« first day (2207 days earlier)      last day (3109 days later) » 
01:00 - 19:0019:00 - 00:00

19:01
I'm going out, so ping me with your question, and I'll help the best I can
@bwDraco you'll save even more data by using Privoxy as your proxy, and you can have it compress images so much that you might actually be okay with viewing low-res images it sends you
wonder if there's a proxy or VPN transport that does LZMA2 compression
I'll need some time to configure a dedicated proxy server, but will look into it when I get a chance.
The primary goal is to reduce data usage. Privacy is a secondary benefit, appreciated but not strictly necessary.
Dog
Dog
19:18
ai.se makes me feel dumb.
@oldmud0 Last I checked Snapdragons don't even do zoom. It's a chipset, not a camera lens.
@Hennes Yes,
I've never come across any Windows 7 key in any environment that was tied to a specific bit-edition/architecture
Why do they do this?
Why do people delete their posts, or why does the system show that banner?
Dog
Dog
The banner
I suspect there's other bookkeeping (e.g. the number of answers) that's tricky to update on the fly
It's probably just easier to slap a banner on it and ask people to reload to clean it up
Dog
Dog
It's not effective at hiding the information, if that's what they're trying to do.
I'm pretty sure it's not intended to hide the info, since they would just clear the text if that was the goal
Dog
Dog
19:28
Yeah, but they deliberately make it hard to read - though not impossible, just seems... pointless.
I guess for the same reasons that very-low-voted posts are translucified?
Dog
Dog
Heck, they're changing the style of the div already to make it hard to read (opacity: 0.1) they could easily just do innerHTML="" to blank it completely
@BenN Yeah but they tend to be un-translucified when you try to read them IIRC (or mouseover?)
Maybe it's to prevent the jarring effect of zapping the element out of existence and suddenly shifting everything else up
<speculation intensifies>
Dog
Dog
This sounds like something for meta :-P
Anyway, now that I've figured it's two clicks to un-hide, I'm gonna go read it, which is what I wanted to do to begin with
@Dog There are a lot of silly things about SE. Like the trusted user privilege page documentation that @BenN and I tried to get fixed. But the SE devs approach any such suggestion with a standoffish and extremely arrogant perspective, thinking they know more than people and not providing any solid justification for the way it is.
They'll do absolutely anything to avoid having to justify the way it is, or -- worse -- actually change something. If the site isn't outright down, don't expect much.
19:32
The real issue is that SE is understaffed.
They don't have the resources to seriously entertain every user request.
The advanced debugger adb is the standard UNIX debugger found on Solaris 1 and 2, HP-UX and SCO. It is the successor of a debugger called db. The initial version was written by Steve Bourne. ADB is the standard debugger on Solaris and the Solaris kernel debugger kadb that was introduced with SunOS-3.5 (1986) is a minor variant of adb. A version of ADB was integrated into the BSD kernel as a kernel debugger. On Solaris, ADB was replaced by the Modular Debugger mdb with Solaris 8 (2000) and the ADB command line interface now is emulated by mdb when it is called as adb. Mdb has become OpenSource with...
@bwDraco Is that really the issue, though? If they weren't arrogant, and weren't standoffish, then even if they are hopelessly understaffed so that nothing will ever get done, they would at least acknowledge that it's a problem, and add it to the backlog with or something.
Ah, thanks. I should mention that
Trying to instead pretend like legitimate issues aren't actual issues is just lazy and tells your community that you don't want them to participate in helping make the site better.
19:34
10
A: Abrupt change in moderation staff?

bwDracoI think the issue lies in the SE team's failure to communicate the issue properly. If a moderator appears to be acting without community consensus, there should be warnings stating clearly the nature of the issue and the correct course of action to take: HopelessN00b, I'm becoming very conce...

@allquicatic: Consider posting something on MSE if this is a serious problem.
19:46
@bwDraco lol, I'm done "contributing" to MSE and being stonewalled, and telling them that they're behaving that way will immediately draw a kneejerk "What?! What am I doing?!" -- people who have a problem are generally very, very bad at realizing they have a problem
@DavidPostill I updated my answer
In the few times I've had to interact with Stack Exchange staff, it's been mostly problem-free.
Dog
Dog
@allquicatic TBH that sounds like a lot of online communities, not just SE. Plenty of place/forums/sites/developers/project managers tend to respond to the slightest criticism with "That's not a valid problem". Or bugs being closed as "won'tfixbecauseIdon'tcare" or "not a bug". etc.
I'll use their bandwidth as a convenient chat site, but they've made it very clear to me that they don't want my contributions, so I'll be happy not to make them :)
@allquicatic True. I can't really think of a way to express that kind of concern without producing anger
19:48
The problem is, someone with a different, better personality may be less effective at running stable communities.
It's really, really hard to run a community and not get frustrated by the problems that come up.
Dog
Dog
Heck I'm probably guilty of it myself.
No, I know I'm guilty of it myself.
It's just like being a sysadmin.
People always douse community/product creators in feedback, and a lot of it sounds good but is just not worth the effort
The change allquicatic and I asked for would be super easy to make, and I still think it's worthwhile, but I do understand their viewpoint
@bwDraco The funny thing is, even a comment like "I can't be arsed to fix it" acknowledges that there's a problem. Huge difference. I'm okay with someone saying they can't be bothered to fix a minor issue. Trying to act like they're on some higher intellectual plane and mysteriously they know that it's not an issue, now that's just arrogance.
Hell, I've pulled the CBA card multiple times with Cavil, but at no point have I said "you're wrong, nothing's actually the matter, your concerns are invalid". Valid concerns. No time to work on them.
It's all too easy to get burned out. Even the most enthusiastic developer can very well degenerate to this point.
No matter your intentions, it's a trap that's incredibly hard to avoid, especially when you're at the top of a community. There's a reason they say "absolute power corrupts absolutely."
Dog
Dog
19:53
Ouch. I just remembered how many times in the past I've responded to a customer with "No, that's not a problem, you're just doing it wrong. RTFM".
@bwDraco Power attracts the corruptible.
While I have no reason to believe that it's literally impossible to avoid doing the wrong thing, it takes an absurd amount of willpower to remain truly benevolent as one moves up the ladder.
I think I'd say it's impossible to always avoid doing the wrong thing
"To err is human" &c
The difficulty of avoiding corruption scales with the amount of power one has access to.
Of course, mistakes are not always avoidable, but otherwise avoidable wrongdoing can become effectively (but not theoretically!) impossible to avoid by a weak-willed person in power.
Transparency helps a lot with that, and fortunately the SE platform has a good deal of transparency built in
Also, almost all things are reversible (I can't think of a noteworthy irreversible thing a non-mod can do), which is definitely a good thing
Dog
Dog
20:28
Well crap
I just read through all the Shog9/Hopelessn00b drama on SF...
another power hiccup during a storm, lasted about 15 seconds
20:41
@allquicatic oyou get many?
Just wish I had the skills for a good job like you do, @allquicatic...
I'm busy doing household work right now.
I'll start by brushing up on HTML and CSS
A lot of studying and learning to do...
@djsmiley2k storms? daily
21:10
:/
21:41
To go a step further: I've installed iftop on my server to get a better sense of just how much data I'm saving using the SOCKS proxy.
iftop is a nifty little tool for monitoring bandwidth usage on the server, per socket and going in and out of the system.
This isn't my main server (the one that hosts my website). This is my secondary, experimental server, normally used to host a Linux cloud desktop but also used for this kind of proxying.
iftop is funky indeed
Curious? I'm using Linode 2GB servers. Affiliate code available upon request (I'm not spamming it unless someone wants it :) )
hehe i already setup something at home but thx
i litterally have no money to play :/
@djsmiley2k Ouch. Although I'm currently not on a job (employed as a sports photographer at my alma mater but currently off-season), I get a fairly large allowance that lets me do stuff like this.
It certainly isn't enough for really big projects, though.
i have 2 kids :D
im employed but contractor, so not paid when not there
son just spent 4 days in hospital
21:53
iftop says cumulative Tx 4.62 MB Rx 4.96 MB. Not much but even kilobytes can make all the difference.
Tx is the amount of data the server's sent, Rx is the amount of data the server's received.
now hes not sleeping so im stuckj between stay up and make sure he sleeps, or try sleep myself but hell likely start screaming again
but im leaving this job woooooooooooo
If I browse with image loading disabled, the difference would likely be much larger as images generally aren't compressible. I'm on Wi-Fi, though, and this is just for testing purposes.
thats a lot of tx
Testing with images disabled...
are you only looking at the outgoing interface?
wait actually u wanna just filer on the phones ip
21:57
@djsmiley2k That's the cumulative Tx. I'm on the server's main network interface.
yah u need to filter on the phone o really tell
Remember that this is a proxy server. It's passing traffic through an compressed SSH tunnel.
The main goal is to reduce data usage. Added privacy is a secondary benefit.
from my experience, regular apps use more internet than regular browsing
Curious about whether LTE provides decent encryption...
Unfortunately, only Firefox is proxied. I don't want to break other apps. Besides, most data is used through web browsing.
Dog
Dog
!!caat
This is on Wi-Fi a while back:
Feb 16 at 13:20, by bwDraco
user image
yes but the tunnel terminates on the server right?
Yeah. The browsing happens through the server's IP address.
(I just use an openvpn I host on my server, but well, it doesn't compress)
so in iftop you can filer by src/dst
hey @arda
:)
22:03
@djsmiley2k hey :)
Firefox is configured to use a SOCKS proxy, which is managed by the SSH client app ConnectBot.
you can even do this iftop -F 10.0.0.0/255.0.0.0
4 hours ago, by bwDraco
Got a server with SSH access? Here's how to set up a SOCKS proxy for browsing on Android. Enable compression for the SSH connection in ConnectBot to reduce mobile data usage, especially when browsing with images disabled.
and itll monitor all interfaces
tho this will double/increase the traffic due to counting it twice
Only the main interface enp4s0 is relevant here.
iftop monitors this by default.
22:05
reverse order
Hmm. What data plan do you have?
@bwDraco LTE 12GB
I think the Android 6.0 update fixed the issue with extreme email checking. That used to several hundred megabytes a day
Huh. I'm on AT&T with an upgrade to take effect next billing cycle.
I haven't set up email on my phone, only my (non-LTE) tablet.
Oh, I'm not in states. I'm in Turkey and am using Vodafone.
Right now, it's a mere 2 GB (and I don't use much on LTE). The upgrade bumps it to 3 GB while dropping the cost.
22:10
You should consider switching to sprint
We're fine on the AT&T network. They just came out with new plans that are a better deal for us.
I think I made a mistake upgrading to 12gb, now that the email thing is fixed
My parents are still on legacy feature phones (but plan to switch to smartphones by 1Q 2017 or so), which is why we can get away with this little data.
I have never exceeded 1 GB on LTE in any billing cycle.
But with this house move coming up, I will be without Wi-Fi for a while and will need more data...
AT&T has Rollover Data which gives me a bit more leeway, at least before the plan change takes effect...
(any Rollover Data is lost on a plan change, which is why the change isn't effective until next billing cycle)
Dog
Dog
@arda Last I checked the average person used like 1.5GB a month on 3G and 2.5GB a month on 4G. That was a while ago though
I can go through 25GB in a day. Did that by accident once. Otherwise it's usually 10-20GB a month 95% of which is on speedtests -_-
@Dog I use over average though
@Dog I did 60
Dog
Dog
22:24
Our networks cap you when you reach your allowance so you can't "go over" without manually going to your online account and buying more data
Wow. If I'm on the field on the time, my parents are able to upgrade to a larger data plan, but it's presently not necessary.
Dog
Dog
Except in the case where I hit 25GB, that was on zero-rated data tho
Doing 60GB would have cost about $400
when I use all my internet + use 3usd worth of internet that day, I don't pay for the rest I use that day
I used that when I wasn't home but had shows to download
Dog
Dog
One of our networks only allows you to buy each of the overage data packs once in a billing cycle, so the maximum you could ever do in a month was your allowance + 6GB + 3GB + 1GB +100M
On AT&T's new Mobile Share Advantage plans (like nearly everyone else, a change spearheaded by T-Mobile), running out of data results in your getting throttled for the rest of the billing cycle. There are no more overage charges.
Dog
Dog
22:25
Then you're hard capped and need to use a different SIM
@arda Nice. We used to have plans like that ten years ago, back when you were lucky to get over 0.1Mbps though.
You can always call AT&T to buy more data or switch to a larger plan as needed.
Ikno, I really wanted to get one of those
Dog
Dog
Everyone's ditched the unlimited plans now, at least for PC/laptop access. Some still have unlimited mobile access, but no tethering allowed, and often heavily throttled.
IOW as soon as people started using more, they got given less... -_-
this is different though, they were unlimited on month while this is unlimited on that day
@Dog again, sprint
@Dog Yup. The problem is that if you try to do true unlimited, you will inevitably have users that use extremely large amounts of data (terabytes!) and that hurts service for everyone.
22:28
You get throttled to speeds that are usable. 2G speeds I think
@arda 128 Kbps on AT&T.
Dog
Dog
We have something like that when we're abroad - "Unlimted data" for £2 a day, with a 150MB "fair use policy". In reality the speeds are so slow from the outset you'd be hard pressed to even use up 50MB.
@bwDraco I meant sprint. Sorry, reddit keeps recommending sprint to everyone so I kinda know everything about it
Usable for light web browsing but not for anything intensive.
worst time I had my internet allowance finish was 1) looking for something in SO 2) updating my smartwatch
22:29
Hence, T-Mobile will deprioritize traffic from users who use more than 26GB in a billing cycle, resulting in lower speeds if the user is on a congested tower.
my internet back then used to stop when I reached the limit though.
Dog
Dog
Pretty much the only times I ever actually reach my limit is when I'm speedtesting. So the worst time my allowance ran out was... speedtesting.
The only one exception was when I was in Finland and got on a plane, only to find Spotify had deleted all its locally stored content, so I was frantically trying to redownload songs as the plane was speeding down the runway.
Managed to run out of data about halfway down the runway. Reasonably good timing... >_>
spotify's mobile app is terrible
On the new T-Mobile One unlimited data plans, tethering is throttled unless you add a $15 option for 5GB of high-speed tethering (if you do a lot of tethering, you may need multiple such allotments). Streaming media is also limited to 480p unless you add a $25 option.
> Streaming media is also limited to 480p
how do they enforce it
22:33
Using the existing infrastructure they used for zero-rating streaming media at reduced quality (Binge On).
ah
can't you, idk, use a proxy or vpn to watch in 1080 or whatever?
Don't think this is allowed...
pretty sure fcc rules say somkething about limiting quality too but alas ameriika is facked
@Dog why do you speedtest that much?
lol @ "facked"
22:52
Sorry, my Android tablet wasn't cooperating because it was running out of memory (and Firefox doesn't like making lots of connections through a SOCKS proxy at the same time)
23:06
@bwDraco ok usable for light browsing. and assuming you have all day to do something, how long would you figure it would take to download 1 Gig ? without paying them microtransaction to do so?
Bob
Bob
@Dog weird that they would restrict the phone
Maybe regulatory reasons
@Psycogeek I think 128kbps is max 16kb/s so 17 hours
23:29
ok thanks, that , , , that sucks.
not really
I live on 3mpbs and lately it is down to levels of even 0.5mbps
(I have 40mbps internet on phone though. yay lte)
Dog
Dog
23:45
@arda I agree
@arda Fun
@Bob The S7? Nah, I doubt it's a restriction. More likely they just didn't bother putting the required amount of hardware in. You need multiple receive paths, tuners, transmitters, etc. For each aggregated carrier you basically need a whole separate set of radios, amplifiers, filters, etc.
Moreso on the transmit side than receive side, which is why receive CA is far more common than TX CA
Bob
Bob
@Dog Ah.
Dog
Dog
I suspect it'll become more apparent as we go on that the more CA capability a manufacturer claims a phone has the more restrictions there'll actually be on its functionality
01:00 - 19:0019:00 - 00:00

« first day (2207 days earlier)      last day (3109 days later) »