@RyanM That pattern looks like it's already caught by Potentially bad keyword in body and Potentially bad keyword in answer Append -force to the command if you really want to add this pattern.
@SmokeDetector The question is asking for this type of information. I haven't looked for undisclosed affiliation. If there is some, then this is spam, but without undisclosed affiliation, this isn't spam, due to the question asking for it.
@Makyen That pattern looks like it's already caught by Potentially bad keyword in body and Potentially bad keyword in answer Append -force to the command if you really want to add this pattern.
@tripleee That pattern looks like it's already caught by Potentially bad keyword in answer and Potentially bad keyword in body Append -force to the command if you really want to add this pattern.
@tripleee That pattern looks like it's already caught by Potentially bad keyword in body and Potentially bad keyword in answer Append -force to the command if you really want to add this pattern.
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Bad keyword in answer, blacklisted website in answer, potentially bad ip for hostname in answer, potentially bad keyword in answer, potentially bad keyword in username (184): Unable to create class in eclipse by Data Science on superuser.com (@Ollie)
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Bad keyword in answer, blacklisted website in answer, potentially bad ip for hostname in answer, potentially bad keyword in answer, potentially bad keyword in username, +1 more (255): Installation of Pytorch GPU Windows by Data Science on superuser.com (@Ollie)
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Bad keyword in answer, blacklisted website in answer, potentially bad ip for hostname in answer, potentially bad keyword in answer, potentially bad keyword in username, +1 more (255): Error using pip with requirements.txt by Data Science on superuser.com (@Ollie)
@Mast I'm also unsure. Mod-PII match against that e-mail in the top-right of the blog page would confirm undisclosed affiliation but we'd need an SO mod for that.
Still mildly concerning that they've posted it twice.
@Magisch Messages/reports from SmokeDetector in Charcoal HQ are generally kept as records. If you really need to delete a message, please use sd delete-force. See this note on message deletion for more details.
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Bad keyword in answer, bad keyword with email in answer, email in answer, pattern-matching email in answer, potentially bad keyword in answer (350): Explain "You People" please by smith on ell.SE
@SmokeDetector tpu- How is the question asking for "Best tablet for painting 2021" or the best electric weed eater? They've linked spam websites and disguised it with innocent-looking text, so that's a TP AFAIK.
@Magisch I really meant to just offer it as an option which you could choose. I don't mean to push you in either direction or to imply one is the better choice. It had sounded like you weren't all that comfortable getting back into things and I want to make you more comfortable.
Spam user? I'm struggling to find any concrete affiliation, but two of those answers were posted within two and a half minutes of each other (2 weeks ago); the last one, 6 hours ago.
@Makyen Just noticed this message. There is affiliation now that I look for it (the name Vishal appears as the author of one of the articles in the first link), but I tp'ed it because the links go to some random blog selling stuff that has nothing to do with the question. I also raised a spam flag; do you feel a custom flag would be preferable?
@JeffSchaller It's not even an edge case IMO, and I believe that's the right feedback, but there's certainly members who would disagree. There's a teams post about this issue, in case you haven't seen it. I've opined there as well.
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Link at end of answer, potentially problematic ns configuration in answer (62): Book Stack Sort by Fahmida Riva on codegolf.SE (@hyper-neutrino @cairdcoinheringaahing @lyxal)
