Thanks for the links. I'll look at the fate site and read the fate explanation later today, most likely in the evening. I've been wondering what other kinds of RPG's are out there since I'm fed up with certain aspects about d&d 3.5, and honestly the one 4E campaign I briefly played just....wasn't for me.
@Gameboon Instead of stats like "Str" and "Dex," your character's defining stats are short, pithy phrases that describe something about his nature, ability, gear, or relationships.
Stuff like "Black Sheep of the Delphi Council" or "What's the worst that can happen?" aren't just catch phrases for your character in Fate; they're stats.
And one thing they say in the Fate Core book that I've found to be amazingly accurate: you will be amazed at how often a player will want to "screw over" their own character if it makes a fun story.
@Gameboon "do other stuff" = contemplate the meaning of your existence now that you realize suddenly and harshly that D&D is not the end-all and be-all of rpg's ?
@Gameboon When I read Fate, I was struck by how much the system was designed to let me do the things I've been doing despite the systems I was playing in before.
@BESW I think I like reading actual plays set in the same universe I'm roleplaying in and I sometimes wonder about what would happen if I was the protagonist, instead of them. Just reading is awesome, but makes me wanna be part of it.
I like the automatic +100 rep you get on all SE sites once you have enough rep in one. It lets you skip all this tedious business to downvote or join chats.
Lots of elementary and middle schools offer (paid) extracurricular activities to students, like art classes or, in this case, D&D. We're trying to convince my nephew to go.
@Zachiel When you're half-babysitter, it's not as much fun.
I have a friend whose first RPG experience was actually teaching one of these classes. She never played before. The company gave her a quick tutorial (using a system they developed in-house, to keep it simple) and sent her in.
She had two groups, one she loved, one she loathed.
A few months after that she joined our PF game. She was surprised that people do actually role play in these games, rather than just hunt down and kill various monsters, in as vicious and violent a manner as possible.
Cool. I like them. Though now that I have them - I wish I could have a tool that lets me design my own maps, the generator is awesome, but it doesn't get exactly what I want. I have the map in my head already - I just suck at drawing.
Plus - I want to be able to manipulate the map digitally, including labels, territories (that could shift and change) roads, etc. and castles/towns... :)
I haven't used rptools for years... they were the best free stuff I could find pre-2008, when I actually needed such things, but weren't very satisfying.
no, any is not specific. IIRC Ctrl+I removes fow from the new current location's point of view (useful for teleports), while Ctrl+S de-fogs the whole path
I have many marketings! Send $240 by Paypal and I will give you best pro marketings. 100% executive quality guarantee. Also, local singles in your area.
Shannon Appelcline on industry trends: D&D coasting, industry as a whole doing well, some strong market penetration from "indie" products like Fate Core and Dungeon World, plus a bunch of other stuff, if you care.
Meanwhile, in other news, that one niche system that you love but have a hard time finding others to play with still remains something you can only discuss online but never play. (We all have one if you've been at this more than a few years.)
@ProfessorLokiCaprion Yes, and at the same time no. Strictly speaking anything that isn't Lord Pun-Pun, Dread Prince of All, is mechanically inhibiting oneself. More practically speaking, I tend to define 'inhibiting' oneself as choosing options that don't make your concept work.
@MadMAxJr - Well if your concept is 'highest damage Barbarian possible' then yeah. I'm thinking more along the lines of something like, "I want to represent a sorcerer with some draconic heritage."
You might be a half-dragon (shooting self in face), a draconic creature (easily bought off), or take lineage feats (weak but screw it you have spells)
[Not-serious reply] Dig through dubious quality 3rd-party materials until you find the re-write of that thing you want that is totally unbalanced and constantly ask your DM to accept the material
Half Dragon may not work, but Half Awesomeagon has the same rules and can use wands of magic missile as ammo magazines in a crossbow.
2
I used to let my players propose solutions to character building problems if they could make something similar to an existing feat/class/race/rule, but unfortunately over time, this became more the norm than the exception, so I've had to roll back to by-the-book to have any hope of playing and not stopping to discuss custom rule interaction every 5 minutes.
I'm making a character who is going to be multi-classing, specifically Fighter/Cleric. He's a Reach Cleric, so I wanted him to have some good feats (Selective Channel, Power Attack, Combat Reflexes, Improved Initiative, and Extra Channel), thus he will have a fighter level. Thing is, I can't figu...
Am I bad person for running a half-dragon (black) gelatinous cube as an NPC, or am I a bad person for running aforementioned cube as the assassin sent to slay the party?
"items picked up disappear if tucked into the clothing or pouches worn
by the creature."
– Invisibility, d20srd
Based on the above, I'd say stuff put into the box arguably becomes invisible. A pouch is a container. A box is a container. Stuff put into an invisible container disappear.
S...
the rules really leave no room for argument
none
that doesn't mean you have to, should, or are best off if you follow them
nor did I ever claim it was
I just said that the claim that the rules support his "interpretation" is inaccurate
because it is
they do not support that interpretation in the least
@Metool It's the necessity of such disclaimers which is being debated.
Specifically, SSD is right: the space between descriptive and legal text is often very fuzzy in 3.5, and taking all text as legal text leads to strange internal contradictions.
However, there is no way to confidently determine which text is intended to be legal--and often intended-legal text is also problematically fuzzy.
tl;dr: 3.5 doesn't know or care about the difference between flavour and rules.