@Makyen iBug/SandyShores 8b949c9 (Makyen: test_helpers: Comment out tiny.cc/gsbbpy -autopull This problem appears to be only on some hosts. Somethings been wrong with getting the redirected URL from tiny.cc/gsbbpy for the last 8 days, or so. It started failing at [this CI, which was just a typical !!/blacklist-website command. The commit is here Resolution doesn't work when tried from CircleCI or my EC2 instance. However, it does work from Travis CI and my Windows machine.)](//github.com/Charcoal-SE/SmokeDetector/commit/8b949c9)
@Makyen That pattern looks like it's already caught by Potentially bad keyword in body and Potentially bad keyword in answer; append -force if you really want to do that.
@Makyen That pattern looks like it's already caught by Potentially bad keyword in body and Potentially bad keyword in answer; append -force if you really want to do that.
@Makyen That pattern looks like it's already caught by Potentially bad keyword in body and Potentially bad keyword in answer; append -force if you really want to do that.
@Makyen That pattern looks like it's already caught by Potentially bad keyword in body and Potentially bad keyword in answer; append -force if you really want to do that.
@double-beep I assume you are trying to run the Sites where a user doesn't have an account on. It works for me for my global user ID, but doesn't work when I try it with yours. I get the same error as you are reporting.
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Bad keyword in body, bad keyword in title, body starts with title and ends in url, pattern-matching website in body, potentially bad keyword in body, +1 more (490): AlphaMax Pro NO2 by christinejamesa on stackoverflow.com
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Potentially bad keyword in body, potentially problematic ns configuration in body (2): چگونگی طراحی سایت by signco on stackoverflow.com
@SmokeDetector Based on the Google translation, I could see this one being either spam or an off-topic question. I'm leaning towards spam, but I'd want a native speaker to give a better feel for which it might be.
the fact that the domain already has two hits and that the link is completely gratuitous - and inexplicable if the author didn't know the answer - says spam to me
I'm definitely leaning towards spam. The two posts feel like poor spam attempts, but could also be the result of a confused user. But, I do consider spam to be more likely.
@SmokeDetector It seems the website mentioned is owned by them. The linked site contains "Automatic SQL query generator in LOCALHOST" while the question asks "Show product and its images with PHP / MySQL".
@Stormblessed You could use [^\w/], which matches everything that's not a word character or a /. Note: both the Unicode and non-Unicode based \w includes _. SmokeDetector uses Unicode based versions of character classes in most places, so \w is significantly expanded beyond its ASCII based definition of [A-Za-z0-9_].
@Stormblessed If you're wanting the opposite of a single character, then, as you've already discovered, you can use inverted character sets: [^your characters]. If you're wanting to not match a specific string of characters, it's usually easiest to do that with negative look-arounds: (?!negative look-ahead) and (?<!negative look-behind).
I should probably note that many regular expression versions don't support negative lookbehinds (positive and negative), or at least not variable-length look-behinds. However, the regex package which SmokeDetector has good support for look-behinds, even supporting variable-length look-behinds.
@connectyourcharger You are not a privileged user. Please see the privileges wiki page for information on what privileges are and what is expected of privileged users.
@connectyourcharger BTW: I'm happy to give you SmokeDetector privileges, which would allow you to give feedback, if you want them. However, since you specifically asked for autoflagging, I wasn't sure if you wanted SmokeDetector privileges.
You may also want to look at the userscripts we have available (GitHub), as they can be quite helpful, depending on how you want to participate. For viewing, feedback & flagging in chat, I find FIRE and AIM to be the ones I use the most.
Just so you know, we normally tell people when they are getting privileges that we practice the "ton of bricks" discipline method here: If you mess-up sufficiently, or consistently, we come down like a ton of bricks :-).
To quote ArtOfCode: TL;DR: ton-of-bricks is mostly to say that we almost never need to enforce things because things enforce themselves through having a good community here. If it gets to the point that someone's enforcing something, something's gone badly wrong.
