« first day (659 days earlier)      last day (3422 days later) » 

02:05
@JayCarr Like after a lightning strike. When the air fills in the gap of where the lightning strike happened and it creates a sonic boom.
@casey What is splat
I like to think of it as the air molecules spreading out on the top part of the wing due to the slope.
02:30
Off topic: Everybody thinks that states like Kansas or Nebraska are so bad and scary because they get huge tornadoes, but what you don't realize is that Arizona is even worse. When I lived in Arizona on a random day in the summer time the winds would start increasing randomly to speeds of 30+mph and then down the street you would see a giant dust devil coming towards you(I have saw a dust devil pick up a metal lunchbox before). These will come straight at you and are very scary.
At least a couple times a week I would see a dust devil. One day I was hanging out with my best friend and a dust storm blew in randomly and the wing speeds increased and everyone knew what that meant. Dust devils where coming down the street and they were powerful. There was 1 dust devil per 15 seconds coming down the street and where large and 1 dust devil that day was so powerful that it hit my friend and pushed him down to the ground.
weird note -- apparently it may be possible now to fly with only a WAAS GPS for IFR navigation, depending on where you are in the country (RNAV (GPS) approaches are being case-by-case evaluated/authorized for use as alternates)
Dust storms are very common in Arizona and people are always saying that seeing that wall of dust looks like the worlds going to end. I have never seen one of these walls before, but I have seen lots of dust devils during these storms and where very scary( way worse than Kansas). Also monsoons where common in Arizona and during my time living there we had 2 supercells form and produce golf ball size hail and that's bigger hail than in Colorado who has a supercell a week.
So if there is any of you who think Kansas is so scary then try living in Phoenix and there's a huge difference.
Also we have had hurricane force winds before that blew my basketball hoop over and caused severe damage to my backyard. I believe on that day it was an actual hurricane or a supercell.
quoting from FSIMS on the topic
@casey Remember how you said nobody can pay you to live in Arizona. Well here's a few more reasons why you shouldn't move there.
03:07
blah, ETOOLONG. (so no FSIMS quote in chat for you guys, sorry!)
@casey Hmmm, for some reason that "spin" visualization is causing problems in my head because it reminds of how turbulent air looks going over the top of the wing... But I can see what you mean. Are there formulas for figuring out spin and splat on a wing? (I assume the answer is yes... What are they?)
 
6 hours later…
09:11
@JayCarr you can't have the low pressure on top without the high pressure below, I feel it confusing to separate the two things, they should be treated as two parts of a single fenomen.
09:26
@Federico why not?
10:07
0
Q: Can we graduate please? :)

MikeFoxtrotSeeing as to that we are in principle in the green on the Area 51 statistics (I know these are not exact) and have been for some time. I feel we have what is a solid community represented by a fairly distributed group. These have varying areas and levels of expertise that should ensure that the...

@falstro put a hand in a bowl of water (or a pool) and try to push the water to one side, you will have "high pressure" (wave forming) on the side you push towards and "low pressure" (if you push hard enough you will see a lack of water) on the other side
you cannot have one without the other
10:26
@Federico Venturi effect?
@falstro try flying with a wing attached to an infinite plate :P
also, venturi effect comes from a restriction in the available cross section, there is no such thing around a wing
fair enough
I just though your statement "can't have high pressure without low on the other side" seemed a bit too broad at first glance.
you cant move anything through a fluid and not have high pressure in front and low pressure behind it, sure
then we agree :D
But you sure as hell can increase the pressure below without reducing the pressure above. Just put it on top of a fan. :)
eh, but the it is the fan that will have a low/high pressure gradient across its blades :P
10:32
yes
so what?
the "low" and "high" are relative to each other
no, they're relative to the "surrounding"
you're simply shifting where the phenomenon occour, not the phenomenon
what phenomenon? you're saying you can't have high without a low "on the other side", I just gave you an example
hence, I think your statement was too broad
you are shifting "which side" : before of the object, with the fan, of the fan blades
10:35
you're the one assuming a closed system
or I probably am misunderstanding what the fan would do
I'm just saying that your statement a "wing can't have high pressure below without low pressure above" is false, or at the very least lacking some conditions. Just increase the air pressure below and you've got it. The wing can't "produce" high pressure below without "producing" low pressure above should suffice.
ah, ok, if "produce" fixes it, then ok, I'm fine with it.
assuming there's no way to increase pressure on one side without reducing on the other, but my fluid dynamics are too rusty for that
or reducing on one side without increasing on the other
I thought that was bernoullis principle, but I readily admit I don't understand that one :)
10:51
@Federico just to be clear, you're saying that bernoulli's principle cannot actually create a pressure differential where one side is ambient pressure and the other is not?
(not trying to call you on it, I'm asking because I don't know)
no, I am saying that you cannot push a fluid with a finite solid object and not have a high pressure side while at the same time not having a low pressure side (or viceversa)
Bernoulli, like Venturi, needs a change in cross section available. Even if you would consider the atmosphere bounded rigidly both below and on top, the cross section of a wing hardly makes a difference.
In the classical depiction of Bernoulli you have a fluid inside a tube, you have no interaction between what's inside the tube and what's outside, it all relies on the tube to be infinitely rigid
11:18
ok, cool, thanks
11:58
Do you guys believe in ghosts?
12:14
@Ethan I'm pretty sure the answer will be a resounding "no" all around. I guess it depends on your definition of ghost for some (for me it's still no though)
12:55
@Ethan I've seen baseball and softball sized hail in CO, KS, OK and TX.
13:51
@JayCarr in that case do the stirring cup visualization. Fill the cup mostly full. The pressure at the bottom of the cup is the weight of the atmosphere and the water above it, and the water being much more dense we can focus on that. Stir the water and note that the fluid in the center of the cup dips low. The faster you stir, the lower the fluid level dips. If less fluid is over the center of the cup than the edges, there is less force down on the middle of the cup (m*g)
and so the pressure is lower
you can see it in drains as well when a vortex forms and the water level inside the vortex drops dramatically. that is also spin
14:30
@Federico That's more or less what I said in my example. The wing creates both phenomena by moving through the air.
@casey Ah, got it. Can you maybe point me at some formulas for all of this (for people who might possibly suck at math and need really good descriptions of all of the variables?)
yeah, but then you insert remark like this: "The air being pulled down is what makes the downwash."
while you cannot isolate the air "pulled down" (above the wing) from the one being "pushed down" (below the wing). They both are part of the downwash and I feel that focusing only on one and mentioning the other with a sentence there almost "by chance" ("But yes, the pressure on the bottom of the wing also matters.") can be misleading.
@Federico Fair, I misspoke (I do that all the time it seems.) You're correct, it's the combination of the two that creates that downwash.
 
4 hours later…
18:10
@JayCarr the simplest is a very generalized "perturbation pressure is proportional to dynamic pressure perturbation - buoyancy pressure perturbation" and "dynamic pressure perturbation = splat - spin"
and "perturbation pressure" is just the pressure anomoly
and this is true for well-behaved pressure fields where $\nabla^2 p' \propto -p'$
18:41
@Federico it really depends on the airfoil
19:00
@Ethan it doesn't
19:17
@casey lol...link to a formatted equation? Or at least tell me the name of the equation and I'll try my (generally terrible) Google-fu.
@JayCarr install the chrome mathjax-in-SE-chat extension :)
@casey I'd have to be in Chrome first, but that's easily arranged.
all $\nabla^2 p' \propto -p'$ really means is the field is generally sinusoidal with no discontinuities
Wow, suddenly there are formulas...
e.g. a functions second derivative is equal to its negative
19:27
My head is hurting...it's days like this I curse my lack of math background...
e.g. d/dx sin = cos, d/dx cos = -sin, d2/dx2 sin = -sin
See, I don't exactly know what a derivative is, that's how far off of understanding this I am.
a derivative is an instantaneous rate of change of a function at a point, e.g. the slope of the tangent line to the curve at a point.
if you consider a line, y=x, that has a slope of 1 everywhere, its derivative is 1
Ah...
But a sin wave is curvy.
And it's derivitave changes, therefore, right?
yes
19:30
So is the second derivative the second derivative of a set?
but a cosine is curvy in just the right way so that at every point it is the derivative of a sine wave at the same point
Aren't sine and cosine ones that, if you summed their values they would cancel each out on the verticle axis?
Or something?
a second derivative is the derivative of a derivative
angrily flings a 15-pound calculus textbook
I WAS TOLD THERE WOULD BE NO MATH!
(Once again I was lied to!)
19:32
d/dx sin = cos, d2/dx2 sin = -sin, d3/dx3 sin = -cos, d4/dx4 sin = sin
lol
Hey, some of us desperately wish we were good at this stuff, count your blessings.
lol, I need to find a book that can explain calc for dummies.
There's too much physics I am just missing out on.
Plus I'd really like to read Principa Mathmatica some day and not be entirely lost.
wow... I wish it wouldn't onebox amazon like that
lol, makes you look like you are producing content like a beast.
@JayCarr "If a group of angry students push Dr. Brack off the roof of the building, assuming a partially elastic collision {insert parameters I don't remember here} and neglecting air resistance, how high will he bounce?"
@voretaq7 Maybe after I read that book I'll answer you ;)
I kind of want to read a calculus book that doesn't teach it as dry math though (my ADHD addled brain HATES THAT WITH A BURNING PASSION).
19:36
@casey The best calculus textbook I own (and I happen to own several because apparently you can't escape calculus by taking Computer Science!) is from the 1960s or 70s - it's pea-soup green clothbound with some kind of torroidal solid on the cover, and the title is "Calculus".
Is there were some way to learn it in context of space exploration? Which as I recall is what it was developed for by Newton, right?
@voretaq7 Any chance for a link on that one?
@JayCarr I don't even know the ISBN for it (if it has one) :-P
@voretaq7 i have way too numerous calculus books, but I do have a similar one to that around here.
the biggest lie in basic math education is that the 134th edition of the basic calculus text has anything new over the 1st
@casey If it has a bunch of really good practical engineering examples in it it's probably the same one
19:39
@voretaq7 yea, that is it
Yeah the only difference in the books is the examples - some are really good, and some are AWFUL.
@voretaq7 See, that I'd be interested in. Something that shows how the math is being used to find solutions to engineering problems.
Yet still treats me with kids gloves....
I took my differential equations class with the textbook 5 editions old I got used on amazon for $2. I think I found two or three assigned homework problems that differed and no actual content changes aside from those problems...
@casey The joke in my college math department about the Anton calculus books is that each new edition just corrected some error in the solutions manual (or replaced an unsolvable problem with one that actually works).
19:42
I remember in my Calc3 class we were working on one of the problems for an entire 2 hour class period, and about 15 minutes from the end the professor got this funny look and we all started muttering to ourselves - I think we all reached the same conclusion of "This doesn't converge" at around the same time
though I have a printing from 2000
Have either of you seen the Calc classes they offer on MIT Open Courseware?
Might that be a good way to learn?
@voretaq7 my vector cal (probably the same as cal3) instructor did this a lot. He'd work for 90% of the class on a problem, realize it can't be solved with the methods we learned in class, then he'd pull some masters level math out just to prove it could be solved.
@casey Hmm, mine isn't that one, I think it's one of the very early editions of the Larsen "calculus and analytic geometry" books
Oh @casey will appreciate this:
(it looks like it would be a completely ridiculous joke of a textbook, but it's actually a very solid introductory text!)
Is that for calculus as well?
19:47
@JayCarr no, but it contains some light calculus (and good explanations of the bits you need).
Added it to my wish list, might grab it later.
I imagine if they came out with a calculus book it would involve Newton and Leibniz having some kind of boxing match :)
Maybe if I'm still feeling enthusiastic after reading "A Brief History of Time" I'll look harder into these math books.
That's be pretty epic.
Math (when you're learning it for a purpose) is actually fun.
Tell me, how confused would I be if I just picked up Principa Mathmatica and tried to read it?
19:48
the way we generally teach math with the rote memorization and abstract problems is bullshit.
3
@JayCarr Depends on how good your Latin is I suppose :-)
@voretaq7 lol, perhaps a translation then.
@voretaq7 Agree, so much agree! Just wish they'd let me feel like the math I was doing was somehow useful...
 
1 hour later…
21:01
@voretaq7 I have a pretty good text book on fourier analysis somewhere. To date the only maths textbook I've opened after the final... I liked that class. For once maths turned out to be actually useful for something. ;)
@JayCarr I'm not good at math either. Have you ever had a migran those are so painful?
21:40
@Ethan lol, no, I just get extremely frustrated. More so than I'm comfortable with being...
@JayCarr Being a teenager you get so mad at something and then tears come out of your eyes. I get mad and if I'm mad for long enough I will start crying its so weird.
The wifi is not working is when I get really ticked off.
@JayCarr Newton didn't actually do any space exploration

« first day (659 days earlier)      last day (3422 days later) »