Quick question: are moderators caring about the Deposit user, when I flag about it? Or just deleting the user, or only his posts without merging? Because my recent "deposit" flags are all leaving an existing user, after being treated
@Gnoupi It really depends. I heard about that the Deposit user shouldn't actually be used, at least from SO/network side. If I don't merge into deposit I'll simply destroy the user.
If they don't want moderators to use it, then they should come up with a "delete spammer" button, which is actually gathering information about what the user posted, which ip, etc.
With popularity comes spam, and Stack Exchange is popular. It sometimes takes a few repeats before you start to recognize the same URL or product name, and blacklisting frequently spammed URLs is a non-trivial process which moderators can't even do ourselves.
For one-time drive-by spammers, the ...
A bunch of pedants started nitpicking at an answer of mine that had +11 and answered the question. So I deleted my answer. Poo on them for downvoting me and picking things apart. Pedants make the community overall lose out. The accepted answer is much less in depth and, as a result of being so simplified, doesn't say anything "wrong". Whatever.
Now, on the other hand, pedants who make copy-edits are beneficial.
@slhck Ok, so in short "we have the tools to deal with spam, but moderators are not going to have access to it". Apparently the role of the moderator is not to deal with spam, and let the big boys do that.
No one forced me. I deleted it of my own volition. I got tired of the arguments that my answer created in the answer-comments due to tiny details that had nothing to do with the actual topic of the question.
I probably should have asked them to copy-edit it (suggest a revision or make one straight away if high enough rep) rather than deleting it, but they were getting hostile, so I figured it was for the best.
@slhck I guess things changed with the expansion of the SE network. Before, you had but a handful of moderators on SO, SU, SF. They were by the way also moderators on Meta.SO. But with all the Area 51 sites, there started the need for "local moderators", and you had suddenly a bunch of more or less clueless guys receiving moderator access.
I guess it makes sense, in the current context, that moderators are not given all the tools they should. wouldn't want the kids to burn the house
So now we need super-moderators to separate the mods from the real mods? And then super-duper-mods to separate the super mods from the real real mods? And then super-duper-pooper mods to... okay, yeah, next thing you know you'll have to have 30k rep and mod status to post an answer
Guess I'll just stop bothering, and click that "spam" button when I see one. After all, why do I care. It's not like if I was a moderator. I'll just bother with my 6k reputation worries.
I'm so disappointed at the vending machine... it made me buy two snickers bars to get one because the first one got stuck. Now instead of existing for 48 hours to burn off a snickers bar I'll have to exist for 96 hours to burn off two
Is there a way to make a chat room that's "linked" to a question? Like that link that comes up when you've been talking too long in comments and it asks if you want to move to chat. I'd like to force that without going through a lot of comments first...
I'm hating this day and it's not even over... /me mumbles about so-called "experts" crapping out a terrible, terrible document that is technically inaccurate, lacks references, and contains spelling mistakes so vulgar I can't even type them here without getting banned
and then making changes every 2 hours and expecting us to "integrate" them
You just have to love the function names Apple uses in their frameworks: NSPersistentUIManager writeWindowSnapshot:length:width:height:bytesPerRow:toFile:inDirectory:encryptingWithKey:uuid:checksum:isUserWaitingImpatientlyForThisThingToFinish:
@allquixotic These are all basically a named argument/function signature hybrid. So in essence, every caller with just hard-code ..... isUserWaitingImpatientlyForThisThingToFinish:YES
I don't know Objective C, so that's pretty confusing to me. Colons being equivalent to some kind of one-off code block or something... I don't even.... what is going on... no, I know Java, C++, C, Ruby, Python (sukoshi), Vala, C#, VB.NET, VBScript and OCaml. I think that's enough.
I've seen some pretty horrendous Objective code that makes me want to use shred. Horrendous C code makes me want to use unlink, which is tame by comparison
@allquixotic They just make argument names part of the method signature. It's quite trivial to map e.g. to Ruby, see here in the section Implement the Timer.
I just don't like Objective-C, even if it's being used in a free software context and compatible with gcc and can be compiled on Linux (very little Obj-C out there actually meets those specifications, btw). Although "Objective-C++" takes the cake, imo. Not sure if Apple supports that, but GNU does.
And by "takes the cake" I mean "wouldn't touch it with a c foot pole"
@Santosh Looks like it stops Vimium from grabbing any commands until you push escape. Could be useful if a webpage isn't playing nice with it and they're both trying to capture the input.
do you know if there's a way to force it to grab input? I just switched tabs over here by accident and put "K" in the chat box a dozen times xD
@r.tanner.f, I don't know what you mean, but generally no, it's a PITA
but editing an 89 page document over a dozen times in a single day and constantly integrating changes and fighting with MS Word is less preferable an activity than editing an answer on SU