> The syntax of systemd's unit files is inspired by XDG Desktop Entry Specification .desktop files, which are in turn inspired by Microsoft Windows .ini files.
@JourneymanGeek now ain't that speed. what is the from/to there?
@Ramhound and , my question is, did they make MS account a requirement to install and keep running the windows system? Even minus all the email and online box stuff and store.
As i know there is 4 pins(TCK,TMS,TDI and TDO) and it convert in 32 pin (PC) and vice versa, but i want some more knowledge about this.
There are online references :
http://www.fpga4fun.com/JTAG2.html
http://www.fpga4fun.com/JTAG1.html
But if anybody gives little more overview and the in dep...
Well how do i ask people who never connect to the web in any way shape or form, post install and upgrage and update, if thier newer windows systems still continue to function and stay activated , if they are never on the web to tell us :-)
I said, who knows? If i hop in a motor home and cut across the country with a now working OS (of the new kind) and have NO connection to the web for years , and knowing there is a lot of behind the scenes connections that go to MS servers. Will the system still be working for playing movies, and offline games, and printing letters.
the HPs solution center exists in the notifications tray after installing the big pig pile of junk to run a HP all in one printer scanner . My parents had one. it is not a requirement for printing, which only needs a printer driver, or scanning, which only needs a scanner driver , and could also have scanner software.
A really clean neat install of a all-in-one the user could just install the needed driver and software things, and have a whole lot less mess
Their full driver didn't install because the basic driver was installed, lol
"For Windows XP Starter Edition, Windows Vista Starter Edition and Windows 7 Starter Edition • Is supported for USB only" - Written by HP a multi-Billion dollar company. Can't even do English.
@Bob or I can uninstall stuff, shred the free space, and you can scp my qed image off of my server (Server 2012 R2) and when it's like, "YOU'RE NOT THE SAME!!!!! D:" you can give it your product key.
superuser.com/questions/950852/… more Fear created by the WEB saying BS like "you can't stop the updates" when so far many users have proved that updates can be broken as easily as before (if anyone knew how to break it to begin with) . And even Driver installs can be set to wait for the user. The web while trying to explain one aspect , has done a disservice creating undue fears.
Remember back with UEFI entry, there was huge WEB based undo fear generated that MS was trying to lock out Linux. and other scare things that were quite easily overcome in most situations.
This one though (to me) is pretty stupid :-) If you have a great fear of the system being broken (that part is smart), why would you update to the newest piece of MS junk pumped out, and not wait till most of the bugs are fixed.
I find the "OMG it is not a dupe" stuff to be obnoxious, but do see things that certannly are not the same marked as dupes. So I understand the users fear (again) of being marked as a dupe. Problem is on first reading of both, it looks like the same basic issue ?
At the least all of the "out of control updates" fear that the user now has thanks to the stupid web, be it security or F---Up tuesday patches , are solved with a link to "how to kill updates"
Making the answer for both the same, even if one question leans to "security" and the other question leads to "patching patches"
"By default, Microsoft turns your computer into a peer-to-peer node to help it distribute Windows 10 updates, in order to save Microsoft server bandwidth costs. " Cool MicroTorrents :-)
slate.com/articles/technology/bitwise/2015/08/… I wish they would Date this stuff. ok article showing the 101 ways to attempt to disable your information from going to microsoft. (while your goggle phone does the same unabated ;-)
Create paranoia, as the update share is only from your local network. Spookey Moulder Trust No One.
Microsoft can have all my data , i am OK with it . I am not ok with sharing my errors that i caused myself, by breaking the system and overclocking. And i am not ok with Microsoft further sharing my data with the 3 marketeers and robin hoods merry men.
I do not want my advertising distorted by any of my purchace histroy , I already bought that stuff , now i need LESS of it, and more of what I did not buy. what part of that do the marketeers never understand?
we know microsoft screwed up everything, but it isnt quite as bad as an apple user percieves it at first, any good microsoft user has been living with stuff like that for ages :-)
the question would be more usable, if others with the same board , find it by searching, and he tells what does and does not work. So it would help if his board was in the text.
And if he draggs his butt back in , and at least somewhere tells if he got it working.
I was just saying that a question like that would be fully reusable if another person in the same situation with the same board, not only finds it but also finds some facts about updating that board specific to win10.
I see nothing wrong with any of the edits
All drivers should have ^ as a mode :-) Work Nicely .
Let's say I put my desktop (1920x1080 native) resolution to something custom like 480x270, which is exactly 4 times smaller than my 1080p native resolution, which SHOULD look really sharp with nearest filtering, but either my GPU or my display forces a linear filtering which looks completely blur...
I'm trying to run a script recursively against a file share and I'm getting some "path too long" errors. But when I dig into it, some of them aren't.
I'm using -ErrorVariable to capture the error details into a variable called $ErrLog. Then, the following to log them to a CSV:
if ($ErrLog.Lengt...
directory plus file name less than 255? Did you try the same scripting on a quick copy of the stuff your trying to do, at a higher subfolder level with short file names to see if anything works? I thought they solved this lenght issue 15 years ago :-)
I'm trying to generate a list of all known file on a file share with Attributes "Archive + Offline".
But I keep running into PathTooLongException errors.
So far I've only found that Robocopy can work past the file length errors excpet I cant get the same sort of "These attributes only" sort of re...
@Psycogeek I don't care that I'm getting errors. I knew there would be some, and that's why I'm logging them. What I'm trying to figure out is why I'm getting errors that don't seem appropriate - "path too long" on a path that's less than 248 characters?
So, you're saying because everyone's using RoboCopy and doesn't care about the limit then nobody's going to bother answering why I'm getting errors against it inappropriately?
I do not know myself at all. even if i was doing anything like that i have had great fear of messy long paths and huge filenames.
I do not even like the microsoft organisation methods :-)
@Iszi If the right person comes along, or @bob or @allquixotic who are really good with this coding stuff happened apon your question, they could help. never know.
I'd actually be surprised if the limit were in "characters", since the difference between 260 four-byte UTF-8 characters and 260 ASCII characters is a factor of four
@JourneymanGeek well yeah, there's that, too - one wonders what the filesystem is on the network share, and what version of SMB it's using, and (by extension) what OS it's running on
So, next question: Is there a way to run RoboCopy with multiple search criteria at once? i.e.: Instead of running Robocopy File1; Robocopy File2 can I do something like Robocopy File1, File2?
(The actual stand-ins for File1 & File2 will involve wildcards, if that matters.)
@Psycogeek So I figured out Robocopy's not for me. I need to be able to log last modified time and owner info, and I don't see where Robocopy will give me that - and if I pass it to PowerShell, it'll just barf at the length again. So right now I'm fine with just logging any path length errors. I'm just scratching my head as to why these shorter ones are getting flagged. I can log and move on just fine for now, but it's an interesting mystery.
@Iszi You can always bypass the win32 subsystem and do direct I/O against NTFS. I wonder if anyone wrote a utility to do that in powershell or if you'd have to delve into native code
@allquixotic At this stage, actually getting to the files is beside the point - I have a few ideas for workarounds. I just want to know anyway why I'm getting errors that I seemingly shouldn't be getting.
@DragonLord is it a hard launch, or a soft launch? where the former means I can go on $FOO_RETAILER_SITE and buy one at MSRP, and the latter means some lucky guy got one and has it on sale on eBay for $12000 and that's the only one available.
I think I'll be able to continue with Ivy Bridge for another year, until Skylake's successor comes out - the requirements for games, CPU and memory-wise, aren't encroaching significantly on what I have available
what games are encroaching on is the crunching power of the AMD Tahiti GCN 1.0 chip
Hey. I'm trying to upload a scanned file through a college application webservice. Max upload is 600kb and my two page scan is just short of 1mb. Is there any way I could shrink that pdf? Should I try scanning to another format (jpeg, png)?
this is where bertieb wishes he hadn't clicked "dismiss"
Was a floating dealie up in the top left; only item in it was a link to http://meta.superuser.com/questions/9580/i-can-no-longer-log-into-super-user-since-the-new-login-appeared
After 18 months with this problem I ended up solving it. I solved it by doing an upgrade to Windows 10. This problem has not surface since I performed the upgrade, so I get to continue to use IE 11, which I still prefer over any other browser even Edge for the time being at least.
Makes me wish I never published the question in the first place.
But it still doesn't mean someone with this problem has the capacity to upgrade. They might be eligible, but maybe they have reasons not to upgrade? Maybe the organisation they work for won't support an upgrade to Win10
Tried to gracefully shut it down, but ran "halt" which for some reason causes the machine to stop completely rather than shut down gracefully (like it used to)
Had to use Linode's out-of-band shell to run the "destroy" command, which pulls the plug on the instance.
I have attempted to seek out better answers. I honestly wish I could delete the question. After today and I wish I could nuke everything. I am just tired of being given hell by users like @qasdfdsaq