@Bob i was mainly asking because many of the Indian dudes i work with have joints that creak around like a skeleton from a video game, though they are physically fit... :P
was wondering if they also had to jump from high platforms and hurt themselves like JMan did
Remfs are those who treat troops as expendables while sitting behind their control panels and deciding whoever gets support, supplies etc.? In other words remfs are non-combatants?
Supervisor: "Where is JourneymanGeek?" Guy: "He's out back shoveling mud." Supervisor: "Oh, OK. Carry on, then." JManGeek: "SNNNNOOOORRREEEE" Supervisor: "What was that?" Guy: "My chair creaked Sir." Supervisor: "Oh, OK. Carry on, then."
Haven't exercised for half year. No I am back and everything hurts. I let my body forgot about exercise and that's what happened. It's that shit all over again.
@jokerdino It was somehwat like this in reality. Mp3 music, mp4 some video codecs are supported Mp5 more video codecs were supported, it might even play a higher data rate video.
@jokerdino There were some (called) mp4 devices, that would not actually play a Divx , MSmpeg4 , or Xvid. :-) let alone what gets packaged into Mp4 containers . i am soo confused
@Psycogeek MP4 is just a container format, and the problem is that many conflicting proprietary extensions exist to some of the video codecs that MP4 supported, so there's Xvid, Divx, Microsoft, etc.
@Boris_yo and just when you think you have figured out a woman (what is womens logic?) They will change it on you. (up until the time that the estrogen runs low)
@Gowtham Yes there has been Free 4gig ramdisk from a shareware type developer now for 10+ years. In 32 bit systems a person could even Ramdisk the extended and unused memory.
Before things like chrome shoved all the net temps into ram (or cache or however) Using a ramdisk for a net temps location, was lots faster feeling , with a normal broadband type connection.
Then i would use ram disk as temporary working spaces sometimes, for fair sized files, then move them (manually) back after having routed them through various things. I never applied the Refill on boot methods , For me it was usefull that it Dissapears on boot.
ramdisks aren't much better for gaming than HDD because you still have to load the data from HDD to ramdisk on boot (or at some point) and that takes time
@somequixotic I tested using it with the refill on boot method. I made a specific partition that was the exact same size. So it was easy to put anything in, and back link it to the partition or the ramdisk, to keep it solid. I never did like it enough to keep doing that.
Comment on SU ""You are using a pirated version of Win XP, so if you have a problem with that, please ask your cracker of confidence or rewrite your question""
@Boris_yo no, any good ram throughput benchmark kind of utility would be way better to determine your ram speed. Ramdisk drivers have some overhead. Which makes me wonder if AMD didnt optomise the code better.
@Boris_yo a RAM "disk" is a virtual filesystem driver, so anything that attempts to I/O with the ramdisk has to go through at least one syscall, though probably more than one... each syscall requires a context switch from ring 3 (userspace) to ring 0 (kernelspace) in the CPU, and several types of syscalls require significant serialization overhead in userspace, in the kernel, or both, as well as potentially an inter-processor interrupt (IPI) which makes all CPUs wait and have to sync up
due to the overhead of syscalls, there is an upper limit on the amount of syscalls that can be made per second, before the CPU is spending 99% of its time just context switching
it's probably easier to hit that limit than to max out the raw throughput of RAM
a pure userspace program that just reads and writes values in its own process space will be able to saturate RAM though, pretty easily
@RobertHarvey By that logic, SE should do absolutely nothing about anything until they've figured out how to prevent the eventual heat-death of the universe. Oh, and seeing through the continuation of humanity beyond the red dwarfism of our Sun in a couple billion years, which is coming up Real Soon Now(â„¢). — somequixotic24 secs ago
@Nikola in what context did you hear it? were you walking on the street and somebody yelled at you, "CORE ES!" and that's it? or were you talking about a particular subject? or something in the news?
"ES" can also be the abbreviation for "Spanish" (Espanol) language in internationalization packages, so in that case it would mean "Core" (whatever that is or refers to) in Spanish
then there's OpenGL ES, which is OpenGL for embedded systems
So guys do you have an answer to my question after 9 hours?
;o)
If I spend 24 hours a day on SuperUser and after 10 years achieve a rep of 999 bilions of billions , does it mean I can post questions and chat at any of those 105 websites of Stack Exchange?
Or the rep on SuperUser does not matter... and I have to fulfill the requirements of each and every of 105 websites of StackExchange to be able to chat and ask questions on any of 105 websites of SE...?
How to trace someone by having his browser logged-in to FB for example, that shows his identity?
I know that you can trace someone by his IP Address and going to his ISP.
But other than that, I mean if my ex is currently logged-in on Facebook on one tab of his brower and on the other tab side-b...
I know how to do the classic "network addressing" when I am allowed to waste IP address ranges...
But what if I am not allowed to do it?
For example in this case:
Imagine, there is a network 6 which has 8 computers.
We see that if the IP address wasting was not allowed, then the network 6 wou...
> I was talking to another PC network professional, who has 20 years of experience, yesterday and he told me that when there is a free unused range of IP addresses, it's allowed to "put" as many networks as possible to this unused range as long as they fit in there...
the first one is nonsense. it isn't answering the question. a network is an IP range as defined by CIDR. your question is about not wasting IP addresses. You use the phrase "as long as they fit in there", which, they would only fit if they are compliant with CIDR. Otherwise you can't enter a valid netmask.
no -- the question is about wasting IP addresses, and the answer says nothing about whether putting networks in "as long as they fit" is wasting IP addresses or not
OK. Where in your one-paragraph answer do you tell us How to do the network addressing when the wasting of IP addresses is not allowed? You simply tell us that it is possible to "put as many networks as possible into the unused range as long as they fit in there". That doesn't say how to do network addressing. It doesn't say how the networks have to be configured. It doesn't say how you can avoid wasting IPs.
The question is valid. But the answer doesn't match up with the question. The answer by ultrasawblade directly answers your question and does a good job of it.
You can delete the question, but it's worth keeping on the site IMHO.
the answer is "you can put as many networks into a free unused range as you can fit", which is basically what your first deleted answer says. but the problem is that other users interpreted your question as being something entirely different