It might be better and more useful to rephrase the question. Asking just because you want to be sure is perfectly valid, but your reason for asking doesn't need to be a part of the question. How to phrase your question depends on what you're trying to validate.
So since you already have an answer you want to validate, you should ask the question that can lead to it. For instance if your answer is that "Only X can do Y.", your question should be "Who can do Y?"
Well if we accept my answer to the other question, it does mean that innate spellcasting isn't enough. If the answer to your new question says something different, that means my answer was wrong
That's why I think they're really strongly linked.
I was thinking to expand my answer to say that innate spellcasting isn't enough (per my own reading of the rules of course), I think I will do so now
innate spellcasting per se doesn't seem enough. It gets tricky to me when we consider spells that the innate spellcaster knows, though. "It feels awkward" that he can't read a spell even if he can cast it. Sorcerers are somewhat "Innate spellcasters" from their lore, as I understand, and that doesn't stop them from reading spell scrolls.
@HellSaint Thinking about other innate spellcasters, though... every drow can cast faerie fire innately. Can they then read all scrolls? An ice mephit can cast sleep once per day--full access to scrolls?
I think the distinction that matters is that the feature that gives the ability to cast the spell has to link that spell to a class?
In that sense, Magic Initiate would qualify but Drow innate magic would not
Magic Initiate stating "Choose a class: bard, cleric, druid, sorcerer, warlock, or wizard. You learn two cantrips of your choice from that class’s spell list."
If Magic Initiate qualifies... any class would get access to casting the most powerful Wizard spells from scrolls if they find one and have the feat...
@YannickMG yeah, but then that's still awkward to me that some powerful and intelligent innate spellcasters, Mind Flayers being an excelent example, are not able to read even spells that they can cast, while a Magic Initiate that barely learned some wizard cantrips can read a Wish Scroll
High Elf's Cantrip ability is worded the same way: "Cantrip: You know one cantrip of your choice from the Wizard spell list. Intelligence is your spellcasting ability for it."
Does this mean that every High Elf can read wizard spell scrolls by default?
The other interpretation is that the rules on the DMG only provide guidance for players casting spells? That sounds very wrong.
Yeah, it might be something on the lines "Welp the DM can make the creatures do whatever he wants with the scrolls anyway so let's give guidance only to the PCs LUL"
If a creature on an official adventure would ever be supposed to use a spell scroll the adventure will probably say so haha Other than that they are probably comfortable letting it to the DM.
There's a very good reason they wouldn't deal with spell scrolls
They do not use Arcana to cast spells. They effect them directly with their mind. This means they don't actually "know" them just like a Wizard would know every specific part of what goes into making the magic work
So it makes sense that they couldn't write spell scrolls or use them
but comparing to sorcerers... While they do understand what gestures, words and materials they use, their "understanding" is still somewhat "instinctive" or "innate"
I think the main problem for me is that I "see" Innate Spellcasting as something very close to how I see the Sorcerers' spellcasting.
Here's the next problem. High Elf's cantrip ability refers to the wizard spell list but they can only cast a single cantrip. Drows can cast several spells but the ability doesn't refer to a spell list. It feels wrong for High elves to be able to use spell scrolls but not drows
Next up: Arcane Tricksters are rogues and their class do not have a spell list. So RAW they can't use spell scrolls even though they can obviously cast spells as though they were wizards
> Poor Quality Assurance. Once per session, when a character invokes one of their character aspects or uses one of their stunts, you can remove it from their character sheet for the rest of the session.
@BESW Was Leslie Nneka Arimah among the stuff you recommended? I was just listening to it on LeVar Burton Reads and thought its plot sounded familiar, but I couldn't find you mentioning it.
She's on my to-read list, but I haven't gotten to her yet.
Currently the second Murderbot Diaries book has distracted me from my 15th century Tenochtitlan urban fantasy murder mystery, which was in turn distracting me from my Vietnamese space opera book, which was distracting me from my post-environmental-apocalypse orcamancy book...
And oh look I've got three solarpunk anthologies, and a half-dozen half-finished design/typography texts...
But what am I reading? Take Us To Your Chief.
Oh, and I just added Brown Girl in the Ring to the list, because Brown Girl Begins looks awesome but it's still in the film festival circuit.
Though frankly the Tenochtitlan book is getting a little weary? The author seems to think that the stakes always have to be end-of-the-world levels of dire, not trusting herself or her readers that a story with more intimate, personal stakes will be just as compelling.
@doppelgreener In this question I think OP actually means doubling HP, as in doubling HP for the purposes of CR calculation. I agree it could be a bit more clear though
In my copies of the 5e Player's Handbook and 5e Monster Manual, I cannot find it stated anywhere that they are source books for 5th edition. In the PHB, both the preface and the introduction only mention "Dungeons and Dragons", without specifying the edition. I imagine this would make the books h...
Wizards of the Coast has spent twenty-five years creating and distributing exception-based game systems for which publication dates are crucially important to rules interactions. Can you tell?
@kviiri just make it fun and engaging, don't focus much on rules on the first sessions. It's your SO, you know how to make her have fun and be engaged :)
I'm... getting very tired of our new revisiting of 4e. Everybody involved is awesome, but no matter how much I try the system is just negative fun for me now.
Completely unrelated: In Fate of Agaptus, a failed attack costs the attacker a point of stress, and a boost is gained automatically when the attacker succeeds with style.
...hm. In Agaptus, before a physical conflict starts everybody works themselves into "froth," a kind of rage/focus state that limits the approaches you can use but lets you tap into magic rituals and things--and just gives you free invokes with a really great flavor.
gotcha, I don't think so. She hasn't wrapped her head around how things work in D&D 4e, or at least mentioned she hadn't & I hadn't had a conversation with her about it yet.
But right now she's just having trouble with sleep & that's it.
I'm suggesting taking on the assistant role because I know it'd take pressure off you and let me continue to participate, not because I think you need it to be a good GM.
A few weeks back, this yes-or-no question got asked and answered by the OP, with the answer YES. I eventually replied NO and my reasoning, and the community votes pended towards my answer. The OP has not accepted an answer.
This question came from another question, on which a very similar thing ...
@trogdor it is a little stressful because i need to remain focused on reading for extended periods and that is very difficult. but it's something i want to be better at.
@trogdor i thought i had ADHD making it hard to focus, but it turns out my generalised anxiety is what makes it hard to focus. i'm in a state of high alert to absolutely everything that is or might be happening around me, and i'm in that state all the time. it means i can't just filter things out and absorb myself in writing, i've got a lot of other things tugging at my attention.
it basically comes from like... when a caveman's out hunting, it's useful to be on your guard so that you hear the tiger before it pounces on you and kills you. most people enter that state, then come home and then settle down again and relax. people with generalised anxiety are always in that state.
do you sleep enough? Have you gone to the DR? Have you tried things that are physically tiring (i.e.-exercise)?
Specifically about sleep enough: I thought I had ADD, like got a Doc to prescribe me ritalin. It helped enough, but I eventually realized that I was just long-term sleep deprived.
it's thought to either come from learned behaviours or be caused by a chemical being out of whack somewhere in one's brain chemistry. (The brain can tell something is wrong, but it can't figure out why, so it just goes looking for things that could be causing it and is on alert for the source of wrongness perpetually. Typical, blaming everything but itself... :P)
@Yuuki oh that is very true. It is a good upgrade that everyone should honestly consider.
Looks like I was overruled: it gathered enough of a negative score that delete votes were possible, and the community’s done so now. — SevenSidedDie ♦17 hours ago
A supermarket near where I used to live had a massive walk-in fridge, it contained the whole meat and fish departments, as well as frozen foods, beers, etc
@Rubiksmoose That allows us to avoid the blind leading the blind over a cliff. The answer was poor, and the question was also poor. It would have been nice if we (as a group) could have done a little better job of clarifying the question, and the source of confusion. As it is, the answers are long but not concise, which Hannah seems to point out as a problem in one of her comments
@KorvinStarmast agreed. Though I think it was unclear that the question was unclear. It seemed to be a simple misconception about what preparing meant. But apparently that is not what OP meant.
@KorvinStarmast I posted that as related because I had no idea what the OP was confused about (that was one of the possibilities). I still don't really know. My answer covered the option that the other answer didn't
ive got a question about teiflings, are variants legal? or are they homebrew? the only place i could find them on were the wiki and i was told not to trust the wiki so i came here to ask.
I just put in a bunch of D&D races into a markov generator and got back a few gems Hobgobgonborgelin Merforgedalken, Golk, Kherborgelingeling, Tieflinotaur, Half-elf-elflingeling Hobgobgonbor
@KorvinStarmast I see what you are trying to do, but I'm not sure your comment is what needs to be asked here. We need to clarify what her confusion point is IMO before anything else.
Assuming you mean D&D 5e, they are legal, but variants need to be cleared with your DM. I think Adventurer's League games ("official" D&D) don't allow anything that gives flying at level 1, so the wings variant would be off the table.
@Khaos basically there's several thousand RPGs, we actively service hundreds on this site, and there's several dozen we'll regularly talk about here. and there's a lot of different editions and play environments for D&D. :)
I was under the impression that accepted answers could not be deleted (except by diamond mods). However, on RPG.SE we had a question in which it seems like the answer was deleted by the community after it had been accepted.
Neither the FAQ on deleting answers nor the CW on deleting detail this. ...
@KorvinStarmast Agreed. Though I think that OP just wants an answer to how many spells they can prepare but doesn't want or care to correct their misunderstanding about how preparation works. That is how I am reading it now.