a lot of people (especially techies) want to live in the US... there's a lot of land out there that isn't part of the US, and frankly also better education systems, better economies and better ISPs and copyright/patent policies in other places
we're basically a "second world" country now and people still want to emigrate by the droves
must be the statue of liberty :P
fyi it's fake, underneath the statue of liberty is a CIA headquarters
not much except that it's easier to hit a ground target from space than it is to hit a space target from ground, and certainly takes more accurate aiming systems to be able to hit a space target period... I can see countries having space wars but not ground wars because any kind of ground attack would be nuclear MAD
for example we go to war with countries all the time right now but we purposefully avoid warring with nuclear-capable countries because we don't want them nuking us... i don't think a space war would lead to ground nuking even between two nuclear-capable countries because losing a few space assets is not the end of the world but ICBMs hitting your territory is the end of the world
so if they're far enough away that it wouldn't affect the populations down below, then sure, you could see nuclear space wars and blow up all the satellites... so what? the nuclear threat doesn't stop us from claiming territory on the ground
it might not be a thing that's happening today but I don't think power hungry countries will be able to resist
it's mainly a matter of economics and the lack of anything truly valuable, tactically or strategically, in space at this point in time -- I mean there is telecommunications, but you don't conquer a country by knocking out their GPS, internet, science projects, and TV... you have to have something up space with military strategic value in order for combat up there to be meaningful
I wonder if they are ever going to succeed at that space elevator idea... it's been floating around for decades in books but the closest I've heard to building one is "hehe we could use carbon nanotubes, they're really strong"
@OliverSalzburg: back to the table highlight thingy... what if I have html/css like the one in this question, and the functionality is working, but the background-color is not updating? (Chrome)
@allquixotic: I did basically tell them 'wait till I graduate'. I'll likely get in touch immediately after my final term is squared off to see if we can get things started.
we have a frightening number of CSS files but I did at least manage to find the CSS file that contains the implementation of what color it sets when you hover over a table row
mainly needed the color, viewing it live isn't so important
speaking of important
what does !important at the end of a color attribute mean?
in CSS.. is this some custom code or is it builtin?
yeah, probably a few security issues at least, and definitely going to slow down render speed, choke up RAM, etc
i have a pared-down Firefox profile for chat/gmail/SU/wikipedia and a separate profile that can launch simultaneously with gadzillion extensions for web app security testing
but it seems Chrome is better for JS/CSS/DOM testing
Ive recently gotten interested in SU... A mod pointed me to a certain newly asked post (i was discussing a similar thing the ot he r day). I answered it, and answered one more. Got mucho reps :p
@joker win8? Removed. My hdd is 250 gig. Old laptop (have a better one at home). Win7 was already there, with lots of stuff installed. Id triplebooted 8. Bery little space left, deleted it after I had my fun
@OliverSalzburg, sorry to keep bugging you but I'm a CSS noob... I should probably learn CSS... anyway what's the difference between these aside from the color being set? .lol-table table.row-highlight tbody tr:hover { background-color:#FFC!important; }
someone needs to write a proxy (or a browser plugin) that replays the http transactions of a browser session as they actually happened O_O
like you start up the browser and it starts playing back the http streams as they were sent/received, including all headers etc
but it does it on localhost using a fake localhost port as an interposer instead of the actual server
so the developer can see what http requests and responses occurred
i guess you could manually save out the http request and response data to files and send them the files, but that's cumbersome and doesn't provide the graphical representation because they'd have to extract the payload from the http response and load it into the browser
but basically the browser would have a tab that takes up a third of the screen and can optionally pop out into a window (similar to FireBug or Chrome dev tools) that shows the "live" http request and response and you can select it by file, and each request and response has a unique number assigned to it, auto incrementing
the browser side would submit the exact http request that you made to the server, but it would submit it to your proxy interposer
and the proxy would answer with what the server answered with
so a developer could watch your transaction unfold and see what your browser asked for and what the server gave it