-answer). I am requesting that we stop pinning the accepted answer to the top and just allow it to be in its natural sort order position.
My request bas...
Internally, we've been discussing how we can deal with obsolete or out-of-date answers. A few weeks ago, I requested some feedback on how to encourage edits to these types of answers, while I'm still wading through everything on that post but now I'm focusing my attention on the problem of negat...
As the network ages and we have answers that are 7+ years old, we run into situations where changes in technology, etc. result in a once great answer becoming out-of-date, obsolete, or somewhat problematic. We don’t want to lose or delete these answers, due to legacy applications that still need...
I tend to disagree. I think the accepted answer signals that the question has been answered to the satisfaction of the asker, and that's still a pretty strong signal.
I'd be in support of unpinning negative accepted answers, and I'd be in favor of not keeping them pinned if they're wildly outscored by another answer.
I was surprised today to see two answers both on +1/-0, and the accepted one was below the other. I think the reason is that the accepted one was a self-answer, but that still seems wrong.
@BretCopeland only unpinning negative answers suffers from the same thing, it's a good answer gets upvotes, just not the best answer -> gets downvotes since it's pinned to the top even though it's a good answer.
The guy answering gets punished for the actions of the asker (accepting the "wrong" answer)
I didn't say it should have to be negative, just that it should have to be "wildly" outscored by another answer. What "wildly" means could be up for interpretation. Maybe it's always 10 votes, maybe it's double the votes of the accepted, I don't know. I think the threshold should generally be higher than just a vote or two though.
On Stack Overflow, the checkmark should be replaced with:
the problem is, ok, 10 votes to unpin, you've just imposed 10 downvotes on a perfectly good, although not great answer. Why not just upvote the other? They already did, but with the downvote, they can vote twice.
The problem is "the community" wants to see answer X at the top, and will jump through hoops to get it there.
so I don't see why we should have said hoops in the first place.
You have the same problem regardless of the threshold. Hmmm, the answer I like has nine votes, but the accepted one has ten, so I'm going to down vote the accepted and upvote the one I like so they swap places... I'm so powerful!
I actually think people are a bit less likely to down vote when they know that the other answer will move to the top if it simply collects enough upvotes.
Right now, they feel like they have to send a message by downvoting.
I'll be back in Kansas City for about a week in September. I'm going to a conference in St. Louis, but figured since I was so close, might as well spend time with family.
Originally from Platte Woods, but I've also lived in Overland Park and near Brookside (where my dad now lives).
I guess technically the neighborhood I grew up in was "Royal Oaks North", but even I had to look that up. I usually say a bit north of Parkville or a little south of the airport.
The last time I was in Kansas City, I made it a point to go flying out of MKC. I had always wanted to do that as a kid. We just flew over to Lawrence (my college town) and back. My dad sat in the back seat and took video of my landings. Luckily they weren't awful.
I rented from a flight school that day and went up with a CFI. It was probably the most pleasant flight with a CFI I've ever had because I wasn't actually trying to get checked out in the plane, just wanted to fly around.
@Federico That is one of the major limitations of Stack Exchange. The idea of the "correct answer" check mark goes all the way back to Stack Overflow. And it supposedly meant "I tried this and it worked for my particular problem".
well, in our case it means "this is explaining what I wanted to know"
and I could not understand how that was applicable to the case in question (that I see evolved in quite a discussion here)
@BretCopeland First time I came to NY was 7/30/92. I know this because when we landed on 31R at JFK and this Tristar was still sitting there off the end of 13R, having crashed the previous evening.
@BretCopeland Was quite a sight. I was jumpseating from work at MEM. I was getting ready to leave and my wife turned on the tv. Memphis cable had a NYC station and they were showing the story (TWA843). My wife almost didn't let me go.
I feel, at least for training, high wings gives you a better view of the runway when on downwind / base. Thats when I'm looking out the window sideways to judge position.
I thought aviation.stackexchange.com/questions/29513/… was a pretty good question. There's nothing "broad" about it. It's naive, but there's nothing wrong with naive questions.
@falstro I need an "I told you so" Bender meme (for when the auditor writes up a non-conformance for specifically what I predicted we'd get slapped for)
@voretaq7 well, you can give a better answer than that even: you just have to tell the questioner what they need to know instead of what they're asking
I've even seen people VTC with a comment along the lines of "you can't answer this question because it is based on a false assumption" and then retract the vote when someone gives a good answer
(our auditor however is fond of pointing out that the way the FDA insists we need to do certain things is stupid, and that we should direct the FDA to him so he can tell them to do whatever the German equivalent of biting a shiny metal ass is...)
@DanHulme we're technically subject to both random audits and random FDA inspections. Both our auditors and our regional FDA office like us, and have never made a surprise visit.
(well the FDA did once, but that's because someone there put us on the inspector's schedule and nobody ever contacted us.)
@falstro I am quite certain there is a German word for metalassbiting - assembled, in true German fashion, by epoxying 3 other words together and duct-taping on a vowel sound somewhere in the middle.
(also it's funny because our auditors don't know I still speak a very little bit of German, so I can follow about half of their side conversations)
medical projects are annoying because all our processes are based around their documentation needs, even though they're like a quarter of the projects we do
@falstro that's about what I would have assembled, but I imagine there's a german idiomatic for "kiss my ass" / "bite my ass" that I don't know which would be used in there
(see, I come back and in less than 20 minutes the room is talking about German phrases for ass-biting. I TOTALLY ELEVATE THE LEVEL OF DISCOURSE WHEREVER I GO!)
@DanHulme Most whisky old enough to vote, or a decent rye. Certain vodkas (for me it would be Ketel One). Absinthe if it's the real shit (and developers probably drink the real shit). Maybe a few other things.
@voretaq7 not really.. but it is been a dream to learn flying.. not to be a pilot per se.. I am a cabin crew management... nothing can make me trade this job.. but I love the idea of being able to fly something small..
i got the money, i can arrange the time.. but the will.. got its peeks like now..
@HeidelBerGensis Stuff along similar lines would be a Cessna 152 (probably find a bunch of flight schools with those), or the SportCruiser (not as common, part of the newer generation of "light sport" planes like the C42)
just to throw some other options out there in case the schools near you don't have C42s on the flight line :)
I live between Saudi Arabia and Indonesia.. but I am not planning to take a course in any of these two countries.. the plan should be fun, that includes a new country to add my list.. and a new language would be fine as well..
I do miss my favorite coffee shop in Gothenburg. On Mondays, they'd put little stickers on your takeaway cup saying "Monday, finally!". Almost made Mondays tolerable.
just remember: !FRG 11/038 FRG RWY 1/19 CLSD TO SKED AIR CARRIER ACFT MORE THAN 9 PAX 1512010500-1712010500 !FRG 11/037 FRG RWY 1/19 CLSD TO UNSCHEDULED AIR CARRIER ACFT MORE THAN 30 PAX 1512010500-1712010500 !FRG WE ARE NEVER MOVING THESE HANGARS HAHAHAHAHA GET STUFFED
I'm strongly leaning towards moving away from New York in the near future, and I'm really excited to be able to go flying more after that since I'll have more money, and should be a lot closer to an airport.
I'm not sure I could ever leave NY (everyone who was born & raised here and leaves always seems miserable for the decision), but by god I could fly a lot more if I lived in the middle of nowhere and worked remotely.
(and like Bret said getting cleared through the NY class B isn't really a big deal - as long as you can get a word in on the frequency they'll usually make it work for you)
You just plan your flight to stay clear, and if you want to try to go through, you call up New York Approach, say what you want to do, and they'll either say yes or no.
New York controllers are surprisingly nice. I've heard stories of other (much less busy) airspaces with asshole controllers who don't want you to bug them or ask to go through their airspace.
It's also one of those "I think I'll make a day-trip there to scout the approach and see how I feel about this…" airports, might do that early next month
(it may happen next year otherwise 2018. The FAA is apparently actually waving money at us now so I might take advantage of that offer. $500 is $500 :)
@voretaq7 there's probably something dumb behind every clause in the agreement...
also, I have an interesting fear-of-flying-ish question from my own family -- my mom is fine when the plane is straight and level, but has a terrible time with both turbulence and maneuvering flight -- are there things that could be looked into to help her acclimate to such things, or is this an odd case where the typical solutions wouldn't work so well?
@Shalvenay hey, my mother won't get into anything with less than two engines and they damn well better be jet turbines so you're already a step ahead :)
the couple of passengers I've had that were freaked out by maneuvering flight did better after I let them have the controls for a bit (though at last 2 people I've flown with are deathly afraid of the yoke and want nothing to do with it, so that's probably not a universal fix).
@voretaq7 I don't believe it's motionsickness per se -- but she does get very uncomfortable (she also has problems with rollercoasters, and low blood pressure)
some people just don't enjoy the sensation of motion (especially "dropping" motion like turbulence, and doubly so when they're not in control of the motion) - not much to be done there, and the usual cure is valium or similar
If that's the case getting her up in something like a 172 on a calm day with an instructor might even be helpful. If it's more related to motion sickness/nausea/discomfort than fear though I don't think a small plane would help the situation and I'd suggest trying something like the relief band