@TomMcW When it builds again, let it get thicker before inflating the boot.

also: PSA: the NOTAM goat show is back -- if any of you Stackizens are running into uselessly confusing, superfluous/irrelevant, duplicative, or otherwise useless NOTAMs, I'm pretty sure the OpsGroup folks would like to hear from you!: flightservicebureau.org/the-notam-goat-show

@Federico @Jamiec @BretCopeland @Farhan btw: do you want to pin that post to chat for me, or would you rather I make a Meta post for that PSA? (figured getting the word out would be good, in so far as we can contribute to cutting down on the garbage delivered to hapless airmen everywhere)

@Shalvenay Personally I think chat is fine, it is not really related to stackexchange, so on meta would be a little out of place.

also, how long should it stay starred?

@Federico some sites use their meta for announcements not strictly related to the site, so it's fine iff it's what the community wants

e.g. SF&F posts obituaries of people who are notable and relevant to the site's topic (writers, actors, &c.)

@DanHulme ah, never seen that, thanks for the correction

@abelenky It should be aviation.meta, not meta.aviation; I get a Chrome privacy warning if I go to that one. Or did you deliberately want to test meta.aviation?

Although, that note is from mid-2016.

Yes, they changed all the meta sites some time, I forget exactly when

K. Thx.

Here you go: meta.stackexchange.com/q/292058/151305

@Federico until the Ops.Group wraps up this year's NOTAM Goat Show (I'm expecting it to be a month or two)