I still do not grok why your write speed is so much higher then other speeds.
In a mirrror you write to both drives. So the limit is the write speed of a drive. And 166MB/sec would be nice. Great even for a 5900 RPM drive. But read speeds at 35 or 38MB/sec. That belongs to an old, slow drive
Yes, but say to got 1GB RAM, maybe 800MB free. If I copy 2TB (or any amount way bigger then those 800MB free RAM) it will start to fill those 800MB. Once that buffer is full it can not accept more without writing it.
I think I got all my SATA ports at the edge of the motherboard. Out of the way of add-in card. Good for cable management. Hard tor each once the case is assembled
"The amusing 'but does it run Crysis?' question has a cousin:
These links aren't for my mac, because the battery is different than normal laptop. New MacBook Pro have different battery. — Alessandro Minoccheri2 mins ago
I have 2 monitors connected to my nvidia graphics card, and one connected to my intel integrated graphics card. I have nvidias binary graphics drivers installed, and the 2 monitors work as expected. Alas - my 3rd monitor only works when you do "crtl + F1" (aka a terminal)
getting this to work should be fun :P
it means I have to be running the nvidia driver as well as the intel one at the same time, right?
My setup is as follows:
Linux Mint 14 x64
Intel Core i5-2500k
GeForce GTX 560 Ti Cu II
A monitor on the far left connected to the motherboard (integrated graphics on the i5)
A central monitor connected to the graphics card
A monitor on the far right connected to the graphics card
My current x...
Those two created and maintained the db with all of stacks administration. dozens of years of transactions (Membership fees, club fees, every single transaction of the bar, buying drinks, over date stuff, actual HW costs etc). The tables grew rather large
People may want to connect their ultrabook to a larger screen and do some actually constructive work on it. Alter all, an ultrabook is not a movie player.
yeah, I made the mistake using greens in a raid 5, boy was i in a world of hurt. finally i gave up and swapped em all out for blacks and it was almost a 3x improvement on R/W speeds
@JaredTritsch I still think the main issue was the misreported physical sector size
I dunno, with all the recommendations to use 2x the physical size with the dd family of tools, I assume that would be faster. In which case, if RST is optimising for a multiple of 512 bytes, well...