> The Slimax Green Coffee easiest way to be sure that you're getting the right approach that works especially that will help you obtain your Weight Loss aims is always to
That is a wonderfully unappetizing name
"Do you want coffee? We have Folgers and Slimax" "uhhhh"
@Andy To avoid SmokeDetector reporting posts too slowly, you can report at most 5 posts at a time. This is to avoid SmokeDetector's chat messages getting rate-limited too much, which would slow down reports.
@Andy You can execute the !!/report command again in 21.0 seconds. To avoid one user sending lots of reports in a few commands and slowing SmokeDetector down due to rate-limiting, you have to wait 30 seconds after you've reported multiple posts using !!/report, even if your current command just has one URL. (Note that this timeout won't be applied if you only used !!/report for one post)
I think their standard camera does 1K-2K. They have a CD shattering one that is 170K FPS. They mention in the video how much time that is, but I can't remember right off hand
Feature Request for Smokey: When you give feedback by directly replying to a report in form of sd k or sd f or sd n Allow a text comment to be added afterwards as a helpful pointer for those in review as to why you gave that feedback. Some of the feedback could benefit from a deeper explaination I think. (cc @Undo cc @Meta)
[ SmokeDetector ] URL in title, bad keyword in body, bad keyword in title, link at end of body, pattern-matching website in body, pattern-matching website in title: http://advancedtrimsite.com/megadrox/ by Ladonna on drupal.stackexchange.com…
@Magisch I thought that already was a thing? I've seen @Ferrybig (and maybe others) commenting on k and f posts (e.g. here or here) - is that not seen anywhere other the room?
@Undo just realised that the review feedback action on MS might be CSRF vulnerable. We're passing data across GET parameters - is the authenticity token verified on that request, or are we vulnerable?
Heh. Didn't know tpy still registers as a true feedback.
@WaiHaLee its not really a thing, to see that comment, you actually need to search the chat reply we have writes. This can be hard in a case of a f command since this remove the smokey message. @magish want this information to be stored in metasmoke itself so we can find it easely
@ArtOfCode it would only work on new posts, metasmoke doesn't accept feedback on posts with already feedback. But changing the request to use a post forum wouldn't fix it as those can also be used in a cross site attack
@Ferrybig It does accept feedback in those cases, actually. We changed that so that my userscript could push feedback.
@Ferrybig POSTs are harder to do - the traditional CSRF is an image in an email - but yeah. I'm more concerned about the auth token - if that's getting verified, we're safe.
[ SmokeDetector ] URL in title, bad keyword in body, bad keyword in title, link at end of body, pattern-matching website in body, pattern-matching website in title: http://topmusclemighty.com/testadrox/ by fankaleman on drupal.stackexchange.com…
I'm surprised that the link at the end of body reason is still such a big reason we catch these. I'd have thought spammers changed their format more frequently.
If it's just bad feedback, that's fairly easy to deal with (just invalidate in metasmoke and review everything). If it's bad !!/reporting, I have no idea what we want to do
The thing to do is probably just generalize/anonymize it and throw it up for CHQ and maybe SOCVR to discuss.
yup, got it.
If we really, really need to contact someone privately and don't have their email... I'm almost comfortable calling this a moderation issue. Or just asking for their email, or skype, or something. If they're evasive... we can handle that when we come to it.
The mail server I use for my domain is just a simple python script for smtp debugging purposes, to lazy to install a real mailbox program on and having to go through every account to remove spam
@Undo you're going to need to find the MS entry for the first one, I think there's a deleted message I can't get at because transcript and lack of mod.
16349 and 21347 (body: "udemy", reason: "Blacklisted website in answer") are spam because of Allavsoft, not Udemy. They just coincidentally have udemy in the body.
If poop was an option, the decision would be easier -- there's some mental friction in saying "false" to such a post. In a way, it is an option already, ignore-
