I think laptop quality depends more on how much you're willing to spend than the brand - I've used terribad cheapo ones and super great ones from the same company
I wish it was easy to order a laptop like you do with a desktop. That case please (large! with plenty room for air circulation). That motherboard. This graphics card, ... etc etc
I never buy brand name desktops. They generally are to locked down in the BIOS/EFI, sometiems do not have PCI-e slots (or have 4 PCI-e slots which are not PCI-e compatible)
E.g. a lenovo SFF with max 40 draw by 4 PCI-e slots.
Mu default for a desk top is "I choose the items. Including OC motherboard" And no, overclocking is not important and will not be tried. But the freedom which comes with that setup is important
Maybe I'm just unlucky, but all of my experiences with *nix software have required me to fiddle around with weird text files or install some other thing before the thing I want will actually work
To be honest, though, some of my frustration probably comes from my lack of experience with Linux
And there was the time I installed Ubuntu, ran the Software Updater like it asked, rebooted like it asked, and then was presented with a kernel panic that wouldn't go away
@aleccj1 Convince devs of all the games I play to develop first-class ports (not emulation; buggy and slow) to GNU/Linux or OS X and I might consider switching; til then, it's a no-brainer that I have to have at least one good Windows box with a high-end GPU.
My server runs Ubuntu as the host OS with a Windows virtual machine. I have a Macbook Pro that runs (only) OS X (haven't bothered with Bootcamp). I have an iPhone and an Android LG Volt and I maintain/assist with the operation of several Android phones in the family (Note 4 used to be my primary phone). My server used to run SmartOS. Even my main Windows desktop has Ubuntu 16.04 installed as dual boot and a VMware Workstation VM.
I don't "just" run one thing or another. I run what I need for the task at hand. Which basically means I run everything.
I use a "MacBook Pro (Retina, 13-inch, Early 2015)" (top-end model with 512 GB storage) as my main driver at work because work seems content to let me suffer on a 2010 Dell Latitude with 4 gigs of RAM, a 5400 RPM HDD, and so much security software that starting Word takes 10 minutes.
@aleccj1 My machine is Win10 and rock solid, except when hardware such as hard drives start dying. The main thing is not to install every piece of turd software you "might" need.
@Mokubai I have every piece of turd software I "might" need, but I'm very good at preventing their aggressive "I MUST START ON BOOT AND POP A WINDOW IN YOUR FACE WHEN YOU REBOOT :D" bullshit from taking hold
half the battle is just neutralizing start-on-boot nonsense
you start when I tell you to start, and not before, goddamnit
Then there are the exciting scenarios where you accidentally install two incompatible programs and one refuses to uninstall while the other is installed
I am currently in that situation with Hyper-V and VMware -_-
my main problem with windows is windows rot and the fact that it frustrates the shit out of me due to appearing to be made for those that cant computer
Not VMware Player, apparently; I can't uninstall it while Hyper-V is present, and I'm not going to uninstall Hyper-V because I have a lot of nice VMs that I would prefer to not reconfigure
> Windows Rot is defined in the Urban Dictionary as the process by which a Windows machine becomes progressively slower the longer you use it and the more software you install on it
@aleccj1 "Windows rot"? Maybe with Windows Vista and earlier... these days you just use Disk Cleanup every 3 months; CCleaner twice a year; and a non-Scientology defragger like PerfectDisk once or twice a year, and it runs as well as factory. Oh, and clean up old detached devices (thumb drives you've thrown in the trash, etc.) and make sure it doesn't revert your new drivers to older ones.
it's not all that bad... I have an install that was originally Windows 8 and has been upgraded numerous times (8.1 -> 10 -> 10 Anniversary) and it runs exactly as I need it to.
Windows rot is a misnomer, more like "User installed a shedload of crap, never uninstalled any of it, left all their 'updaters' running all the time, and clicked every 'install x' popup that appeared in front of them."
@aleccj1 If I'm going to be in the so-called "*nix" world, I don't go for any half-measures. Give me native GNU/Linux or go home. MinGW, Cygwin, UoW, even OS X's BSD userland is insufficient and limited compared to what you get within 5 minutes of installing Ubuntu and running apt install (maybe with a few PPAs). Therefore I primarily just use my dedicated server over Mosh or Guacamole (depends on if I need a GUI or not) for my *nix stuff.
@aleccj1 Not a fan of the terminal emulator (iTerm2 is a little better but still not great). No systemd. Jenkins doesn't work equivalently to how it runs on GNU/Linux (many, many issues in the configuration and installation process that don't manifest on Ubuntu/Debian by installing it via apt). When compiling programs, there are many glibc-specific things that various programs I use expect, so the compile fails. I could go on and on.
brew isn't terrible, but it's not GNU/Linux, either.
A Mac is for convenience, good hardware, long battery life, low-effort system administration, and primarily for the beautiful display and GUI. So, I use it mainly for that. Other than the occasional dip into Eclipse -- where most of what I do is backed by a GNU/Linux server, so very little is actually done on the Mac -- it's basically a video player, IM, and web browser. The occasional Adobe Acrobat or Excel.
VBA is horribly, horribly broken in Excel 2016 on OS X. I had to email myself a file and hop over to my Windows desktop because apparently adding 25 + 26 in VBA when both variables are stored as Longs produces an overflow. I didn't know the max value of a Long was less than or equal to 51...
@aleccj1 Google Docs doesn't have any meaningful support for automating Sheets with code. Like, serious automation. Cell-level access to formatting data, underlying values, color coding, borders, reading and setting formulas, R1C1 mode, etc. Libreoffice has most of that, but uses a completely different API that I'm not familiar with.
I've been using Office VBA for automating repetitive tasks (and saving other people hundreds of hours of manual labor) on and off since about 2001. If you don't work in the fields I work in, you don't really see the practical purpose to it, but it's absolutely essential when you have a spreadsheet with 58 columns and 4900 rows and you need to calculate, aggregate and cross-check an accounting weenie's arbitrarily laid-out spreadsheet with rows and columns merged here and there, hidden rows, etc.
it's not my day job, but I occasionally get pulled into helping other people with their stuff when they get in a tough spot, because I know the APIs like the back of my hand and rarely need to go on MSDN.
@aleccj1 I'm a software engineer with occasional responsibilities ranging from finance to HR to recruiting to training.
"We will be extending the PowerShell Remoting Protocol (MS-PSRP) to use OpenSSH as a native transport. Users will have the option to use SSH or WINRM as a transport." (From the blog post.) Yay!
@bwDraco rumors are it's faster than Broadwell-E, but when they say "faster" are they talking about total throughput, or single-thread? because if it's single-thread, we gamers might be interested
huh... even if I don't end up buying this, I think it will serve as giving Intel "twenty lashes" on the back, to whip that previously-complacent organization into shape :D
I think we need to wait for benchmarks to come out before any conclusions can be drawn. It'll be interesting to compare the flagship Zen 8C/16T part with the Intel Core i7-6900K.
@bwDraco They could actually move a lot of product if gamers see it as a way to get something faster than the 6700K for gaming without paying $1000 for Broadwell-E
I'll pay $400 for a CPU that beats my 6700K soundly in single-thread
Polaris has already proven successful in mainstream systems.
I kinda think that AMD will charge about $600-700 for a CPU that nearly matches the i7-6900K.
As for the 4C/8T mainstream parts, I think AMD will be able to approach the i7-6700K (and perform at the same level as the non-K i7-6700) inside of $250.
but I probably won't be playing exclusively DX12 / Vulkan games for another 5 years, minimum
I think Intel hasn't done as major of a re-write of their CPU architecture as Zen is for AMD, since at least Nehalem, maybe even Core...
Sandy, Ivy, Haswell, Broadwell, Skylake... all names of Intel architectures that have been relatively iterative, mostly just keeping up with industry trends like DDR4, PCIe 3.0, support for faster system buses, moving stuff onto the CPU die (and then back off again, in the case of the VRMs), better iGPUs, power efficiency and die shrinks, Turbo Boost, and a few new instructions. That's about it for Intel since ~2011.
> It’s not a CPU. Technically Summit Ridge isn’t a CPU, but an SoC, which means there’s no chipset needed for most of the functionality. On at least one Summit Ridge demo board, we spied a chip that appeared to handle the SATA and SATA Express ports. But these are engineering boards, so who knows.
It's a huge honor for the engineers who worked on this brand-new architecture, to be able to bring AMD back to glory \o/
> During the event, AMD demonstrated an 8-core, 16-thread "Summit Ridge" desktop processor (featuring AMD's "Zen" core) outperforming a similarly configured 8-core, 16-thread Intel "Broadwell-E" processor when running the multi-threaded Blender rendering software with both CPUs set to the same clock speed.
Oh. My. Freaking. God.
If AMD can bring those clockspeeds up to match a 6900K running at full speed, they'd have a bestseller on their hands.
8C/16T Summit Ridge beats an i7-6900K, both chips running at 3.2 GHz.
Pretty sure AMD can get the clock speeds up. Remember that the TDP of the Summit Ridge chip is 95W, less than the 140W TDP of the Intel part.
Okay, it's 3.0 GHz, not 3.2 GHz. Then again, if Summit Ridge is comparable to Broadwell-E clock-for-clock in more benchmarks than this, then Intel is going to have to step up its game.
Bulldozer involved some very questionable design decisions. Of course, AMD will still be a bit behind Intel by the time Zen is launched, but competitive pricing will mean that Intel finally has serious competition.