@Rubiksmoose SF&F is rampant with comment streams that look like reddit. History beta is for the most part a lost cause, though the mods there try their best. The community are utterly undisciplined.
Aviation has a similar problem, though there are a few people who do try to work on the clutter ... sometimes.
Without the community buying into the premise, it won't work. Christinity.SE is uneven, and I think a few of the people who used to work from the community mod angle to keep things tidy have moved on to other things. I typically have 3-5 times as many action items when I drop in there for a quick look, in terms of community mod action, as I ever do here.
> Welcome to rpg.se! Please take a look at the [tour], it's a useful introduction to the site. Titles, while useful summaries for questions, do not replace the question itself. Please [edit] your question to describe the problem or challenge you're facing.
@KorvinStar: One of my friends said that if he ever encountered one of my characters in the same game, he would make it his business to get off the material plane as fast as possible.
@Joshua so long as he's sold most of his possessions ahead of time, perhaps not a bad plan. Material plane seems to attract a lot of monsters and murderhobos
I decided I do not like the magical definition of telling the truth very much. It's too literal minded to comprehend "might as well be true" or "simplification".
Hours ago, the Draconis Navigation Bureau detected a large object drifting in from deep space.
Pilots: Investigate the object's size, speed, nature, and trajectory and report back.
Those Who Were Here Before.
A campaign framework for Tachyon Squadron.
https://www.drivethrurpg.com/browse.php?keywords=tachyon&manufacturers_id=2152&affiliate_id=24139
also I read through all the chat stuff I missed and the diamond-mods' comments in that StackOverflow thread bother me so much
also I dunno if this is worth suggesting, regarding the rules-as-written tag, but... maybe renaming it would be clearer? something like [literal-rules-readings] (with the current name as a synonym of that)?
because [rules-as-written] as a tag name is easily misinterpreted, especially by those who don't bother reading the tag wiki
@Xirema @V2Blast Just scrolled up to see that Stack Overflow thread. Wow, I want to flag it but the people who would respond to it are the problem. That is just such a terrible attitude. I find myself having the same arguement on writing.se at the moment. So glad for the standard of moderation on rpg.se!
@Rubiksmoose I feel like there should be comment about "don't delete your question", but I can't really word it properly. Like, "It's not a bad question", or "you shouldn't delete it if you don't like the answer".
@Ben @Rubiksmoose how about: "This is a good question that could help people other users. If you have received an answer you like accept it, otherwise [edit] or leave a comment explaining what you think is missing from the current answer(s). We usually only delete bad or abandoned questions, if you wish to discuss it you are welcome in Role-playing Games Meta or [chat] anytime."
I think I remember a story about a player that played a Paladin that way. They were old ang grubby, and really rude, and whenever they used "lay on hands" they would just yell at the other PCs
He told everyone he was a fighter too, which was a big part of the apparent issue everyone had with it
I personally found it rather fun and even hilarious when my character got dropped by something and was roused. Simply because the angry dragonborn in our party yelled angrily about not putting full effort into the fight
Especially because he didn't ever do anything other than yell at us
It was great
Though I can see why that kind of character could make someone mad
I think as a whole, the hobby puts a lot of unnecessary emphasis on the idea of setting up an awesome payoff through several sessions of miserable time
Or not necessarily miserable, but possibly lesser kinds of badness anyway
GMs and players set up dramatic twists and plan years-long megacampaigns
@Ben I mean, the "mechanically a paladin but described as a grumpy old man" part would be fine as an example of a) mundanes are awesome and b) mechanics don't have to drive story. The problem was that it wasn't presented as either of those things, it was presented as "this guy was unfun to play with but it's awesome because he was only doing it so that he could eventually surprise us with a big twist".
I'm leaving out the "and this makes him better than us", because, well...yikes.
It's even worse because a short story like that quite easily justifies its bad stuff with a good ending. So if one doesn't think about it too much, it's easy to relate to "ooh that's so awesome".
But in real life, assuming that was played out as described, we're talking about something like dozens of hours of bad time.
I want to find this story again to inspire my fellow newer players to break the mold of role-playing.
I remember reading an incredibly inspiring [D&D probably] story about a player who was role-playing a Paladin "in disguise" as an awful lazy crotchety fighter so well, that the players thought h...
Which of the following is true:
Tag criteria are prescriptive; one reads the criteria of a tag and checks whether they apply to the question; tag criteria change through meta discussions and/or wiki edits.
Tag criteria are descriptive; one watches how authors use tags, and edits the wiki to ma...
A colleague of mine reported that especially in the formerly-socialist parts of Germany, it's quite common for landlords to turn on the heating on a given date --- regardless of the actual weather conditions.
Student housing is pretty good at doing that too, but luckily about half of my net worth is in sweaters
The other half is blankets, quilts and woolen socks.
We discussed eyeballable units earlier, it's kinda fun how oftentimes it's easy to get a rough estimate of how cold it is out by just looking.
The wind is quite obvious (yes, I know it doesn't really make the air colder, but the effect is equivalent to having actually colder air), but also clouds (clear days in the winter tend to be colder than overcast days), what shape the snow is in, what things are dry and what are wet
I've got a friend who, while living in California, had people actually think that "being able to tell the weather by standing outside" was a Magical Native Skill.
This question references https://www.dndbeyond.com/, which is an official WoTC website. The problem we face with this content is that it is not accessible without a twitch account (afaik).
This defeat a huge part of this stack exchange. We could avoid this website but since it is seen as offic...
Yes, as modern people on the street. They seem very definitely present in depictions of modern North America, such as in CSI or Renegade, or in RPG books.
Not ubiquitous of course, but not unheard of either.
But yeah, I do think of CSI and Renegade as relatively modern - one of them is from the 80s and the other is younger than me. Or how about Mentalist. Or the Monster Hunters tabletop RPG line.
If we're talking about how media influences our contemporary understanding of the world, then media which actually influences contemporary understanding would be appropriate to cite.
You could, for example, have mentioned the Twilight franchise which attempts to depict a modern Native tribe but fails spectacularly at portraying them as an actual real-life identity by reducing them to a supernatural foil for an obviously fictional premise.
Well, isn't CSI pretty influential? And (checking wiki) the oldest of the series lasted until 2015, which is pretty recent.
I'm just very puzzled by your mention of people who think that all of the first nations died by today. That seems so odd given that they're present in media coming from your continent.
Then ask about why I say it, rather than telling me I'm wrong by citing obscure decades-old media I'd never even heard of before as if that somehow proves a point.
Or google it for yourself and find an indigenous perspective on the subject.
Okay, asking differently: how did people manage to never encounter a depiction in the media, or did but assumed (without ever checking) that the depiction takes zero inspiration from contemporary living people? That seems rather mind-boggling.
I said that people are surprised when confronted with the idea that indigenous peoples still exist in America. That's not the same as people honestly thinking there are no indigenous peoples still living in America--though some do think that as well, for a variety of reasons.
I mean, just watching TV about the (say, post-2000s) world, encountering an explicit member of the first nations seems much more likely than encountering an explicit rusyn or even belarusian.
> That's not the same as people honestly thinking there are no
It starts with historical education, which almost always frames First Nations in the past tense; we learn about first contacts but round about the Trail of Tears most references to indigenous peoples dry up and discussions of expansion and Manifest Destiny are framed as "settling" (not invading) empty land.
And modern depictions of First Nations peoples tend to reinforce that "dying out or already gone" presentation, as a subset of the Colored Pain narrative. Natives are often portrayed by non-Native actors (one of the most famous portrayers of Native American characters in TV history was an Italian man) and presented as incidental or exotic.
Official storybooks of a multinational state being rather quite on the matters of non-dominant nations seems pretty par for the course (I was born in USSR and caught a bit of that experience on the non-dominant side). But from consuming a bunch of USAian media, I always had the impression that in the public consciousness they take up a visible (though not necessarily accurate!) presence.
Thus, while most Americans if given a few moments to think about it will say "Yes of course there's Indians here," they will be extremely surprised to actually meet one because they don't actually think about it as a part of their current nation's demographic composition.
No. Surprised to be reminded that they still live.
Because in our everyday lives, it's very tempting to forget that we're standing on stolen ground--and our media makes it easy to do that forgetting by mostly presenting Natives in easy-to-digest-and-forget ways.
That's one reason the Standing Rock protests were so disruptive.
@vicky_molokh Pay attention, next time, to how much the media presents First Tribes as modern nations with coherent social identities, rather than as individual Americans with a few exotic quirks. And then look at how many of Natives get to have their own stories rather than being tools in the stories about the white people.
Consider how often they cast a non-Native actor in the role, which (like acting cis actors in trans roles, or abled actors in disabled roles) sends the message that there are just so few of these people in the real world that you can't find one to hire.
Well, last I remember, they are presented as separate. E.g. in the Mentalist there's an exchange where a merchant is selling a feathered souvenir, and Jane asks him 'Don't you feel bad about mercantilising your legacy like that?' or the like, and the merchant replies 'Nah, these are X items, we are Y'.
Look at Westworld, which spent an entire episode of its second season showcasing almost all Native actors speaking a Native language (though not, for most of them, their own language)... and then remember all those characters are robots created to please human masters and go check how many actors playing actual humans are Native.
Yes, there is an increasing effort to be more responsible about these kinds of portrayals in media. But it's pushing against a lot of inertia and it's still very much a background thing.
Maybe watch Reel Injun and consider the ongoing debate within Native communities about the benefits and harms done by participating in bad representation.
At any rate, my point is that we are given motive and opportunity to conveniently forget that we are living on stolen land and the original occupants are still here, unassimilated and sovereign despite our society's best efforts.
And so, despite most of us technically knowing they're still here, many of us wind up being surprised and re-surprised when we're reminded of it in real life... because TV and the movies aren't real, so reminders there don't actually percolate into the same brainspace.
Just like I know people who watched Black Lightning but didn't realize all the social problems in the show are real and un-exaggerated, it's just the actual superpowers that are made up, despite being inundated with media about the physical and social violence visited on black Americans and their communities.
Well, the difference of brainspace . . . I suppose it's better to have people stay able to separate reality and fiction, though more interest in which fictions are inspired by reality is useful.
Humans are really good at ignoring things we don't like, and most Americans are made VERY uncomfortable by the notion of confronting things like the legacy of BQ.
Oh, humans are certainly good at that. OTOH, I suspect if they weren't, they'd go extinct as a species under the burden of mental strain of facing all the things they don't like.
(BQ is a measurement of Nativeness determined by how many of your ancestors were Native. It's not something any Native tribe came up with on their own; it was forced on them by white governments and its effect is to limit Native national sovereignty by limiting their nations' ability to enroll citizens, and over time to reduce the overall population of people the white governments have treaties with.)
(That Natives have their own sovereign nations is also a thing many people are surprised by. But also many don't because the conditons of being recognized as sovereign are determined by the occupying governments and tend to be almost impossible to meet for those nations which were hardest hit by relocation and slaughter.)
The indigenous people around here (the Sami) are likewise quite often neglected, although their legal and cultural situation has improved a lot over the past decades with improving popular consciousness. However, there's some whole new kinds of tensions going on, often tying in messily with the urban vs rural -debates.
I live among an indigenous people who had their sovereignty denied by the United Nations because they were occupied by people who didn't ever treat them as sovereign, and that's what counts: if the occupying force ever deigned to at least pretend you were a nation.
@BESW I facetiously regret to inform you, regarding the above, that you and troggy are no longer my only US colonial friends. I recently got in touch with someone from Puerto Rico
One thing that's sadly common outside the bigger cities is a blatant disregard of environmental regulations. They're often seen as a bureaucratic folly, imposed by the stupid city folk who don't realize that the river has been a perfectly good outlet for all kinds of filth for the last 1500 years or so. Except the amount and intensity of filth have exploded in severity, but hey, stupid city folk :(
(Usually the large-region Bahá'í administration structures are organized by national boundaries, but five or six years ago people were working on re-districting the Spiritual Assemblies of Norway, Sweden, and Finland, to better reflect what I understood to be a common cultural identity across the northern areas of all three nations and provide an administrative structure that made more sense that way.)
(I think the idea was basically to have a fourth Spiritual Assembly, for Sápmi.)
It gets more divisive when native privilege gets invoked --- there was recently a case where professional Sami fishers knowingly disregarded fishing limitations, since they have by traditional law a right "since time immemorial" to fish in their own waters. It makes sense to a certain extent --- but modern day fishing methods are capable of wrecking river ecosystems, so some kind of regulation must be enforced.
@BESW Yes, the Sápmi region intersects all three countries, as well as the Kola peninsula (part of Russia)
@kviiri Ah, yeah, I've seen that get played out in a lot of places. There's often an issue that the regulations are put in place without attempts to accommodate people whose lives they actually threaten.
Like Alaska Natives who go "Okay but what do we eat."
And often in the Pacific the scientific experts are actually missing massive pieces of the ecological puzzle that the locals are familiar with but can't phrase the way the scientists can hear it.
I think I'm not positioned to have a view worth sharing.
I think that human dignity and the responsibility to curate our environment responsibly are both important values and that they aren't mutually incompatible but there's no one-size-fits-all solution and specific solutions need to be arrived at by people who are familiar with the reality of the situation and those whose dignity is at stake.
I think the long-term wise, although likely painful, move would be to just shift the burden of administering fishing to an agency appointed by the Sámi parliament.
I do feel like indigenous peoples should have truly sovereign governance over their areas, for so many reasons. (Within the context of an international body in which all nations participate equitably, also.)
Whenever that possibility comes up here, white folx freak about about how they'd get kicked out of their homes and I'm like "Probably not? But if so, that's fair."
It wouldn't be so bad, I mean, they're usually the same people who say "oh they don't have it so bad under our rule", why would it be any different in reverse
Oh, there's definitely nuance. But a key principle of effective reparations is that you'll never perfectly hit the "right amount" of repayment for injustice and so the only way to make reparations actually work is to over-compensate.
@kviiri It always seemed like projection to me, and/or a fear that the indigenous people have been assimilated so much they'll take on the same attitudes.
The main difficulty of the dilemma is that any attempts to provide compensation will inevitably hit innocents with punishment for their parents' sins.
And I don't know how to solve that.
Imagine someone tells that Russians should pay for 'our' Gholodomor. How would you imagine doing that? By taxing modern Russians? But they didn't take part in that.
I mean it would be injustice to blame Russians living today for the faults of their parents against us. (It wouldn't be an injustice to blame them for the bad things they actually committed more recently!)
I have personally and generationally benefited from a personal and generational injustice done to the people who are Native to this place I live. I can't help not, my benefits are built into the fabric of the society they've had imposed on them.
Yes, but you (presumably; of course I don't know you well enough to know for sure) did no wrong, so any de facto punitive action against you would be an injustice, even if someone were to call such punishment by some non-punitive euphemism.
It's therefore my responsibility as a person who values justice and mercy to use the advantages I've been given to empower the people at whose expense those advantages came.
In name, but not in effect. As I said, let's say I start demanding reparations for Gholodomor. But that cannot be done without taking the stuff (money) of Russians who didn't do anything wrong.
(On a tangent, I think stopping doing bad stuff that's currently being done is more important than trying to right/compensate for old wrongs. But that's an additional matter.)
Both are necessary; righting ongoing injustices is impossible without taking into account the generational deprivation that enables and perpetuates them.
Reparations are about making amends for a wrong and fixing the damage caused by it.
It starts with apologies and talks that identify the wrong and the damage, and it becomes an ongoing process that may take generations to heal. Reparations that have reduced generational trauma to a payment of money have been laughably insufficient to actually address the damage done.
That's why, for example, Guam talks about getting a chance to determine its own political status--because that right has been denied its people for hundreds of years. And the people who would get to vote on such a choice? I shouldn't be among them, because that injustice is the only reason I live here in the first place.
I don't think the damage of a genocide can be 'fixed'. You can't bring people back to life, and you can't just magically pay a compensation by turning people of one nation into another (a facetious scenario, yes). An apology is . . . well I see that as having near-zero value, but maybe I'm atypical. Reversing a centuries-long occupation would likely require things like exiling innocents from their current area of residence and/or denying their voting right.
If Guam actually got a chance to determine its political status, it might become an independent nation... or a full State of the USA... or something else entirely. Chances are good that I wouldn't be kicked off the island no matter what, because only a fringe extremist group thinks that's even possible.
But it'd be totally reasonable for me to have to apply for citizenship to the Nation of Guam and meanwhile I'd be living as a foreign national.
As for generational trauma... that depends on the nature of the trauma and the people involved.
Again, I don't have the right to say how that sort of thing should happen. There are many very smart people who DO have the right to enter that discussion, and they've said many very smart things about it.
My role right now is to use my platform to amplify their voices.
@BESW I have very mixed feelings about that one. On one hand, I know firsthand the consequences of having too high a percentage of another, aggressive, nation living within a border of a newly independent state. On the other, it seems wrong to revoke people's citizenship because of their nationality when 'I did not cross the border, the border crossed me' happens.
Oh, my stance against revoking citizenships comes from an ethical PoV, my stance for it comes from the cynical (in the new sense of the word) pragmatist who's bitter about an annexation/occupation that's been excused through 'needing to protect the interests of brothers abroad'.
I got a lot less humane in the years when that happened. But I didn't forget that I became a worse person. And I don't want other people to become more bitter and less ethical the same way I did.
I live here because my parents and grandparents moved here to benefit from an American war in SEA which exploited Guam's resources and people. America was able to use Guam that way because the American press baited McKinley into starting a war on false pretenses and our previous occupier gave us to America to get the war to stop. And that occupier just sort of waltzed up and went "Welp, these people are living on a convenient island and we can shoot them when they revolt. Bring over the flag!"
(Also because after WWII the UN looked at the situation and went "Eh, the American occupation is justified because Spain gave them permission, and the Spanish occupation was too long ago to bother with, so you people don't get to complain about being exploited by America because you've been exploited for too long.")
When the League of Nations was first established, someone asked 'Abdu'l-Bahá what He thought about it, and He replied, "It has no teeth."
Interestingly, the UN did give the islands north of us, in the same island chain and with indigenous people of the same culture, which had been occupied for just as long but by a different chain of nations, the opportunity for self-determination because its former occupiers were on the losing side of the war.
Yeah, in order for it to really work at least one major power would have to choose to be humble and back the UN's decisions without using its support as a cudgel and/or going off on its own.
The Kayanerenh-kowa, the Great Peace, the Five Nations Confederacy. Known in American textbooks as the Iroquois Confederacy, but that's... not a great word.
@vicky_molokh yeah, five year plan is a phrase that's been back in use and doesn't evoke the visceral reactions it once did. A number of interviewers have no problem asking candidates, "what's your five year plan?"
@vicky_molokh The UN, and specifically the role of the UNSC, was set up by the powers of the world (at the time) to support their interests. If the veto wasn't there, none of the major powers would have joined and the UN would have gone the way of the league of nations. Those who believe that altruism drove the founding of the UN are living in a fantasy world.
As a collective security organization, it has mixed virtues and vices. As "a world cop" it is heavily influence by the interests of member nations. That is by design.
not to mention the financial aspect/corruption of nations offering troops for a fee to UN operations, and other nations offering troops and not charging the UN (I think the term is 'seconded' or something like that ... the details of that are part of the dirty little secrets piece that don't become apparent until you operate in that situation in real life.
@KorvinStarmast Did you have a chance to try out Crisis in the Kremlin yet?
I finally managed a successful "Soviet Union" of sorts. Namely, building a heavily export-focused economy at the expense of maintaining an army and gradual relaxation of state control on media made my Russia an economic powerhouse. The union itself broke to a billion little pieces, of course, but my scientists discovered a HIV vaccine so that's a plus I guess.
@kviiri I don't see me getting any new games for a month or so. My leisure time has been reassigned somewhat by our lady of the house of starmast, so I'll need to take a peek at it in maybe May.
I just read a great comment summarising a common issue:
By the way, please do not use "wiki" as a synonym for "Wikipedia". A wiki is a site built using a particular technology. Wikipedia is only one of many such sites, nor was it the first. Saying "According to wiki" is rather like saying "According to book" without mentioning which book. — David Siegel22 hours ago
@doppelgreener Problem with vernacular. Rollerblades are inline skates. Google isn't the internet.
I would interpret "according to wiki" as either "according to wikipedia" if there wasn't much context or possible "according to the wiki" if I was aware there might be a context specific wiki out there.
@doppelgreener btw I am thinking about proposing that we add the HNQ feed to chat on meta. To raise more awareness of what question are hot or not (for the sake of identifying potential or ongoing issues and noticing trends maybe). Do you have any first run thoughts on how good of any idea it is? Crazy?
@doppelgreener I'd have to look at the way the SRSs are set up, but if they are keyed off the marker the system now puts on them they would only appear once in the feed per post.
@doppelgreener There is. I'm looking into it more, but people have developed streams for each site. There might even be a better way to do it now with the improvements (eg the timeline event).
Just trying to guage whether you (or anybody) had a leaning on the idea before I dedicated too much time to it (the details are obviously going to be important for a good proposal)
@Rubiksmoose The exactly one time I ever tried to solve a Rubik's cube, it took me 30 minutes, following a guide. I've never properly taught myself the process.
@DavidCoffron You can take some pride that your question motivated me to add a new function, flatten() to my RollBuilder object. All it does is take non-zero outcomes and make them equal to 1, but it is one of those things that you need to do a lot more often than you'd expect.
So the entire code to represent this problem is
factory.getXdYRoll(11,8).filter(59, FilterType.GREATER_EQUAL_TO).flatten().repeat(3)