@SmokeDetector At best, this is NAA. All three videos are on the same YouTube channel. The very low number of views for each of the videos (< 100) and low number of subscribers (<230) to the channel indicate affiliation is probable, but the videos are most of a year old. OTOH, there is a new video posted 10 days ago, but it was not linked in this answer.
@Makyen I don't read / write Russian but I did note that this came up all of a sudden; perhaps they left their laptop unlocked in the dorm, or some such thing, or sold it and the drive was unerased. @victor got all the pings, it would probably be best if he inquired. I thought a note on the unexpected (?) outcome here would be useful. --- I didn't see anything on Stack Overflow (English), but I did expect a longer suspension on the Russian site.
!!/report stackoverflow.com/a/70728309 "Troll: None of this user's posts are serious attempts at solving problems or asking questions. Already deleted: 1 (blatant trolling, see [original](stackoverflow.com/revisions/70728380/1) (10k link) for info), 2 (pretty clear too). This one is totally false: the verbose parameter sets the verbosity mode"
!!/report stackoverflow.com/a/70728349 "Troll: None of this user's posts are serious attempts at solving problems or asking questions. Already deleted: 1 (blatant trolling, see original (10k link) for info), 2 (pretty clear too). sets the image size larger, no attempt to solve the actual issue."
@Makyen That pattern looks like it's already caught by Potentially bad keyword in answer and Potentially bad keyword in body Append -force to the command if you really want to add the pattern you entered.
@Makyen That pattern looks like it's already caught by Bad keyword in answer and Bad keyword in body Append -force to the command if you really want to add the pattern you entered.
@Makyen That pattern looks like it's already caught by Potentially bad keyword in answer and Potentially bad keyword in body Append -force to the command if you really want to add the pattern you entered.
@tripleee That pattern looks like it's already caught by Blacklisted website in body and Blacklisted website in answer Append -force to the command if you really want to add the pattern you entered.
@gparyani No, Roomba Forecaster (RF) has not yet been updated to accommodate that change in how SE handles migrated questions and it's interaction with the Roomba. RF also doesn't account for the prevention of 30 day deletion when the first downvotes the question has received are within 2 days of when the question would have been deleted.
Both issues are changes in SE operation since I last significantly worked on the logic. The downvotes issue is the more complicated one, as it requires data which isn't available from either scraping the question page nor in the SE API request which RF makes.
Yes, I've seen the question you've pointed me at about the Roomba, along with the single answer it has/had. The answer is largely what I'd expect to see on such a question when the issue that's being looked for isn't something which happens routinely, even though it does happen enough to be something I encountered multiple times when testing RF and/or were seen and reported by others.
@Makyen Theoretically, you could get downvote data from scraping the post timeline with daily vote summaries enabled, though that would only work for 1k+ users.
But practically, I don't think it's worth accounting for that.
@Makyen It would be nice if you provided examples of such questions, in a comment on the answer.
@gparyani I'm aware of that option. As I said, the data needed to determine if that criteria applies isn't in the question page or the SE API request which is already being made, which means it would need to be obtained elsewhere. If getting that data is worth a AJAX request on its own is another consideration.
@gparyani I haven't looked to see if I have such examples from 5 years ago.
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Blacklisted website in body, potentially bad ip for hostname in body, potentially bad ns for domain in body (101): Is the MCU over? by xiaoye on electronics.SE
That pattern may be a North American number. If it is, please use a format which starts with an optional `1` followed by possible separator text and has the main number in the format `706-534-5433` where `-` could be a single alpha character or any `[\W_]*+`. Alternately, you can add the comment `(?#IS NorAm)` to the end of the pattern to force also using the alternate normalized form, or `(?#NO NorAm)` if it's not a North American phone number and it's incorrectly recognized as one. Perhaps try
@tripleee That pattern looks like it's already caught by Potentially bad keyword in answer and Potentially bad keyword in body Append -force to the command if you really want to add the pattern you entered.
