« first day (847 days earlier)      last day (4118 days later) » 

10:00 PM
Ok guys. The first one who asks if it's my usual game gets a punch in his/her face. (XD hello guys!)
Were you the DM
 
@Zachiel eh?
 
@Zachiel Why don;t you just tell us which game you were talking about first so we have some context, and we don't need to ask?
 
because I don't think the game is relevant in this specific case, but it looks like everyone tries to say "if it's that whacky game of yours logic can't apply"
D&D 3.5. What would happen if I managed to cast scry + message to get in touch with a NPC with indifferent attitude?
 
@Zachiel A PNG? I assume you don't mean Portable Network Graphic? :P
Ah, interesting.
Anyway, I don't think anything special happens. He recieves the message and acts on it with all his current knowledge.
 
Think Evil NPC with something to hide and many personal private affairs
 
10:06 PM
their attitude is not relevant.
 
well maybe if it was friendly or hostile things would have been different
 
@LitheOhm Assuming that you sign your message - or your identity is revealed - then attitude is relevant.
 
@SimonGill true.
 
My identity was clear from the content of the message
 
@Zachiel did the message pertain to their "something to hide" or "many personal private affairs"?
 
10:07 PM
no
 
@Zachiel "I don't think anything special happens. He recieves the message and acts on it with all his current knowledge."
 
I just want to see how many people actually could see what happened later
 
yeah. If it continues and is annoying, then an evil and particularly powerful NPC might become annoyed and seek retribution.
 
@Zachiel Anybody who is scrying and anybody in visual range with line of sight... I can't think of anything that would change that.
 
or at the very least, misdirection
@SimonGill yep
 
10:09 PM
@SimonGill how many of you could foresee the npc reaction I mean
 
@Zachiel it'd depend on the NPC and their motivations, as well as what inclines them toward evil
 
bipolar paranoid npc
 
lol. Not specific at all, are you :P
 
@Zachiel It depends entirely on the NPC and message in question.
 
with affairs with a dragon cult cell
 
10:11 PM
@Zachiel I'd say the bipolarity would give you a randomness factor of whether they were up/down during the receipt of the message.
 
@Zachiel Why does he not have scry-blocking of some kind up already? A lead lined room for starters.
 
ok my question was more general. Did any of you thought that someone could be offended if I took a peek into their lives without any advice?
 
the paranoid part, probably seek to find out who. However, if identity was revealed: might seek out that person
@Zachiel how do you mean, "without any advice?"
 
like
suddenly
I decide I have to tell you something
and I scry on you
 
any previous involvement? Were we friends once? Those factors would come into play, I bet
especially if said NPC was once nonevil
 
10:13 PM
We had previus professional contact
I told the NPC I had to get in touch with him but I didn't tell him how
And he didn't expect privacy violation
 
@Zachiel does scrying count as privacy violation in your world?
 
@Zachiel He wouldn't be happy.
 
I think it counts.
 
@LitheOhm Why wouldn't it? Who would like being seen without having control of the camera?
 
@Zachiel k. In my games it doesn't. People who don't want it can have spells or magic items.
 
10:15 PM
I think a leaden chamber would do
you don't have a parley with a dragon in a leaden chamber
 
@SimonGill not sure. I just never figured to limit it in DnD context. If there's wizards, then there's crystal balls and that's something people would accept
@Zachiel lead and a few other things block scrying, true. Nondetection, misdirection and some other stuff also
 
So a wizard can see me when I make out?
Popular revolt!
 
@Zachiel sadly, yes.
 
lvl 1 npc
popular fireball too
 
@LitheOhm Sounds dystopian to me. But if it works, then that's fine.
 
10:17 PM
any wizard with that spell would hopefully have better things to do, but maybe that's the only reason they became a wizard
 
I wasn't talking about on-purpose
 
@SimonGill most of the books I've read contain less-than-famous wizards, like Stephen King's Eyes of the Dragon
 
So it's 0 on 3 figuring it out before I had the solution out
let's say 0/2 because of @LitheOhm's assumptions
 
Flagg has more important things to do then care about who is making out with who. However, if someone mentions his name then he is aware, it's his business as far as he is concerned (very evil megalomaniac, and yes dystopian)
 
Thank you guys
I feel a little bit less stupid now. (And sorry if some of that got attached to you)
 
10:19 PM
@Zachiel glad to help :P still not sure I understand the question, admittedly
 
@LitheOhm same
 
Since I did that to a PC
and the PC reported me to my guild leader expecting it never happens again
And I'm leaving the guild to save my leader's reputation
I was wondering if it really was so easy to foresee the consequences as everybody tells me
 
@Zachiel no way, not easy to foresee said consequences. There are so many different factors and choices and paths.
 
admittedly it might have been tied to the social context of my game if you still were unconvinced of the solution but I got at least one positive here
 
some factors would heavily influence it, but I wouldn't call that simple.
@Zachiel well that's good.
 
10:22 PM
let's say foresee the possible consequences
 
You see, this is another one of those times that being in an online forum game changes the assumptions we need to make.
 
@SimonGill Maybe a DM's NPC would have made less of a fuss because NPCs don't really have unchangeable agendas
 
@SimonGill yeah, if this were a Ravenloft, Eberron or Faerun game my answers would have differed at least slightly. And that's still in just the one system lol
 
@Zachiel Probably.
 
@Zachiel depends on how much your DM gets into it and what that NPCs agendas are, I'd say
 
10:25 PM
the (N)PCs agenda here seems to be OH GOD THEY SCRIED ON US LET'S SCARE EVERYONE WHO WANTS TO TRY THAT
 
There's also the consideration that you're dealing with another player who doesn't have access to your tone and non-verbal signals.
 
@SimonGill sending message while he can't see me?
The content of the message wasn't really that important.
 
@Zachiel lol. Well, if the person scried often enough and disrupted their life, then it's well within that NPCs rights to react. Doesn't make it correct, but how would you feel if you were a captive audience to someone you barely knew?
 
It might have been forgiven if it was urgent
 
@Zachiel If complaining to the authorities has worked often in the past, then people will do that because they've been trained to.
@Zachiel No, you're dealing with a player sitting in some other room and interacting entirely through text.
 
10:27 PM
@SimonGill yeah, I agree. Complaining to a guild leader isn't a scare tactic, it's called chain of command
 
Yes but I mean I didn't have to mimick anything
 
if the guild leader doesn't approve, then the NPC is doing something wrong.
most of the time* qualifier lol
and depending on the game, perhaps even some of the time
 
@Zachiel Sorry, don't understand.
 
the guid leader needed to approve because it's a politician (yes, this might be an issue)
 
@SimonGill same. It appears context is important, @Zachiel
 
10:28 PM
@LitheOhm context, yes, which game, I still think no
 
@Zachiel the system is 3.5, yes?
 
the system is free roleplay by chat using 3.5 rules for combat, and checks. No diplomacy or intimidate rolls out of combat
 
@Zachiel odd, k.
maybe not, I don't do online forums much
 
really fun, If i could play a charactre who didn't take the wrong decisions at every step
 
maybe that PC just wants to give you a hard time? I've had games like that.
 
10:30 PM
her guild leader wants to give everyone hard time
 
@Zachiel nice.
 
@Zachiel The fact that it is an online forum game with many players and DMs that are easily swayed by flattering their egos does matter in this case as well. It changes how things will happen from the usual idea of a few players around a table. We don't have enough experience of how your game works to understand what's really going on.
 
What I'm saying is that it could have been predictable here as it was there that there was something undesirable about being scried
the consequences are dependant of the peculiar game
 
@SimonGill agreed
 
no DM involved here except for rolling the scry save
 
10:32 PM
@Zachiel k
 
Yeah, knowing you are being scried is unpleasant for characters. If the character had no way to know there was scrying happening - then the player is metagaming.
 
It had, for I was scrying the character to talk to her
while we were talking she didn't know I could see her
 
@Zachiel not a character familiar with the message spell?
that one requires line of sight
 
that character maybe not (I don't know). Her guild leader, who was involved in the message, lvl 16 wizard
so she also knew which spells can be used to send message to long distances
 
did she know for sure you weren't within a hundred feet or so?
 
10:36 PM
different city
and she was in her bedroom
 
So the complaining character knew that you scried on her in a private location?
 
yes
 
And she took OOC action or IC action against you?
 
IC
 
Yeah, that all seems reasonable to me.
 
10:37 PM
If someone was wondering, it is my decision to leave the guild
not my guild leader's
 
@SimonGill same here
@Zachiel right, to save face for the leader
 
the only thing I can say against that is that she chose where she was when I scried her
 
@Zachiel was it prearranged?
 
but I don't think it's relevant since I wasn't floating invisible near to her
pre-arranged in the sense that I told her "I'm gonna scry on you to send you a message, here's the text, tell me your reply"
 
@Zachiel I'm not sure I follow this part, then.
 
10:40 PM
the previous day I sent her a different message
25 words
there's this guy coming to your town, pretends he's a cartographer, keep an eye on him he might be a liar for he sells treasure maps too cheap
please don't tell anyone
I'll call you tomorrow with more details
(paraphrasing)
instead of telling (in italian it's like "saying") that to anyone
she wrote it
 
@Zachiel k
 
and her guild leader was pissed I gave orders to her subordinate
and she also was pissed I didn't want her to be informed
She teleported at me yesterday
 
@Zachiel this was after she told her guild leader that she was messaged by your character, and scried upon by the same?
 
So it's nothing to do with sending a message, more to do with what you said.
 
I'm getting to it in chronological order
 
10:44 PM
@Zachiel k
 
and I had an hard time telling her guild leader I intended to explain today that she could tell that to anyone except the cartographer and the ones who were incapable of acting
 
bbl
 
I got some hard looks for my choice to send a message to the most absent from town guild member also
Since my guild leader had the idea on who to call I declined my responsabilities for that
maybe my guild leader is angry at me too
yesterdey evening i used scry+message to tell the other guild member that everything was fine and that I solved the issue with her leader in person.
since she was expecting a message from me
I didn't think about using sending to tell her "I'm gonna scry on you"
plus several other things that happened meanwhile
like a sergeant in my guild being the message-receiver's magic mentor, which had me get punched in the face and grabbed by the neck by a ghaele-morphed character
because I tried to spy on her pupil (the sergeant is really possessive)
 
Frankly - there's too many details to be sure what's going on and what you could do, or have done, differently.
 
I think I'm done with telling you the funny story
I could have lied on "yes I used message, why?"
but the low level PC made the questions in the best order
like "I'm impressed, what spells did you use?"
 
10:54 PM
Maybe. Dunno.
 
I think I could have told them I use a personal variant of message
and trick her into believing that by casting scry with the hidden cast trick
mmmh I guess scry is too much visible when you cast it
you need a mirror
and someone appears there
lies are not so useful when spells can detect them
 
:shrug:
 
I'm pumping up bluff only to feign a different alignment after a dispel
 
Given the astonishing variety of available spells, and the ability of prestige classes, feats, and magic items to modify them further, I have no problem with a 3.5 caster being able to snowball anybody not trained in spellcraft.
@Zachiel Pretty sure the DC for that is 60 or higher.
 
@BESW That's why I need a chocker of eloquence
 
10:58 PM
Display False Alignment: DC 70.
 
mmmh I guess my guild leader made a really sound choice deciding to raise charisma on his chamaleon
 
I had an epic doppelganger who could change alignment at a moment's notice, and could also make detect thoughts pick up whatever he wanted it to and nothing else.
I usually had him thinking about the Knight2King theory.
 
+1
 
11:04 PM
@BESW haha, love it.
 
11:22 PM
@BrianBallsun-Stanton Dai.
 
@BESW Dai stihó
Arrrrgh, this is a horrible case of jetlag.
 
11:34 PM
@BrianBallsun-Stanton Where are you now?
 
@BESW Sydney.
 
I think I'm playing something online now, bye
 
@Zachiel good luck storming the castle.
 
@Zachiel Shouldn't you know what you're doing? :P
 
@SimonGill I've taken the gnome and expanded his stats to be more transparent so I can run him without constantly looking things up.
Would you mind taking a look and making sure I didn't misunderstand anything?
 
11:46 PM
@BESW Sure
 
Incoming textblock!
GARDEN GNOME
- Feisty Garden Ornament
Alertness: Average (+1) or Good (+3) to notice small things
Athletics: Mediocre (0) or Average (+1) to dodge
Fists: Fair (+2)
Investigation: Average (+1) or Good (+3) to notice small things
Stealth: Good (+3) or Epic (+7) to remain hidden
- Diminutive Size [-1], Inhuman Toughness [-2] (catch: smashing [+1]), Claws (Venomous) [-2] (flavored as bite), Glamours (seemings, can use Stealth for opposed efforts) [-2]
- Physical O O O O
- Venom: Fists maneouver to inflict "Poisoned" aspect: each subsequent exchange, target rolls Endurance to defend against an a
 
Is Dim. Size included in your stats?
 
Stealth up to Epic when hiding, Alertness/Investigation Good when looking for small things, Athletics +1 to dodge, penalties to Might, and limit 1 physical stress (but Fists:1 from Claws helps mitigate).
 
I take it that Might ends up at 0 rather than in negatives? And is weapon damage after the limited stress damage?
 
(Which means you need a roll of 3 or higher with a Great Alertness to notice them when they want to hide.)
@SimonGill Might is assumed to be Mediocre, with penalties from -2 to -4 and flat-out inability as appropriate for situation.
 
11:52 PM
@BESW And with the Glamour Seeming - they can hide right in front of you too :) I still love that idea.
 
I'm not sure if the Diminutive stress cap is applied before or after the weapon damage.
I assume it is.
@SimonGill Yes. This pleases me. And with FATE points you can find 'em if you know they're there.
 
@BESW Works for me :) So long as you can see everything you need.
 
@BrianBallsun-Stanton More coffee?
 
a time turner would be ... optimal.
 
11:59 PM
Sorry, don't have one of those to spare.
 
@SimonGill Some idiot broke most of them.
 

« first day (847 days earlier)      last day (4118 days later) »