Scherzando! by hamZardo is a musical tabletop roleplaying game about things going explosively wrong in which you play both the characters and the soundtrack.
I spent nearly an hour writing the answer for this and although I think it's a good one I'm still paranoid that it's going to end up getting downvoted for some reason. rpg.stackexchange.com/questions/153423/…
@JohnClifford I'd mostly be concerned about "I'm answering the question in the title rather than the one in your last paragraph" because that's a practice which tends to create problems so the phrase is gonna raise some eyebrows and make some voters more skeptical/critical of the rest of the content.
Really? I would have thought answering a question not in the title would be more confusing.
I was just clarifying that my answer is "yes, you can benefit from multiple Shield spells" and not "yes, using Shield Block prevents you from casting every copy of Shield you have."
@JohnClifford Try saying that more explicitly. "I'm answering" makes it sound like you're ignoring the body text entirely for your whole answer, rather than just describing exactly which sentence your lede sentence is responding to.
The post body is the actual question, and the other part is just the title. Questions regularly have their titles adjusted to match the real question in the body, while the reverse (changing the body to match the title) is done only in unusual circumstances.
Answers should answer the question — ...
Can you think of any use case that would suggest that the "can't cast the spell again for 10 minutes" clause of Shield would apply to every copy of it you have from any source?
Unfortunately I don't have enough expertise with the systems involved to cast conscientious votes, I can only speak to broad structural/phrasal patterns I see across the RPG.SE experience.
@JohnClifford I'm skeptical of that argument just because the "spells" that you cast are not the "instances of spells" that can be in effect at any moment.
@MarkWells That is a fair point, but there's also nothing that says each of your prepared spells is considered the same spell if its name is identical to another one.
No, but I would say it does refer to casting the same prepared copy of Shield in the particular slot you cast it from. Having it as one of your other cantrips is independent of that, I feel.
This question (deleted, viewable by 10k+ rep only) is deleted within minutes after a VTC as duplicate to this question is called.
It is indeed a duplicate to the suggested question.
Given that duplicates are actually valuable to us as a signpost to the referenced question, with different word...
@JohnClifford Thinking about it now, on the one hand, it's really weird that you could take the same cantrip multiple times and it would actually do something.
On the other hand, taking Shield as two of your cantrips do that you can have two shields fits really well with my preferred conceptual model of cantrips.
In the 1990s I once played a horror RPG. I'd like to track it down again but I'm unable to figure out what it was. As best I can remember:
The PCs are powerful, almost alien beings. Players had a great deal of freedom in what their PCs looked like.
The PCs normally reside in another universe o...
@BESW I think the issue there is actually that "what solutions are available?" depends entirely on what your goal is (as now noted in mxy's answer to Someone_Evil's meta). Which is why "should" questions often get downvoted/VTCed
@MarkWells I felt the same way, but the fact is that there's nothing stopping you from doing so and nothing in the rules that says having multiple copies of a spell prepared links them together in any way.
@KorvinStarmast I've spotted a comment where you mention writing a composition then picking a title. Interesting. Around here, there's usually an offer of 3-6 titles (or, in looser cases, themes) and you need to write a composition based on the one you've chosen, not the other way around. Or at least that was the way it was when I was a pupil.
@vicky_molokh You appear to be mixing up topic and title. Topics as writing prompts are a common way to exercise the ability to write about a topic. A title chosen after writing an essay or theme paper allows for a letting the process of writing complete a series of connected and organized thoughts, and then using the result the inform the precise shape of the title. The same piece can have a variety of titles that "fit well enough" but getting "the right fit" is another matter.
What I learned in high school, in terms of fitting a title to any given piece of writing on a topic was to focus on the topic, and let how I treated it inform the title. (Heck, may have learned that in junior high.). I still find that the best way to select a title regardless of the topic.
(And I've had plenty of help here in getting my titles right when I don't go through that process).
Headline writing is somewhat similar, but with a slightly different purpose.
@KorvinStarmast As far as I recall, most of the time they would de facto be the same. E.g. 'Depiction of serfdom in Shevchenko's poetry', with no additional label applied. They would differ in e.g. tasks involving writing a short story, but not compositions. (Unless I've hit a language barrier and what I think a composition is is something else.)
@vicky_molokh That said, five of us can get the same writing prompt - Depiction of serfdom in Shevchenko's poetry - and treat it somewhat differently, and even focus on different aspects of the topic in the final composition. Having the title fit what was finally written and/or concluded would often mean that none of the five retain the topic as title. @BESW Indeed, there are.
(And of course coming up with a title for a book or a short story is often an iterative process as an author follows their muse ...)
What I have found in technical writing work I've been involved with is an imperative to get titles to fit the content; it seems to be more important than in creative writing.
@vicky_molokh speaking of which, did you ever finish the two page 5E game we talked about a while back? :)
@BESW I'm torn between "these are interesting ideas, and the mathematics checks out" vs. my "twitter is a microblogging platform, not a blogging platform" pet peeve.
@JoelHarmon Ernesto Oroza coined "technological disobedience" to describe the modern application of the resolviendo attitude codified in Con Nuestros Propios Esfuerzos during Castro's "Special Period in Times of Peace." A piece of technology is created for a specific purpose, and resolviendo requires disobeying that intent: looking at a piece of technology and seeing it not as an object with a particular purpose but as component parts temporarily combined to accomplish a current need.
@JoelHarmon The maths check out, but somehow I don't feel that rerolls serve well to demystify the math. If anything, I think they make it less transparent.
@BESW Ah, right, I recall hearing about that before, just in a totally different context. Stuff like "washing machines have a totally serviceable electric motor. What if you took it out to use it for something else?"
I like seeing that kind of "but what constructive use can I make of this?" attitude applied to technologies that corporations are trying to overcurate.
@JoelHarmon Yeah, and making the feeling of "I'm more likely to do better" accurate is more important than easily understanding the maths involved in why that feeling is accurate.
@JoelHarmon Hmmm. I wonder if I'm having a confirmation bias, or if die-tactile-oriented players and designers tend to also be the ones that mystify the maths the most. E.g. World of Darkness and . . . Weapons of the Gods was it? . . . seem to want a quirky feeling of rolling differently, but also happen some of the most mystifying and obfuscating maths.
Funny you are speaking about dice and obscure maths... I spent half an hour yesterday trying to figure what was the point buy equivalent of "Roll 4d6 and drop the lowest"
When I started in D&D, my friends really liked the randomness of rolling for stats. By the time I quit D&D we'd come around to much preferring point buys, because people rolling badly made us feel worse than people rolling well made us feel good.
These days if a game offers the option to roll for ability-stat-like things, we only take that option if it's a silly light-hearted and very short game.
I agree. Random might be fun for a short game, where you know you aren't stuck forever with a character that has a 6 in a characteristic. But on the long run, I find point buy system more rewarding
Very cool stuff, though, it's our default choice for any game where we don't have a system specifically for the kind of story we're wanting to tell.
Yeah, Fate's a bunch of gaming tools that loosely fit together into a system but rely heavily on the people playing to have a shared understanding of the setting/story/themes they're wanting to work with.
Unlike some game systems, which use the mechanics to push for a specific kind of story/theme setup even if the players aren't all understanding that.
If everybody agrees on what kind of story you want to play but you want help playing it, Fate's awesome. But if, say, you want to play a space opera game but one of your friends has never seen Star Wars or Flash Gordon... try a system like Lady Blackbird because it'll give more guidance for playing that kind of story.
@Nyakouai You know how in Powered by the Apocalypse games, all your moves and character features are basically tropes and story moments from the kind of genre that particular game's inspired by? Fate's more about giving each player, and the group as a whole, the tools for making their own set of those tropes and story moments they want to have happen a lot in their game.
Then also during play, it puts a lot more power in the hands of the players, to decide when things are going to go badly and when things will go well for their characters, and to add world details as we play.
@KorvinStarmast I like that, but I dislike the bit (in 5e RAW) about every magic item in the world needing an hour of get-to-know-you-time to know all its secrets.
Let’s say a ranger casts spike growth (up to 10 minutes), then realizes it is useless since the enemy is able to fly. Can they end the spell prematurely?
Let's say a barbarian named Boomtar is in a room with stalkers and can’t see them because they are invisible. Boomtar bravely lunges forward and happens to run into the stalker. May Boomtar then make an attack at the stalker?
Extending the current system
There are two parts to this answer. The first is fairly simple - to homebrew the point-buy system to extend the range, simply use the formula already implicitly used in the book. Specifically:
If the score is less than or equal to 13, the point value = score - 8
If...
D&D 5E has an "advantage" concept where instead of rolling 1d20, you roll 2d20 and take the higher. Likewise, disadvantage means rolling 2d20 and taking the lower.
How does this affect the expected average outcome of the roll?
@KorvinStarmast Yeah. I miss read magic and identify and quests to figure out all the things this does. I know I can make that up as a GM (and I do), but without the coreset including examples of that, I worry about it dying off.
@nitsua60 With so many different flavors of magic user now in the game, and some of them having spell slot limitations, I think the devs didn't want to create a party where nobody could figure out what these magical items did. I'd rather they came up with a different way to do that so that Identify would retain its value. (And I'd like to see a similar spell for divine casters ...)
@nitsua60 I do something similar usually. If it's a simple magic item, fine.. one hour and you find the button. If it has interesting always on effects, I wait until they apply obviously or someone casts identify. E.g. had a magic clockwork shortsword. Does +1 damage per successive round it was used for an attack up to +3 max. The description for the short rest was that, "it feels like it whirs and moves inside"
@nitsua60 quests to figure out all the things this does not to mention Arcana and Histlry checks (with hard DCs, 15- 20 and beyond depending on rarity) where using guidance or help could be a way to use the skill system to do it ...
Here is where I once again wish that Warlock were Int caster ... and if we apply this approach, then the Int score takes on a new importance.
@KorvinStarmast Definitely make a series of skill checks. Easy one to find the trail head so to speak and then successively more difficult ones at forks in the roadquest. Success means easier path or bonus loot along the way.
yoink This is why I always carry a notebook around.
I very narrowly avoided ending up in a situation where I had a Curse of Strahd party with no good-aligned characters in it. XD I wasn't looking forward to figuring out what to do with a Sunsword nobody could attune to.
@JohnClifford Under the idea that stars and suns are roughly the same thing, just that a sun is closer, the starsword being radiant damage is fine. If stars are "something else" and not suns that are very far away ... that's a different thing.
See magic item "ring of shooting stars" for another take on this.
@KorvinStarmast That...would be an interesting spin, if a starsword had different damage implications if the star in question was a red dwarf, giant blue, etc.
@JohnP Moonbeam is radiant damage, I think, and it's reflected sunlight if we use "our world" models for that.
@Yuuki Attunement is for PCs. The star sword would be "through magic" somehow harnessing the unique powers of that star ... or the unique characteristics of that star ...
@JohnClifford Glad I checked, though, RoSS has morphed quite a bit since the first time I ever got one in OD&D. That one would only do the meteor swarm thing outdoors.
That'd actually be really cool for my campaign because I'm planning on transporting the players through various planes of existence and settings, so if they do get a sword like that it could change its function depending on where they are.
@JohnClifford RINGS: Shooting Stars: This ring functions only during the hours of darkness when the wearer is under the open sky. It will cast Light spells for a distance of 24", throw a fireball of 12 points damage, or hurl a solid missile of 12 points damage
@Yuuki Ring of Shooting Stars: when using this ring, you shoot six lead slugs into John Lennon. 8^o
@JohnClifford The more I think of it the more I like the idea of making one of the damage options radiant.
@KorvinStarmast Bard item: Ring of Autotune - Any song you sing is at a +2 for being on tune, but there is a 1 in 10 chance you will irritate/enrage your target.
5e version .... Shooting Stars ... For every charge you expend, you launch a glowing mote of light from the ring at a point you can see within 60 feet of you. Each creature within a 15-‐‑foot cube originating from that point is showered in sparks and must make a DC 15 Dexterity saving throw, taking 5d4 fire radiant damage on a failed save, or half as much damage on a successful one
@JohnClifford There was a trilogy of books written by Robin Hobb, with a core plot feature including a play on words regarding "Chivalry is Dead" (Farseer Trilogy/Assassin Trilogy)
@Yuuki Yeah, can't discuss too much about it in a PG 13 room, but the later seasons/books they really mess with the characters in a lot of interesting ways.
@JohnP Based on family history documents, my grandfather had (IIRC) 1/4th Irish and 1/4th Scots ancestry (due grandparents) so I suppose should pursue that idea as a simpler avenue of recovering a small bit of family heritage. Thanks for the link.
@Someone_Evil I just realized that a dog may never use the word "should" in conversation, since I am led to believe that dogs don't have a sense of futurity. (Am I being led astray?)
Anyone else noticing that we're getting a fair number of questions lately where the answer is pretty much "Nothing in the rules covers this very specific edge case, it's up to your DM"?
@vicky_molokh I don't think it is a problem in the sense that we should do something about it, but it is a set of questions that don't have good answers, and were the answers are very similar. But, sure, let's call it a phenomenon instead, if the wording matters.
@goodguy5 Yes, I was trying for a micro pun there.
@JohnClifford Since 2014 we have a lot of questions like that. It's a 5e thing.
@goodguy5 I was also presuming an ability, like a D&D "speak with animals" spell, to converse with a dog beyond the mundane means that I use with mine.
@Someone_Evil The explicit language in the 5e manual regarding rulings over rules informs my comment there, but you are correct that other games and systems run into it as well.
5e may suffer from the reverse of the PF thing: no rule for it at all, or a vacant space in a rule section ...
@JohnClifford Arrgh, I just had a thought. When a barbarian raging shoves or grapples another creature, does that shove or grapple constitute an attack such that it sustains rage? Grapple/shove is called a "special melee attack" so I think it does.
There is a rule in the "Moving Around Other Creatures" section which states:
Whether a creature is a friend or an enemy, you can't willingly end your move in its space...
I am wondering just how absolute this rule is and have come up with example situations where its application is unclear ...
Has the change to the Morris site caused the Feeds functionality to pick up all the threads in their 'meta' section?
It felt like we're getting a lot of items from them in that feed, and it's not interesting to folks who aren't users of that forum (me included)
Oh, it's not just their meta section, but seems to include other parts, including really old threads with new activity. I feel like that part of the feed needs updating so we aren't spamming ourselves with all the activity of that forum.
@JohnClifford If it's a single downvote, it can be literally anything including that the downvoter is just having a bad day. If it's more than that, someone is likely to explain, eventually.
I assume the feed we read has changed content after an update on their site. Not sure how that feature works, but I assume @BESW or a mod knows/can fix it
I can remove it temporarily if it is being a nuisance and then we can try to figure out what is wrong from there.
If someone had the time to write up a Meta on it, it might help us track and deal with the issue :)
I'm just stopping by briefly so I don't have the time at the moment (though might be able to do it later tonight if nobody else has). I also haven't been in here long enough to see what the issue is.
It seems that Morrus' Unofficial Tabletop RPG News feed has been spamming chat with lots of posts including old ones, and we're not sure what is going on.
For the time being I have removed it from the chat feed to prevent it from being a nuisance.
Anybody have any idea what is going on?
Well, lets see how well that question gets received. :p
Found tweets from ed greenwood saying that in 5e FR, paladins do have to follow a deity despite mainstream 5e that not being a requirement. I'm looking for the source of that assertion.
> Welcome to this new upgrade of the site. We are now on a totally different software platform. Many things will be different, and bugs are expected. Certain areas (like downloads and reviews) will take longer to import. As always, please use the Meta Forum for site queries or bug reports. Note that we (the mods and admins) are also learning the new software.
@MikeQ Yes, since they haven't published any FR specific settings books yet, I want to see if this is in a different book as an addition, or if it is made up out of whole cloth.
@KorvinStarmast They're called the Forgotten Realms because everyone has their own and if you leave a campaign, you have to forget everything you learned about it before joining another table.
Well., this is a sticky wicket. I can't register or log in/forgot password, because their captcha is screwed up (ENWorld). I can't post on meta that it's messed up because I can't log in. :p
The DM in our game homebrewed something called a Dire Otter Swarm and had the Corroded Metal attribute that can destroy nonmagical items, but he gave it a buff that allowed them to destroy Magical Items, to which the rest of our party gave him a confused look. Are we just being excessively sensit...
Anyone got any thoughts on the "Unified Theory" with "Natural Medicine" question? I still think that saying you can use one skill check in place of the original doesn't change which one the feat requires.
I'd read it as changing Treat Wounds from "this requires a Medicine check" to "This requires a Medicine check, but you can use Nature instead if you want".
Oh I know Mike, I'm just asking if anyone else in here has thoughts on it. :P
@KorvinStarmast Does that address FR specifically? Doesn't seem to, but I'm not that familiar with 5e yet.
@KorvinStarmast - Also the original question tweet specifies 5e PHB, Ed's response should be addressing FR in 5e but who knows what he was smoking at the time.
@JohnP If this is a rules question about 5e (as it is tagged), then Greenwood is not an official source and this question should be closed as a duplicate. If this question is only about lore, then maybe the 5e tag should be removed. — Raj38 secs ago
I'm...not sure how to answer that. I thought that I specified it pretty well.
Thieves' Cant is a class feature of Rogue in 5e.
As it is a method of communication, can it be taken as a language? If not, is it mechanically equivalent to something that can be swapped so that characters of another class can use it without multiclassing?
Are there any other rule mechanics e.g...
@JohnP It could help to clarify what you mean by "valid ruling", e.g. if it overrides the PHB text. Otherwise it's sortof a dupe of the linked question.
@Someone_Evil It's also a 5e thing because a lot of non-D&D games have clearer guidance and principles for the GM to follow, and we can write answers about that.
@Someone_Evil I've noticed that RSS feeds tend to get weird when sites are re-jiggering anything to do with how they post new content. It should calm down eventually and we can put it back.
This question:
Do Forgotten Realms paladins have to follow a deity?
references this other question:
Are paladins required to follow a god?
asking what seems to be the same question. Why is it not a duplicate? The implication seems to be that unofficial tweets can override an official source ...
I have been thinking over this and couldn't find anything about it online so far.
If I animate a corpse into a zombie to be my undead follower using the spell animate dead, when it is reduced to 0 HP will it get the benefit of undead fortitude, and, if it is then not slain will I still retain th...
I have a spreadsheet. 60 rows, ~100 columns.
I wish to concatenate the data from each set of 3 columns, to produce ~30 columns of 'merged' data.
e.g. currently columns include "Fighter 1", "Fighter 2", Fighter 3", "Wizard 1", "Wizard 2", Wizard 3" etc.
i wish to put the data from each set int...