What does 97% accuracy mean? 3% of SO questions is 250 posts per day (and this is just new questions, Smokey also looks at new/edited answers, and edited/bumped questions).
> Blacklisted website in body, blacklisted website in title ---------- Title - Position 1-23: thecreatingexperts.com Body - Position 1-23: thecreatingexperts.com
> Bad keyword in body, bad keyword in title, bad keyword in username ---------- Title - Position 1-20: training in chennai Username - Position 1-20: training in chennai Body - Position 1-20: training in chennai
> Pattern-matching website in body, pattern-matching website in title ---------- Title - Position 3-19: essayguardian.co Body - Position 3-19: essayguardian.co
Due to Worldbuilding’s nature, it sometimes gets some really bizarre attempts at spamming. Some of them may be an intentional joke; some may be copy-pasting an existing answer gone ridiculous. In this question, we shall collect the most bizarre spam for general amusement.
Some rules:
One spam ...
Hurray, 3D Printing is in public beta! This means we are not the first site in alphabetical ordering anymore and they get all the questions from those who are stupid enough to choose the site they are asking on this way.
> In past few months, there are a devastatingly few number of users that cast up votes, and many of users aren't coming back to site, and existing users don't have so much reputation, because no one is voting up great questions / answers. meta.webmasters.stackexchange.com/q/1405
Sure, everyone went to vote on Worldbuilding instead. It's more fun.
I just had a huge lightbulb idea. What if when the user has low reputation and submits a spam or crap question/answer that gets moderated, the user has to do a "quick 5 minute refresher" on the thing they did wrong. For example if they can't put together a coherent English sentence, then they have to do a quick micro-SAT test that's timed. If they can't finish it, then they get to keep their account, it's just their reputation goes into the negative as a: "hostile or harmful user".
@EricLeschinski Most spammers use a hit-and-run method of distributing their crap. The only offenders who post multiple crap post it at the time their first spam isn't removed yet.
Further evidence that delete votes make little difference for answers. 5860 answers deleted by 20K votes, versus 79958 deleted by 2K recommend-deletion.
Don't worry, the best people makes mistakes, I would also seen over the : that comes after it (ran the code in javascript console, took way to long for it to see...)
In any case, I should add that the default mode, "chat only", does not use websocket: it only alerts about SmokeDetector posts. The tracker is an additional thing on top of that, which delivers own reports. Sort of a backup for SmokeDetector when it's down. I don't use it much, since SD has become very accurate.
It looks really spammy to me, the post has 2 downvotes, and 1 upvotes and definitely NAA. It also follows most spam answers that have just 1 answer per user account
Smokey reads active questions, not new ones. This one was apparently bumped by Community. If anyone is slow, it's probably the users of the site with editing privileges.
Due to Worldbuilding’s nature, it sometimes gets some really bizarre attempts at spamming. Some of them may be an intentional joke; some may be copy-pasting an existing answer gone ridiculous. In this question, we shall collect the most bizarre spam for general amusement.
Some rules:
One spam ...
