heh, the iOS calculator actually had weird floating point results being exposed to the UI for a while until they patched it to give the obvious fixed value when it makes sense to do it
especially with decimals and mult/division like that
I'm trying to figure out whether IPS is worth the price, and also if ~VA is fine too or not
ffs clippy
and then there comes the aspect of freesync/gsync
max res I think I'm comfortable with is 2560x1440 but then the diagonal size gotta be right to feel like an extension of my current fullhd 24" display coz I've been on that for a veeeery long time
so it's gotta be ~30" to retain the same pixel saze
Essentially, there were only six weeks between RTM and ready-for-business. That seems to be much faster than the last two Feature Updates! Right now my home network machines are configured to use the Semi-Annual Channel with an extra 30-day deferral, but I may need to bump that up to 60 days.
I tend to be very conservative with my home network machines, and there isn't really anything compelling within version 1803 that I want to use as soon as possible. Ultimately, I was hoping to see more than two or three "Patch Tuesday" cycles before version 1803 was automatically installed, especially with a noticeably larger amount of problems related to this Feature Update.
@ADHDCat is TN still faster than IPS in some way if both monitors are 165hz?
like are there ghost frames which remain for a couple frames at a fraction of intensity or something
I've read a bit about it a long time ago and I bet technologies have changed over the years and something had been done after the high framerate craze started
do you have any 120/144/165/200hz monitors on different matrices to compare
Microsoft (R) Windows Debugger Version 10.0.17674.1000 AMD64
Copyright (c) Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Loading Dump File [C:\WINDOWS\MEMORY.DMP]
Kernel Bitmap Dump File: Kernel address space is available, User address space may not be available.
************* Path validation summary **************
Response Time (ms) Location
Deferred SRV*D:\sysdebug\symbols*msdl.microsoft.com/download/symbols
Symbol search path is: SRV*D:\sysdebug\symbols*msdl.microsoft.com/download/symbols
> PROCESS_NAME: PrecisionX_x64.exe
> DRIVER_IRQL_NOT_LESS_OR_EQUAL (d1) An attempt was made to access a pageable (or completely invalid) address at an interrupt request level (IRQL) that is too high. This is usually caused by drivers using improper addresses. If kernel debugger is available get stack backtrace. Arguments: Arg1: 0000000000000000, memory referenced Arg2: 0000000000000002, IRQL Arg3: 0000000000000008, value 0 = read operation, 1 = write operation Arg4: 0000000000000000, address which referenced memory
Arg1: 0000000000000000, memory referenced
Precision XOC caused a kernel null pointer dereference?
@Hakase The refresh rate may be the same, but TN displays still have faster response times. Although the latest IPS panels are a significant improvement, they're still slower than TN.
@Hakase Think of it this way, a monitor with 1ms response time and 1000Hz can display 1000 different images per second. A monitor with 10ms response time and 1000Hz can display 1000 different images per second, but each image will overlap with the previous 10 as they slowly fade away
I've seen high framerate vids of 60hz monitors back in the day broken into frames and showing examples of ghosting but I've been looking today and couldn't find any recent ones about 120hz+ monitors
Increasing the refresh rate from 60 Hz to 144 Hz will reduce latency between frames, but this will not reduce the time the panel needs to change the pixels.
Different sources of input lag add up. The limited refresh rate is but one source of latency, and the LCD's response time only adds to it.
As you've pointed out, a typical 60 Hz monitor can take up to 16.667ms to update its contents. However, even after it updates its internal buffer, it still n...
What's the difference between grey-to-gray (GtG) and black-to-white (BtW) response time estimation of displays? Why would I like to know both of them? When (why) would they vary?
This is why I like OLED... the response time is pretty much dependant on how fast you can switch a transistor, and on standard monitor tests, literally too low to be measurable.
Aaanyway. TN = fast. MVA = medium. IPS = slow. That's pretty much it. There's plenty of tricks used on each and every technology to make things react faster, or appear faster without actually reacting faster, making slower technologies more competitive. Similarly, there's tricks used on poorer quality panel types (e.g. TN) to improve colour and viewing angles, so they are both fast, and reasonably accurate.
It just comes down to reading individual monitor reviews and comparing what they say to what you need.
One of the fastest 1440p monitors out there is the Dell S2417DG. It's the monitor I personally use and I can't say I've ever been disappointed with it.
Colour critical professional photo/video work - get a professional IPS, end of story. Time critical competitive fast action gaming, get a gaming optimized TN, end of story. Movies, general pictures, web, non-professional gaming... you get to choose from the whole gamut of 50000 different types.
OLED is quite literally the best for everything, but exceedingly expensive, exceedingly difficult to do right, and exceedingly niche. At least in the desktop market. But consider nearly all the flagship phones from the biggest manufacturers use OLED, you get the idea.
thankfully I also know spider so he'll be feasting on the roach soonish
turns out you gotta look out for dual link DVI support in gpus coz 1030 only supports single link and I wouldn't be able to get 144hz out of certain cheap monitors
which sucks
but for reals I don't know python
why do you use python tho
I could do probably anything with a c# console app and that's what I do
c# also comes with a very convenient debugger :p
good for home and work projects
but wait…
if my monitor's got 2ms response rate, then this kinda ghosting is to be expected on other TN monitors as well?
maybe it gets 2 times less prominent but then it's still hella prominent man
I thought I could get so much better…
Iiyama G-Master GB2760QSU-1 is the cheapest one TN 2560 with 27" size
I don't wanna get 2560 at the same 24" I've been using for so long, it's gonna mess with my eyes
also I want a bigger monitor coz that only makes sense
well, that didn't work... lol.
What's the difference between grey-to-gray (GtG) and black-to-white (BtW) response time estimation of displays? Why would I like to know both of them? When (why) would they vary?
