3:34 PM
@LeeWoofenden I'm not sure about that specifically, but there's evidence priests doubled as doctors. They were to inspect sores and such, then decide what to do.
I think they more thought along the lines that illness was caused by evil, but we can glean they were developing toward medicine and even infectious germ theory.
1 hour later…
5:03 PM
@fredsbend It's not that they weren't aware of issues of health and disease. There is a great deal of material in the OT about health and sickness. But I'm not aware of any that connects that with which animals were ritually clean and which were not. As for developing toward (modern) medicine and germ theory, that, I think, is a fine example of superimposing modern ideas onto ancient texts.
@fredsbend Where are you getting the phrase "drunk with meat"? There are, of course, prohibitions against gluttony in the Bible. But that's not a matter of which meat is eaten, but of the quantity of meat eaten.
@fredsbend Yes, in Acts 10:28 Peter says to Cornelius (a Gentile), "God has shown me that I should not call anyone profane or unclean." Clearly Paul interpreted metaphorically the vision God gave him of all kinds of unclean meat, which God told him to "kill and eat." And yet, God in that instance said, "What God has made clean, you must not call profane," referring to the "unclean" meat.
I think it's hard to argue that this is only metaphorical, given that in Acts 15 the debate was all about whether Gentiles were to be required to be observant Jews. That would include the dietary restrictions.
Naturally the Jewish Christians would continue to eat the way they were accustomed to eat. For them, it would have been too jarring to eat food that had been prohibited to them by religious law all their lives. But those dietary restrictions were abolished even for them, and certainly for new Gentile converts to the faith.
6:01 PM
Burt what I said was "we can glean they were developing toward medicine and even infectious germ theory."
"Things make illness" vs "evil spirits". The transition started a long long time ago, especially among elites.
The plain observation that meat is heavy is in play here. It's not a prohibition, but it does show they understood food/feeling/behavior correlations.
God, through Christ, made all men clean. Interpreting this verse as being about food rabbit trails at best and robs the gospel itself at worst!
6:36 PM
@fredsbend All of this is part of the argument that the dietary laws of the OT are abrogated, and no longer apply.
@fredsbend Once, when I was a teenager, my grandmother gave me a $5 bill and, with a twinkle in her eye, admonished me "not to waste it on riotous living." :-)
@fredsbend If so, it was a very long way off. Also, health through healthful eating habits and health through avoiding germs are two quite different things. It certainly could be argued that the ancient Jews were aware that unhealthful eating habits could lead to disease, based at least upon the laws against gluttony. But the idea that germs and pathogens in foods cause disease was many centuries away.
2 hours later…
8:15 PM
8:30 PM
When taking this dogma as given, you can easily explain and believe nearly anything because of God's [foresight, kindness, power, etc].
Conversely, when taking the correct exegetical approach the conclusions that the author was inconsistent, or changed his mind, or lied, or doesn't know what he's talking about are all on the table.
8:49 PM
« first day (2292 days earlier) ← previous day next day → last day (2361 days later) »
Transcript for
Dec1
Dec '172
Dec3
The Upper Room
General discussion for Christianity.SE, pseudo-meta support, a...