« first day (1730 days earlier)      last day (3282 days later) » 
00:00 - 15:0015:00 - 00:00

3:00 PM
Cool
 
Spending a lot of money today
Ordered this thinkgeek.com/product/1d95/?icpg=bise cause its FINAALLY back in stock
 
Got me something pretty?
 
I hope that whatever you bought get shipped safely
Or just as safe as this:
 
lol
Local US shipping + courier through a transhipper
 
I can understand doing things on auto pilot, but bubblewrapping bubblewrap seems excessive
 
3:02 PM
Since for some reason they don't ship that wallet or the kindle outside the UPS
 
I tend to keep looking at new stuff for my desktop (build in jan 2009).
But heck, it is still fast enough
So I should not spent much money on it
 
Bob
@Hennes they didn't bubblewrap bubblewrap
they padded it
 
Ok, technically wrong.
 
Bob
stops this from happening:
that happens when the contents shift around inside
@Hennes there's a very real difference
the padding is supposed to keep it in place. bubblewrap is supposed to absorb shock.
 
@Zirak: got myself a kindle and a cover for it, and a new wallet I've wanted for eons.
 
3:06 PM
3 minutes of movie.. I kept waiting for a second box to show up.
 
Its only the second, and I've spent nearly all my monthly spending allowance ;p
(lucky I have a few months buffer)
 
@Bob fun fun :D
 
Bob
@allquixotic this guy seems happy with mydigitalssd :P
 
3:22 PM
Chromebook no possible to get virus? How then ~400 malware and evil POS programs end up on google play?
everything get virusey
 
MS was kind enough to let .Net go linux right? soo now MS no feel alone, give linux viruses too
 
Bob
@JourneymanGeek Oh yea, that turned up on Aviation
14
Q: In what circumstances could a 787 stay powered on continuously for 248 days?

John WisemanThe FAA has issued an airworthiness directive for the 787: SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for all The Boeing Company Model 787 airplanes. This AD requires a repetitive maintenance task for electrical power deactivation on Model 787 airplanes. This AD was pro...

 
Captain over Intercom: Were not really experiencing turbulance, just need to re-boot this thing, and we will quit plummeting into the ocean, by the way your seat is a flotation device.
 
Bob
@Psycogeek the vast, vast majority of malware that ends up on consumer machines is through user action - it doesn't matter which OS you use
It's not malware breaking into a system through some flaw in the OS or other software.
It's malware breaking into the system through the user.
Of course, having official package repositories helps. But even then we see this happening.
 
3:34 PM
If those stores werent so interesting in Big Numbers, and instead usable programs, the stores wouldnt be the bottom side of the terlit.
They dont rightly care what kind of stuff is put up in them, no B&M store would put poop in the pickle isle :-)
(they use the web for that)
 
0_0
(not the journeymangeek... Probably another one of the Mystery Mutts (tm)
 
Same goes for the ads they put on the sites, they were getting people infected because they didnt care what diseased 2 bit whore would give them money. plus they didnt get 2 bits for the ads either.
google has Billions , , Billions, but they couldnt hire somebody to be a store manager , and see what was going up on the shelf? The fraud programs are not that hard to spot.
The idea with the machines is you set them up, and they do all your work for you, and you just roll in the money. Sounds like a "work at home" scam. but even cars come off the assembly line with about 30 things that needs fixin, tech goods often have patches that have to be manually applied. Humans still could perform a valuable role.
There are other things going ary too, like when e-bay (or others like it) have a problem with customer, the squeaky wheel gets the deal. That works good to solve a problem the machine does not handle, but there are people that learned that the squeaky wheel can flat out ripp people off.
Somewhere in there they need more humans, instead of a blathering machine, and a free pass for any complaints. Usually that means having a human in the machine :-) to have more general human interactions.
we just jack a few humans into the matrix.
 
 
2 hours later…
6:32 PM
Please Stand-by This site is currently in read-only mode
Feel free to resume your regularly scheduled answering
 
7:02 PM
What scheme is right one?
Comodo Backup does: 1 Full, 1 Incremental and 1 Differential
EaseUs ToDo does: 1 Full and 1 Incremental
I use 2 software programs to mitigate risk of failed recovery.
 
7:25 PM
I donno, i would rather have a fully verified or compared one, and even in-so-much tested by having to do a recovery (which is dangerous in itself) . having 2 softwares would be to complicated for me, melt my brain. Program updates that make changes or cause failures, organisation of the backed-up elements, disk filling.
once again seperating the OS to a small partiton , and having it be small enough to easily store full recoveries , provides for more than one file item, in the case that one gets broken. Using sync and compare methods for "data" and the huge rest of it, visably seeing what is syncing (copying deleting and changed) prior to pushing the button.
Then compares, between the (data) backup and the other disk, tell you if things are chaging that should not be changing.
Is not so easy to do syncs and compares with running operating system, but easy to do with simple data.
Backup progams are going to handle all the files (take like incramental pieces, or database style backups) Then something goes wrong and the user suddenly needs to cope with all the parts and pieces created by the backup, and thatsa gonna suck.
So I like the backup file items to also be user managable, as depending on a program is not Yourself :-) and yourself is more dependable than a program is.
At any rate, If you ever have to Restore parts of it or all of it, and you then have to manage the file items the backup created, THAT is when you will wish that it was simple, and user managable.
Back one, database (big piles of files in huge chunks) can fail or fault. If your big ass data pile is in 2-3 places, but completly unchanged , not encrypted, not compressed, in the same folder structure. Then the user can access the files just like they did before. any single file , like say a bad picture, or a bad video, or a bad piece of music , is just one item lost. a f---up database is instead a complete horror show.
Ok delete all that, and say it like this instead. If your "Data" all your pictures and documents, and music, is on a different partition. And that partition is just raw file copied (synced compared) to an external disk (or 2) it is just as organised and managable there, as it was where it came from.
It is safer like that, because there is no program dependancy, it is easier to restore any or all of it because it is just a clone/copy of the other one.
 
8:12 PM
Is there someone here who can diagnose a GCC internal compiler error, possibly a GCC 4.9 regression?
0
Q: GCC internal compiler error (segmentation fault in cc1plus) under multiple distributions

Cristofer MartinsWell i'm trying to compile a software and in every time i try there is this error: c++: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault (program cc1plus) Please submit a full bug report, with preprocessed source if appropriate. See <file:///usr/share/doc/gcc-4.9/README.Bugs> for instructions. I ha...

 
I don't want to have all that trouble to run something that should work. — Cristofer Martins 9 mins ago
Then don't run it then.
 
8:28 PM
Google search , has some stuff on that. stackoverflow.com/questions/24079072/… is it also likely here , that it is the code?
google.com/… adding the filter for past year, got more results that were from the update, and looked very relevent to his same situation.
 
8:49 PM
94 results at SO spanning 6 years, many could be summed up in this "It surely a g++ bug. But your code isn't correct"
 
9:11 PM
argg this games is made by my Xgf, they keep changing the rules on me, and one mis-step and i am dead. I of course am the same also, stupid enough to still try.
 
9:39 PM
superuser.com/questions/909053/… how to put a $1000 video card on a $300 laptop :-)
 
 
1 hour later…
10:41 PM
@Psycogeek i had to buy this graphics card once i collect enough money for building an ultimate gaming pc....so i couldn't spend extra money buying a medium performance card
 
With desktop it is fairly easy to upgrade cpu, memory and gpu once the money comes in. just good to start with a great motherboard.
 
10:57 PM
@Psycogeek can i use a my existing LED tv with laptop instead of buying another 4k monitor?
via HDMI may be?
with HDMI the display will be fine or stretched out on TV screen?
 
@androidplusios.design: there's fairly reasonably priced ways to stick a 'real' graphics card on a laptop. That said, that's a REALLY wierd part to buy first, and chances are your laptop will be a bottleneck
Are you planning on a processor with no onboard GPU? (LGA2011 intel? AMD FX?)
 
11:32 PM
.... goddamn it
Apparently the vps I run my blog on got compromised
 
Jet
Which VPS is it?
 
buyvm
It has my blog running on it
 
Jet
"BuyVM - Affordable, unmanaged VPS", that's why it got compromised :)
 
Naw, they're decent
I probably goofed
 
Jet
hmm but I see their plans are low on bandwidth. Maybe you run out of bandwidth?
 
11:39 PM
Naw, I just host a blog on it
 
Jet
good for blogs, worths trying
 
00:00 - 15:0015:00 - 00:00

« first day (1730 days earlier)      last day (3282 days later) »