« first day (398 days earlier)      last day (3683 days later) » 

02:25
@Farhan or someone with more rep than me: aviation.stackexchange.com/questions/11807/… does need an edit (the OP mixed up the DC-8 and the DC-9 and that got missed when Farhan edited it -- but I don't have the rep to make an edit that small)
@Shalvenay done
03:24
@fooot -- you caught one of the dodgy references, but not the other one (there is no DEC-9...)
@Shalvenay Got it now
I didn't read too closely and thought it was referring to a registration or something
cool, ty!
 
5 hours later…
08:18
watch out, this new user seems to be spamming a website (I just flagged 3 "answers" containing the same link)
08:46
most definitely spam, the owner of the website seems to be the user: who.is/whois/www.aerotransport.com
(and there is a fourth post with the site mentioned, although the hyperlink is not there)
yeah, it's spam but not vandalism spam: I think he just doesn't understand that this isn't appropriate
 
5 hours later…
13:38
He received multiple negative votes on all his "answers" as well. Given that, I don't think he'll stay around for long.
14:18
@fooot Thanks for the feedback.
It is indeed a big topic, but I'm not sure how it can be broken into multiple questions.
e.g. one question for each phase of preparation?
Suggestions are welcomed.
 
1 hour later…
15:36
@Farhan One possibility is breaking the answer in half at the picture. One question about how circumnavigation is defined, another about how people actually do it.
I do think that leaves the first part a bit sparse and the second part still very broad. Maybe you could include some typical routes or something in the first part.
15:53
@fooot I have the same feeling.
About routes, almost everyone has altered it at varying levels.
One person even mentioned that since he was ahead of schedule, he extended several legs to do some more site seeing.
@kevin What do you suggest?
16:07
I voted for too broad on that one as well.
When I first saw the title I thought it was like a marathon flight or something to break world records.
Then the routes... depending on which countries the flyer pick, airplane endurance and perhaps political situation of that area, I'd say it definitely varies
Suggestion....well, "what is circumnavigation" is a good topic on its own; regarding "how do pilots circumnavigates", I agree with @fooot it's still too broad.
@kevin yeah you can lease a A380 top it off with fuel and leave empty otherwise and you'll get very close to completing a circumnavigation in one go
I think if we fill only a few people in the A380 we should get pretty close (-: If we can remove the seats and replace them with cabin fuel tanks, even better.
fit a refueling probe and we can go for lap 2
we stay in the air forever!
16:22
@kevin at least until the engines fail
hmmm, is ETOPS considered in circumnavigation? lol
@kevin there should be some space in the cargo hold ;)
we'll be orbiting the Earth every two days, the only such vehicle except the space station
 
2 hours later…
18:38
so, when I'm trying to do my flying lesson this weekend there will be a B757 and an E170 taking up space
rbp
rbp
@DanHulme on the ramp?
well, the B757 is supposed to be arriving before I start, but the E170 will be doing circuits
18:56
@rbp Re: this comment, I thought the regs only required a placard if you take off. As best I can tell you can taxi around all day long with busted equipment & no placard…
rbp
rbp
19:45
@voretaq7 i think that's what 91.213 says, yes, but i would not want to be the one who noticed the malfunction and scrubbed the flight, didn't placard it, and it failed in flight for the next guy
@rbp Agreed - I would put a sticky note on it too in case the plane was dispatched later before the gyro could be fixed so whoever got it knew there was a problem - but it's not required until you take off.
rbp
rbp
agreed, and I just added a comment
I'm picky about stuff like that because we have so many people bitching about how the FAA is all up in their bizniz, but half of the stuff they've convinced themselves is required is just stuff they've heard and taken as gospel :)
like the "I won't declare an emergency! I don't wanna have to do all that bloody paperwork!" crowd
rbp
rbp
i didn't go into the next level of detail, but you can turn the engine off in a heli, and while they blades are still turning, pull up on the collective and roll the aircraft over
@rbp … flying deathtraps :)
rbp
rbp
19:51
"The R-22 is certificated for VFR, day and night operations

with a minimum crew of one pilot."
@voretaq7 did i tell you about the flying job?
@rbp are you flying deathtraps? :)
rbp
rbp
@voretaq7 flying glider sightseeing rides
glider...sightseeing? 0_o
that's.... interesting
rbp
rbp
???
Not sure I'd want to do sightseeing in a glider, it seems to limit the options for "circle over this nice thing on the ground and take pictures"
though I suppose it has the advantage of being quiet(er)
Australia is on a roll with these new safety ADs - mandatory control cable replacement at 15 years now.
20:03
@voretaq7 I thought you were being extreme about that, but I flew a heli in X-Plane and the L/D was negative. Probably because of how it's calculated. But still. Madness.
@fooot WITCHCRAFT :-)
rbp
rbp
20:19
@voretaq7 no, no no, glider rides are awesome. this will be out of driggs, idaho, along the western side of the tetons
L/D in a heli is pretty low, about 3:1 in an auto
you're going down at 1500fpm, until the very end, so depends on airspeed and % rotor RPM, but it ain't good
21:20
Stack Exchange podcast is actually live again.

« first day (398 days earlier)      last day (3683 days later) »