The quota_remaining property was not in the API response. Error: Violation of backoff parameter at 02:31:35 UTC. Backing off on requests for the next 12 seconds. Previous URL: https://api.stackexchange.com/2.2/questions
The quota_remaining property was not in the API response. Error: Violation of backoff parameter at 02:31:49 UTC. Backing off on requests for the next 12 seconds. Previous URL: https://api.stackexchange.com/2.2/questions
The quota_remaining property was not in the API response. Error: Violation of backoff parameter at 02:32:03 UTC. Backing off on requests for the next 12 seconds. Previous URL: https://api.stackexchange.com/2.2/questions
The quota_remaining property was not in the API response. Error: Violation of backoff parameter at 02:32:17 UTC. Backing off on requests for the next 12 seconds. Previous URL: https://api.stackexchange.com/2.2/questions
The quota_remaining property was not in the API response. Error: Violation of backoff parameter at 02:32:32 UTC. Backing off on requests for the next 12 seconds. Previous URL: https://api.stackexchange.com/2.2/questions
The quota_remaining property was not in the API response. Error: Violation of backoff parameter at 02:32:46 UTC. Backing off on requests for the next 12 seconds. Previous URL: https://api.stackexchange.com/2.2/questions
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Mostly non-latin body, mostly non-latin title, potentially bad asn for hostname in body, potentially bad ns for domain in body (161): vic3bet เกมออนไลน์ by vip vip89 on meta.SE (@Ollie)
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Bad ip for hostname in body, bad keyword in title, potentially bad asn for hostname in body, potentially bad keyword in body, potentially bad keyword in title, +1 more (201): Whatsapp marketing services in chennai by user19124585 on meta.SE (@Ollie)
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Blacklisted website in answer, mostly non-latin answer, non-latin link in answer, potentially bad ns for domain in answer, potentially bad keyword in answer (223): Operating Leverage Interpretation by user62709 on quant.SE
@Luuklag While the regex can and should be improved to reject these FP, the only recent change to it was 14 months ago in order to reduce the number of FP it had been seeing up to that time. That change didn't result in it catching any additional FP (i.e. it was actually an improvement). In other words, catching those FP appears to have been part of the regex for at least the last couple of revisions.
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Bad keyword in body, bad keyword in title, body starts with title and ends in url, potentially bad keyword in body, potentially problematic ns configuration in body (290): Visa Agency In Chennai by Aram Visas on travel.SE
@Luuklag I have no idea where you're getting that number. The actual numbers for the bad keyword alpha(?!\s*[=*()]\s*max)(?<!\(alpha)[\W_]*+(?:x[\W_]*+)?(?:rush|fuel|xtrm|levo|max(?!\s*[:|=()*02-9\n\r,.\]])|prime|force[\W_]*+testo|monster[\W_]*+advanced|muscle|boost) are 1485 Total / 1461 TP (98.38% TP) / 24 FP / 0 NAA
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Bad keyword in body, blacklisted website in body, potentially bad ip for hostname in body, potentially bad ns for domain in body, potentially bad keyword in body (195): Will python be used in the future? by vinod chavan on superuser.com (@Ollie)
@JeffSchaller That pattern looks like it's already caught by Bad keyword in answer, Bad keyword in body, Blacklisted website in body, and Blacklisted website in answer Append -force to the command word(s) if you really want to add the pattern you provided.
@Luuklag I have updated the regex to alpha(?!\s*[=*(),.]\s*max)(?!\s*max\s*(?:is\s+\d|[=/+*;]))(?<!\\alpha)(?<!\{alpha)(?<!\(alpha)(?!_prime$)(?!(?-i: Prime(?<=^Alpha Prime))$)[\W_]*+(?:x[\W_]*+)?(?:rush|fuel|xtrm|levo|max(?!\s*[:|=()*02-9\n\r,.\]])|prime|force[\W_]*+testo|monster[\W_]*+advanced|muscle|boost), which is 1465 Total / 1461 TP (99.73% TP) / 4 FP / 0 NAA
@SmokeDetector @Machavity I'm not sure why you gave FP feedback on this report. To me, it appears to be clearly the type of job offer described in "Are job offers spam?" as spam. Am I missing something?
@SmokeDetector Actually, they do have one other (non-spam) post. So there is a chance it is legit, but the fact that that exact IP is blacklisted in Metasmoke and it is online gambling makes me suspect spam. Flagged as spam, but could a mod check that out?
@Ollie That pattern looks like it's already caught by Potentially bad keyword in answer and Potentially bad keyword in body Append -force to the command word(s) if you really want to add the pattern you provided.
